[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13164026#comment-13164026 ]
Eli Collins commented on HDFS-2638: ----------------------------------- Unit tests are running, earlier run was clean. test-patch results follow. 4 findbugs warnings are HADOOP-7847, not this patch. Existing test coverage should be sufficient. {noformat} [exec] [exec] -1 overall. [exec] [exec] +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. [exec] [exec] -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. [exec] Please justify why no tests are needed for this patch. [exec] [exec] +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. [exec] [exec] +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. [exec] [exec] -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 4 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. [exec] {noformat} > Improve a blog recovery log > --------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-2638 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2638 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: name-node > Affects Versions: 1.0.0 > Reporter: Eli Collins > Assignee: Eli Collins > Priority: Minor > Attachments: hdfs-2638-b1-1.patch > > > It would be useful to know whether an attempt to recover a block is failing > because the block was already recovered (has a new GS) or the block is > missing. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira