[Hibernate] 3.0 final today?
Anyone got any objection to building and releasing today? I think we are done... -- Gavin King +61 410 534 454 +1 404 822 8349 callto://gavinking Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jboss.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30 ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
Re: [Hibernate] 3.0 final today?
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:19:21 +0200, Gavin King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone got any objection to building and releasing today? I think we are done... I didn't make it into the office for the sql 7 test. Will be there tomorrow - don't know if that will affect final release. Did (+) syntax get supported by the new parser or is the workaround still to use the old parser here ? -- -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jboss.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30 ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
RE: [Hibernate] 3.0 final today?
Theta-join syntax is supported. The issue was HQL index-access (i.e. the [] stuff) and HQL collection-functions on theta-join dialects. The collection functions are working. AFAIK, the index-access thing is still a problem (at least there is a test case in HQLTest failing for this reason when running on Oracle 8i). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max Rydahl Andersen Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:17 AM To: Gavin King; 'hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: Re: [Hibernate] 3.0 final today? On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:19:21 +0200, Gavin King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone got any objection to building and releasing today? I think we are done... I didn't make it into the office for the sql 7 test. Will be there tomorrow - don't know if that will affect final release. Did (+) syntax get supported by the new parser or is the workaround still to use the old parser here ? -- -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jboss.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30 ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel --- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30 ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
Re: [Hibernate] 3.0 final today?
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:33:00 +0200, Steve Ebersole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sounds ok for a release then. Can we update the migration guide to reflect this specific issue so people only shift to the old parser if really needed. -max Theta-join syntax is supported. The issue was HQL index-access (i.e. the [] stuff) and HQL collection-functions on theta-join dialects. The collection functions are working. AFAIK, the index-access thing is still a problem (at least there is a test case in HQLTest failing for this reason when running on Oracle 8i). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max Rydahl Andersen Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:17 AM To: Gavin King; 'hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: Re: [Hibernate] 3.0 final today? On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:19:21 +0200, Gavin King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone got any objection to building and releasing today? I think we are done... I didn't make it into the office for the sql 7 test. Will be there tomorrow - don't know if that will affect final release. Did (+) syntax get supported by the new parser or is the workaround still to use the old parser here ? -- -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jboss.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30 ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
RE: [Hibernate] 3.0 final today?
NM, I just fixed it :) -Original Message- From: Max Andersen Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:54 AM To: Steve Ebersole; Gavin King; hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hibernate] 3.0 final today? On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:33:00 +0200, Steve Ebersole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sounds ok for a release then. Can we update the migration guide to reflect this specific issue so people only shift to the old parser if really needed. -max Theta-join syntax is supported. The issue was HQL index-access (i.e. the [] stuff) and HQL collection-functions on theta-join dialects. The collection functions are working. AFAIK, the index-access thing is still a problem (at least there is a test case in HQLTest failing for this reason when running on Oracle 8i). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Max Rydahl Andersen Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:17 AM To: Gavin King; 'hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: Re: [Hibernate] 3.0 final today? On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:19:21 +0200, Gavin King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone got any objection to building and releasing today? I think we are done... I didn't make it into the office for the sql 7 test. Will be there tomorrow - don't know if that will affect final release. Did (+) syntax get supported by the new parser or is the workaround still to use the old parser here ? -- -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jboss.com --- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30 ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
