[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-14997) BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously

2021-09-22 Thread Xiaoqiao He (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Xiaoqiao He updated HDFS-14997:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.2.3

> BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14997
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: datanode
>Reporter: Xiaoqiao He
>Assignee: Xiaoqiao He
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0, 3.2.3, 3.2.4
>
> Attachments: HDFS-14997-branch-3.2.001.patch, HDFS-14997.001.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.002.patch, HDFS-14997.003.patch, HDFS-14997.004.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.005.patch, HDFS-14997.addendum.patch, 
> image-2019-12-26-16-15-44-814.png
>
>
> There are two core functions, report(#sendHeartbeat, #blockReport, 
> #cacheReport) and #processCommand in #BPServiceActor main process flow. If 
> processCommand cost long time it will block send report flow. Meanwhile 
> processCommand could cost long time(over 1000s the worst case I meet) when IO 
> load  of DataNode is very high. Since some IO operations are under 
> #datasetLock, So it has to wait to acquire #datasetLock long time when 
> process some of commands(such as #DNA_INVALIDATE). In such case, #heartbeat 
> will not send to NameNode in-time, and trigger other disasters.
> I propose to improve #processCommand asynchronously and not block 
> #BPServiceActor to send heartbeat back to NameNode when meet high IO load.
> Notes:
> 1. Lifeline could be one effective solution, however some old branches are 
> not support this feature.
> 2. IO operations under #datasetLock is another issue, I think we should solve 
> it at another JIRA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-14997) BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously

2021-09-17 Thread Xiaoqiao He (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Xiaoqiao He updated HDFS-14997:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.2.4
   Resolution: Fixed
   Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

> BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14997
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: datanode
>Reporter: Xiaoqiao He
>Assignee: Xiaoqiao He
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.2.4, 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-14997-branch-3.2.001.patch, HDFS-14997.001.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.002.patch, HDFS-14997.003.patch, HDFS-14997.004.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.005.patch, HDFS-14997.addendum.patch, 
> image-2019-12-26-16-15-44-814.png
>
>
> There are two core functions, report(#sendHeartbeat, #blockReport, 
> #cacheReport) and #processCommand in #BPServiceActor main process flow. If 
> processCommand cost long time it will block send report flow. Meanwhile 
> processCommand could cost long time(over 1000s the worst case I meet) when IO 
> load  of DataNode is very high. Since some IO operations are under 
> #datasetLock, So it has to wait to acquire #datasetLock long time when 
> process some of commands(such as #DNA_INVALIDATE). In such case, #heartbeat 
> will not send to NameNode in-time, and trigger other disasters.
> I propose to improve #processCommand asynchronously and not block 
> #BPServiceActor to send heartbeat back to NameNode when meet high IO load.
> Notes:
> 1. Lifeline could be one effective solution, however some old branches are 
> not support this feature.
> 2. IO operations under #datasetLock is another issue, I think we should solve 
> it at another JIRA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-14997) BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously

2021-09-14 Thread Xiaoqiao He (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Xiaoqiao He updated HDFS-14997:
---
Attachment: HDFS-14997-branch-3.2.001.patch
Status: Patch Available  (was: Reopened)

submit patch for branch-3.2 and try to trigger Jenkins.

> BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14997
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: datanode
>Reporter: Xiaoqiao He
>Assignee: Xiaoqiao He
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-14997-branch-3.2.001.patch, HDFS-14997.001.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.002.patch, HDFS-14997.003.patch, HDFS-14997.004.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.005.patch, HDFS-14997.addendum.patch, 
> image-2019-12-26-16-15-44-814.png
>
>
> There are two core functions, report(#sendHeartbeat, #blockReport, 
> #cacheReport) and #processCommand in #BPServiceActor main process flow. If 
> processCommand cost long time it will block send report flow. Meanwhile 
> processCommand could cost long time(over 1000s the worst case I meet) when IO 
> load  of DataNode is very high. Since some IO operations are under 
> #datasetLock, So it has to wait to acquire #datasetLock long time when 
> process some of commands(such as #DNA_INVALIDATE). In such case, #heartbeat 
> will not send to NameNode in-time, and trigger other disasters.
> I propose to improve #processCommand asynchronously and not block 
> #BPServiceActor to send heartbeat back to NameNode when meet high IO load.
> Notes:
> 1. Lifeline could be one effective solution, however some old branches are 
> not support this feature.
> 2. IO operations under #datasetLock is another issue, I think we should solve 
> it at another JIRA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-14997) BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously

2019-12-26 Thread Ayush Saxena (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ayush Saxena updated HDFS-14997:

Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

> BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14997
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: datanode
>Reporter: Xiaoqiao He
>Assignee: Xiaoqiao He
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-14997.001.patch, HDFS-14997.002.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.003.patch, HDFS-14997.004.patch, HDFS-14997.005.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.addendum.patch, image-2019-12-26-16-15-44-814.png
>
>
> There are two core functions, report(#sendHeartbeat, #blockReport, 
> #cacheReport) and #processCommand in #BPServiceActor main process flow. If 
> processCommand cost long time it will block send report flow. Meanwhile 
> processCommand could cost long time(over 1000s the worst case I meet) when IO 
> load  of DataNode is very high. Since some IO operations are under 
> #datasetLock, So it has to wait to acquire #datasetLock long time when 
> process some of commands(such as #DNA_INVALIDATE). In such case, #heartbeat 
> will not send to NameNode in-time, and trigger other disasters.
> I propose to improve #processCommand asynchronously and not block 
> #BPServiceActor to send heartbeat back to NameNode when meet high IO load.
> Notes:
> 1. Lifeline could be one effective solution, however some old branches are 
> not support this feature.
> 2. IO operations under #datasetLock is another issue, I think we should solve 
> it at another JIRA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-14997) BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously

2019-12-26 Thread Xiaoqiao He (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Xiaoqiao He updated HDFS-14997:
---
Attachment: HDFS-14997.addendum.patch

> BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14997
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: datanode
>Reporter: Xiaoqiao He
>Assignee: Xiaoqiao He
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-14997.001.patch, HDFS-14997.002.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.003.patch, HDFS-14997.004.patch, HDFS-14997.005.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.addendum.patch, image-2019-12-26-16-15-44-814.png
>
>
> There are two core functions, report(#sendHeartbeat, #blockReport, 
> #cacheReport) and #processCommand in #BPServiceActor main process flow. If 
> processCommand cost long time it will block send report flow. Meanwhile 
> processCommand could cost long time(over 1000s the worst case I meet) when IO 
> load  of DataNode is very high. Since some IO operations are under 
> #datasetLock, So it has to wait to acquire #datasetLock long time when 
> process some of commands(such as #DNA_INVALIDATE). In such case, #heartbeat 
> will not send to NameNode in-time, and trigger other disasters.
> I propose to improve #processCommand asynchronously and not block 
> #BPServiceActor to send heartbeat back to NameNode when meet high IO load.
> Notes:
> 1. Lifeline could be one effective solution, however some old branches are 
> not support this feature.
> 2. IO operations under #datasetLock is another issue, I think we should solve 
> it at another JIRA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-14997) BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously

2019-12-26 Thread Xiaoqiao He (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Xiaoqiao He updated HDFS-14997:
---
Attachment: (was: HDFS-14997.addendum.patch)

> BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14997
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: datanode
>Reporter: Xiaoqiao He
>Assignee: Xiaoqiao He
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-14997.001.patch, HDFS-14997.002.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.003.patch, HDFS-14997.004.patch, HDFS-14997.005.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.addendum.patch, image-2019-12-26-16-15-44-814.png
>
>
> There are two core functions, report(#sendHeartbeat, #blockReport, 
> #cacheReport) and #processCommand in #BPServiceActor main process flow. If 
> processCommand cost long time it will block send report flow. Meanwhile 
> processCommand could cost long time(over 1000s the worst case I meet) when IO 
> load  of DataNode is very high. Since some IO operations are under 
> #datasetLock, So it has to wait to acquire #datasetLock long time when 
> process some of commands(such as #DNA_INVALIDATE). In such case, #heartbeat 
> will not send to NameNode in-time, and trigger other disasters.
> I propose to improve #processCommand asynchronously and not block 
> #BPServiceActor to send heartbeat back to NameNode when meet high IO load.
> Notes:
> 1. Lifeline could be one effective solution, however some old branches are 
> not support this feature.
> 2. IO operations under #datasetLock is another issue, I think we should solve 
> it at another JIRA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-14997) BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously

2019-12-26 Thread Xiaoqiao He (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Xiaoqiao He updated HDFS-14997:
---
Attachment: HDFS-14997.addendum.patch
Status: Patch Available  (was: Reopened)

> BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14997
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: datanode
>Reporter: Xiaoqiao He
>Assignee: Xiaoqiao He
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-14997.001.patch, HDFS-14997.002.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.003.patch, HDFS-14997.004.patch, HDFS-14997.005.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.addendum.patch, image-2019-12-26-16-15-44-814.png
>
>
> There are two core functions, report(#sendHeartbeat, #blockReport, 
> #cacheReport) and #processCommand in #BPServiceActor main process flow. If 
> processCommand cost long time it will block send report flow. Meanwhile 
> processCommand could cost long time(over 1000s the worst case I meet) when IO 
> load  of DataNode is very high. Since some IO operations are under 
> #datasetLock, So it has to wait to acquire #datasetLock long time when 
> process some of commands(such as #DNA_INVALIDATE). In such case, #heartbeat 
> will not send to NameNode in-time, and trigger other disasters.
> I propose to improve #processCommand asynchronously and not block 
> #BPServiceActor to send heartbeat back to NameNode when meet high IO load.
> Notes:
> 1. Lifeline could be one effective solution, however some old branches are 
> not support this feature.
> 2. IO operations under #datasetLock is another issue, I think we should solve 
> it at another JIRA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-14997) BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously

2019-12-19 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Íñigo Goiri updated HDFS-14997:
---
Summary: BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously  
(was: BPServiceActor process command from NameNode asynchronously)

> BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14997
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: datanode
>Reporter: He Xiaoqiao
>Assignee: He Xiaoqiao
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-14997.001.patch, HDFS-14997.002.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.003.patch, HDFS-14997.004.patch, HDFS-14997.005.patch
>
>
> There are two core functions, report(#sendHeartbeat, #blockReport, 
> #cacheReport) and #processCommand in #BPServiceActor main process flow. If 
> processCommand cost long time it will block send report flow. Meanwhile 
> processCommand could cost long time(over 1000s the worst case I meet) when IO 
> load  of DataNode is very high. Since some IO operations are under 
> #datasetLock, So it has to wait to acquire #datasetLock long time when 
> process some of commands(such as #DNA_INVALIDATE). In such case, #heartbeat 
> will not send to NameNode in-time, and trigger other disasters.
> I propose to improve #processCommand asynchronously and not block 
> #BPServiceActor to send heartbeat back to NameNode when meet high IO load.
> Notes:
> 1. Lifeline could be one effective solution, however some old branches are 
> not support this feature.
> 2. IO operations under #datasetLock is another issue, I think we should solve 
> it at another JIRA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-14997) BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously

2019-12-19 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Íñigo Goiri updated HDFS-14997:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.3.0
 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
   Resolution: Fixed
   Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

> BPServiceActor processes commands from NameNode asynchronously
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14997
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14997
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: datanode
>Reporter: Xiaoqiao He
>Assignee: Xiaoqiao He
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-14997.001.patch, HDFS-14997.002.patch, 
> HDFS-14997.003.patch, HDFS-14997.004.patch, HDFS-14997.005.patch
>
>
> There are two core functions, report(#sendHeartbeat, #blockReport, 
> #cacheReport) and #processCommand in #BPServiceActor main process flow. If 
> processCommand cost long time it will block send report flow. Meanwhile 
> processCommand could cost long time(over 1000s the worst case I meet) when IO 
> load  of DataNode is very high. Since some IO operations are under 
> #datasetLock, So it has to wait to acquire #datasetLock long time when 
> process some of commands(such as #DNA_INVALIDATE). In such case, #heartbeat 
> will not send to NameNode in-time, and trigger other disasters.
> I propose to improve #processCommand asynchronously and not block 
> #BPServiceActor to send heartbeat back to NameNode when meet high IO load.
> Notes:
> 1. Lifeline could be one effective solution, however some old branches are 
> not support this feature.
> 2. IO operations under #datasetLock is another issue, I think we should solve 
> it at another JIRA.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org