Re: [Histonet] tissue retention times

2010-01-25 Thread Kim . Donadio
We are not a MOHS lab. I know many laws have changed since I worked in 
one, this being one of them I think. I would not go as far as to getting a 
-80 freezer for this. If you cant send them out to another lab for 
processing or do it there, both which are very costly. I might try saving 
the samples in the small 20 ml 10% buffered formalin bottles. Not sure 
what your laws are there about the disposal of formalin but here we can 
neutralize it and toss it. So this might be a cost efficient way for you 
to meet this requirement without processing your samples. 




Kim Donadio 
Pathology Supervisor
Baptist Hospital
1000 W Moreno St.
Pensacola FL 32501
Phone (850) 469-7718
Fax (850) 434-4996



Ingles Claire  cing...@uwhealth.org 
Sent by: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
01/21/2010 12:11 PM

To
histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
cc

Subject
[Histonet] tissue retention times






OK, everybody crack open your JCAHO requirement manuals...
We are a MOHS lab and were surveyed by Joint Commission about 2 months 
ago. During the survey, we were cited because we only retain our physical 
tissue specimens for 24 hours, as they remain fresh and are not fixed. We 
throw the tissue the following afternoon vs. retaining for the 1 week 
after microscopic sections are examined and reports are reviewed and 
signed. (Standard #QC.2.120) 
Has anyone else (specifically a Mohs lab) been cited for this? We are 
currently trying to appeal, but have been denied so far. I am having a 
teleconference with the JCAHO powers that be to try and get the appeal 
going again, but I'm not the lawyer type.
The letter states that their interpretation is that even if the tissue is 
not regarded as 'gross' tissue, any 'useable' tissue must be retained for 
a minimum of a week after the case is signed off on.I am thinking on 
focusing on the 'useable' bit as related to diagnostic value of delayed 
retained fresh tissue processing i.e. freeze artifact, tissue degredation, 
inability to perform ancillary testing, etc. Also, what is the definition 
of 'reviewed and signed reports'? Does this mean when the case is 
finalized, or just the tissue sections in question? We sometimes have 
patients that go a month + between Mohs procedures on the same positive 
lesion.
We will probably have to get a -80 freezer for this if the appeal doesn't 
go through. Not to mention the fact that some of our cases are not 
resolved for months. We would have constantly search when cases are 
finalized to know when we can dispose of the tissue. FYI, the letter also 
states that the JCAHO standard is more stringent than the CLIA standard, 
so I'm not even really going to use it in arguments. 
 
HELP!
Claire Ingles
UW Hospital  Clinics
Madison WI
 

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



-
All electronic data transmissions originating from or sent to
Baptist Health Care Corporation (BHC) are subject to monitoring.
This message along with any attached data, are the confidential and
proprietary communications of BHC and are intended to be received
only by the individual or individuals to whom the message has been
addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, please take notice that any use, copying, printing,
forwarding or distribution of this message, in any form, is
strictly prohibited and may violate State or Federal Law. If you
have received this transmission in error, please delete or destroy
all copies of this message.  For questions, contact the BHC Privacy
Officer at (850) 434-4472.  Rev.10/07.
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] tissue retention times

2010-01-21 Thread Kolman, Kimberly D.
We are a small Mohs operation, but we just process and paraffin block
all our remaining specimens and file them with the rest of our pathology
cases.  This worked for CAP anyway.

Kim Kolman, HT, (ASCP)
VA Eastern Kansas Health Care System
Leavenworth, Ks 66048

-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Ingles
Claire 
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:11 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] tissue retention times

OK, everybody crack open your JCAHO requirement manuals...
We are a MOHS lab and were surveyed by Joint Commission about 2 months
ago. During the survey, we were cited because we only retain our
physical tissue specimens for 24 hours, as they remain fresh and are not
fixed. We throw the tissue the following afternoon vs. retaining for the
1 week after microscopic sections are examined and reports are reviewed
and signed. (Standard #QC.2.120) 
Has anyone else (specifically a Mohs lab) been cited for this? We are
currently trying to appeal, but have been denied so far. I am having a
teleconference with the JCAHO powers that be to try and get the appeal
going again, but I'm not the lawyer type.
The letter states that their interpretation is that even if the tissue
is not regarded as 'gross' tissue, any 'useable' tissue must be retained
for a minimum of a week after the case is signed off on.I am thinking on
focusing on the 'useable' bit as related to diagnostic value of delayed
retained fresh tissue processing i.e. freeze artifact, tissue
degredation, inability to perform ancillary testing, etc. Also, what is
the definition of 'reviewed and signed reports'? Does this mean when the
case is finalized, or just the tissue sections in question? We sometimes
have patients that go a month + between Mohs procedures on the same
positive lesion.
We will probably have to get a -80 freezer for this if the appeal
doesn't go through. Not to mention the fact that some of our cases are
not resolved for months. We would have constantly search when cases are
finalized to know when we can dispose of the tissue. FYI, the letter
also states that the JCAHO standard is more stringent than the CLIA
standard, so I'm not even really going to use it in arguments. 
 
HELP!
Claire Ingles
UW Hospital  Clinics
Madison WI
 

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] tissue retention times

2010-01-21 Thread Cheri Miller
We do the same. We aren't a MOHs operation but we do many frozen cases and we 
process the tissue, cut a permanent processed slide of the frozen sections and 
then retain them for 10 years along with our other blocks. Cheri
Cheryl Miller HT ASCP CM
Histology Supervisor
Physicians Laboratory Services
Omaha, NE. 402 731 4148
-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Kolman, 
Kimberly D.
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 12:18 PM
To: Ingles Claire ; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] tissue retention times



PRIVILEGED / CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be contained in this message.  If you 
are not the addressee intended / indicated or agent responsible for delivering 
it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that you are in possession of 
confidential and privileged information.  Any dissemination, distribution, or 
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email 
from your system.

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet