Posting for my colleague, Jeff Gordon, because his post did not go through 
successfully:

"Suzie, your histonet post was forwarded to me by a colleague, and I thought I 
could help with your mast cell staining dilemma with pan-keratin.  University 
of Pennsylvania published an article a while back about "undesirable" 
reactivity of cytokeratins that focused primarily on sentinel lymph node 
testing.  In their study they found that when cytokeratin markers OTHER than 
strictly AE1/AE3 (with no other components) were used, other non-epithelial 
elements were being labeled that they deemed "undesirable."  This entire 
article can be found here for your's and your pathologists' reference:  
http://www.archivesofpathology.org/doi/pdf/10.1043/0003-9985(2000)124%3C1310%3AUCIONN%3E2.0.CO%3B2
  

Based on these findings, and because another person in the thread also 
indicated that they may be dealing with the same issue, cervical tissue that 
was rich in mast cells was stained on a Ventana Ultra with cytokeratin AE1/AE3 
ONLY as well as with cytokeratin OSCAR (which is another pan-keratin but with a 
lesser sensitivity to squamous epithelium than AE1/AE3) with CC1 mild heat 
retrieval and 16 minute heated primary incubation and Ultraview detection.  To 
confirm the presence of mast cells in the tissue, both CD117 and tryptase were 
also stained on the same tissue with the same protocols.  The results showed 
that though there was an abundance of mast cells present labeled by tryptase 
and CD117, there was no detectable staining of mast cells with either 
cytokeratin AE1/AE3 or with cytokeratin OSCAR, while the epithelial portion of 
the tissue stained with both cytokeratins (though the OSCAR was noticeably 
weaker because of the lower sensitivity to squamous epithelium).  

The stains can be seen here:  
http://www.cellmarque.com/cmc/AO_mastcellreactivity.php  

Hopefully this helps.  If you have any questions, please contact us at your 
convenience."

Thank you

-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Miller, Suzie
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 8:57 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Pankeratin- Trouble with Mast Cell Staining

Hello Everyone,

If you have a Ventana Ultra and use (Ventana# 760-2595) Pankeratin 
AE1/AE3/PCK29, would you consider sharing your staining protocol?

Our Pathologists are displeased with the amount of mast cell staining with our 
current protocol so we are looking to explore other protocols or suggestions.

Thank you for your assistance,
Suzie

Suzie Miller, MLT ASCP
Senior Histotech
Mercy Health System of Maine Laboratory
mill...@emhs.org<mailto:mill...@emhs.org>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email message, including any associated files, is for the sole use of the 
intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged, or subject to copyright, trade secret or other protection. This 
message also may contain information protected by state and federal privacy 
laws that are enforced through serious civil and criminal sanctions. Any 
unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are 
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately 
by replying to this e-mail, and delete the original and all copies of this 
message from your computer or other device.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

Reply via email to