Re: [Help-glpk] KPI simple function

2009-10-24 Thread Simone Atzeni

Hi Xypron,

I'm sorry for disturbing you again.

Following your suggestion, I created this model:

var Z1;
var Z2;
var U;

maximize obj : 0.18 * Z1 + 0.82 * Z2;
#maximize obj : 0.5 * Z1 + 0.5 * Z2;

s.t. c1 : 20 * Z1 + 110 * U = 83; # (0.3,0.7)-(0.85,0.6)
s.t. c2 : 28 * Z1 - 8 * U = 19; # (0.85,0.6)-(0.75,0.25)
s.t. c3 : 4 * Z1 + 40 * U = 13; # (0.75,0.25)-(0.25,0.3)
s.t. c4 : 80 * Z1 - 10 * U = 17; # (0.25,0.3)-(0.3,0.7)

s.t. c5 : 40 * Z2 - 5 * U = 9; # (0.25,0.2)-(0.3,0.6)
s.t. c6 : 30 * Z2 - 110 * U = - 57; # (0.3,0.6)-(0.85,0.75)
s.t. c7 : 80 * Z2 - 20 * U = 53; # (0.85,0.75)-(0.75,0.35)
s.t. c8 : 12 * Z2 - 40 * U = -5; # (0.75,0.35)-(0.25,0.2)

solve;
printf U =%6.3f, Z1 = %6.3f, Z2 = %6.3f\n, U, Z1, Z2;
end;

When I try to solve this problem I get the same solution whatever is  
the objective function,
but I need that when I change the objective function the result is  
different.

The real problem is this:

U is an action and Z1 and Z2 are two KPIs that depend on U. I'm  
looking for just a model to represent this in a simple way to finish  
my project. Sadly, I don't have the real KPI.


Thanks
Simone


On 23/ott/09, at 19:31, xypron wrote:



Hello Simone,

There was a typo
s.t. c4 : y =0; # (3,0)-(0,0)

Best regards

Xypron


xypron wrote:


Hello Simone,

if the solution of a linear program is unique, it will always be in a
vertex of the
convex polyeder described by the constraints.

The objective function gives the optimization direction and hence  
decides

which
vertex of the polygon is the solution.

For a two dimensional problem lets think of an polygon given by the
following vertices:
(0,0) (1,1) (2,1) (3,0)
This corresponds to the following inequalities:
s.t. c1 : x - y = 0; # (0,0)-(1,1)
s.t. c2 : y = 1; # (1,1)-(2,1)
s.t. c3 : x + y = 3; # (2,1)-(3,0)
s.t. c4 : x =0; # (3,0)-(0,0)

If our optimization direction is (1,1) the objective is
maximize obj : x + y;
The solution is vertex (2,1)

If our optimization direction is (-1,1) the objective is
maximize obj: -x + y;
The solution is vertex (1,1);

The complete model is:

var x;
var y;

# uncomment the appropriate objective
#maximize obj :  x + y; # direction (1,1);
maximize obj : -x + y; # direction (-1,1);

s.t. c1 : x - y = 0; # (0,0)-(1,1)
s.t. c2 : y = 1; # (1,1)-(2,1)
s.t. c3 : x + y = 3; # (2,1)-(3,0)
s.t. c4 : x =0; # (3,0)-(0,0)
solve;
printf x = %6.3f, y = %6.3f\n, x, y;
end;

Best regards

Xypron


Simone Atzeni wrote:


Hi all,

I'm looking for two functions that could represent simple KPIs.

In other world, I would like two MILP, in this way:

MILP 1:

MAX J = 0.5 * Z1 + 0.5 * Z2

Z1 = -AX + C
Z2 = BX + D

and

MILP 2:

MAX J = 0.32 * Z1 + 0.68 * Z2

Z1 = -AX + C
Z2 = BX + D

Z1 and Z2 are the values of the KPI and they depend on X. The
constraints should be equal but the results (the values of Z1 and  
Z2)

should be different changing the coefficients fo the objective
function, in this case (0.5 - 0.5) for the MILP1 and (0.32 - 0.68)  
for

the MILP 2.

I can't find a good function. I need just functions where Z1 and Z2
depend on X but changing the coefficients in the objective functions
change the values of Z1, Z2 and X.

MILPs I'm using are the follow:

MAX J = 0.5 Z.1 + 0.5 Z.2

Z.1 = 5X (0.196116135138184 Z.1 - 0.98058067569092 U.1 = 0) (the
equations have been normalized)
Z.2 = -3X + 4 (0.196116135138184 Z.2 + 0.115384615384615 U.1 =
0.153846153846154)

and

MAX J = 0.32 Z.1 + 0.68 Z.2

Z.1 = 5X
Z.2 = -3X + 4

This is the picture of the two functions:



Both MILPs have the same solution.

Z.1 = 1
Z.2 = 0.666795
X = 0.2

In this case the weights, (0.5 - 0.5) for the MILP1 and (0.32 -  
0.68)

for the MILP 2, don't influence the results of the MILP. I want
something in a way that the weights influence the results, so that  
the

two MILPs have different result but they should being equal.

Can someone help me?

