Re: Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Fractional/negative fixity?
I don't see how it's too complex. Isn't infixl ?? prec ?? < $ (??) = whenOperator exactly what you want to say? Sure you can solve the problem with negative fixities, but that's less expressive than the above (the total order is actually an over-specification). You want ?? to bind more tightly than does $; that's exactly what this approach would let you specify. When conjuring a number less than 0, what makes -1 a more appropriate choice than -2? There's really no answer to that question. Fractional fixities make it even worse. Nick On 11/6/06, Bulat Ziganshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Henning, Monday, November 6, 2006, 1:27:54 PM, you wrote: >> print msg `on` mode==debug >> >> but failed because my code frequently contains '$' and there is no way >> to define operation with a lower precedence > This could be solved by the solutions proposed in this thread: > > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2006-October/018923.html it's too complex for my purposes. -1 priority is enough -- Best regards, Bulatmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re: Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Fractional/negative fixity?
But DEC's language FOCAL had fractional line numbers. :) On Nov 7, 2006, at 06:00 , Henning Thielemann wrote: On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: Hello Henning, Monday, November 6, 2006, 1:27:54 PM, you wrote: print msg `on` mode==debug but failed because my code frequently contains '$' and there is no way to define operation with a lower precedence This could be solved by the solutions proposed in this thread: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2006-October/ 018923.html it's too complex for my purposes. -1 priority is enough This reminds me on good old BASIC programming days, where we numbered lines in steps of 10, in order to be able insert lines later. Unfortunately, BASIC never supported negative nor fractional line numbers. :-) ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Fractional/negative fixity?
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: > Hello Henning, > > Monday, November 6, 2006, 1:27:54 PM, you wrote: > > >> print msg `on` mode==debug > >> > >> but failed because my code frequently contains '$' and there is no way > >> to define operation with a lower precedence > > > This could be solved by the solutions proposed in this thread: > > > > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2006-October/018923.html > > it's too complex for my purposes. -1 priority is enough This reminds me on good old BASIC programming days, where we numbered lines in steps of 10, in order to be able insert lines later. Unfortunately, BASIC never supported negative nor fractional line numbers. :-) ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Re[2]: [Haskell-cafe] Fractional/negative fixity?
Hello Henning, Monday, November 6, 2006, 1:27:54 PM, you wrote: >> print msg `on` mode==debug >> >> but failed because my code frequently contains '$' and there is no way >> to define operation with a lower precedence > This could be solved by the solutions proposed in this thread: > > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2006-October/018923.html it's too complex for my purposes. -1 priority is enough -- Best regards, Bulatmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
