As long as everything is solved and there is no doubt about whose specimen it
is, I don't see any benefit in letting people know that is was initially
compromised.
René J.
--- On Wed, 3/11/09, Bell, Lynne lynne.b...@cvmc.org wrote:
From: Bell, Lynne lynne.b...@cvmc.org
Subject: [Histonet] Compromised specimens
To: Histonet (histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu)
histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Date: Wednesday, March 11, 2009, 1:17 PM
When our histology lab receives a compromised specimen (not labeled
with patient's name, wrong DOB, no label whatsoever, etc) we have the
offending party correct the error and fill out an accountability form accepting
full responsibility for the identification of the specimen. We then scan the
accountability form into the patient's medical record and include the
information in the specimen comments section of the pathology
record. This information does not print on the official pathology report.
My question - should the pathologist include in his/her report the compromised
specimen information? Presently, on our clinical lab reports and cytology
reports it is included - simply saying Compromised Specimen. Our
pathologists historically have not wanted to include this in the official
pathology report and I feel that it should be in there - sort of a cover
your butt addendum.
I'm curious what other hospitals do!!
Thanks in advance,
Lynne A. Bell, HT (ASCP)
Lead Histologist
Central Vermont Medical Center
130 Fisher Road
Barre, VT 05641
802-371-4923
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
