Re: [HCP-Users] HCP Pipeline without T2w

2018-03-17 Thread Pedro Costa Klein
Well, in this case, I will be using your toolbox now as it is just to get
familiar with it. I am really looking forward to the update then!

Thank you so much for the support.

Pedro


2018-03-16 21:40 GMT+01:00 Erin W. E. Dickie <erin.w.dic...@gmail.com>:

> In cases where you don't have a T2w image. You would run freesurfer's 
> `*recon_all`
> *on your T1w scans and then *`ciftify_recon_all` * to essentially mimic
> the HCPPipelines Anatomical. * `ciftify_recon_all` *contains a little bit
> of PreFreesurfer.sh and all of PostFreesurfer.sh and is meant to be run
> after freesurfer.
>
> In the next release (i.e. next week), ciftify_recon_all will use the
> MSMSulc surface based registration (matching the HCP outputs) instead of
> the freesurfer registration. I would recommend waiting for that.
>
> For fMRI, the current workflow will be fMRIprep followed by
> ciftify_subject_fmri.
>
> We will also try to clarify this more in the documentation over the next
> few weeks.
>
> Thanks,
> Erin
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Pedro Costa Klein <pedrockl...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Thank you Matt for the indication and thank you Erin for such a quick
>> response!
>>
>> Erin, this toolbox seems to be exactly what I was looking for!
>>
>> Does this toolbox replaces all the stages of the pipeline or should I use
>> it at some point of the HCP pipeline (e.g. after running the
>> PreFressurfer.sh)?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> 2018-03-16 15:56 GMT+01:00 Erin W. E. Dickie <erin.w.dic...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Thanks for the recommendation Matt!
>>>
>>> Pedro, the ciftify toolbox link is here (https://edickie.github.io/cif
>>> tify). The toolbox started with exactly with what you are suggesting
>>> (modifying the .sh files to make them run without T2w images). Over time we
>>> ended up translating the key parts to python and adding more detailed
>>> logging and less intermediate output files.
>>>
>>> The current state of the package is a little unstable as I'm currently
>>> working in a few final changes. I'm aiming to publish a more stable release
>>> within the next two weeks.
>>>
>>> Let me know if you have any questions.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Erin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would recommend the ciftify toolbox if your data do not meet HCP
>>>> Pipelines acquisition requirements (lacking highres T2w scan and or
>>>> Fieldmap).  The ciftify toolbox is currently beta, but should be fully
>>>> available in the very near future (Erin Dickie the author is CCed and can
>>>> give more details).
>>>>
>>>> Peace,
>>>>
>>>> Matt.
>>>>
>>>> From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Pedro Costa
>>>> Klein <pedrockl...@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Friday, March 16, 2018 at 3:49 AM
>>>> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>>>> Subject: [HCP-Users] HCP Pipeline without T2w
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I have a dataset that I wish to use with the HCP pipeline scripts from
>>>> the repository in https://github.com/Washington-University/Pipelines,
>>>> but I don't have the T2w images for the subjects. Is it possible (perhaps
>>>> with some modification on the .sh files) to use pipeline without the T2w?
>>>> If so, what would be the impact on the outputs and what are the most
>>>> "critical" steps that I must pay attention to while changing the scripts?
>>>>
>>>> Another idea would be to replace the T2w images by a synthetic image
>>>> (e.g. a T2w atlas, like the MNI). Is this option acceptable? If so, what
>>>> would be the best approach for using a atlas replacing the T2w?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for your insights.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Pedro Costa Klein **(*https://scholar.google.
>>>> com.br/citations?user=ll3ukqMJ)
>>>> *PhD Student*
>>>> *Klinik und Poliklink für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
>>>> - Ludwig-Maximilians Universität*
>>>> pedrockl...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> HCP-Users mailing list
>>>> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
>>>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Pedro Costa Klein **(*https://scholar.google.
>> com.br/citations?user=ll3ukqMJ)
>> *PhD Student*
>> *Klinik und Poliklink für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
>> - Ludwig-Maximilians Universität*
>> pedrockl...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
*Pedro Costa Klein **(*
https://scholar.google.com.br/citations?user=ll3ukqMJ)
*PhD Student*
*Klinik und Poliklink für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
- Ludwig-Maximilians Universität*
pedrockl...@gmail.com

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users


[HCP-Users] HCP Pipeline without T2w

2018-03-16 Thread Pedro Costa Klein
Dear all,

I have a dataset that I wish to use with the HCP pipeline scripts from the
repository in https://github.com/Washington-University/Pipelines, but I
don't have the T2w images for the subjects. Is it possible (perhaps with
some modification on the .sh files) to use pipeline without the T2w? If so,
what would be the impact on the outputs and what are the most "critical"
steps that I must pay attention to while changing the scripts?

Another idea would be to replace the T2w images by a synthetic image (e.g.
a T2w atlas, like the MNI). Is this option acceptable? If so, what would be
the best approach for using a atlas replacing the T2w?

Thank you very much for your insights.

-- 
*Pedro Costa Klein **(*
https://scholar.google.com.br/citations?user=ll3ukqMJ)
*PhD Student*
*Klinik und Poliklink für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
- Ludwig-Maximilians Universität*
pedrockl...@gmail.com

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users