[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10424) DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15294112#comment-15294112
]
Hudson commented on HDFS-10424:
---
SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9835 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/9835/])
HDFS-10424. DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security (cnauroth:
rev bcde1562d25c4f5595f4e3436dc3630315b1ceed)
*
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/HDFSPolicyProvider.java
*
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/CommonConfigurationKeys.java
*
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/NameNodeRpcServer.java
*
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/TestHDFSPolicyProvider.java
*
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/qjournal/server/JournalNodeRpcServer.java
> DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
> ---
>
> Key: HDFS-10424
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: gu-chi
>Assignee: Chris Nauroth
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.8.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-10424-branch-2.8.001.patch, HDFS-10424.001.patch
>
>
> {quote}
> protocol org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.protocol.DatanodeLifelineProtocol is
> unauthorized for user * (auth:KERBEROS) | Server.java:1979
> {quote}
> I am using security cluster authenticate with kerberos, as I checked the the
> code, if security auth enabled, because the DatanodeLifelineProtocol is not
> inside HDFSPolicyProvider, when authorize in ServiceAuthorizationManager,
> AuthorizationException will be thrown at line 96.
> Please point me out if I am wrong
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10424) DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15293476#comment-15293476
]
Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-10424:
--
Test failure seems unrelated.
+1 for the patch.
> DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
> ---
>
> Key: HDFS-10424
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: gu-chi
>Assignee: Chris Nauroth
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HDFS-10424-branch-2.8.001.patch, HDFS-10424.001.patch
>
>
> {quote}
> protocol org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.protocol.DatanodeLifelineProtocol is
> unauthorized for user * (auth:KERBEROS) | Server.java:1979
> {quote}
> I am using security cluster authenticate with kerberos, as I checked the the
> code, if security auth enabled, because the DatanodeLifelineProtocol is not
> inside HDFSPolicyProvider, when authorize in ServiceAuthorizationManager,
> AuthorizationException will be thrown at line 96.
> Please point me out if I am wrong
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10424) DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15293410#comment-15293410
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10424:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 15s
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 2m 16s
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 6m
59s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 5m 55s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m 36s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
10s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 50s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
39s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 2s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 51s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 13s
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
24s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 5m 31s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 5m 31s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m 27s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m 27s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 1m 5s
{color} | {color:red} root: patch generated 4 new + 155 unchanged - 1 fixed =
159 total (was 156) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 44s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 49 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use git
apply --whitespace=fix. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
53s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 54s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 45s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 6m 54s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_91.
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 47m 56s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_91. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 7m 17s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_101.
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 45m 34s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_101. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10424) DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15293187#comment-15293187
]
Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-10424:
--
Reports were not available to check the test failure.
bq. Slave went offline during the build
Re-triggered jenkins for this.
> DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
> ---
>
> Key: HDFS-10424
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: gu-chi
>Assignee: Chris Nauroth
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HDFS-10424-branch-2.8.001.patch, HDFS-10424.001.patch
>
>
> {quote}
> protocol org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.protocol.DatanodeLifelineProtocol is
> unauthorized for user * (auth:KERBEROS) | Server.java:1979
> {quote}
> I am using security cluster authenticate with kerberos, as I checked the the
> code, if security auth enabled, because the DatanodeLifelineProtocol is not
> inside HDFSPolicyProvider, when authorize in ServiceAuthorizationManager,
> AuthorizationException will be thrown at line 96.
> Please point me out if I am wrong
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10424) DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15293062#comment-15293062
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10424:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 17s
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 3m 11s
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 7m
44s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m 11s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.8.0_74 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m 51s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
13s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 53s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
47s {color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 6s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.8.0_74 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 59s
{color} | {color:green} branch-2.8 passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 14s
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
30s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 5m 56s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_74 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 5m 56s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m 48s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m 48s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 1m 8s
{color} | {color:red} root: patch generated 4 new + 154 unchanged - 1 fixed =
158 total (was 155) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 48s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} whitespace {color} | {color:red} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:red} The patch has 49 line(s) that end in whitespace. Use git
apply --whitespace=fix. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 4m 2s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 9s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_74 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 57s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95 {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 7m 58s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed with JDK v1.8.0_74.
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 61m 58s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.8.0_74. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 8m 16s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed with JDK v1.7.0_95.
