[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292285#comment-15292285
]
Chris Nauroth commented on HDFS-10437:
--
This came out of investigation on HDFS-10424, which reported a similar problem
for {{DatanodeLifelineProtocol}}. The test I wrote for the patch attached
there also indicated a possible problem for {{ReconfigurationProtocol}}.
[~xiaobingo], would you please check? Cc [~arpitagarwal].
> ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-10437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>
> The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security
> policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is
> not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality
> is not working correctly in secured clusters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292293#comment-15292293
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-10437:
--
Nice catch [~cnauroth], thank you for the heads up!
> ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-10437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>
> The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security
> policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is
> not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality
> is not working correctly in secured clusters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292294#comment-15292294
]
Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-10437:
--
cc [~xiaobingo]
> ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-10437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>
> The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security
> policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is
> not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality
> is not working correctly in secured clusters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292394#comment-15292394
]
Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-10437:
--
Thanks [~cnauroth] for the catch. We should add ReconfigurationProtocol to
HDFSPolicyProvider.
> ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-10437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>
> The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security
> policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is
> not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality
> is not working correctly in secured clusters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292395#comment-15292395
]
Chris Nauroth commented on HDFS-10437:
--
[~xiaobingo], thanks for confirmation. When we do that, let's also update the
new {{TestHDFSPolicyProvider}} suite that I'm adding in HDFS-10424 to remove
the special-case check for {{ReconfigurationProtocol}}.
> ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-10437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>
> The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security
> policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is
> not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality
> is not working correctly in secured clusters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15292401#comment-15292401
]
Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-10437:
--
Ok, I will jump to this after HDFS-10424 is committed. Thank you.
> ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-10437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>Assignee: Xiaobing Zhou
>
> The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security
> policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is
> not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality
> is not working correctly in secured clusters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15337486#comment-15337486
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10437:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 36s
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 35s
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 8m
2s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m 56s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
31s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m 8s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
34s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 6s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 14s
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
46s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m 4s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 8m 4s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 1m 37s
{color} | {color:red} root: The patch generated 4 new + 100 unchanged - 0 fixed
= 104 total (was 100) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m 4s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
46s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 53s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 22m 10s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-common in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 72m 29s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
23s {color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 142m 51s {color}
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestLargeBlockReport |
| Timed out junit tests | org.apache.hadoop.http.TestHttpServerLifecycle |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:e2f6409 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12811499/HDFS-10437.01.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-10437 |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 73a0c34f47d2 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | trunk / 0761379 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_91 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15821/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-root.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15821/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15821/artifact/patchprocess/pa
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15337529#comment-15337529
]
Xiaobing Zhou commented on HDFS-10437:
--
Thank you [~arpitagarwal] for helping to post the patch. It didn't come up
from my todo list.
The patch looks good to me.
> ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-10437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
>Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>Assignee: Xiaobing Zhou
> Attachments: HDFS-10437.01.patch, HDFS-10437.02.patch
>
>
> The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security
> policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is
> not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality
> is not working correctly in secured clusters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15337613#comment-15337613
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-10437:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 24s
{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m 0s
{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 42s
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 7m
43s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 8m 23s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 1m
36s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m 19s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
30s {color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 2m 8s
{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m 16s
{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
52s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 7m 1s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 7m 1s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} checkstyle {color} | {color:red} 1m 20s
{color} | {color:red} root: The patch generated 2 new + 100 unchanged - 0 fixed
= 102 total (was 100) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m 42s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvneclipse {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s {color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 3m
15s {color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m 42s
{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 7m 45s
{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 75m 45s {color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s {color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 129m 52s {color}
| {color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestEditLog |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:e2f6409 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12811512/HDFS-10437.02.patch |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-10437 |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux b85b6eb7fcec 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed
Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | trunk / 0761379 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_91 |
| findbugs | v3.0.0 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15824/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-root.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15824/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| unit test logs |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/15824/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| Test Results |
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-10437) ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15338269#comment-15338269
]
Hudson commented on HDFS-10437:
---
SUCCESS: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #9983 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/9983/])
HDFS-10437. ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider. (arp:
rev 0319d73c3b14c09da0f28371dc857b2cc5f6ec7a)
*
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/CommonConfigurationKeys.java
*
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/HDFSPolicyProvider.java
*
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/TestHDFSPolicyProvider.java
> ReconfigurationProtocol not covered by HDFSPolicyProvider.
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-10437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10437
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
>Affects Versions: 2.9.0
>Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>Assignee: Arpit Agarwal
> Fix For: 2.9.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-10437.01.patch, HDFS-10437.02.patch,
> HDFS-10437.03.patch
>
>
> The {{HDFSPolicyProvider}} class contains an entry for defining the security
> policy of each HDFS RPC protocol interface. {{ReconfigurationProtocol}} is
> not listed currently. This may indicate that reconfiguration functionality
> is not working correctly in secured clusters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
