Le 17/03/2012 02:44, Greg Weber a écrit :
the text library and Text data type have shown the worth in real world
Haskell usage with GHC.
I try to avoid String whenever possible, but I still have to deal with
conversions and other issues.
There is a lot of real work to be done to convert away from [Char],
but I think we need to take it out of the language definition as a
first step.
I can only see one issue with the proposal: it can be convenient to
operate on a list of characters.
But I think there are plenty of solutions at our disposal. A simple
conversion from Text to a list of characters might suffice. In GHC,
OverloadedStrings means users would still be free to use String the
same way they are now.
Good point, but rather than specifying in the standard that the new
string type should be the Text datatype, maybe the new definition should
be that String is a newtype with suitable operations defined on it, and
perhaps a typeclass to convert to and from this newtype. The reason of
my remark is although most implementations compile to native code, an
implementation compiling to, for example, JavaScript might wish to use
JavaScript's string type rather than forcing its users to have a native
library installed.
Regards,
ARJANEN Loïc
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
