Re: correct 'guix system reconfigure config.scm' files
Quiliro Ordonez Baca writes: >>> Please criticize the sintax where >>> appropriate. Thank you. >> I think guile can critisize syntax errors, too. >> try `guix system build config.scm` > > So, this is the way to test if it is correct? That is one way to test if there are problems. If "guix system build" fails, then it is not correct. If it succeeds, then it might be correct. It is possible to successfully build an operating system declaration that is syntactically correct but semantically incorrect. For example, if your operating system configuration file defines a user named "bob" when the user should actually have been "alice", Guix will not complain even though it is not what you intended. -- Chris signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: correct 'guix system reconfigure config.scm' files
Martin Castillo writes: > Hi, Hi. Thank you for your reply. > On 11.01.2018 01:33, Quiliro Ordonez Baca wrote: >> >> I have 3 different config files: >> pastebin.com/tmLvPAYG >> pastebin.com/jmYHb6us >> pastebin.com/aGHcY3Ey >> I do not remember which one was good. > good in what sense? In that it is correctly constructed. >> Please criticize the sintax where >> appropriate. Thank you. > I think guile can critisize syntax errors, too. > try `guix system build config.scm` So, this is the way to test if it is correct? Quiliro
Re: correct 'guix system reconfigure config.scm' files
Hi, On 11.01.2018 01:33, Quiliro Ordonez Baca wrote: > > I have 3 different config files: > pastebin.com/tmLvPAYG > pastebin.com/jmYHb6us > pastebin.com/aGHcY3Ey > I do not remember which one was good. good in what sense? > Please criticize the sintax where > appropriate. Thank you. I think guile can critisize syntax errors, too. try `guix system build config.scm` Martin -- GPG: 7FDE 7190 2F73 2C50 236E 403D CC13 48F1 E644 08EC
correct 'guix system reconfigure config.scm' files
I have 3 different config files: pastebin.com/tmLvPAYG pastebin.com/jmYHb6us pastebin.com/aGHcY3Ey I do not remember which one was good. Please criticize the sintax where appropriate. Thank you.