[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Release Note: The following environment variables are deprecated. Set the corresponding configuration properties instead. Environment Variable| Configuration Property | Configuration File |--| HTTPFS_TEMP | hadoop.http.temp.dir | httpfs-site.xml HTTPFS_HTTP_PORT| hadoop.httpfs.http.port | httpfs-site.xml HTTPFS_MAX_HTTP_HEADER_SIZE | hadoop.http.max.request.header.size and hadoop.http.max.response.header.size | httpfs-site.xml HTTPFS_MAX_THREADS | hadoop.http.max.threads | httpfs-site.xml HTTPFS_SSL_ENABLED | hadoop.httpfs.ssl.enabled| httpfs-site.xml HTTPFS_SSL_KEYSTORE_FILE| ssl.server.keystore.location | ssl-server.xml HTTPFS_SSL_KEYSTORE_PASS| ssl.server.keystore.password | ssl-server.xml These default HTTP Services have been added. Name | Description ---| /conf | Display configuration properties /jmx | Java JMX management interface /logLevel | Get or set log level per class /logs | Display log files /stacks| Display JVM stacks /static/index.html | The static home page Script httpfs.sh has been deprecated, use `hdfs httpfs` instead. The new scripts are based on the Hadoop shell scripting framework. `hadoop daemonlog` is supported. SSL configurations are read from ssl-server.xml. > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha3 > > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch, > HDFS-10860.006.patch, HDFS-10860.007.patch, HDFS-10860.008.patch, > HDFS-10860.009.patch, HDFS-10860.010.patch, HDFS-10860.011.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xiao Chen updated HDFS-10860: - Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Incompatible change,Reviewed (was: Incompatible change) Fix Version/s: 3.0.0-alpha3 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Committed to trunk! Thanks [~jzhuge] for the great work here, and [~bobhansen] for the early pointer. > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha3 > > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch, > HDFS-10860.006.patch, HDFS-10860.007.patch, HDFS-10860.008.patch, > HDFS-10860.009.patch, HDFS-10860.010.patch, HDFS-10860.011.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Attachment: HDFS-10860.011.patch Patch 011 * Fix a typo in patch 010 > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch, > HDFS-10860.006.patch, HDFS-10860.007.patch, HDFS-10860.008.patch, > HDFS-10860.009.patch, HDFS-10860.010.patch, HDFS-10860.011.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Attachment: HDFS-10860.010.patch Patch 010 - Update ServerSetup.md.vm TESTING DONE - - Verify /jmx, /logLevel, /conf, and /stack with hadoop.httpfs.http.administrators set to “$USER” - No access for kerberos login "hdfs" - Access for kerberos login “$USER" - HttpFS Bats regression tests https://github.com/jzhuge/hadoop-bats-tests and https://github.com/jzhuge/hadoop-setup-scripts in insecure, ssl, and ssl+kerberos mode > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch, > HDFS-10860.006.patch, HDFS-10860.007.patch, HDFS-10860.008.patch, > HDFS-10860.009.patch, HDFS-10860.010.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Wang updated HDFS-10860: --- Priority: Blocker (was: Major) Upgrading this to a blocker for alpha3, looks like we're close in any case but this is something I definitely want in. > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch, > HDFS-10860.006.patch, HDFS-10860.007.patch, HDFS-10860.008.patch, > HDFS-10860.009.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Attachment: HDFS-10860.009.patch Patch 009 - Update ServerSetup.md.vm TESTING DONE - Verify ServerSetup.html > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch, > HDFS-10860.006.patch, HDFS-10860.007.patch, HDFS-10860.008.patch, > HDFS-10860.009.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Attachment: HDFS-10860.008.patch Patch 008 - Add config property hadoop.httpfs.http.administrators to control access to instrumentation servlets - Enhance TestHttpFSServerWebServer to start server on any port of localhost TESTING DONE - TestHttpFSServerWebServer - HttpFS Bats regression tests https://github.com/jzhuge/hadoop-regression-tests in insecure and ssl mode - Verify ServerSetup.html and static index.html > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch, > HDFS-10860.006.patch, HDFS-10860.007.patch, HDFS-10860.008.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Attachment: HDFS-10860.007.patch Patch 007 - Xiao’s comments - Test simple request in TestHttpFSServerWebServer#testStartStop TESTING DONE - TestHttpFSServerWebServer - HttpFS Bats regression tests https://github.com/jzhuge/hadoop-regression-tests in insecure and ssl mode - Verify ServerSetup.html and static index.html > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch, > HDFS-10860.006.patch, HDFS-10860.007.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch, > HDFS-10860.006.