subject:"\[hibernate\-dev\] ci.hibernate.org \: announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts"

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

2018-01-17 Thread Sanne Grinovero

On 17 January 2018 at 08:34, Yoann Rodiere  wrote:
> Thanks for trying :) We might try to improve the Maven plugins in question,
> but as you said we already spent quite some time on infrastructure...
>
> That being said, if we are ever to follow-up on this caching idea, Gunnar's
> idea of a local Nexus got me thinking... Was your change only about
> performance, or is it also about the bill? From what I understood we pay for
> outbound network traffic, so those recurring downloads might be a problem...

Right, my goal was to both improve performance and cost, but I was
mainly driven by concerns aout the Docker images.
Turned out this could not be applied for Docker as the documentation
was more explicit about such dangers but (I thought) I had a nice
Maven cache as side effect.

> To reduce the bill, what if we simply added a AWS node running a Nexus
> repository or a HTTP cache acting as proxy to the various Maven repositories
> we use?

That was my first idea as well, but after a quick look - I might be
wrong - it looked like a significant time investment.
Unfortunately while there are various "proxy as a service" options,
they are not meant for inbound traffic to your own cluster.
I have managed Nexus instances in the past and would not want to do it
again - also I doubt that it would be very effective either on the
bill or on the download speeds.. essentialy while it might help a tiny
bit it's not worth the effort.

Consider also that there's a mirror of Maven Central in our same data center.

> If we pay for outbound network traffic but not for network traffic between
> our own nodes, that would be a solution. Not sure if we would gain much in
> performance, since network speed would probably be similar, but that might
> reduce the bill (depending on the cost of this additional node, of course).

Bandwith on AWS is metered both inbout and outbound to external IPs.
Internal services are also metered, but in a different cost cathegory
(way cheaper). Finally, when our own nodes are provisioned by enabling
co-loction or cluster features then the communication among those in
the same group is free. It's not possible to "launch" any of the other
AWS provided services directly within your own cluster, so unless we
can reuse data from our direct peers one might as well hit the local
mirror of Central.

All in all, I was hoping to learn something at low risk to then apply
this to Docker images, that's higher priority so we can suspend the
work on Maven stuff. There's no free "Nexus service for Docker" -
maybe we should deploy OpenShift as I guess it contains such
functionality.

Thanks,
Sanne

>
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 at 23:24 Sanne Grinovero  wrote:
>>
>> Version F27v17 of the slaves is running now, with NFS drive removed.
>>
>> sorry for the experiment :)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sanne
>>
>> On 16 January 2018 at 21:51, Sanne Grinovero  wrote:
>> > On 16 January 2018 at 21:33, Steve Ebersole  wrote:
>> >> well Gradle is used in CI environments all over the place, so it must
>> >> work.
>> >> But I think we need some different configurations in the Gradle command
>> >> used.  For example, it is highly suggested that the Gradle daemon be
>> >> disabled in CI but I'm not sure all of our jobs actually do that.  I'll
>> >> look
>> >> into that...
>> >
>> > I wouldn't mind having the Gradle deamon always on, if it helps we
>> > could even pre-load it with some tuned configuration.
>> > The only drawback I see is to make it easy to upgrade Gradle version,
>> > in case one needs, without having to go through server configuration
>> > scripts.
>> >
>> > We need strict isolation about writes in the cache though; for now
>> > I'll disable it, not least for the concerns that Yoann and Gunnar
>> > pointed out, then we can experiment with cool ideas more carefully.
>> >
>> > Funny, one would expect to know by know about the perils of a
>> > distributed cache :)
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 3:30 PM Sanne Grinovero 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes I did it for Gradle too, sorry. The `/efs-maven-artifacts` is the
>> >>> guilty mount point.
>> >>>
>> >>> I don't know any quick solutions for the various concerns you all
>> >>> raised, so I'll roll this back tonight.
>> >>>
>> >>> It's good to know that it's not too hard to have a shared FS between
>> >>> these machines; needs better planning though.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Sanne
>> >>>
>> >>> On 16 January 2018 at 19:41, Steve Ebersole 
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> > Did you happen to do the same for Gradle caches?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Some jobs are failing:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > * What went wrong:
>> >>> > Could not resolve all dependencies for configuration
>> >>> > ':buildSrc:runtimeClasspath'.
>> >>> >> Timeout waiting to lock artifact cache
>> >>> >> (/efs-maven-artifacts/.gradle/caches/modules-2). It is currently in
>> >>> >> use
>> >>> >>

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

2018-01-17 Thread Yoann Rodiere

Thanks for trying :) We might try to improve the Maven plugins in question,
but as you said we already spent quite some time on infrastructure...

That being said, if we are ever to follow-up on this caching idea, Gunnar's
idea of a local Nexus got me thinking... Was your change only about
performance, or is it also about the bill? From what I understood we pay
for outbound network traffic, so those recurring downloads might be a
problem...
To reduce the bill, what if we simply added a AWS node running a Nexus
repository or a HTTP cache acting as proxy to the various Maven
repositories we use?
If we pay for outbound network traffic but not for network traffic between
our own nodes, that would be a solution. Not sure if we would gain much in
performance, since network speed would probably be similar, but that might
reduce the bill (depending on the cost of this additional node, of course).

On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 at 23:24 Sanne Grinovero  wrote:

> Version F27v17 of the slaves is running now, with NFS drive removed.
>
> sorry for the experiment :)
>
> Thanks
> Sanne
>
> On 16 January 2018 at 21:51, Sanne Grinovero  wrote:
> > On 16 January 2018 at 21:33, Steve Ebersole  wrote:
> >> well Gradle is used in CI environments all over the place, so it must
> work.
> >> But I think we need some different configurations in the Gradle command
> >> used.  For example, it is highly suggested that the Gradle daemon be
> >> disabled in CI but I'm not sure all of our jobs actually do that.  I'll
> look
> >> into that...
> >
> > I wouldn't mind having the Gradle deamon always on, if it helps we
> > could even pre-load it with some tuned configuration.
> > The only drawback I see is to make it easy to upgrade Gradle version,
> > in case one needs, without having to go through server configuration
> > scripts.
> >
> > We need strict isolation about writes in the cache though; for now
> > I'll disable it, not least for the concerns that Yoann and Gunnar
> > pointed out, then we can experiment with cool ideas more carefully.
> >
> > Funny, one would expect to know by know about the perils of a
> > distributed cache :)
> >
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 3:30 PM Sanne Grinovero 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yes I did it for Gradle too, sorry. The `/efs-maven-artifacts` is the
> >>> guilty mount point.
> >>>
> >>> I don't know any quick solutions for the various concerns you all
> >>> raised, so I'll roll this back tonight.
> >>>
> >>> It's good to know that it's not too hard to have a shared FS between
> >>> these machines; needs better planning though.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Sanne
> >>>
> >>> On 16 January 2018 at 19:41, Steve Ebersole 
> wrote:
> >>> > Did you happen to do the same for Gradle caches?
> >>> >
> >>> > Some jobs are failing:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > * What went wrong:
> >>> > Could not resolve all dependencies for configuration
> >>> > ':buildSrc:runtimeClasspath'.
> >>> >> Timeout waiting to lock artifact cache
> >>> >> (/efs-maven-artifacts/.gradle/caches/modules-2). It is currently in
> use
> >>> >> by
> >>> >> another Gradle instance.
> >>> >   Owner PID: 1423
> >>> >   Our PID: 10249
> >>> >   Owner Operation: resolve configuration ':classpath'
> >>> >   Our operation:
> >>> >   Lock file:
> >>> > /efs-maven-artifacts/.gradle/caches/modules-2/modules-2.lock
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:06 AM Yoann Rodiere 
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> > We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a
> bad
> >>> >> > habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
> >>> >> > "mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I could not agree more, that would be cleaner, but that's not
> possible.
> >>> >> And
> >>> >> believe me, I tried hard. Last time I checked, some of the plugins
> we
> >>> >> use
> >>> >> with dynamic dependency resolution would ignore the artifacts being
> >>> >> built,
> >>> >> and would always fetch the artifacts from the Maven repos (for
> >>> >> SNAPSHOTs,
> >>> >> they would end up using nightlies).
> >>> >> I'm not talking about when we use standard maven markup to declare
> >>> >> dependencies, but when the plugin itself has to fetch dependencies
> >>> >> "dynamically", which happens when we setup a WildFly server with our
> >>> >> own
> >>> >> modules in particular. See maven-dependency-plugin's "artifactItems"
> >>> >> configuration.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 at 11:29 Sanne Grinovero 
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> > On 15 January 2018 at 08:42, Yoann Rodiere 
> >>> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> > > Thanks Sanne !
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > I have one question...
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > >> Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as
> cache
> >>> >> > >> and
> >>> >> > >> we reserve the right to wipe it

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

2018-01-16 Thread Sanne Grinovero

Version F27v17 of the slaves is running now, with NFS drive removed.

sorry for the experiment :)

Thanks
Sanne

On 16 January 2018 at 21:51, Sanne Grinovero  wrote:
> On 16 January 2018 at 21:33, Steve Ebersole  wrote:
>> well Gradle is used in CI environments all over the place, so it must work.
>> But I think we need some different configurations in the Gradle command
>> used.  For example, it is highly suggested that the Gradle daemon be
>> disabled in CI but I'm not sure all of our jobs actually do that.  I'll look
>> into that...
>
> I wouldn't mind having the Gradle deamon always on, if it helps we
> could even pre-load it with some tuned configuration.
> The only drawback I see is to make it easy to upgrade Gradle version,
> in case one needs, without having to go through server configuration
> scripts.
>
> We need strict isolation about writes in the cache though; for now
> I'll disable it, not least for the concerns that Yoann and Gunnar
> pointed out, then we can experiment with cool ideas more carefully.
>
> Funny, one would expect to know by know about the perils of a
> distributed cache :)
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 3:30 PM Sanne Grinovero  wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes I did it for Gradle too, sorry. The `/efs-maven-artifacts` is the
>>> guilty mount point.
>>>
>>> I don't know any quick solutions for the various concerns you all
>>> raised, so I'll roll this back tonight.
>>>
>>> It's good to know that it's not too hard to have a shared FS between
>>> these machines; needs better planning though.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sanne
>>>
>>> On 16 January 2018 at 19:41, Steve Ebersole  wrote:
>>> > Did you happen to do the same for Gradle caches?
>>> >
>>> > Some jobs are failing:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > * What went wrong:
>>> > Could not resolve all dependencies for configuration
>>> > ':buildSrc:runtimeClasspath'.
>>> >> Timeout waiting to lock artifact cache
>>> >> (/efs-maven-artifacts/.gradle/caches/modules-2). It is currently in use
>>> >> by
>>> >> another Gradle instance.
>>> >   Owner PID: 1423
>>> >   Our PID: 10249
>>> >   Owner Operation: resolve configuration ':classpath'
>>> >   Our operation:
>>> >   Lock file:
>>> > /efs-maven-artifacts/.gradle/caches/modules-2/modules-2.lock
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:06 AM Yoann Rodiere 
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a bad
>>> >> > habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
>>> >> > "mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.
>>> >>
>>> >> I could not agree more, that would be cleaner, but that's not possible.
>>> >> And
>>> >> believe me, I tried hard. Last time I checked, some of the plugins we
>>> >> use
>>> >> with dynamic dependency resolution would ignore the artifacts being
>>> >> built,
>>> >> and would always fetch the artifacts from the Maven repos (for
>>> >> SNAPSHOTs,
>>> >> they would end up using nightlies).
>>> >> I'm not talking about when we use standard maven markup to declare
>>> >> dependencies, but when the plugin itself has to fetch dependencies
>>> >> "dynamically", which happens when we setup a WildFly server with our
>>> >> own
>>> >> modules in particular. See maven-dependency-plugin's "artifactItems"
>>> >> configuration.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 at 11:29 Sanne Grinovero 
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > On 15 January 2018 at 08:42, Yoann Rodiere 
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> > > Thanks Sanne !
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > I have one question...
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > >> Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as cache
>>> >> > >> and
>>> >> > >> we reserve the right to wipe it all out at any time.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > I gather you say that so that we don't try to "release" artifacts
>>> >> > > into
>>> >> > this
>>> >> > > cache? But temporary storage for the duration of one build will
>>> >> > > still
>>> >> > > be
>>> >> > > safe?
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Because our builds obviously rely on the local repository for
>>> >> > > short-term
>>> >> > > storage (for the duration of the build). For example the
>>> >> > > dependencies
>>> >> > > are
>>> >> > > only checked and downloaded if necessary at the beginning of the
>>> >> > > build,
>>> >> > and
>>> >> > > then are expected to exist in the local repository until the build
>>> >> > > stops.
>>> >> > > Another example: our WildFly modules are first built and installed
>>> >> > > in
>>> >> > > the
>>> >> > > "modules" subproject, and later "fetched" from the local repository
>>> >> > > in
>>> >> > the
>>> >> > > "integrationtest/wildfly" subproject.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > If we were to clear the cache during a build, things would probably
>>> >> > > go
>>> >> > > wrong. Worse, if two parallel builds were to install the same
>>> >> > > artifacts
>>> >> > > (e.g. hibernate-search-engine version

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

2018-01-16 Thread Sanne Grinovero

On 16 January 2018 at 21:33, Steve Ebersole  wrote:
> well Gradle is used in CI environments all over the place, so it must work.
> But I think we need some different configurations in the Gradle command
> used.  For example, it is highly suggested that the Gradle daemon be
> disabled in CI but I'm not sure all of our jobs actually do that.  I'll look
> into that...

I wouldn't mind having the Gradle deamon always on, if it helps we
could even pre-load it with some tuned configuration.
The only drawback I see is to make it easy to upgrade Gradle version,
in case one needs, without having to go through server configuration
scripts.

We need strict isolation about writes in the cache though; for now
I'll disable it, not least for the concerns that Yoann and Gunnar
pointed out, then we can experiment with cool ideas more carefully.

Funny, one would expect to know by know about the perils of a
distributed cache :)


>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 3:30 PM Sanne Grinovero  wrote:
>>
>> Yes I did it for Gradle too, sorry. The `/efs-maven-artifacts` is the
>> guilty mount point.
>>
>> I don't know any quick solutions for the various concerns you all
>> raised, so I'll roll this back tonight.
>>
>> It's good to know that it's not too hard to have a shared FS between
>> these machines; needs better planning though.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sanne
>>
>> On 16 January 2018 at 19:41, Steve Ebersole  wrote:
>> > Did you happen to do the same for Gradle caches?
>> >
>> > Some jobs are failing:
>> >
>> >
>> > * What went wrong:
>> > Could not resolve all dependencies for configuration
>> > ':buildSrc:runtimeClasspath'.
>> >> Timeout waiting to lock artifact cache
>> >> (/efs-maven-artifacts/.gradle/caches/modules-2). It is currently in use
>> >> by
>> >> another Gradle instance.
>> >   Owner PID: 1423
>> >   Our PID: 10249
>> >   Owner Operation: resolve configuration ':classpath'
>> >   Our operation:
>> >   Lock file:
>> > /efs-maven-artifacts/.gradle/caches/modules-2/modules-2.lock
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:06 AM Yoann Rodiere 
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a bad
>> >> > habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
>> >> > "mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.
>> >>
>> >> I could not agree more, that would be cleaner, but that's not possible.
>> >> And
>> >> believe me, I tried hard. Last time I checked, some of the plugins we
>> >> use
>> >> with dynamic dependency resolution would ignore the artifacts being
>> >> built,
>> >> and would always fetch the artifacts from the Maven repos (for
>> >> SNAPSHOTs,
>> >> they would end up using nightlies).
>> >> I'm not talking about when we use standard maven markup to declare
>> >> dependencies, but when the plugin itself has to fetch dependencies
>> >> "dynamically", which happens when we setup a WildFly server with our
>> >> own
>> >> modules in particular. See maven-dependency-plugin's "artifactItems"
>> >> configuration.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 at 11:29 Sanne Grinovero 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On 15 January 2018 at 08:42, Yoann Rodiere 
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > > Thanks Sanne !
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I have one question...
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as cache
>> >> > >> and
>> >> > >> we reserve the right to wipe it all out at any time.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I gather you say that so that we don't try to "release" artifacts
>> >> > > into
>> >> > this
>> >> > > cache? But temporary storage for the duration of one build will
>> >> > > still
>> >> > > be
>> >> > > safe?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Because our builds obviously rely on the local repository for
>> >> > > short-term
>> >> > > storage (for the duration of the build). For example the
>> >> > > dependencies
>> >> > > are
>> >> > > only checked and downloaded if necessary at the beginning of the
>> >> > > build,
>> >> > and
>> >> > > then are expected to exist in the local repository until the build
>> >> > > stops.
>> >> > > Another example: our WildFly modules are first built and installed
>> >> > > in
>> >> > > the
>> >> > > "modules" subproject, and later "fetched" from the local repository
>> >> > > in
>> >> > the
>> >> > > "integrationtest/wildfly" subproject.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > If we were to clear the cache during a build, things would probably
>> >> > > go
>> >> > > wrong. Worse, if two parallel builds were to install the same
>> >> > > artifacts
>> >> > > (e.g. hibernate-search-engine version 5.9.0-SNAPSHOT), we would run
>> >> > > the
>> >> > risk
>> >> > > of testing the wrong "version" of this artifact in one of the
>> >> > > builds...
>> >> >
>> >> > SNAPSHOT being installed are indeed a problem, e.g the PR testing
>> >> > jobs
>> >> > could conflict with the regular master jobs.
>> >> > We should reconfigure those to

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

2018-01-16 Thread Steve Ebersole

well Gradle is used in CI environments all over the place, so it must
work.  But I think we need some different configurations in the Gradle
command used.  For example, it is highly suggested that the Gradle daemon
be disabled in CI but I'm not sure all of our jobs actually do that.  I'll
look into that...

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 3:30 PM Sanne Grinovero  wrote:

> Yes I did it for Gradle too, sorry. The `/efs-maven-artifacts` is the
> guilty mount point.
>
> I don't know any quick solutions for the various concerns you all
> raised, so I'll roll this back tonight.
>
> It's good to know that it's not too hard to have a shared FS between
> these machines; needs better planning though.
>
> Thanks,
> Sanne
>
> On 16 January 2018 at 19:41, Steve Ebersole  wrote:
> > Did you happen to do the same for Gradle caches?
> >
> > Some jobs are failing:
> >
> >
> > * What went wrong:
> > Could not resolve all dependencies for configuration
> > ':buildSrc:runtimeClasspath'.
> >> Timeout waiting to lock artifact cache
> >> (/efs-maven-artifacts/.gradle/caches/modules-2). It is currently in use
> by
> >> another Gradle instance.
> >   Owner PID: 1423
> >   Our PID: 10249
> >   Owner Operation: resolve configuration ':classpath'
> >   Our operation:
> >   Lock file: /efs-maven-artifacts/.gradle/caches/modules-2/modules-2.lock
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:06 AM Yoann Rodiere 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a bad
> >> > habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
> >> > "mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.
> >>
> >> I could not agree more, that would be cleaner, but that's not possible.
> >> And
> >> believe me, I tried hard. Last time I checked, some of the plugins we
> use
> >> with dynamic dependency resolution would ignore the artifacts being
> built,
> >> and would always fetch the artifacts from the Maven repos (for
> SNAPSHOTs,
> >> they would end up using nightlies).
> >> I'm not talking about when we use standard maven markup to declare
> >> dependencies, but when the plugin itself has to fetch dependencies
> >> "dynamically", which happens when we setup a WildFly server with our own
> >> modules in particular. See maven-dependency-plugin's "artifactItems"
> >> configuration.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 at 11:29 Sanne Grinovero 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 15 January 2018 at 08:42, Yoann Rodiere 
> wrote:
> >> > > Thanks Sanne !
> >> > >
> >> > > I have one question...
> >> > >
> >> > >> Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as cache
> and
> >> > >> we reserve the right to wipe it all out at any time.
> >> > >
> >> > > I gather you say that so that we don't try to "release" artifacts
> into
> >> > this
> >> > > cache? But temporary storage for the duration of one build will
> still
> >> > > be
> >> > > safe?
> >> > >
> >> > > Because our builds obviously rely on the local repository for
> >> > > short-term
> >> > > storage (for the duration of the build). For example the
> dependencies
> >> > > are
> >> > > only checked and downloaded if necessary at the beginning of the
> >> > > build,
> >> > and
> >> > > then are expected to exist in the local repository until the build
> >> > > stops.
> >> > > Another example: our WildFly modules are first built and installed
> in
> >> > > the
> >> > > "modules" subproject, and later "fetched" from the local repository
> in
> >> > the
> >> > > "integrationtest/wildfly" subproject.
> >> > >
> >> > > If we were to clear the cache during a build, things would probably
> go
> >> > > wrong. Worse, if two parallel builds were to install the same
> >> > > artifacts
> >> > > (e.g. hibernate-search-engine version 5.9.0-SNAPSHOT), we would run
> >> > > the
> >> > risk
> >> > > of testing the wrong "version" of this artifact in one of the
> >> > > builds...
> >> >
> >> > SNAPSHOT being installed are indeed a problem, e.g the PR testing jobs
> >> > could conflict with the regular master jobs.
> >> > We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a bad
> >> > habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
> >> > "mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.
> >> >
> >> > I agree about the perils of clearing the cache during in-progress
> builds
> >> > too.
> >> >
> >> > I just meant to warn that we don't have any backup plan in place, and
> >> > I do plan to just wipe the whole thing occasionally:
> >> >  - when we have any direct need, e.g. currupted downloads
> >> >  - when it gets too large
> >> >  - if it gets too expensive
> >> >  - regularly, just to "practice" that everything works with an empty
> >> > cache
> >> >
> >> > Also our "disaster recovery" plan to rebuild all infrastructure will
> >> > always assume it's ok to reboot with having this file system empty.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Sanne
> >> >
> >> > >
>

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

2018-01-16 Thread Sanne Grinovero

Yes I did it for Gradle too, sorry. The `/efs-maven-artifacts` is the
guilty mount point.

I don't know any quick solutions for the various concerns you all
raised, so I'll roll this back tonight.

It's good to know that it's not too hard to have a shared FS between
these machines; needs better planning though.

Thanks,
Sanne

On 16 January 2018 at 19:41, Steve Ebersole  wrote:
> Did you happen to do the same for Gradle caches?
>
> Some jobs are failing:
>
>
> * What went wrong:
> Could not resolve all dependencies for configuration
> ':buildSrc:runtimeClasspath'.
>> Timeout waiting to lock artifact cache
>> (/efs-maven-artifacts/.gradle/caches/modules-2). It is currently in use by
>> another Gradle instance.
>   Owner PID: 1423
>   Our PID: 10249
>   Owner Operation: resolve configuration ':classpath'
>   Our operation:
>   Lock file: /efs-maven-artifacts/.gradle/caches/modules-2/modules-2.lock
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:06 AM Yoann Rodiere  wrote:
>>
>> > We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a bad
>> > habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
>> > "mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.
>>
>> I could not agree more, that would be cleaner, but that's not possible.
>> And
>> believe me, I tried hard. Last time I checked, some of the plugins we use
>> with dynamic dependency resolution would ignore the artifacts being built,
>> and would always fetch the artifacts from the Maven repos (for SNAPSHOTs,
>> they would end up using nightlies).
>> I'm not talking about when we use standard maven markup to declare
>> dependencies, but when the plugin itself has to fetch dependencies
>> "dynamically", which happens when we setup a WildFly server with our own
>> modules in particular. See maven-dependency-plugin's "artifactItems"
>> configuration.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 at 11:29 Sanne Grinovero  wrote:
>>
>> > On 15 January 2018 at 08:42, Yoann Rodiere  wrote:
>> > > Thanks Sanne !
>> > >
>> > > I have one question...
>> > >
>> > >> Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as cache and
>> > >> we reserve the right to wipe it all out at any time.
>> > >
>> > > I gather you say that so that we don't try to "release" artifacts into
>> > this
>> > > cache? But temporary storage for the duration of one build will still
>> > > be
>> > > safe?
>> > >
>> > > Because our builds obviously rely on the local repository for
>> > > short-term
>> > > storage (for the duration of the build). For example the dependencies
>> > > are
>> > > only checked and downloaded if necessary at the beginning of the
>> > > build,
>> > and
>> > > then are expected to exist in the local repository until the build
>> > > stops.
>> > > Another example: our WildFly modules are first built and installed in
>> > > the
>> > > "modules" subproject, and later "fetched" from the local repository in
>> > the
>> > > "integrationtest/wildfly" subproject.
>> > >
>> > > If we were to clear the cache during a build, things would probably go
>> > > wrong. Worse, if two parallel builds were to install the same
>> > > artifacts
>> > > (e.g. hibernate-search-engine version 5.9.0-SNAPSHOT), we would run
>> > > the
>> > risk
>> > > of testing the wrong "version" of this artifact in one of the
>> > > builds...
>> >
>> > SNAPSHOT being installed are indeed a problem, e.g the PR testing jobs
>> > could conflict with the regular master jobs.
>> > We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a bad
>> > habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
>> > "mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.
>> >
>> > I agree about the perils of clearing the cache during in-progress builds
>> > too.
>> >
>> > I just meant to warn that we don't have any backup plan in place, and
>> > I do plan to just wipe the whole thing occasionally:
>> >  - when we have any direct need, e.g. currupted downloads
>> >  - when it gets too large
>> >  - if it gets too expensive
>> >  - regularly, just to "practice" that everything works with an empty
>> > cache
>> >
>> > Also our "disaster recovery" plan to rebuild all infrastructure will
>> > always assume it's ok to reboot with having this file system empty.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Sanne
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 at 01:18 Sanne Grinovero 
>> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi all,
>> > >>
>> > >> while the new build machines are fast, some of you pointed out we're
>> > >> now spending a relative high amount of time downloading maven
>> > >> dependencies, this problem being compounded by the fact we "nuke"
>> > >> idle
>> > >> slaves shortly after they become idle.
>> > >>
>> > >> I just spent the day testing a distributed file system, and it's now
>> > >> running in "production".
>> > >> It's used exclusively to store the Gradle and Maven caches. This is
>> > >> stateful and independent from the

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

2018-01-16 Thread Gunnar Morling

2018-01-15 11:54 GMT+01:00 Yoann Rodiere :

> > We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a bad
> > habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
> > "mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.
>
> I could not agree more, that would be cleaner, but that's not possible. And
> believe me, I tried hard. Last time I checked, some of the plugins we use
> with dynamic dependency resolution would ignore the artifacts being built,
> and would always fetch the artifacts from the Maven repos (for SNAPSHOTs,
> they would end up using nightlies).
> I'm not talking about when we use standard maven markup to declare
> dependencies, but when the plugin itself has to fetch dependencies
> "dynamically", which happens when we setup a WildFly server with our own
> modules in particular. See maven-dependency-plugin's "artifactItems"
> configuration.
>

Yes, I wanted to bring this up, too.

I believe it's a similar issue for the OSGi-based tests. The brute-force
solution is to actually work with "install", but have a job-local Maven
repo to prevent any side-effects across jobs. That won't be great for build
times, though, unless perhaps a local Nexus would be available as a cache
on each slave.


> On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 at 11:29 Sanne Grinovero  wrote:
>
> > On 15 January 2018 at 08:42, Yoann Rodiere  wrote:
> > > Thanks Sanne !
> > >
> > > I have one question...
> > >
> > >> Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as cache and
> > >> we reserve the right to wipe it all out at any time.
> > >
> > > I gather you say that so that we don't try to "release" artifacts into
> > this
> > > cache? But temporary storage for the duration of one build will still
> be
> > > safe?
> > >
> > > Because our builds obviously rely on the local repository for
> short-term
> > > storage (for the duration of the build). For example the dependencies
> are
> > > only checked and downloaded if necessary at the beginning of the build,
> > and
> > > then are expected to exist in the local repository until the build
> stops.
> > > Another example: our WildFly modules are first built and installed in
> the
> > > "modules" subproject, and later "fetched" from the local repository in
> > the
> > > "integrationtest/wildfly" subproject.
> > >
> > > If we were to clear the cache during a build, things would probably go
> > > wrong. Worse, if two parallel builds were to install the same artifacts
> > > (e.g. hibernate-search-engine version 5.9.0-SNAPSHOT), we would run the
> > risk
> > > of testing the wrong "version" of this artifact in one of the builds...
> >
> > SNAPSHOT being installed are indeed a problem, e.g the PR testing jobs
> > could conflict with the regular master jobs.
> > We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a bad
> > habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
> > "mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.
> >
> > I agree about the perils of clearing the cache during in-progress builds
> > too.
> >
> > I just meant to warn that we don't have any backup plan in place, and
> > I do plan to just wipe the whole thing occasionally:
> >  - when we have any direct need, e.g. currupted downloads
> >  - when it gets too large
> >  - if it gets too expensive
> >  - regularly, just to "practice" that everything works with an empty
> cache
> >
> > Also our "disaster recovery" plan to rebuild all infrastructure will
> > always assume it's ok to reboot with having this file system empty.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sanne
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 at 01:18 Sanne Grinovero 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> while the new build machines are fast, some of you pointed out we're
> > >> now spending a relative high amount of time downloading maven
> > >> dependencies, this problem being compounded by the fact we "nuke" idle
> > >> slaves shortly after they become idle.
> > >>
> > >> I just spent the day testing a distributed file system, and it's now
> > >> running in "production".
> > >> It's used exclusively to store the Gradle and Maven caches. This is
> > >> stateful and independent from the lifecycle of individual slave nodes.
> > >>
> > >> Unfortunately this solution is not viable for Docker images, so while
> > >> I experimented with the idea I backed off from moving the docker
> > >> storage graph to a similar device. Please don't waste time trying that
> > >> w/o carefully reading the Docker documentation or talking with me :)
> > >> Also, beyond correctness of storage semantics, it's likely far less
> > >> efficient for Docker.
> > >>
> > >> To learn more about our new cache:
> > >>  -
> > >>
> > https://github.com/hibernate/ci.hibernate.org/commit/
> dc6e0a4bd09fb3ae6347081243b4fb796a219f90
> > >>  - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/efs/latest/ug/how-it-works.html
> > >>
> > >> I'd add that - because of other IO tuning in place - writes

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

2018-01-16 Thread Steve Ebersole

Did you happen to do the same for Gradle caches?

Some jobs are failing:


* What went wrong:
Could not resolve all dependencies for configuration
':buildSrc:runtimeClasspath'.
> Timeout waiting to lock artifact cache 
> (/efs-maven-artifacts/.gradle/caches/modules-2). It is currently in use by 
> another Gradle instance.
  Owner PID: 1423
  Our PID: 10249
  Owner Operation: resolve configuration ':classpath'
  Our operation:
  Lock file: /efs-maven-artifacts/.gradle/caches/modules-2/modules-2.lock



On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:06 AM Yoann Rodiere  wrote:

> > We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a bad
> > habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
> > "mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.
>
> I could not agree more, that would be cleaner, but that's not possible. And
> believe me, I tried hard. Last time I checked, some of the plugins we use
> with dynamic dependency resolution would ignore the artifacts being built,
> and would always fetch the artifacts from the Maven repos (for SNAPSHOTs,
> they would end up using nightlies).
> I'm not talking about when we use standard maven markup to declare
> dependencies, but when the plugin itself has to fetch dependencies
> "dynamically", which happens when we setup a WildFly server with our own
> modules in particular. See maven-dependency-plugin's "artifactItems"
> configuration.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 at 11:29 Sanne Grinovero  wrote:
>
> > On 15 January 2018 at 08:42, Yoann Rodiere  wrote:
> > > Thanks Sanne !
> > >
> > > I have one question...
> > >
> > >> Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as cache and
> > >> we reserve the right to wipe it all out at any time.
> > >
> > > I gather you say that so that we don't try to "release" artifacts into
> > this
> > > cache? But temporary storage for the duration of one build will still
> be
> > > safe?
> > >
> > > Because our builds obviously rely on the local repository for
> short-term
> > > storage (for the duration of the build). For example the dependencies
> are
> > > only checked and downloaded if necessary at the beginning of the build,
> > and
> > > then are expected to exist in the local repository until the build
> stops.
> > > Another example: our WildFly modules are first built and installed in
> the
> > > "modules" subproject, and later "fetched" from the local repository in
> > the
> > > "integrationtest/wildfly" subproject.
> > >
> > > If we were to clear the cache during a build, things would probably go
> > > wrong. Worse, if two parallel builds were to install the same artifacts
> > > (e.g. hibernate-search-engine version 5.9.0-SNAPSHOT), we would run the
> > risk
> > > of testing the wrong "version" of this artifact in one of the builds...
> >
> > SNAPSHOT being installed are indeed a problem, e.g the PR testing jobs
> > could conflict with the regular master jobs.
> > We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a bad
> > habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
> > "mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.
> >
> > I agree about the perils of clearing the cache during in-progress builds
> > too.
> >
> > I just meant to warn that we don't have any backup plan in place, and
> > I do plan to just wipe the whole thing occasionally:
> >  - when we have any direct need, e.g. currupted downloads
> >  - when it gets too large
> >  - if it gets too expensive
> >  - regularly, just to "practice" that everything works with an empty
> cache
> >
> > Also our "disaster recovery" plan to rebuild all infrastructure will
> > always assume it's ok to reboot with having this file system empty.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sanne
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 at 01:18 Sanne Grinovero 
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> while the new build machines are fast, some of you pointed out we're
> > >> now spending a relative high amount of time downloading maven
> > >> dependencies, this problem being compounded by the fact we "nuke" idle
> > >> slaves shortly after they become idle.
> > >>
> > >> I just spent the day testing a distributed file system, and it's now
> > >> running in "production".
> > >> It's used exclusively to store the Gradle and Maven caches. This is
> > >> stateful and independent from the lifecycle of individual slave nodes.
> > >>
> > >> Unfortunately this solution is not viable for Docker images, so while
> > >> I experimented with the idea I backed off from moving the docker
> > >> storage graph to a similar device. Please don't waste time trying that
> > >> w/o carefully reading the Docker documentation or talking with me :)
> > >> Also, beyond correctness of storage semantics, it's likely far less
> > >> efficient for Docker.
> > >>
> > >> To learn more about our new cache:
> > >>  -
> > >>
> >
>

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

2018-01-15 Thread Yoann Rodiere

> We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a bad
> habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
> "mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.

I could not agree more, that would be cleaner, but that's not possible. And
believe me, I tried hard. Last time I checked, some of the plugins we use
with dynamic dependency resolution would ignore the artifacts being built,
and would always fetch the artifacts from the Maven repos (for SNAPSHOTs,
they would end up using nightlies).
I'm not talking about when we use standard maven markup to declare
dependencies, but when the plugin itself has to fetch dependencies
"dynamically", which happens when we setup a WildFly server with our own
modules in particular. See maven-dependency-plugin's "artifactItems"
configuration.



On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 at 11:29 Sanne Grinovero  wrote:

> On 15 January 2018 at 08:42, Yoann Rodiere  wrote:
> > Thanks Sanne !
> >
> > I have one question...
> >
> >> Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as cache and
> >> we reserve the right to wipe it all out at any time.
> >
> > I gather you say that so that we don't try to "release" artifacts into
> this
> > cache? But temporary storage for the duration of one build will still be
> > safe?
> >
> > Because our builds obviously rely on the local repository for short-term
> > storage (for the duration of the build). For example the dependencies are
> > only checked and downloaded if necessary at the beginning of the build,
> and
> > then are expected to exist in the local repository until the build stops.
> > Another example: our WildFly modules are first built and installed in the
> > "modules" subproject, and later "fetched" from the local repository in
> the
> > "integrationtest/wildfly" subproject.
> >
> > If we were to clear the cache during a build, things would probably go
> > wrong. Worse, if two parallel builds were to install the same artifacts
> > (e.g. hibernate-search-engine version 5.9.0-SNAPSHOT), we would run the
> risk
> > of testing the wrong "version" of this artifact in one of the builds...
>
> SNAPSHOT being installed are indeed a problem, e.g the PR testing jobs
> could conflict with the regular master jobs.
> We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a bad
> habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
> "mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.
>
> I agree about the perils of clearing the cache during in-progress builds
> too.
>
> I just meant to warn that we don't have any backup plan in place, and
> I do plan to just wipe the whole thing occasionally:
>  - when we have any direct need, e.g. currupted downloads
>  - when it gets too large
>  - if it gets too expensive
>  - regularly, just to "practice" that everything works with an empty cache
>
> Also our "disaster recovery" plan to rebuild all infrastructure will
> always assume it's ok to reboot with having this file system empty.
>
> Thanks,
> Sanne
>
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 at 01:18 Sanne Grinovero 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> while the new build machines are fast, some of you pointed out we're
> >> now spending a relative high amount of time downloading maven
> >> dependencies, this problem being compounded by the fact we "nuke" idle
> >> slaves shortly after they become idle.
> >>
> >> I just spent the day testing a distributed file system, and it's now
> >> running in "production".
> >> It's used exclusively to store the Gradle and Maven caches. This is
> >> stateful and independent from the lifecycle of individual slave nodes.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately this solution is not viable for Docker images, so while
> >> I experimented with the idea I backed off from moving the docker
> >> storage graph to a similar device. Please don't waste time trying that
> >> w/o carefully reading the Docker documentation or talking with me :)
> >> Also, beyond correctness of storage semantics, it's likely far less
> >> efficient for Docker.
> >>
> >> To learn more about our new cache:
> >>  -
> >>
> https://github.com/hibernate/ci.hibernate.org/commit/dc6e0a4bd09fb3ae6347081243b4fb796a219f90
> >>  - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/efs/latest/ug/how-it-works.html
> >>
> >> I'd add that - because of other IO tuning in place - writes might
> >> appear out of order to other nodes, and conflicts are not handled.
> >> Shouldn't be a problem since snapshots now have timestamps, but this
> >> might be something to keep in mind.
> >>
> >> N.B.
> >> Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as cache and
> >> we reserve the right to wipe it all out at any time.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Sanne
> >> ___
> >> hibernate-dev mailing list
> >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Yoann Rodiere
> > yo...@hibernate.org /

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

2018-01-15 Thread Sanne Grinovero

On 15 January 2018 at 08:42, Yoann Rodiere  wrote:
> Thanks Sanne !
>
> I have one question...
>
>> Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as cache and
>> we reserve the right to wipe it all out at any time.
>
> I gather you say that so that we don't try to "release" artifacts into this
> cache? But temporary storage for the duration of one build will still be
> safe?
>
> Because our builds obviously rely on the local repository for short-term
> storage (for the duration of the build). For example the dependencies are
> only checked and downloaded if necessary at the beginning of the build, and
> then are expected to exist in the local repository until the build stops.
> Another example: our WildFly modules are first built and installed in the
> "modules" subproject, and later "fetched" from the local repository in the
> "integrationtest/wildfly" subproject.
>
> If we were to clear the cache during a build, things would probably go
> wrong. Worse, if two parallel builds were to install the same artifacts
> (e.g. hibernate-search-engine version 5.9.0-SNAPSHOT), we would run the risk
> of testing the wrong "version" of this artifact in one of the builds...

SNAPSHOT being installed are indeed a problem, e.g the PR testing jobs
could conflict with the regular master jobs.
We should reconfigure those to not "install" - that's actually a bad
habit, legacy from Maven 2 times - people nowadays recommend using
"mvn clean verify", especially on CI environments.

I agree about the perils of clearing the cache during in-progress builds too.

I just meant to warn that we don't have any backup plan in place, and
I do plan to just wipe the whole thing occasionally:
 - when we have any direct need, e.g. currupted downloads
 - when it gets too large
 - if it gets too expensive
 - regularly, just to "practice" that everything works with an empty cache

Also our "disaster recovery" plan to rebuild all infrastructure will
always assume it's ok to reboot with having this file system empty.

Thanks,
Sanne

>
>
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 at 01:18 Sanne Grinovero  wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> while the new build machines are fast, some of you pointed out we're
>> now spending a relative high amount of time downloading maven
>> dependencies, this problem being compounded by the fact we "nuke" idle
>> slaves shortly after they become idle.
>>
>> I just spent the day testing a distributed file system, and it's now
>> running in "production".
>> It's used exclusively to store the Gradle and Maven caches. This is
>> stateful and independent from the lifecycle of individual slave nodes.
>>
>> Unfortunately this solution is not viable for Docker images, so while
>> I experimented with the idea I backed off from moving the docker
>> storage graph to a similar device. Please don't waste time trying that
>> w/o carefully reading the Docker documentation or talking with me :)
>> Also, beyond correctness of storage semantics, it's likely far less
>> efficient for Docker.
>>
>> To learn more about our new cache:
>>  -
>> https://github.com/hibernate/ci.hibernate.org/commit/dc6e0a4bd09fb3ae6347081243b4fb796a219f90
>>  - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/efs/latest/ug/how-it-works.html
>>
>> I'd add that - because of other IO tuning in place - writes might
>> appear out of order to other nodes, and conflicts are not handled.
>> Shouldn't be a problem since snapshots now have timestamps, but this
>> might be something to keep in mind.
>>
>> N.B.
>> Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as cache and
>> we reserve the right to wipe it all out at any time.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sanne
>> ___
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Yoann Rodiere
> yo...@hibernate.org / yrodi...@redhat.com
> Software Engineer
> Hibernate NoORM team
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

2018-01-15 Thread Yoann Rodiere

Thanks Sanne !

I have one question...

> Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as cache and
> we reserve the right to wipe it all out at any time.

I gather you say that so that we don't try to "release" artifacts into this
cache? But temporary storage for the duration of one build will still be
safe?

Because our builds obviously rely on the local repository for short-term
storage (for the duration of the build). For example the dependencies are
only checked and downloaded if necessary at the beginning of the build, and
then are expected to exist in the local repository until the build stops.
Another example: our WildFly modules are first built and installed in the
"modules" subproject, and later "fetched" from the local repository in the
"integrationtest/wildfly" subproject.

If we were to clear the cache during a build, things would probably go
wrong. Worse, if two parallel builds were to install the same artifacts
(e.g. hibernate-search-engine version 5.9.0-SNAPSHOT), we would run the
risk of testing the wrong "version" of this artifact in one of the builds...

On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 at 01:18 Sanne Grinovero  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> while the new build machines are fast, some of you pointed out we're
> now spending a relative high amount of time downloading maven
> dependencies, this problem being compounded by the fact we "nuke" idle
> slaves shortly after they become idle.
>
> I just spent the day testing a distributed file system, and it's now
> running in "production".
> It's used exclusively to store the Gradle and Maven caches. This is
> stateful and independent from the lifecycle of individual slave nodes.
>
> Unfortunately this solution is not viable for Docker images, so while
> I experimented with the idea I backed off from moving the docker
> storage graph to a similar device. Please don't waste time trying that
> w/o carefully reading the Docker documentation or talking with me :)
> Also, beyond correctness of storage semantics, it's likely far less
> efficient for Docker.
>
> To learn more about our new cache:
>  -
> https://github.com/hibernate/ci.hibernate.org/commit/dc6e0a4bd09fb3ae6347081243b4fb796a219f90
>  - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/efs/latest/ug/how-it-works.html
>
> I'd add that - because of other IO tuning in place - writes might
> appear out of order to other nodes, and conflicts are not handled.
> Shouldn't be a problem since snapshots now have timestamps, but this
> might be something to keep in mind.
>
> N.B.
> Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as cache and
> we reserve the right to wipe it all out at any time.
>
> Thanks,
> Sanne
> ___
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>

-- 
Yoann Rodiere
yo...@hibernate.org / yrodi...@redhat.com
Software Engineer
Hibernate NoORM team
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

[hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

2018-01-13 Thread Sanne Grinovero

Hi all,

while the new build machines are fast, some of you pointed out we're
now spending a relative high amount of time downloading maven
dependencies, this problem being compounded by the fact we "nuke" idle
slaves shortly after they become idle.

I just spent the day testing a distributed file system, and it's now
running in "production".
It's used exclusively to store the Gradle and Maven caches. This is
stateful and independent from the lifecycle of individual slave nodes.

Unfortunately this solution is not viable for Docker images, so while
I experimented with the idea I backed off from moving the docker
storage graph to a similar device. Please don't waste time trying that
w/o carefully reading the Docker documentation or talking with me :)
Also, beyond correctness of storage semantics, it's likely far less
efficient for Docker.

To learn more about our new cache:
-
https://github.com/hibernate/ci.hibernate.org/commit/dc6e0a4bd09fb3ae6347081243b4fb796a219f90
- https://docs.aws.amazon.com/efs/latest/ug/how-it-works.html

I'd add that - because of other IO tuning in place - writes might
appear out of order to other nodes, and conflicts are not handled.
Shouldn't be a problem since snapshots now have timestamps, but this
might be something to keep in mind.

N.B.
Please never rely on this as "storage": it's just meant as cache and
we reserve the right to wipe it all out at any time.

Thanks,
Sanne
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

Re: [hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

[hibernate-dev] ci.hibernate.org : announcing distributed cache for maven artifacts

12 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information