Thanks
Simone


___
Help-glpk mailing list
Help-glpk@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk







--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/KPI-simple-function-tp26025826p26030427.html
Sent from the Gnu - GLPK - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



___
Help-glpk mailing list
Help-glpk@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk




___
Help-glpk mailing list
Help-glpk@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk


[Help-glpk] KPI simple function

2009-10-23 Thread Simone Atzeni
Hi all,I'm looking for two functions that could represent simple KPIs.In other world, I would like two MILP, in this way:MILP 1:MAX J = 0.5 * Z1 + 0.5 * Z2Z1 = -AX + CZ2 = BX + DandMILP 2:MAX J = 0.32 * Z1 + 0.68 * Z2Z1 = -AX + CZ2 = BX + DZ1 and Z2 are the values of the KPI and they depend on X. The constraints should be equal but the results (the values of Z1 and Z2) should be different changing the coefficients fo the objective function, in this case (0.5 - 0.5) for the MILP1 and (0.32 - 0.68) for the MILP 2.I can't find a good function. I need just functions where Z1 and Z2 depend on X but changing the coefficients in the objective functions change the values of Z1, Z2 and X.MILPs I'm using are the follow:MAX J = 0.5 Z.1 + 0.5 Z.2Z.1 = 5X (0.196116135138184 Z.1 - 0.98058067569092 U.1 = 0) (the equations have been normalized)Z.2 = -3X + 4 (0.196116135138184 Z.2 + 0.115384615384615 U.1 = 0.153846153846154)andMAX J = 0.32 Z.1 + 0.68 Z.2Z.1 = 5XZ.2 = -3X + 4This is the picture of the two functions:Both MILPs have the same solution.Z.1 = 1Z.2 =0.666795X = 0.2In this casethe weights,(0.5 - 0.5) for the MILP1 and (0.32 - 0.68) for the MILP 2, don't influence the results of the MILP. I want something in a way that the weights influence the results, so that the two MILPs have different result but they should being equal.Can someone help me?ThanksSimone___
Help-glpk mailing list
Help-glpk@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk


Re: [Help-glpk] KPI simple function

2009-10-23 Thread xypron

Hello Simone,

if the solution of a linear program is unique, it will always be in a vertex
of the 
convex polyeder described by the constraints.

The objective function gives the optimization direction and hence decides
which
vertex of the polygon is the solution.

For a two dimensional problem lets think of an polygon given by the
following vertices:
(0,0) (1,1) (2,1) (3,0)
This corresponds to the following inequalities:
s.t. c1 : x - y = 0; # (0,0)-(1,1)
s.t. c2 : y = 1; # (1,1)-(2,1)
s.t. c3 : x + y = 3; # (2,1)-(3,0)
s.t. c4 : x =0; # (3,0)-(0,0)

If our optimization direction is (1,1) the objective is
maximize obj : x + y;
The solution is vertex (2,1)

If our optimization direction is (-1,1) the objective is
maximize obj: -x + y;
The solution is vertex (1,1);

The complete model is:

var x;
var y;

# uncomment the appropriate objective
#maximize obj :  x + y; # direction (1,1);
maximize obj : -x + y; # direction (-1,1);

s.t. c1 : x - y = 0; # (0,0)-(1,1)
s.t. c2 : y = 1; # (1,1)-(2,1)
s.t. c3 : x + y = 3; # (2,1)-(3,0)
s.t. c4 : x =0; # (3,0)-(0,0)
solve;
printf x = %6.3f, y = %6.3f\n, x, y;
end;

Best regards

Xypron


Simone Atzeni wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I'm looking for two functions that could represent simple KPIs.
 
 In other world, I would like two MILP, in this way:
 
 MILP 1:
 
 MAX J = 0.5 * Z1 + 0.5 * Z2
 
 Z1 = -AX + C
 Z2 = BX + D
 
 and
 
 MILP 2:
 
 MAX J = 0.32 * Z1 + 0.68 * Z2
 
 Z1 = -AX + C
 Z2 = BX + D
 
 Z1 and Z2 are the values of the KPI and they depend on X. The  
 constraints should be equal but the results (the values of Z1 and Z2)  
 should be different changing the coefficients fo the objective  
 function, in this case (0.5 - 0.5) for the MILP1 and (0.32 - 0.68) for  
 the MILP 2.
 
 I can't find a good function. I need just functions where Z1 and Z2  
 depend on X but changing the coefficients in the objective functions  
 change the values of Z1, Z2 and X.
 
 MILPs I'm using are the follow:
 
 MAX J = 0.5 Z.1 + 0.5 Z.2
 
 Z.1 = 5X (0.196116135138184 Z.1 - 0.98058067569092 U.1 = 0) (the  
 equations have been normalized)
 Z.2 = -3X + 4 (0.196116135138184 Z.2 + 0.115384615384615 U.1 =  
 0.153846153846154)
 
 and
 
 MAX J = 0.32 Z.1 + 0.68 Z.2
 
 Z.1 = 5X
 Z.2 = -3X + 4
 
 This is the picture of the two functions:
 
 
 
 Both MILPs have the same solution.
 
 Z.1 = 1
 Z.2 = 0.666795
 X = 0.2
 
 In this case the weights, (0.5 - 0.5) for the MILP1 and (0.32 - 0.68)  
 for the MILP 2, don't influence the results of the MILP. I want  
 something in a way that the weights influence the results, so that the  
 two MILPs have different result but they should being equal.
 
 Can someone help me?
 
 Thanks
 Simone
 
 
 ___
 Help-glpk mailing list
 Help-glpk@gnu.org
 http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/KPI-simple-function-tp26025826p26030380.html
Sent from the Gnu - GLPK - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



___
Help-glpk mailing list
Help-glpk@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk