Re: Gregorian date in Hebrew characters

2005-01-14 Thread Joan C Biella
Descriptive notes:

1) I can't think of a rule or RI that requires a note like the one
Heidi is proposing to justify the transcription of a date which is not
in any way problematic.  We seldom see Gregorian dates expressed in
Hebrew characters, which may make this one initially confusing, but not
ultimately so.

2) There is no reason to put such a date in brackets.  Brackets would
imply that the date is being supplied from some source other than the
title page, and it is not.

3) If the cataloger (Heidi) wants to call attention to the odd
formulation of the date, no particular form of words describing the
situation is required.

Joan 

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/12/2005 5:46:26 PM 
Dear Heidi and dear group,
...
It is my understanding, that you need a 500 note to justify the date
you are giving in the 260. Whether the Hebrew characters, used by the
printer to give the date of printing, lead to a date valid in the Hebrew
calendar or the Gregorian calendar is theoretically not relevant here,
IMHO. So, one point of view might be that you don't need to put a 500
note at all, just put your date in brackets.

Your question itself indicates that you want draw the attention of the
future user of your bib record that the civil calendar was used, and not
the Jewish one. It is not every day that a Hebrew book, dated 1617, uses
the Gregorian calendar. So, I would agree that you should draw the
attention of the reader. I would construct my note as following:

The date of publication given in Hebrew characters [on t.p. _ if
relevant_ ] is for the Gregorian calendar.

 Requesting again your indulgence,

- r.

Sources consulted: lccn 90209190, 90208626, 84129293
Dictionary for the term chronogram

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
Roger Kohn
Cataloger, Hebraica Team
Library of Congress
LS/CAT/RCCD/HB (4384) 
LM 537
Washington, D.C. 20540-4384
(202) 707-3997
Opinions expressed are those of the author, and are not official
statements by the Library of Congress.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 




 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/01/2005 15:11:17 
Dear Group,
I would like some help constructing a note.
I have the Gregorian date 1617 in Hebrew characters 
alef,tav,resh,yud,Zayin.
Would I say something like title page for Ketuvim has date of
printing

1617 in Hebrew characters.?
Thanks, Heidi


Heidi G. Lerner
Hebraica/Judaica Cataloger
Catalog Dept.
Stanford Univ. Libraries
Stanford, CA 94305-6004
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
ph: 650-725-9953
fax:650-725-1120 




Re: Gregorian date in Hebrew characters

2005-01-12 Thread Benjamin S Fryser
This is probably not a very elegant solution but consider taking
various letter combinations such as:  tav-tav-tav-tav -yod-zayin or
tav-tav-shin-shin-resh-yod-zayin or any creative alphabet  combination
that would total to 1617 to formulate a   catchy phrase.   Your
imagination and time is your limit ... 


  Benjamin  Fryser
  Senior Cataloger Specialist
  Library of Congress
  Regional  Cooperative Cataloging
  Washington, D.C.  20540
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/01/2005 15:11:17 
Dear Group,
I would like some help constructing a note.
I have the Gregorian date 1617 in Hebrew characters 
alef,tav,resh,yud,Zayin.
Would I say something like title page for Ketuvim has date of printing

1617 in Hebrew characters.?
Thanks, Heidi


Heidi G. Lerner
Hebraica/Judaica Cataloger
Catalog Dept.
Stanford Univ. Libraries
Stanford, CA 94305-6004
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
ph: 650-725-9953
fax:650-725-1120 



Gregorian date in Hebrew characters

2005-01-12 Thread Roger Kohn

*-

Dear Heidi and dear group,

I am not a descriptive cataloger, so I request your indulgence. My disclaimer, 
opinions expressed are those of the author, and are not official statements by 
the Library of Congress, is fully valid here.

It is my understanding, that you need a 500 note to justify the date you are 
giving in the 260. Whether the Hebrew characters, used by the printer to give 
the date of printing, lead to a date valid in the Hebrew calendar or the 
Gregorian calendar is theoretically not relevant here, IMHO. So, one point of 
view might be that you don't need to put a 500 note at all, just put your date 
in brackets.

Your question itself indicates that you want draw the attention of the future 
user of your bib record that the civil calendar was used, and not the Jewish 
one. It is not every day that a Hebrew book, dated 1617, uses the Gregorian 
calendar. So, I would agree that you should draw the attention of the reader. I 
would construct my note as following:

The date of publication given in Hebrew characters [on t.p. _ if relevant_ 
] is for the Gregorian calendar.

 Requesting again your indulgence,

- r.

Sources consulted: lccn 90209190, 90208626, 84129293
Dictionary for the term chronogram

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
Roger Kohn
Cataloger, Hebraica Team
Library of Congress
LS/CAT/RCCD/HB (4384) 
LM 537
Washington, D.C. 20540-4384
(202) 707-3997
Opinions expressed are those of the author, and are not official statements by 
the Library of Congress.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 




 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/01/2005 15:11:17 
Dear Group,
I would like some help constructing a note.
I have the Gregorian date 1617 in Hebrew characters 
alef,tav,resh,yud,Zayin.
Would I say something like title page for Ketuvim has date of printing

1617 in Hebrew characters.?
Thanks, Heidi


Heidi G. Lerner
Hebraica/Judaica Cataloger
Catalog Dept.
Stanford Univ. Libraries
Stanford, CA 94305-6004
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
ph: 650-725-9953
fax:650-725-1120