{color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 61m 10s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed with JDK v1.7.0_95. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:bl
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10424) DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292763#comment-15292763
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-10424:
--
+1 for the branch-2.8 patch too. Thanks [~cnauroth]!
> DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
> ---
>
> Key: HDFS-10424
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: gu-chi
>Assignee: Chris Nauroth
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HDFS-10424-branch-2.8.001.patch, HDFS-10424.001.patch
>
>
> {quote}
> protocol org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.protocol.DatanodeLifelineProtocol is
> unauthorized for user * (auth:KERBEROS) | Server.java:1979
> {quote}
> I am using security cluster authenticate with kerberos, as I checked the the
> code, if security auth enabled, because the DatanodeLifelineProtocol is not
> inside HDFSPolicyProvider, when authorize in ServiceAuthorizationManager,
> AuthorizationException will be thrown at line 96.
> Please point me out if I am wrong
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10424) DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292754#comment-15292754
]
Chris Nauroth commented on HDFS-10424:
--
The Checkstyle warnings are triggered by existing patterns in the code. I'm
not planning on cleaning those up within the scope of this patch.
> DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
> ---
>
> Key: HDFS-10424
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: gu-chi
>Assignee: Chris Nauroth
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HDFS-10424-branch-2.8.001.patch, HDFS-10424.001.patch
>
>
> {quote}
> protocol org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.protocol.DatanodeLifelineProtocol is
> unauthorized for user * (auth:KERBEROS) | Server.java:1979
> {quote}
> I am using security cluster authenticate with kerberos, as I checked the the
> code, if security auth enabled, because the DatanodeLifelineProtocol is not
> inside HDFSPolicyProvider, when authorize in ServiceAuthorizationManager,
> AuthorizationException will be thrown at line 96.
> Please point me out if I am wrong
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10424) DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292656#comment-15292656
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-10424:
--
+1. Neat unit test [~cnauroth]. Thanks for taking care of this and for finding
the ReconfigurationProtocol issue.
> DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
> ---
>
> Key: HDFS-10424
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: gu-chi
>Assignee: Chris Nauroth
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: HDFS-10424.001.patch
>
>
> {quote}
> protocol org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.protocol.DatanodeLifelineProtocol is
> unauthorized for user * (auth:KERBEROS) | Server.java:1979
> {quote}
> I am using security cluster authenticate with kerberos, as I checked the the
> code, if security auth enabled, because the DatanodeLifelineProtocol is not
> inside HDFSPolicyProvider, when authorize in ServiceAuthorizationManager,
> AuthorizationException will be thrown at line 96.
> Please point me out if I am wrong
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10424) DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292487#comment-15292487
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10424:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 14s
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 15s
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 6m
0s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m 10s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
19s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 42s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
54s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 57s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 12s
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
22s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 6m 6s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 6m 6s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 1m 20s
{color} | {color:red} root: patch generated 3 new + 156 unchanged - 0 fixed =
159 total (was 156) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 40s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
24s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} Patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
11s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 0s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 19m 31s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-common in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 70m 28s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
22s {color} | {color:green} Patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 128m 20s {color}
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.TestDFSUpgradeFromImage |
| | hadoop.hdfs.TestFileAppend |
| Timed out junit tests | org.apache.hadoop.http.TestHttpServerLifecycle |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:2c91fd8 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12805069/HDFS-10424.001.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-10424 |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux c45856748611 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | trunk / 42c22f7 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_91 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15503/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-root.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15503/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15503/artifact/pa
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10424) DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15288853#comment-15288853
]
gu-chi commented on HDFS-10424:
---
[~cnauroth] please help check, thx
> DatanodeLifelineProtocol not able to use under security cluster
> ---
>
> Key: HDFS-10424
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10424
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: gu-chi
>Priority: Blocker
>
> {quote}
> protocol org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.protocol.DatanodeLifelineProtocol is
> unauthorized for user * (auth:KERBEROS) | Server.java:1979
> {quote}
> I am using security cluster authenticate with kerberos, as I checked the the
> code, if security auth enabled, because the DatanodeLifelineProtocol is not
> inside HDFSPolicyProvider, when authorize in ServiceAuthorizationManager,
> AuthorizationException will be thrown at line 96.
> Please point me out if I am wrong
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