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Attachment: HDFS-10860.006.patch Patch 006 - Use SSLFactory.readSSLConfiguration introduced by HADOOP-13992 - Document use of CredentialProvider API in CredentialProviderAPI.md and ServerSetup.md.vm - Set TestHttpFSServerWebServer global timeout to 30 seconds TESTING DONE - TestHttpFSServerWebServer - Run {{HTTPFS_HTTP_PORT=1234 hdfs httpfs}} to verify the server is running on port 1234 - Run {{HTTPFS_SSL_KEYSTORE_PASS=abcd hdfs httpfs}} to expect wrong password - Run {{HTTPFS_SSL_KEYSTORE_FILE=/tmp/tt hdfs httpfs}} to expect invalid keystore path - HttpFS Bats regression tests https://github.com/jzhuge/hadoop-regression-tests in insecure and ssl mode - Verify CredentialProviderAPI.html and ServerSetup.html > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch, > HDFS-10860.006.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Wait for HADOOP-13992 > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Attachment: HDFS-10860.005.patch Patch 005 - Add unit tests for HttpFSServerWebServer > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch, HDFS-10860.005.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Status: In Progress (was: Patch Available) To add unit tests for HttpFSServerWebServer > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Attachment: HDFS-10860.004.patch Patch 004 - Update CommandsManual.md and SecureMode.md TESTING DONE - Bats regression tests https://github.com/jzhuge/hadoop-bats-tests in insecure and ssl mode - Verify docs > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch, HDFS-10860.004.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Status: In Progress (was: Patch Available) > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Attachment: HDFS-10860.003.patch Patch 003 - Xiao's comments in HADOOP-13597 TESTING DONE - Bats regression tests https://github.com/jzhuge/hadoop-regression-tests in unsecure and ssl mode - Verify docs > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch, > HDFS-10860.003.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Attachment: HDFS-10860.002.patch Patch 002 - Update doc index.md, ServerSetup.md.vm, and HDFSCommands.md - Set {{HttpServer2.Builder#authFilterConfigurationPrefix}} to integrate with HttpServer2’s secret provider TESTING DONE - hdfs dfs -ls webhdfs://localhost:14000/ - hdfs dfs -ls swebhdfs://localhost:14000/“ in SSL mode - hdfs https, hdfs —daemon start|status|stop httpfs - httpfs.sh run|start|status|stop - hadoop daemonlog - HttpFS unit tests - dist-test nadoop-common and hadoop-hdfs: http://dist-test.cloudera.org/job?job_id=hadoop.jzhuge.1481879379.20252, 10 unrelated test failures. - /jmx, /logLevel, /conf, /stack, /logs, and /static/index.html > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch, HDFS-10860.002.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Status: In Progress (was: Patch Available) Looking into the test failures caused by my {{AuthenticationFilter}} change. > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John Zhuge updated HDFS-10860: -- Attachment: HDFS-10860.001.patch Patch 001 - Create {{HttpFSServerWebServer}} based on HttpServer2 - Share common code with HADOOP-13597 - Convert hadoop-hdfs-httpfs from war to jar - Update httpfs-default.xml - Add configuration keys - Load deprecated environment variables and issue warning - Add “hdfs httpfs” sub-command - Change httpfs.sh to be a wrapper of “hdfs https” - Fix MDCFilter NPE when browsing /conf, /logLevel, /jmx, or /stacks - Obsolete {{httpfs.sh version}} that prints Tomcat version - Obsolete HTTP admin port for Tomcat Manager TESTING DONE - hdfs dfs -ls webhdfs://localhost:14000/ - hdfs dfs -ls swebhdfs://localhost:14000/“ in SSL mode - hdfs https, hdfs —daemon start|status|stop https - httpfs.sh run|start|status|stop - hadoop daemonlog - HttpFS unit tests - /jmx, /logLevel, /conf, /stack, /logs, and /static/index.html TODO - Update docs: ServerSetup.md.vm TODO in new JIRAs: - Switch unit tests to use HttpFSServerWebServer My private branch: https://github.com/jzhuge/hadoop/tree/HDFS-10860.001 > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > Attachments: HDFS-10860.001.patch > > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-10860) Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Wang updated HDFS-10860: --- Summary: Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty (was: Switch HttpFS to from Tomcat to Jetty) > Switch HttpFS from Tomcat to Jetty > -- > > Key: HDFS-10860 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10860 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: httpfs >Affects Versions: 2.6.0 >Reporter: John Zhuge >Assignee: John Zhuge > > The Tomcat 6 we are using will reach EOL at the end of 2017. While there are > other good options, I would propose switching to {{Jetty 9}} for the > following reasons: > * Easier migration. Both Tomcat and Jetty are based on {{Servlet > Containers}}, so we don't have to change client code that much. It would > require more work to switch to {{JAX-RS}}. > * Well established. > * Good performance and scalability. > Other alternatives: > * Jersey + Grizzly > * Tomcat 8 > Your opinions will be greatly appreciated. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org