Re: [Histonet] Microwave use in histo lab

2012-04-06 Thread Lee Peggy Wenk
There is the document from CLSI on Microwave Device Used in Histology 
Laboratory, GP28-A. If your lab is CAP accredited, your organization might 
already be a member of CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) 
www.clsi.org  so you might already have the ability to download this.


It's a consensus document from experts in the field, and was put together 
over a several year period at the NSH Symposium, with lots on input from NSH 
members. Then it was open to the public, and any other histotech 
(researcher, electrician, whoever) could comment on it.


Peggy A. Wenk, HTL(ASCP)SLS
Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, MI 48073
The opinions expressed are mine, and do not reflect Beaumont Hospital.

-Original Message- 
From: Hart, Heather

Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 8:05 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Microwave use in histo lab

Hello everyone!

I am currently taking a class titled Current Trends  Applications in 
Applied Science  Technology which is essentially a capstone course for my 
BSAST degree completion.   This course requires a four part research paper 
on any technology of choice in the (students) related field.  The topic I 
have chosen is Microwave Use in the Histology Lab.  I am trying to gather 
information for the third module in which I need to address the topics 
listed below.  I would appreciate any personal input or opinions about the 
topic per guidelines listed.


Thank you for your help!

Heather Hart, MLT (ASCP)


Various Perspectives and Opinions
  Provide alternative perspectives from experts on technology
  Political implications and influences
  Public opinion on technology such as the media, consumers and 
community
  Your assessment of how effective the initial planning and risk 
assessment was to the implementation and usage of the technology


  “You are encouraged to access other users and/or associated 
technologists in order to gain insight into various perspectives and fully 
understand the applications of the technology selected.”


This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential, 
proprietary, privileged and/or private information.  The information is 
intended to be for the use of the individual or entity designated above.  If 
you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender 
immediately, and delete the message and any attachments.  Any disclosure, 
reproduction, distribution or other use of this message or any attachments 
by an individual or entity other than the intended recipient is prohibited.


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet 



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Microwave use in histo lab

2012-04-06 Thread Mehmet Fatih BOZKURT
Hello,

http://www.ebsciences.com/papers/microwave.htm

I hope this helps..



On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Hart, Heather heather.h...@bms.com wrote:

 Hello everyone!

 I am currently taking a class titled Current Trends  Applications in
 Applied Science  Technology which is essentially a capstone course for my
 BSAST degree completion.   This course requires a four part research paper
 on any technology of choice in the (students) related field.  The topic I
 have chosen is Microwave Use in the Histology Lab.  I am trying to gather
 information for the third module in which I need to address the topics
 listed below.  I would appreciate any personal input or opinions about the
 topic per guidelines listed.

 Thank you for your help!

 Heather Hart, MLT (ASCP)


 Various Perspectives and Opinions
   Provide alternative perspectives from experts on technology
   Political implications and influences
   Public opinion on technology such as the media, consumers and
 community
   Your assessment of how effective the initial planning and risk
 assessment was to the implementation and usage of the technology

   “You are encouraged to access other users and/or associated
 technologists in order to gain insight into various perspectives and fully
 understand the applications of the technology selected.”

 This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential,
 proprietary, privileged and/or private information.  The information is
 intended to be for the use of the individual or entity designated above.
  If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the
 sender immediately, and delete the message and any attachments.  Any
 disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this message or any
 attachments by an individual or entity other than the intended recipient is
 prohibited.

 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet




-- 
Mehmet Fatih BOZKURT, DVM, PhD
Afyon Kocatepe University
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
Department of Pathology
03030, ANS Campus
Afyonkarahisar-TURKEY
Tel: +902722281312-109
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Molecular Testing requests

2012-04-06 Thread Breckenridge, Sue
Hi all! Just wondered how other histology labs are handling this scenario. 
We've noticed with the increase in physician options for Molecular Testing that 
we are being inundated with requests from physicians for testing from various 
reference labs. CAP has specific requirements for reference lab testing and so 
far our policy is to accept request from physician after checking that 
reference lab meets accrediting agency criteria.  Now that there are so many, 
it gets cumbersome (not to mention confusing) when trying to write procedures 
for the testing and educate staff. How are others handling this? Do you request 
all new reference labs must be submitted for approval to physician executive 
committee or just pathologist prior to sending any test requests? How are you 
managing send-out involvement? Do you bill the patient (when Medicare 14 day 
rule not involved), or does the reference lab? Would greatly appreciate hearing 
from you concerning any processes you follow or insights you might have. Thanks!
Sue Breckenridge, Histology Supervisor
Cape Regional Medical Center
Cape May Court House, NJ



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, from 
Cape
Regional Health System contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR LEGALLY
PRIVILEGED.The information is intended only for the use of the individual named
above and may not be disseminated to any other party without Cape Regional 
Health
System's written permission. If you are not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, disclosure,
distribution, copying or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of 
this
e-mailed information is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail 
in
error, please notify us immediately by telephone at 609-463-2163 to arrange for
the return of these documents to us without cost to you.
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] Re: Let's talk forceps

2012-04-06 Thread Beckham, Sharon
Bob, I am so glad that someone else feels the same way as I do.  I'm not the 
only person of a certain age in this histo world.  Everytime I hear the word 
forceps, I think about giving birth.  Both my kids were pulled out with forceps 
back in the '70's.  I HATE that word!  In histology I use tweezers!
 



-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Bob Richmond
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 1:09 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Re: Let's talk forceps

Arrrgh! Tweezers. Pickups.

Grumpy old doc notes that in his day (1960s) the word forceps meant 
obstetrical forceps and nothing else.

I was taught how to apply forceps, though medical students weren't actually 
allowed to. My eldest daughter was delivered by the Professor of Forceps (a 
much beloved practicing obstetrician with ideas far ahead of his time) to a 
crowd of admiring medical students, with an axis traction bar forceps (don't 
ask!) in the greatest feat of obstetrical grandstanding I ever witnessed.

I'm quite sure that nobody misses obstetrical forceps! The VBAC came into use 
not long after I graduated.

Thanks for the tip about the ergonomic, uh, tweezers. Filed for future 
reference.

Bob Richmond
Samurai Pathologist
Knoxville TN

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Aetna requiring CAP accreditation for non-hospital labs

2012-04-06 Thread Cristi stephenson
We are a small GI lab.  While we have not yet received this notice, we have 
heard the rumors and found a letter via Google.  We are State compliant as we 
cannot solicit other practices for work.  The idea we have to be CAP accredited 
seems a little much.  As stated by someone else, CLIA has granted the privilege 
of certifying labs to many other governing bodies.  i believe our State 
inspector is just as competent and demanding of a quality product for quality 
patient care as any CAP inspector would be.  Also, the time constraint is 
completely unreasonable.  We just passed our State inspection with no 
deficiencies last month and have no intentions of making any changes until 
otherwise forced!  In speaking with my director, I believe it is our plan to 
appeal and protest if we receive do receive this notice.  

Thanks
Cristi





From: Katelin Lester katelin09...@gmail.com
To: Carol Torrence ctorre...@kmcpa.com
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Sent: Thu, April 5, 2012 4:00:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Aetna requiring CAP accreditation for non-hospital labs

We also received this notice. We contacted our local CLIA office who had
heard of it this week as well. We are a small lab, so we are not sure yet
how this change will impact us. I'd also be curious to know what smaller,
private labs are planning on doing.
-- 
Katelin Lester, HTL
Gastroenterology Specialists of Oregon, P.C.
Pathology Laboratory
(971) 224-2408

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Carol Torrence ctorre...@kmcpa.com wrote:

 We have received notification from AETNA that they now require non-hospital
 labs to be accredited by CLIA and CAP.  The letter makes it obvious that by
 making such a request that they are not aware that CLIA assigned deemed
 status to CAP and CLIA is actually the gatekeeper.  Secondly we are told to
 be registered by May 1st and accredited by August 1st (which CAP says is
 impossible) or we will have to send our lab to either Quest or Ameripath
 which includes Dermpath Diagnostics division.  It fails to mention that
 there are other CAP accredited non hospital labs in our state.  The Aetna
 contact number is either 'mailbox full or even after leaving a message, no
 return call.  Me thinks me smells a rat.



 If you are a non-hospital lab, have you heard of this?  Does your
 dematopathologist or pathologist know this is coming?  I am interested in
 your comments.



 Carol M. Torrence, HT(ASCP)CM





 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] stainer and coverslipper recommendations for periodic use

2012-04-06 Thread Mandy Annis
Histonet colleagues,

We are interested in purchasing an automatic stainer and  glass 
coverslipper, however as only part of a large research facility our 
histology laboratory receives sporadic use.  Depending on studies, our lab 
may have several weeks or months of intensive use generating thousands of 
slides followed by weeks or months of disuse.  Given our unique work load, 
I am concerned that such periods of inactivity maybe hard on a stainer and 
coverslipper.  Keeping that in mind, can anyone recommend a 
stainer/coverslipper that can withstand inactivity and or that can be 
easily put in hibernation mode until needed?  The stainer would be used 
primarily for H E.  Vendors please feel free to contribute.

Thank you in advance!

Mandy

**
Mandy L. Annis
United States Geological Survey
Columbia Environmental Research Center
4200 New Haven RD  Columbia, MO  65201

Phone:(573)-441-2940 
Fax:(573)-876-1896
e-mail:man...@usgs.gov
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] Aetna requiring CAP accreditation for non-hospital labs

2012-04-06 Thread Carol Torrence
I too have been through many CAP inspections in the past. Passing is not my
concern - how about expense, prep time, time away to inspect a peer.We
are a small private lab also so this a bit of a pain.  There is no way that
CAP will be able to accommodate the workload that will ensue if this becomes
a trend. Which I think it will and there will be more insurance companies
aligning themselves with the larger labs as preferred.  My fear is that
local healthcare will be so undercut that it will become more difficult if
not impossible for even hospital labs to compete. I will never be convinced
that big is better. 

I believe Aetna will hear from CAP on this issue due to the increased
workload to them...deadlines may have to be extended.  We are hearing from a
CAP member that they will not be able to be accredited in such a short time,
according to CAP.

-Original Message-
From: Kim Donadio [mailto:one_angel_sec...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 6:31 PM
To: Katelin Lester
Cc: Carol Torrence; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Aetna requiring CAP accreditation for non-hospital
labs

My lab can pass any inspection I have no fear Bring it on
utube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2Fgl=US#/watch?v=gAQCbczCt8s

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Katelin Lester katelin09...@gmail.com wrote:

 We also received this notice. We contacted our local CLIA office who 
 had heard of it this week as well. We are a small lab, so we are not 
 sure yet how this change will impact us. I'd also be curious to know 
 what smaller, private labs are planning on doing.
 --
 Katelin Lester, HTL
 Gastroenterology Specialists of Oregon, P.C.
 Pathology Laboratory
 (971) 224-2408
 
 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Carol Torrence ctorre...@kmcpa.com
wrote:
 
 We have received notification from AETNA that they now require 
 non-hospital labs to be accredited by CLIA and CAP.  The letter makes 
 it obvious that by making such a request that they are not aware that 
 CLIA assigned deemed status to CAP and CLIA is actually the 
 gatekeeper.  Secondly we are told to be registered by May 1st and 
 accredited by August 1st (which CAP says is
 impossible) or we will have to send our lab to either Quest or 
 Ameripath which includes Dermpath Diagnostics division.  It fails to 
 mention that there are other CAP accredited non hospital labs in our 
 state.  The Aetna contact number is either 'mailbox full or even 
 after leaving a message, no return call.  Me thinks me smells a rat.
 
 
 
 If you are a non-hospital lab, have you heard of this?  Does your 
 dematopathologist or pathologist know this is coming?  I am 
 interested in your comments.
 
 
 
 Carol M. Torrence, HT(ASCP)CM
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet





___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Aetna requiring CAP accreditation for non-hospital labs

2012-04-06 Thread Jesus Ellin
There are several frame of minds here, but most closely this aligns with the 
affordable care act and quality outcomes for patients.  I to agree with the 
statement that other agencies can provide good quality outcomes, but Anatomic 
pathology is changing so rapidly.  From all aspects, but if you look at who 
bills for most of the CMS testing it falls under hospital based laboratories, 
yet the government decides reimbursement based on what the large labs make..  
In the end we are seeing consolidation,, but I hope someone comes to the 
forefront to speak for us all. 
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 6, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Carol Torrence ctorre...@kmcpa.com wrote:

 I too have been through many CAP inspections in the past. Passing is not my
 concern - how about expense, prep time, time away to inspect a peer.We
 are a small private lab also so this a bit of a pain.  There is no way that
 CAP will be able to accommodate the workload that will ensue if this becomes
 a trend. Which I think it will and there will be more insurance companies
 aligning themselves with the larger labs as preferred.  My fear is that
 local healthcare will be so undercut that it will become more difficult if
 not impossible for even hospital labs to compete. I will never be convinced
 that big is better. 
 
 I believe Aetna will hear from CAP on this issue due to the increased
 workload to them...deadlines may have to be extended.  We are hearing from a
 CAP member that they will not be able to be accredited in such a short time,
 according to CAP.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kim Donadio [mailto:one_angel_sec...@yahoo.com] 
 Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 6:31 PM
 To: Katelin Lester
 Cc: Carol Torrence; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Subject: Re: [Histonet] Aetna requiring CAP accreditation for non-hospital
 labs
 
 My lab can pass any inspection I have no fear Bring it on
 utube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2Fgl=US#/watch?v=gAQCbczCt8s
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Katelin Lester katelin09...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 We also received this notice. We contacted our local CLIA office who 
 had heard of it this week as well. We are a small lab, so we are not 
 sure yet how this change will impact us. I'd also be curious to know 
 what smaller, private labs are planning on doing.
 --
 Katelin Lester, HTL
 Gastroenterology Specialists of Oregon, P.C.
 Pathology Laboratory
 (971) 224-2408
 
 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Carol Torrence ctorre...@kmcpa.com
 wrote:
 
 We have received notification from AETNA that they now require 
 non-hospital labs to be accredited by CLIA and CAP.  The letter makes 
 it obvious that by making such a request that they are not aware that 
 CLIA assigned deemed status to CAP and CLIA is actually the 
 gatekeeper.  Secondly we are told to be registered by May 1st and 
 accredited by August 1st (which CAP says is
 impossible) or we will have to send our lab to either Quest or 
 Ameripath which includes Dermpath Diagnostics division.  It fails to 
 mention that there are other CAP accredited non hospital labs in our 
 state.  The Aetna contact number is either 'mailbox full or even 
 after leaving a message, no return call.  Me thinks me smells a rat.
 
 
 
 If you are a non-hospital lab, have you heard of this?  Does your 
 dematopathologist or pathologist know this is coming?  I am 
 interested in your comments.
 
 
 
 Carol M. Torrence, HT(ASCP)CM
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

__
This message is confidential, intended only for the named 
recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged 
or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are 
not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that the 
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you receive this message in error, 
or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender 
at either the e-mail, fax, address, or telephone number 
listed above and delete this e-mail from your computer. 
Thank You.
__

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Aetna requiring CAP accreditation for non-hospital labs

2012-04-06 Thread Kim Donadio
Yikes I just 2 sec ago said that lol 

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 6, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Jesus Ellin jel...@yumaregional.org wrote:

 There are several frame of minds here, but most closely this aligns with the 
 affordable care act and quality outcomes for patients.  I to agree with the 
 statement that other agencies can provide good quality outcomes, but Anatomic 
 pathology is changing so rapidly.  From all aspects, but if you look at who 
 bills for most of the CMS testing it falls under hospital based laboratories, 
 yet the government decides reimbursement based on what the large labs make..  
 In the end we are seeing consolidation,, but I hope someone comes to the 
 forefront to speak for us all. 
 Sent from my iPad
 On Apr 6, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Carol Torrence ctorre...@kmcpa.com wrote:
 
 I too have been through many CAP inspections in the past. Passing is not my
 concern - how about expense, prep time, time away to inspect a peer.We
 are a small private lab also so this a bit of a pain.  There is no way that
 CAP will be able to accommodate the workload that will ensue if this becomes
 a trend. Which I think it will and there will be more insurance companies
 aligning themselves with the larger labs as preferred.  My fear is that
 local healthcare will be so undercut that it will become more difficult if
 not impossible for even hospital labs to compete. I will never be convinced
 that big is better. 
 
 I believe Aetna will hear from CAP on this issue due to the increased
 workload to them...deadlines may have to be extended.  We are hearing from a
 CAP member that they will not be able to be accredited in such a short time,
 according to CAP.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kim Donadio [mailto:one_angel_sec...@yahoo.com] 
 Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 6:31 PM
 To: Katelin Lester
 Cc: Carol Torrence; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Subject: Re: [Histonet] Aetna requiring CAP accreditation for non-hospital
 labs
 
 My lab can pass any inspection I have no fear Bring it on
 utube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2Fgl=US#/watch?v=gAQCbczCt8s
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Katelin Lester katelin09...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 We also received this notice. We contacted our local CLIA office who 
 had heard of it this week as well. We are a small lab, so we are not 
 sure yet how this change will impact us. I'd also be curious to know 
 what smaller, private labs are planning on doing.
 --
 Katelin Lester, HTL
 Gastroenterology Specialists of Oregon, P.C.
 Pathology Laboratory
 (971) 224-2408
 
 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Carol Torrence ctorre...@kmcpa.com
 wrote:
 
 We have received notification from AETNA that they now require 
 non-hospital labs to be accredited by CLIA and CAP.  The letter makes 
 it obvious that by making such a request that they are not aware that 
 CLIA assigned deemed status to CAP and CLIA is actually the 
 gatekeeper.  Secondly we are told to be registered by May 1st and 
 accredited by August 1st (which CAP says is
 impossible) or we will have to send our lab to either Quest or 
 Ameripath which includes Dermpath Diagnostics division.  It fails to 
 mention that there are other CAP accredited non hospital labs in our 
 state.  The Aetna contact number is either 'mailbox full or even 
 after leaving a message, no return call.  Me thinks me smells a rat.
 
 
 
 If you are a non-hospital lab, have you heard of this?  Does your 
 dematopathologist or pathologist know this is coming?  I am 
 interested in your comments.
 
 
 
 Carol M. Torrence, HT(ASCP)CM
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
 
 __
 This message is confidential, intended only for the named 
 recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged 
 or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are 
 not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that the 
 dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is 
 strictly prohibited.  If you receive this message in error, 
 or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender 
 at either the e-mail, fax, address, or telephone number 
 listed above and delete this e-mail from your computer. 
 Thank You.
 __

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Aetna requiring CAP accreditation for non-hospital labs

2012-04-06 Thread Kim Donadio
I agree it's to short of a time frame. I wonder if it has some to do with the 
affordable care act ? 


http://publications.milliman.com/publications/healthreform/pdfs/rating-underwriting-under-new.pdf

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 6, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Carol Torrence ctorre...@kmcpa.com wrote:

 I too have been through many CAP inspections in the past. Passing is not my
 concern - how about expense, prep time, time away to inspect a peer.We
 are a small private lab also so this a bit of a pain.  There is no way that
 CAP will be able to accommodate the workload that will ensue if this becomes
 a trend. Which I think it will and there will be more insurance companies
 aligning themselves with the larger labs as preferred.  My fear is that
 local healthcare will be so undercut that it will become more difficult if
 not impossible for even hospital labs to compete. I will never be convinced
 that big is better. 
 
 I believe Aetna will hear from CAP on this issue due to the increased
 workload to them...deadlines may have to be extended.  We are hearing from a
 CAP member that they will not be able to be accredited in such a short time,
 according to CAP.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kim Donadio [mailto:one_angel_sec...@yahoo.com] 
 Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 6:31 PM
 To: Katelin Lester
 Cc: Carol Torrence; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Subject: Re: [Histonet] Aetna requiring CAP accreditation for non-hospital
 labs
 
 My lab can pass any inspection I have no fear Bring it on
 utube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2Fgl=US#/watch?v=gAQCbczCt8s
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Katelin Lester katelin09...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 We also received this notice. We contacted our local CLIA office who 
 had heard of it this week as well. We are a small lab, so we are not 
 sure yet how this change will impact us. I'd also be curious to know 
 what smaller, private labs are planning on doing.
 --
 Katelin Lester, HTL
 Gastroenterology Specialists of Oregon, P.C.
 Pathology Laboratory
 (971) 224-2408
 
 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Carol Torrence ctorre...@kmcpa.com
 wrote:
 
 We have received notification from AETNA that they now require 
 non-hospital labs to be accredited by CLIA and CAP.  The letter makes 
 it obvious that by making such a request that they are not aware that 
 CLIA assigned deemed status to CAP and CLIA is actually the 
 gatekeeper.  Secondly we are told to be registered by May 1st and 
 accredited by August 1st (which CAP says is
 impossible) or we will have to send our lab to either Quest or 
 Ameripath which includes Dermpath Diagnostics division.  It fails to 
 mention that there are other CAP accredited non hospital labs in our 
 state.  The Aetna contact number is either 'mailbox full or even 
 after leaving a message, no return call.  Me thinks me smells a rat.
 
 
 
 If you are a non-hospital lab, have you heard of this?  Does your 
 dematopathologist or pathologist know this is coming?  I am 
 interested in your comments.
 
