[hibernate-dev] JmxService

[Steve Ebersole]

Anyone using the JmxService?
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

[hibernate-dev] Third candidate release for ORM 5.0

[Steve Ebersole]

http://in.relation.to/2015/07/30/hibernate-orm-500-cr3-release/
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Re: [hibernate-dev] started release

[Scott Marlow]

On 07/30/2015 09:36 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
> On 07/30/2015 03:27 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/30/2015 02:34 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
>>> I think that the failure is caused by HHH-7898 fix. The put is executed
>>> only after the current transaction is finished (as synchronization),
>>> until then the query is cached only for the current session and
>>> therefore not reflected in statistics.
>>
>> Aren't the statistics at the SF level?
>
> Hmm, you're right. Could you send me a trace log for this test to check
> what's happening, rather than guess?

Easily done.  I'll enable TRACE logging for org.hibernate + 
org.infinispan unless you want a little less?

I'll also include org.jboss.as.jpa TRACE logging so we have logging of 
each EntityManager invocation.  May as well include JTA trace also, so 
we know when the TX starts/ends.


>
> Radim
>
>>
>>>
>>> Radim
>>>
>>> On 07/29/2015 09:02 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:
 I missed a WildFly second level query cache failure yesterday in my
 testing http://pastebin.com/kg3YhxxL

 Test steps:

 - creates an entity

 - queries for the entity

 - verify that the query cache hit count is zero.

 - query again for the entity

 - verify that the query cache hit count is one (this fails as the
 query cache hit count is still zero)

 The failing test code is at
 https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/testsuite/integration/basic/src/test/java/org/jboss/as/test/integration/jpa/secondlevelcache/SFSB2LC.java#L255


 And is called from
 https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/testsuite/integration/basic/src/test/java/org/jboss/as/test/integration/jpa/secondlevelcache/JPA2LCTestCase.java#L229


 This hurts my WF10 upgrade to ORM 5.0.0.CR3
 https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/7842

 On 07/29/2015 11:37 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> The release is done minus announcing and SF upload.  Also I decided
> to not
> upload the docs yet since they are still incomplete and i still
> have work
> to do there prior to Final.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:06 AM Steve Ebersole
>  wrote:
>
>> per $subject
>>
> ___
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
 ___
 hibernate-dev mailing list
 hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>
>>>
>
>
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Re: [hibernate-dev] started release

[Radim Vansa]

On 07/30/2015 03:27 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:
>
>
> On 07/30/2015 02:34 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
>> I think that the failure is caused by HHH-7898 fix. The put is executed
>> only after the current transaction is finished (as synchronization),
>> until then the query is cached only for the current session and
>> therefore not reflected in statistics.
>
> Aren't the statistics at the SF level?

Hmm, you're right. Could you send me a trace log for this test to check 
what's happening, rather than guess?

Radim

>
>>
>> Radim
>>
>> On 07/29/2015 09:02 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:
>>> I missed a WildFly second level query cache failure yesterday in my
>>> testing http://pastebin.com/kg3YhxxL
>>>
>>> Test steps:
>>>
>>> - creates an entity
>>>
>>> - queries for the entity
>>>
>>> - verify that the query cache hit count is zero.
>>>
>>> - query again for the entity
>>>
>>> - verify that the query cache hit count is one (this fails as the
>>> query cache hit count is still zero)
>>>
>>> The failing test code is at
>>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/testsuite/integration/basic/src/test/java/org/jboss/as/test/integration/jpa/secondlevelcache/SFSB2LC.java#L255
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> And is called from
>>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/testsuite/integration/basic/src/test/java/org/jboss/as/test/integration/jpa/secondlevelcache/JPA2LCTestCase.java#L229
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> This hurts my WF10 upgrade to ORM 5.0.0.CR3
>>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/7842
>>>
>>> On 07/29/2015 11:37 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
 The release is done minus announcing and SF upload.  Also I decided 
 to not
 upload the docs yet since they are still incomplete and i still 
 have work
 to do there prior to Final.


 On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:06 AM Steve Ebersole 
  wrote:

> per $subject
>
 ___
 hibernate-dev mailing list
 hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

>>> ___
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>
>>


-- 
Radim Vansa 
JBoss Performance Team

___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Re: [hibernate-dev] started release

[Scott Marlow]

On 07/30/2015 02:34 AM, Radim Vansa wrote:
> I think that the failure is caused by HHH-7898 fix. The put is executed
> only after the current transaction is finished (as synchronization),
> until then the query is cached only for the current session and
> therefore not reflected in statistics.

Aren't the statistics at the SF level?

>
> Radim
>
> On 07/29/2015 09:02 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:
>> I missed a WildFly second level query cache failure yesterday in my
>> testing http://pastebin.com/kg3YhxxL
>>
>> Test steps:
>>
>> - creates an entity
>>
>> - queries for the entity
>>
>> - verify that the query cache hit count is zero.
>>
>> - query again for the entity
>>
>> - verify that the query cache hit count is one (this fails as the
>> query cache hit count is still zero)
>>
>> The failing test code is at
>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/testsuite/integration/basic/src/test/java/org/jboss/as/test/integration/jpa/secondlevelcache/SFSB2LC.java#L255
>>
>> And is called from
>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/blob/master/testsuite/integration/basic/src/test/java/org/jboss/as/test/integration/jpa/secondlevelcache/JPA2LCTestCase.java#L229
>>
>> This hurts my WF10 upgrade to ORM 5.0.0.CR3
>> https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/7842
>>
>> On 07/29/2015 11:37 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>>> The release is done minus announcing and SF upload.  Also I decided to not
>>> upload the docs yet since they are still incomplete and i still have work
>>> to do there prior to Final.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:06 AM Steve Ebersole  wrote:
>>>
 per $subject

>>> ___
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>
>> ___
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
>
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

[hibernate-dev] Hibernate Validator 5.2.1.Final released

[Hardy Ferentschik]

Hi,

Hibernate Validator 5.2.1.Final was just released. Most important
new feature is Java 8 support, but there is more - 
http://in.relation.to/2015/07/30/hibernate-validator-521-final/

All artifacts are available in the Maven repositories (JBoss and Maven 
Central), but distribution
bundle upload is still pending while SourceForge struggles to recover from its 
storage fault.

Enjoy!

___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Re: [hibernate-dev] Hosting of binaries

[Emmanuel Bernard]

For info, SourceForge hopes to restore ssh access (the last service they will 
activate) August 3rd.
http://sourceforge.net/blog/sourceforge-infrastructure-and-service-restoration-update-for-728/

> On 28 Jul 2015, at 10:27, Gunnar Morling  wrote:
> 
> Your proposed order seems good. I'd exclude GitHub if it's not scriptable (UI 
> only) as this will hinder releases from the CI server.
> 
> 2015-07-28 9:39 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bernard  >:
> As some of you know Sourceforge has had a severe distributed file system 
> corruption and they have been working on it for a full week. You can read 
> their blog for regular updates http://sourceforge.net/blog/ 
> 
> The concrete issue for us is that we cannot upload new files: Hibernate 
> Validator and Hibernate ORM are now pending a release.
> 
> There are 4 options on the table
> 
> Be patient::
> SourceForge will eventually reopen upload, I imagine it might take form one 
> to two weeks.
> Their binary hosting support is relatively correct and all of our download 
> statistics are there.
> 
> Move to download.jboss.org ::
> JBoss has a facility to host binaries. WildFly amongst other uses it. We can 
> ask them if they are happy with it.
> It is not connected to the rest of the forum/CMS infra, it’s a simple file 
> upload AFAIK so easily scriptable.
> They also offer statistics but how needs to be investigated.
> 
> Move to GitHub::
> GitHub has a binary upload facility. I could only find a web based approach 
> (can it be done programmatically?).
> They don’t seem to have any statistics service, which is a big negative point.
> Also I don’t trust GitHub anymore for their binary hosting. They had a 
> version in the past that they scrapped with barely no notice. I’m not exactly 
> willing to give them my trust again.
> 
> Move to BinTray::
> Binary hosting is their life and blood. People seem happy with them. It seems 
> however that the statistics require a paying package instead of the free oss 
> tier.
> 
> I think we should try in the following order:
> 
> 1. Be patient with Sourceforge (but for how long?)
> 2. go for download.jboss.org  and before that ask 
> around for the process and stability of the infrastructure
> 3. explore Bintray
> 4. GitHub (did I say that I no longer trust their binary hosting support?)
> ___
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org 
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev 
> 

___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM Documentation

[Emmanuel Bernard]

I think topical guides never got traction because the work on doc was down to 
zero. I would not give up hope on them :)

> On 28 Jul 2015, at 19:51, Steve Ebersole  wrote:
> 
> So tentatively I have the following docs:
> 
> 1) "User Manual" - mostly done
> 2) "Domain Model Mapping Guide" - work in progress, but progressing nicely.
> 3) "Integrations Guide" - atm this will be just the devguide with the
> Service+Registry chapter; but I'd like to circle back and pick up other
> topics later.
> 
> This leaves some open points of discussion.  From the proposal itself:
> 
> 1) What do we cover in "batching"?
> 2) "additionalmodules"?  I am inclined to simply drop that one, so unless I
> here differently that is what will happen.
> 
> Emmanuel replied (on irc maybe?  I forget where) that he thought topics
> such as "Performance Monitoring" and "Best Practices" ought to be separate
> documents.
> 
> He also suggested a chapter on bootstrapping.  I totally agree.  I
> essentially copied the topical guides on bootstrapping as a chapter in the
> User Guide.  But that brings up an interesting point as to the distinction
> between topical guides and documentation.  When should something go where?
> I almost like to look at the topical guides as a wiki.  I don't think
> anyone is thrilled with the SBS "wiki" we have access to.  I look at this
> as an asciidoctor-based alternative.  Of course between SBS, GitHub wiki,
> topical guides... gets to be a lot of places to look.  Initially the idea
> of the topical guides was to break down the massive documentation into more
> easily digestible chunks.  But that never gained traction.  Should they
> just go away?
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 5:10 PM Steve Ebersole  wrote:
> 
>> Sanne, yep thats why I sent the second email with a link ;)
>> 
>> Anyway..  I just pushed some initial work on the manual.  Its not complete
>> yet.  And I still need to start on the mapping guide.  Let me know any
>> thoughts y'all have.
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 2:31 PM Sanne Grinovero 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I didn't receive an attachment. AFAIK the mailing list drops them?
>>> On 27 Jul 2015 14:39, "Steve Ebersole"  wrote:
>>> 
 I have been putting a lot of TLC into the ORM documentation this weekend
 getting ready for 5.0 to go Final.  To that end I have put together a
 proposal for these changes, it is attached.  I'd like to get some
 feedback.  Thanks
 
 ___
 hibernate-dev mailing list
 hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
 https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
 
>>> 
> ___
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev


___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev