[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9852) hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Nauroth updated HDFS-9852:
Affects Version/s: (was: 3.0.0-alpha1)
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.0-alpha1)
2.8.0
I cherry-picked this to branch-2 and branch-2.8.
> hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-9852
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Assignee: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Priority: Minor
> Labels: supportability
> Fix For: 2.8.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-9852.001.patch, HDFS-9852.002.patch
>
>
> When I type
> {noformat}hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx{noformat}
> It prints error message:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: is missing
> Usage: hadoop fs [generic options] -setfacl [-R] [{-b|-k} {-m|-x }
> ]|[--set ]
> {noformat}
> But actually, it's the path that I missed. A correct command should be
> {noformat}
> hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx /data
> {noformat}
> In fact,
> {noformat}-setfacl -x | -m | --set{noformat} expects two parameters.
> We should print error message like this if it misses one:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing either or
> {noformat}
> and print the following if it misses two:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing arguments:
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9852) hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Allen Wittenauer updated HDFS-9852:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0.0-alpha1
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
+1 committed to trunk.
Thanks!
> hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-9852
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha1
>Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Assignee: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Priority: Minor
> Labels: supportability
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha1
>
> Attachments: HDFS-9852.001.patch, HDFS-9852.002.patch
>
>
> When I type
> {noformat}hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx{noformat}
> It prints error message:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: is missing
> Usage: hadoop fs [generic options] -setfacl [-R] [{-b|-k} {-m|-x }
> ]|[--set ]
> {noformat}
> But actually, it's the path that I missed. A correct command should be
> {noformat}
> hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx /data
> {noformat}
> In fact,
> {noformat}-setfacl -x | -m | --set{noformat} expects two parameters.
> We should print error message like this if it misses one:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing either or
> {noformat}
> and print the following if it misses two:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing arguments:
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9852) hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang updated HDFS-9852:
--
Priority: Minor (was: Trivial)
> hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-9852
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Assignee: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Priority: Minor
> Labels: supportability
> Attachments: HDFS-9852.001.patch, HDFS-9852.002.patch
>
>
> When I type
> {noformat}hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx{noformat}
> It prints error message:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: is missing
> Usage: hadoop fs [generic options] -setfacl [-R] [{-b|-k} {-m|-x }
> ]|[--set ]
> {noformat}
> But actually, it's the path that I missed. A correct command should be
> {noformat}
> hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx /data
> {noformat}
> In fact,
> {noformat}-setfacl -x | -m | --set{noformat} expects two parameters.
> We should print error message like this if it misses one:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing either or
> {noformat}
> and print the following if it misses two:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing arguments:
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9852) hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang updated HDFS-9852:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9852.002.patch
Rev02: Added another scenario: hdfs dfs -setfacl should also emit error message
if none of the expected options (-x, -m, -b, -k, --set) appear. Added test
cases for the new scenario.
> hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-9852
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Assignee: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Priority: Trivial
> Labels: supportability
> Attachments: HDFS-9852.001.patch, HDFS-9852.002.patch
>
>
> When I type
> {noformat}hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx{noformat}
> It prints error message:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: is missing
> Usage: hadoop fs [generic options] -setfacl [-R] [{-b|-k} {-m|-x }
> ]|[--set ]
> {noformat}
> But actually, it's the path that I missed. A correct command should be
> {noformat}
> hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx /data
> {noformat}
> In fact,
> {noformat}-setfacl -x | -m | --set{noformat} expects two parameters.
> We should print error message like this if it misses one:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing either or
> {noformat}
> and print the following if it misses two:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing arguments:
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9852) hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang updated HDFS-9852:
--
Description:
When I type
{noformat}hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx{noformat}
It prints error message:
{noformat}
-setfacl: is missing
Usage: hadoop fs [generic options] -setfacl [-R] [{-b|-k} {-m|-x }
]|[--set ]
{noformat}
But actually, it's the path that I missed. A correct command should be
{noformat}
hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx /data
{noformat}
In fact,
{noformat}-setfacl -x | -m | --set{noformat} expects two parameters.
We should print error message like this if it misses one:
{noformat}
-setfacl: Missing either or
{noformat}
and print the following if it misses two:
{noformat}
-setfacl: Missing arguments:
{noformat}
was:
When I type
{noformat}hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx{noformat}
It prints error message:
{noformat}
-setfacl: is missing
Usage: hadoop fs [generic options] -setfacl [-R] [{-b|-k} {-m|-x }
]|[--set ]
{noformat}
But actually, it's the path that I missed. A correct command should be
{noformat}
hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx /data
{noformat}
{noformat}-setfacl -x | -m | --set{noformat} expects two parameters.
We should print error message like this if it misses one:
{noformat}
-setfacl: Missing either or
{noformat}
and print the following if it misses two:
{noformat}
-setfacl: Missing arguments:
{noformat}
> hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-9852
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Assignee: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Priority: Trivial
> Labels: supportability
> Attachments: HDFS-9852.001.patch
>
>
> When I type
> {noformat}hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx{noformat}
> It prints error message:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: is missing
> Usage: hadoop fs [generic options] -setfacl [-R] [{-b|-k} {-m|-x }
> ]|[--set ]
> {noformat}
> But actually, it's the path that I missed. A correct command should be
> {noformat}
> hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx /data
> {noformat}
> In fact,
> {noformat}-setfacl -x | -m | --set{noformat} expects two parameters.
> We should print error message like this if it misses one:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing either or
> {noformat}
> and print the following if it misses two:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing arguments:
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9852) hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang updated HDFS-9852:
--
Description:
When I type
{noformat}hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx{noformat}
It prints error message:
{noformat}
-setfacl: is missing
Usage: hadoop fs [generic options] -setfacl [-R] [{-b|-k} {-m|-x }
]|[--set ]
{noformat}
But actually, it's the path that I missed. A correct command should be
{noformat}
hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx /data
{noformat}
{noformat}-setfacl -x | -m | --set{noformat} expects two parameters.
We should print error message like this if it misses one:
{noformat}
-setfacl: Missing either or
{noformat}
and print the following if it misses two:
{noformat}
-setfacl: Missing arguments:
{noformat}
was:
When I type
hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx
It prints error message:
{noformat}
-setfacl: is missing
Usage: hadoop fs [generic options] -setfacl [-R] [{-b|-k} {-m|-x }
]|[--set ]
{noformat}
But actually, it's the path that I missed. A correct command should be
{noformat}
hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx /data
{noformat}
\-setfacl \-m \-x \-\-set expects two parameters.
We should print error message like this if it misses one:
{noformat}
-setfacl: Missing either or
{noformat}
and print the following if it misses two:
{noformat}
-setfacl: Missing arguments:
{noformat}
> hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-9852
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Assignee: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Priority: Trivial
> Labels: supportability
> Attachments: HDFS-9852.001.patch
>
>
> When I type
> {noformat}hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx{noformat}
> It prints error message:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: is missing
> Usage: hadoop fs [generic options] -setfacl [-R] [{-b|-k} {-m|-x }
> ]|[--set ]
> {noformat}
> But actually, it's the path that I missed. A correct command should be
> {noformat}
> hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx /data
> {noformat}
> {noformat}-setfacl -x | -m | --set{noformat} expects two parameters.
> We should print error message like this if it misses one:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing either or
> {noformat}
> and print the following if it misses two:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing arguments:
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9852) hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang updated HDFS-9852:
--
Attachment: HDFS-9852.001.patch
Rev01: added more accurate error message.
> hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-9852
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Assignee: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Priority: Trivial
> Labels: supportability
> Attachments: HDFS-9852.001.patch
>
>
> When I type
> hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx
> It prints error message:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: is missing
> Usage: hadoop fs [generic options] -setfacl [-R] [{-b|-k} {-m|-x }
> ]|[--set ]
> {noformat}
> But actually, it's the path that I missed. A correct command should be
> {noformat}
> hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx /data
> {noformat}
> \-setfacl \-m \-x \-\-set expects two parameters.
> We should print error message like this if it misses one:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing either or
> {noformat}
> and print the following if it misses two:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing arguments:
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-9852) hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wei-Chiu Chuang updated HDFS-9852:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> hdfs dfs -setfacl error message is misleading
> -
>
> Key: HDFS-9852
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9852
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Assignee: Wei-Chiu Chuang
>Priority: Trivial
> Labels: supportability
> Attachments: HDFS-9852.001.patch
>
>
> When I type
> hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx
> It prints error message:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: is missing
> Usage: hadoop fs [generic options] -setfacl [-R] [{-b|-k} {-m|-x }
> ]|[--set ]
> {noformat}
> But actually, it's the path that I missed. A correct command should be
> {noformat}
> hdfs dfs -setfacl -m default:user::rwx /data
> {noformat}
> \-setfacl \-m \-x \-\-set expects two parameters.
> We should print error message like this if it misses one:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing either or
> {noformat}
> and print the following if it misses two:
> {noformat}
> -setfacl: Missing arguments:
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
