[Haskell-cafe] Re: Problem with haddock importing definition
When you say documentation disappears, do you mean that R is still listed, but its comments are not shown, or is R completely absent from the documentation? See http://trac.haskell.org/haddock/ticket/107 He just needs to include B in the other-modules list, so that cabal will pass it to haddock (and setup sdist). I would still like to know the answer to my question though, since I think we can improve Haddock here. R is completely absent from documentation. I did include a working example with .cabal file in that ticket, maybe that can help. (Just to note, my problem was solved by 'other-modules'.) Thanks, Maurício ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Problem with haddock importing definition
2009/5/20 Maurício briqueabra...@yahoo.com: I would still like to know the answer to my question though, since I think we can improve Haddock here. R is completely absent from documentation. OK. That's strange. I thought that Haddock would at least show R but without a link. I did include a working example with .cabal file in that ticket, maybe that can help. (Just to note, my problem was solved by 'other-modules'.) I saw that - thanks. Couldn't investigate it yet since I'm at work :-) David ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
