dons:
jason.dusek:
Too bad they didn't pimp Haskell as practical.
It looked like an archaic view of Haskell based on reading wikipedia,
imo. Perhaps we should take charge of the wikipedia page, if it is that
influential.
To those reading, the wikipedia article is here,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haskell_(programming_language)
Feel free to improve it. We have lots of good content about the current
state of the language, compilers, libraries, applications, domains of
use, size of community, commercial use and so on on haskell.org, so just
apply what you know.
Perhaps we can get a better article out of this that more accurately
reflects the thousands of people reading this list and using Haskell,
the thounsand or so libraries, our excellent optimizing compiler, and
the broad range of apps being produced.
-- Don
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe