RE: [Hibernate] connect by
yes, its easy enough, I guess... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Emmanuel Bernard Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2005 1:50 AM To: hibernate-devel Subject: Re: [Hibernate] connect by Not keen. With native SQL you can achieve these specific cases, right? Gavin King wrote: Should we support START WITH ... CONNECT BY in HQL (just for Oracle users)? It's trivial to implement I guess, what do you guys think? -- Emmanuel Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://emmanuelbernard http://www.hibernate.org --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
[Hibernate] connect by
Should we support START WITH CONNECT BY in HQL (just for Oracle users)? Its trivial to implement I guess, what do you guys think?
Re: [Hibernate] connect by
+1 And the ORDER SIBLINGS BY ... (Oracle 9i+) too (if possible). --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
Re: [Hibernate] connect by
What is the usecases for it ? Its nonportable, so why put it in HQL when it can be done via native sql queries where it kinda belongs ? +0 -max +1 And the ORDER SIBLINGS BY ... (Oracle 9i+) too (if possible). --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel -- -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jboss.com --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
Re: [Hibernate] connect by
Not keen. With native SQL you can achieve these specific cases, right? Gavin King wrote: Should we support START WITH CONNECT BY in HQL (just for Oracle users)? Its trivial to implement I guess, what do you guys think? -- Emmanuel Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED] callto://emmanuelbernard http://www.hibernate.org --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix ___ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
