Re: [Haskell-cafe] vector vs uvector
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, stefan kersten wrote: what's the difference between the vector [1] and uvector [2] packages? should one of those preferred over the other? thanks, sk [1] http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/vector-0.1 [2] http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/uvector-0.1.0.1 To make things even more confusing, there is also: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/storablevector http://code.haskell.org/storablevector/ This library was mentioned in Haskell-Cafe in December of 2007 on Haskell-Cafe and I started to use and extend it by a lazy chunky structure, an ST interface for in-place update, and an experimental element-wise lazy but efficient data structure. Now I become aware that there are parallel efforts. I'm also uncertain where to invest more time. ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: [Haskell-cafe] vector vs uvector
stefan kersten wrote: hi, what's the difference between the vector [1] and uvector [2] packages? should one of those preferred over the other? thanks, sk [1] http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/vector-0.1 [2] http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/uvector-0.1.0.1 You should use the most mature and stable package, which is of course, uvector, being a whole 0.0.0.1 versions past vector. ;) - Lyle ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: [Haskell-cafe] vector vs uvector
On 14.07.2008, at 18:10, Lyle Kopnicky wrote: You should use the most mature and stable package, which is of course, uvector, being a whole 0.0.0.1 versions past vector. oops, didn't notice the thread announcing vector. i'll stick with uvector then for the time being :) sk ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
