[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292285#comment-15292285 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HDFS-10437: -- This came out of investigation on HDFS-10424, which reported a similar problem for {{DatanodeLifelineProtocol}}. The test I wrote for the patch attached there also indicated a possible problem for {{ReconfigurationProtocol}}. [~xiaobingo], would you please check? Cc [~arpitagarwal]. > ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider. > -- > > Key: HDFS-10437 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: namenode >Affects Versions: 2.8.0 >Reporter: Chris Nauroth > > The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security > policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is > not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality > is not working correctly in secured clusters. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292293#comment-15292293 ] Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-10437: -- Nice catch [~cnauroth], thank you for the heads up! > ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider. > -- > > Key: HDFS-10437 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: namenode >Affects Versions: 2.8.0 >Reporter: Chris Nauroth > > The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security > policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is > not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality > is not working correctly in secured clusters. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292294#comment-15292294 ] Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-10437: -- cc [~xiaobingo] > ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider. > -- > > Key: HDFS-10437 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: namenode >Affects Versions: 2.8.0 >Reporter: Chris Nauroth > > The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security > policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is > not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality > is not working correctly in secured clusters. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292394#comment-15292394 ] Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-10437: -- Thanks [~cnauroth] for the catch. We should add ReconfigurationProtocol to HDFSPolicyProvider. > ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider. > -- > > Key: HDFS-10437 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: namenode >Affects Versions: 2.8.0 >Reporter: Chris Nauroth > > The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security > policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is > not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality > is not working correctly in secured clusters. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292395#comment-15292395 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HDFS-10437: -- [~xiaobingo], thanks for confirmation. When we do that, let's also update the new {{TestHDFSPolicyProvider}} suite that I'm adding in HDFS-10424 to remove the special-case check for {{ReconfigurationProtocol}}. > ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider. > -- > > Key: HDFS-10437 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: namenode >Affects Versions: 2.8.0 >Reporter: Chris Nauroth > > The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security > policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is > not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality > is not working correctly in secured clusters. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292401#comment-15292401 ] Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-10437: -- Ok, I will jump to this after HDFS-10424 is committed. Thank you. > ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider. > -- > > Key: HDFS-10437 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: namenode >Affects Versions: 2.8.0 >Reporter: Chris Nauroth >Assignee: Xiaobing Zhou > > The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security > policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is > not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality > is not working correctly in secured clusters. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15337486#comment-15337486 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10437: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment || | {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 36s {color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s {color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files. {color} | | {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 35s {color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 8m 2s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m 56s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m 31s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m 8s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 29s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m 34s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 6s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 14s {color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m 46s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m 4s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 8m 4s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 1m 37s {color} | {color:red} root: The patch generated 4 new + 100 unchanged - 0 fixed = 104 total (was 100) {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m 4s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 30s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s {color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m 46s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 53s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 22m 10s {color} | {color:red} hadoop-common in the patch failed. {color} | | {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 72m 29s {color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 23s {color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. {color} | | {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 142m 51s {color} | {color:black} {color} | \\ \\ || Reason || Tests || | Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestLargeBlockReport | | Timed out junit tests | org.apache.hadoop.http.TestHttpServerLifecycle | \\ \\ || Subsystem || Report/Notes || | Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:e2f6409 | | JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12811499/HDFS-10437.01.patch | | JIRA Issue | HDFS-10437 | | Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit findbugs checkstyle | | uname | Linux 73a0c34f47d2 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux | | Build tool | maven | | Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh | | git revision | trunk / 0761379 | | Default Java | 1.8.0_91 | | findbugs | v3.0.0 | | checkstyle | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15821/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-root.txt | | unit | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15821/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common.txt | | unit | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15821/artifact/patchprocess/pa
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15337529#comment-15337529 ] Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-10437: -- Thank you [~arpitagarwal] for helping to post the patch. It didn't come up from my todo list. The patch looks good to me. > ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider. > -- > > Key: HDFS-10437 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: namenode >Affects Versions: 2.8.0 >Reporter: Chris Nauroth >Assignee: Xiaobing Zhou > Attachments: HDFS-10437.01.patch, HDFS-10437.02.patch > > > The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security > policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is > not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality > is not working correctly in secured clusters. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15337613#comment-15337613 ] Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10437: -- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment || | {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 24s {color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s {color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test files. {color} | | {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 42s {color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 7m 43s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m 23s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m 36s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m 19s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 35s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m 30s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 8s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} | | {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 16s {color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m 52s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m 1s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 7m 1s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 1m 20s {color} | {color:red} root: The patch generated 2 new + 100 unchanged - 0 fixed = 102 total (was 100) {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 42s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m 26s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s {color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m 15s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 42s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 7m 45s {color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} | | {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 75m 45s {color} | {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} | | {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m 28s {color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. {color} | | {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 129m 52s {color} | {color:black} {color} | \\ \\ || Reason || Tests || | Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestEditLog | \\ \\ || Subsystem || Report/Notes || | Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:e2f6409 | | JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12811512/HDFS-10437.02.patch | | JIRA Issue | HDFS-10437 | | Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit findbugs checkstyle | | uname | Linux b85b6eb7fcec 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux | | Build tool | maven | | Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh | | git revision | trunk / 0761379 | | Default Java | 1.8.0_91 | | findbugs | v3.0.0 | | checkstyle | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15824/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-root.txt | | unit | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15824/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt | | unit test logs | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15824/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt | | Test Results |
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15338269#comment-15338269 ] Hudson commented on HDFS-10437: --- SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9983 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/9983/]) HDFS-10437. ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider. (arp: rev 0319d73c3b14c09da0f28371dc857b2cc5f6ec7a) * hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/CommonConfigurationKeys.java * hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/HDFSPolicyProvider.java * hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/TestHDFSPolicyProvider.java > ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider. > -- > > Key: HDFS-10437 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: namenode >Affects Versions: 2.9.0 >Reporter: Chris Nauroth >Assignee: Arpit Agarwal > Fix For: 2.9.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-10437.01.patch, HDFS-10437.02.patch, > HDFS-10437.03.patch > > > The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security > policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is > not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality > is not working correctly in secured clusters. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org