[Haskell-cafe] Why is Haskell not homoiconic?
Hi all! I am curious as to why Haskell not is homoiconic? I am interested in the reasons behind that design descision. I ask using this defintion og homiconicity: Homiconic means that "the primary representation of programs is also a data structure in a primitive type of the language itself" -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homoiconic Examples: LISP, Rebol, Natural Languages... Thank you/Henning ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: [Haskell-cafe] Why is Haskell not homoiconic?
Henning Sato von Rosen wrote: I am curious as to why Haskell not is homoiconic? I am interested in the reasons behind that design descision. I ask using this defintion og homiconicity: Homiconic means that "the primary representation of programs is also a data structure in a primitive type of the language itself" -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homoiconic Examples: LISP, Rebol, Natural Languages... Could you say why do you think Haskell SHOULD belong to this class? Jerzy Karczmarczuk ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