 
 
 Carol M. Torrence, HT(ASCP)CM
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
 
 
 
 

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Aetna requiring CAP accreditation for non-hospital labs

2012-04-06 Thread Davide Costanzo
This is a fascinating thread!!

So what are your thoughts on this - It would appear that, if other insurers
follow suit, this could pose a huge burden on dermatologists that do their
own tissue processing, and all the GI labs across the country that are
popping up doing their own in-house histology. It may be hard, and in some
cases not possible for those labs to become CAP accredited.

In my opinion, that would be a great thing, to see all those physician
offices doing histology close their lab doors, and focus on thier own
specialty rather than invade the pathology world from which they were not
trained. It would seem, to the average witness, that these facilities are
treading on very thin ice as it is. It certainly does appear to be a
violation of Stark laws that were created for a very good reason. In
addition, these offices have stolen the bread and butter from large labs,
and hospital pathology departments and left behind the far less profitable
work. It would be nice to see that work return to the place it belongs - in
Pathology laboratories.

It may be a pipe dream at this point, but who knows - maybe this is the
start of a very, very good thing.



On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Kim Donadio one_angel_sec...@yahoo.comwrote:

 Yikes I just 2 sec ago said that lol

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 6, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Jesus Ellin jel...@yumaregional.org wrote:

  There are several frame of minds here, but most closely this aligns with
 the affordable care act and quality outcomes for patients.  I to agree with
 the statement that other agencies can provide good quality outcomes, but
 Anatomic pathology is changing so rapidly.  From all aspects, but if you
 look at who bills for most of the CMS testing it falls under hospital based
 laboratories, yet the government decides reimbursement based on what the
 large labs make..  In the end we are seeing consolidation,, but I hope
 someone comes to the forefront to speak for us all.
  Sent from my iPad
  On Apr 6, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Carol Torrence ctorre...@kmcpa.com
 wrote:
 
  I too have been through many CAP inspections in the past. Passing is
 not my
  concern - how about expense, prep time, time away to inspect a peer.
  We
  are a small private lab also so this a bit of a pain.  There is no way
 that
  CAP will be able to accommodate the workload that will ensue if this
 becomes
  a trend. Which I think it will and there will be more insurance
 companies
  aligning themselves with the larger labs as preferred.  My fear is
 that
  local healthcare will be so undercut that it will become more difficult
 if
  not impossible for even hospital labs to compete. I will never be
 convinced
  that big is better.
 
  I believe Aetna will hear from CAP on this issue due to the increased
  workload to them...deadlines may have to be extended.  We are hearing
 from a
  CAP member that they will not be able to be accredited in such a short
 time,
  according to CAP.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Kim Donadio [mailto:one_angel_sec...@yahoo.com]
  Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 6:31 PM
  To: Katelin Lester
  Cc: Carol Torrence; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
  Subject: Re: [Histonet] Aetna requiring CAP accreditation for
 non-hospital
  labs
 
  My lab can pass any inspection I have no fear Bring it on
  utube.com/index?desktop_uri=%2Fgl=US#/watch?v=gAQCbczCt8s
 
  Sent from my iPhone
 
  On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Katelin Lester katelin09...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  We also received this notice. We contacted our local CLIA office who
  had heard of it this week as well. We are a small lab, so we are not
  sure yet how this change will impact us. I'd also be curious to know
  what smaller, private labs are planning on doing.
  --
  Katelin Lester, HTL
  Gastroenterology Specialists of Oregon, P.C.
  Pathology Laboratory
  (971) 224-2408
 
  On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Carol Torrence ctorre...@kmcpa.com
  wrote:
 
  We have received notification from AETNA that they now require
  non-hospital labs to be accredited by CLIA and CAP.  The letter makes
  it obvious that by making such a request that they are not aware that
  CLIA assigned deemed status to CAP and CLIA is actually the
  gatekeeper.  Secondly we are told to be registered by May 1st and
  accredited by August 1st (which CAP says is
  impossible) or we will have to send our lab to either Quest or
  Ameripath which includes Dermpath Diagnostics division.  It fails to
  mention that there are other CAP accredited non hospital labs in our
  state.  The Aetna contact number is either 'mailbox full or even
  after leaving a message, no return call.  Me thinks me smells a rat.
 
 
 
  If you are a non-hospital lab, have you heard of this?  Does your
  dematopathologist or pathologist know this is coming?  I am
  interested in your comments.
 
 
 
  Carol M. Torrence, HT(ASCP)CM
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  Histonet mailing list
  Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu