[Histonet] fume exposure

2009-02-14 Thread zodiac29



To All, 



I work in a lab where I stain and coverslip everything by hand. I coverslip 
under a fume hood so there isn't much of an issue there. The main issue is my 
exposue to fumes while staining. I do not stain under a fume hood. My exposure 
times to these c hemicals is increasing becuase our volume is steadly 
increasing as well. I can no longer tolerate these fumes and am expirenc ing 
difficulty breathing and frequent headaches.What are labs that stain there 
slides  by hand doing (types of masks, hoods) to minimize their exposure. If 
you can recommed any specifics I would appreciate it. 



Thank you in advance 

Jenny 



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] hand processing schedule late mouse embryos

2009-02-14 Thread Rene J Buesa
Under separate cover I am sending a protocol that will work well with your 
subjects.
Since you are doing manual processing you can easily use the reagents I 
recommend and eliminate xylene and its terpene and alkane based substitutes.
René J.

--- On Fri, 2/13/09, Nicole Collette collet...@mail.llnl.gov wrote:

From: Nicole Collette collet...@mail.llnl.gov
Subject: [Histonet] hand processing schedule late mouse embryos
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Date: Friday, February 13, 2009, 1:25 PM

HI, All,

One project finished, another just beginning. I am about to embark on a journey
into the land of immunohistochemistry, with late mouse embryos E14.5, E16.5, P0
to examine bone markers in conjunction with LacZ and/or GFP.

We have sadly lost our cryostat (so IHC for the GFP on paraffin sections), and
our tissue processor - both belonged to a friendly investigator down the hall
who has moved on. So, I am processing by hand.

For hand-processing, I have had to do some rigging, and I do the wax steps in a
hyb oven to try to keep the wax (TissuePrep, Fisher) at around 63-65C, while
trying my best to keep the molds, cassettes, and tools with as few giant globs
of solidifying wax as possible. As a result of using the hyb oven, we are forced
to use Clearene (D-limonene), --or some other xylene substitute that could be
recommended--,  instead of xylene for the processing. If anyone has a
recommendation for a better alternative there (aside from a tissue processor
which will have to wait at least until the next grant gets funded--oooh, unless
someone has an old one they want to donate, preferably table-top), I'm all
ears.

My schedule was given to me by a friend who does cartilage, no older than
E14.5, and are basically half hour steps for each ethanol, half hour steps for 3
wax steps at the end. Will this be enough time for infiltration of older samples
without vacuum? Should I increase my steps to 1 hour for these older embryos? I
am optimizing my fixation at 1hour/mm thickness, with the embryos skinned (4%
paraformaldehyde in PBS, I decided to start here since I don't yet know much
about the problems I might encounter with a particular antigen). I have tried
the 30 minute schedule with adult decalcified bones and have not had fantastic
sections. I suspect it could be incomplete washing of the EDTA before
infiltration, but it's possible that the processing schedule is just not
long enough. Any advice?

Thanks in advance! Happy Friday!

Sincerely,
Nicole Collette
Lawrence Livermore National Lab/ UC Berkeley

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet




___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] need controls

2009-02-14 Thread Rene J Buesa
The same appendix that you can use as an HE+ control, usually contains Gram 
+and- bacteria.
René J.

--- On Fri, 2/13/09, Jaime Plata enrri...@yahoo.com wrote:

From: Jaime Plata enrri...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [Histonet] need controls
To: Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu, Steven Coakley sjchta...@yahoo.com
Date: Friday, February 13, 2009, 5:26 PM

GI (small intestine) biopsies are other possibilities associated to skin as
control.
When you mention Grams, are you referring to Bact's positive and negative.?
If this is the case you can make them with blood Agar (microbiology) and
contaminate the tissue with them. Or use Large intestine ther will be many you
jus need to look for them.
 
--- On Fri, 2/13/09, Steven Coakley sjchta...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Steven Coakley sjchta...@yahoo.com
Subject: [Histonet] need controls
To: Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Date: Friday, February 13, 2009, 1:51 PM

I work in a DermPath lab.  Currently we purchase all our controls.  Some are
Ok but some, especially the grams are not.  We'd like to start sectioning.
Our own but all the specimens we get are skins.
 
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet




___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] freezing paraffin blocks

2009-02-14 Thread Rene J Buesa
Not at all!
René J.

--- On Fri, 2/13/09, Jennifer Anderson jander...@halozyme.com wrote:

From: Jennifer Anderson jander...@halozyme.com
Subject: [Histonet] freezing paraffin blocks
To: Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Date: Friday, February 13, 2009, 5:43 PM

Hi All.

 

I've just started sectioning Bouin's fixed paraffin embedded
human/mouse/rat/pig skin again, tissues processed in a softer wax than
I'm used to, so I've been putting the blocks in the freezer at -20
prior
to sectioning.  Will such cold deleteriously affect the blocks or
tissue?

 

Also, is there any harm in cleaning the water bath with a little xylene
to remove any wax build-up?

 

Thanks a lot.

 

Jennifer M. Anderson, Scientist

Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

11404 Sorrento Valley Road

San Diego, CA 92121

858-704-8333

jander...@halozyme.com

 

 


The information transmitted in this email is confidential and is intended only
for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed.  Delivery of this message
to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to
waive confidentiality or any applicable privilege.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
information by individuals or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited by Halozyme and may be in violation of applicable laws.  If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete/destroy this email.
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet




___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Problem with Schiff's reagent

2009-02-14 Thread pbrunko

Good Morning!

I'm a newcomer to the list, and I'll start by pointing out that I'm not a
histologist by any means.  I am a freshwater ecologist, and we're trying to
study mucus secretion behavior in freshwater snails.

Last Spring and last summer, we developed a process whereby we could visualize
snail mucus trails on glass slides using a periodic acid-Schiff's reagent
staining technique.  But now, in following the same protocol as used last year
for making our own Schiff's reagent, I cannot get the final solution to filter
out clear.

Recipe I'm using:
900 ml boiling water
10 grams basic fuchsin
25 ml concentrated HCl acid (12 M)
40 grams sodium metabisulfite
(this is essentially Sigma Aldrich's ratios, I think)

Let this sit for 24 to 72 hours, take 100 ml aliquot, add 0.75 - 1.0 gram
ground activated charcoal, stir for 10 minutes, filter through filter paper
then through GF/C glass fiber filter.  Last summer I got nice, clear (slightly
yellow) and very active Schiff's reagent.

But now I cannot seem to get the filtrate to be clear.  Even after 10 minutes
exposure to ground activated charcoal and filtering, the filtrate remains
bright orange to dark red and it does not seem to stain mucus trails very well.

All the reagents are the same as those used last summer (i.e., less than 7
months old; although the HCl is a bottle several years old from a different
lab).

Anyone have any troubleshooting suggestions?  I don't know the chemistry very
well, but the sodium metabisulfite is used for decoloring the initial
solution, right?  So is the metabisulfite not working for some reason now??

Any help/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers -

Paul

Paul E. Brunkow, PhD
Department of Biological Sciences
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Edwardsville, ILUSA
-
SIUE Web Mail



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] Problem with Schiff's reagent

2009-02-14 Thread Thomas Jasper
Hi Paul,

Some people may think this is taking the easy way out, but...you might
consider purchasing some commercially prepared Schiff's.  It will
(should) be consistent product (consistently produced) and the
manufacturer has the responsibility of QC'ing the product before it is
shipped and sold.

There are any number of reliable companies handling Schiff's (I would
not favor one over another).  You could type Schiff's into your search
engine and I'm certain you'd be able to contact a supplier.  This may be
an answer for you.

Good Luck,

Tom Jasper

Thomas Jasper HT (ASCP) BAS
Histology Supervisor 
Central Oregon Regional Pathology Services
Bend, OR 97701
541/693-2677
tjas...@copc.net 

-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of
pbru...@siue.edu
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 9:54 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Problem with Schiff's reagent


Good Morning!

I'm a newcomer to the list, and I'll start by pointing out that I'm not
a histologist by any means.  I am a freshwater ecologist, and we're
trying to study mucus secretion behavior in freshwater snails.

Last Spring and last summer, we developed a process whereby we could
visualize snail mucus trails on glass slides using a periodic
acid-Schiff's reagent staining technique.  But now, in following the
same protocol as used last year for making our own Schiff's reagent, I
cannot get the final solution to filter out clear.

Recipe I'm using:
900 ml boiling water
10 grams basic fuchsin
25 ml concentrated HCl acid (12 M)
40 grams sodium metabisulfite
(this is essentially Sigma Aldrich's ratios, I think)

Let this sit for 24 to 72 hours, take 100 ml aliquot, add 0.75 - 1.0
gram ground activated charcoal, stir for 10 minutes, filter through
filter paper then through GF/C glass fiber filter.  Last summer I got
nice, clear (slightly
yellow) and very active Schiff's reagent.

But now I cannot seem to get the filtrate to be clear.  Even after 10
minutes exposure to ground activated charcoal and filtering, the
filtrate remains bright orange to dark red and it does not seem to stain
mucus trails very well.

All the reagents are the same as those used last summer (i.e., less than
7 months old; although the HCl is a bottle several years old from a
different lab).

Anyone have any troubleshooting suggestions?  I don't know the chemistry
very well, but the sodium metabisulfite is used for decoloring the
initial solution, right?  So is the metabisulfite not working for some
reason now??

Any help/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers -

Paul

Paul E. Brunkow, PhD
Department of Biological Sciences
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Edwardsville, ILUSA
-
SIUE Web Mail



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] AUTO: Jacquelyn Grewe/Staff/OhioHealth is out of the office .

2009-02-14 Thread JGREWE

I will be out of the office starting  02/11/2009 and will not return until
02/16/2009.

I will respond to your message when I return.


Note: This is an automated response to your message  Histonet Digest, Vol
63, Issue 24 sent on 2/14/2009 12:57:22 PM.

You will receive a notification for each message you send to this person
while the person is away.


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Problem with Schiff's reagent

2009-02-14 Thread Rene J Buesa
Paul:
If I remember correctly the last time I prepared my own Schiff reagent was in 
1955 and it came beautifully BUT it is a real pain to prepare it, and not 
really worth the work.
Since then I purchase my Schiff and avoided all the trouble.
If you have the necessary budget I would advise you to buy it from a reputable 
manufacturer. Mine always came from Sigma.
It will eliminate inconsistencies in your research.
René J.

--- On Sat, 2/14/09, pbru...@siue.edu pbru...@siue.edu wrote:

From: pbru...@siue.edu pbru...@siue.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Problem with Schiff's reagent
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Date: Saturday, February 14, 2009, 12:53 PM

Good Morning!

I'm a newcomer to the list, and I'll start by pointing out that I'm
not a
histologist by any means.  I am a freshwater ecologist, and we're trying to
study mucus secretion behavior in freshwater snails.

Last Spring and last summer, we developed a process whereby we could visualize
snail mucus trails on glass slides using a periodic acid-Schiff's reagent
staining technique.  But now, in following the same protocol as used last year
for making our own Schiff's reagent, I cannot get the final solution to
filter
out clear.

Recipe I'm using:
900 ml boiling water
10 grams basic fuchsin
25 ml concentrated HCl acid (12 M)
40 grams sodium metabisulfite
(this is essentially Sigma Aldrich's ratios, I think)

Let this sit for 24 to 72 hours, take 100 ml aliquot, add 0.75 - 1.0 gram
ground activated charcoal, stir for 10 minutes, filter through filter paper
then through GF/C glass fiber filter.  Last summer I got nice, clear (slightly
yellow) and very active Schiff's reagent.

But now I cannot seem to get the filtrate to be clear.  Even after 10 minutes
exposure to ground activated charcoal and filtering, the filtrate remains
bright orange to dark red and it does not seem to stain mucus trails very well.

All the reagents are the same as those used last summer (i.e., less than 7
months old; although the HCl is a bottle several years old from a different
lab).

Anyone have any troubleshooting suggestions?  I don't know the chemistry
very
well, but the sodium metabisulfite is used for decoloring the
initial
solution, right?  So is the metabisulfite not working for some reason now??

Any help/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers -

Paul

Paul E. Brunkow, PhD
Department of Biological Sciences
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Edwardsville, ILUSA
-
SIUE Web Mail



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet




___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] fume exposure

2009-02-14 Thread Emily Sours
Is it so old-fashioned to use xylene in a fume hood?
We can't even use paraformaldhyde outside of the hood--Environmental Health
and Safety makes sure of that.
But we do research, maybe it's different in other types of labs.

Emily
-- 
It's like hearing Billy Joel play Piano Man-- joyless for all involved,
but demanded by a higher power.
--Kevin Murphy, Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull rifftrax
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] semen analysis

2009-02-14 Thread Anne van Binsbergen
thanks for the email
we are a hospital based diagnostic lab and currently do all the testing
manually

i am actually asking what EQUIPMENT is being used for AUTOMATED analysis
(count, conc, motility etc)

regards
Anne

2009/2/15 Malcolm McCallum malcolm.mccal...@tamut.edu

  semen analysis can be done using various methods depending on what you
 are analyzing.
 I am not certain if you are asking for techniques, or specific procedures.
 However, fluorescence microscopy can be used to assess simple morphology
 using mitotracker blue.
 Fluorescence can also be used with a fast green (I think this is the other
 dye) and propidium iodide to assess viability.
 alternatively, you can assess viability using flow cytometry with the same
 dyes.
 Also, morphology is typically done using SEM and TEM.
 there are several techiques for assessing motility.

 Jill Jenkins at the USGS National Wetlands Laboratory in Lafayette, LA does
 the flow cytometry.
 Anne Grippo at Arkansas State University uses the propidium iodide
 technique,
 Stan Trauth does the sperm morphology with EM and FM.

 Also, the Dallas Zoo has specialized instrumentation specifically for sperm
 work, but the name of the instrument
 has slipped my mind!

 They are doing this on non-human animals, so I'm not sure how applicable
 this is to your question!

 Malcolm L. McCallum
 Associate Professor
 Department of Biological Sciences
 Texas AM University Texarkana
 2600 Robison Rd.
 Texarkana, TX 75501
 O: 1-903-334-6670
 H: 1-903-791-3843
 Homepage: https://www.eagle.tamut.edu/faculty/mmccallum/index.html
 VISIT HERPETOLOGICAL CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGY www.herpconbio.org
 A New Journal Published in Partnership with Partners in Amphibian and
 Reptile Conservation
 and the World Congress of Herpetology.

 Fall Teaching Schedule  Office Hours:
 Ecology: M,W 1-2:40 pm
 Cell Biology: M 6-9:40 pm (don't ask!)
 Forensic Science: T,R 10-11:40am
 Office Hours: MW 12-1, 5-6, TR 11:40-12:30,

 We live in a time when lemonade is made with artificial flavoring, and
 furnisher polish is made with fresh lemons.
 -Alfred E. Neuman




 -Original Message-
 From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu on behalf of Anne van
 Binsbergen
 Sent: Wed 2/11/2009 6:45 AM
 To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Subject: [Histonet] semen analysis

 who out there is using automation for semen analysis and what equipment is
 recommended?
 i am considering the SQA-V from MES
 what say you?

 cheers

 --
 Anne van Binsbergen (Hope)
 Abu Dhabi
 UAE
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet




-- 
Anne van Binsbergen (Hope)
Abu Dhabi
UAE
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet