H-Net* ARE AMERICANS THE VICTIMS OF A HOAX?
What Really Happened.com10-23-01http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hoax.htmlThe time has come to stop using the flag as a blindfold, to stop waving our guns and our gods at each other, to take a close look at the facts which have emerged from the attacks on the World Trade Towers and to recognize the very real possibility, indeed probability, that We The People are the victims of a gigantic and deadly hoax. In a normal terrorist event, the terrorists cannot wait to take credit, in order to link the violence to the socio-political intent of the terrorist organization. Yet the prime suspect in the New York Towers case, ex(?) CIA asset Osama Bin Laden (whose brother is one of George W. Bush's Texas business partners), has issued only two statements regarding the September 11th attacks, and both of those are denials of any involvement. Huge problems are emerging in the official view of events. It's known that the United States was planning an invasion of Afghanistan long before the attacks on the World Trade Towers. Indeed the attacks on the World Trade Towers perfectly fit the timetable of an invasion by October stated by US officials just last summer. The 19 names of suspected hijackers released by the FBI don't point to Afghanistan. They come from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, United Arab Emirates; all across the middle east without a focus in any one region. Indeed, even as the FBI was admitting that its list of 19 names was based solely on identifications thought to have been forged, Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Prince Saudi Al-Faisal insisted that an investigation in Saudi Arabia showed that the 5 Saudi men were not aboard the four jetliners that crashed in New York, Virginia and Pennsylvania on September 11. "It was proved that five of the names included in the FBI list had nothing to do with what happened," Al-Faisal told the Arabic Press in Washington after meeting with U.S. President George W. Bush at the White House. A sixth identified hijacker is also reported to still be alive in Tunisia, while a 7th named man died two years ago!In a recent development, the BBC is reporting that the transcript of a phone call made by Flight Attendant Madeline Amy Sweeney to Boston air traffic controls shows that the flight attendant gave the seat numbers occupied by the hijackers, seat numbers which were NOT the seats of the men the FBI claimed were responsible for the hijacking! FBI Chief Robert Mueller admitted on September 20 and on September 27 that at this time the FBI has no legal proof to prove the true identities of the suicidal hijackers. Yet in the haste to move forward on the already planned war in Afghanistan, our government and the FBI (which does not have the best record for honesty in investigations to begin with, having been caught rigging lab tests, manufacturing testimony in the Vincent Foster affair, and illegally withholding/destroying evidence in the Oklahoma Bombing case) are not taking too close a look at evidence that points away from the designated suspect, ex(?) CIA asset Osama Bin Laden.In particular, the FBI, too busy harassing political dissenters to find spies in its midst, the long rumored mole inside the White House, or plug leaks in high-tech flowing to foreign nations, has willfully and criminally ignored the implications of some vital pieces of information the FBI is itself waving around at the public. We are being told that this crack team of terrorists, able to breeze past airport security as if it wasn't there, wound up leaving so much evidence in its wake that the bumbling Inspector Clouseau (or the FBI) could not fail to stumble over it. The locations where the terrorists supposedly stayed are so overloaded with damning materials that they resemble less a crimes scene, and more a "B" detective movie set, with vital clues always on prominent display for the cameras. Yet another problem lies with the described actions of the hijackers themselves. We are being told on the one hand that these men were such fanatical devotees of their faith that they willingly crashed the jets they were flying into buildings. Yet on the other hand, we are being told that these same men spent the night before their planned visit to Allah drinking in strip bars, committing not just one, but two mortal sins which would keep them out of Paradise no matter what else they did. Truly devout Muslims would spend the day before a suicide attack fasting and praying. Not only does the drinking in strip bars not fit the profile of a fanatically religious Muslim willing to die for his cause, but the witness reports of the men in the bars are of men going out of their way to be noticed and remembered, while waving around phony identifications. Because of the facts of the phony identifications, we don't really know who was on those planes. What we do know is that the men on those planes went to a great deal of trouble to steal the identities of
H-Net* A Map Of Zionism In America And Russia
Posted By: justinDate: Monday, 22 October 2001, at 6:54 p.m. Bill White Commentary -- I got a copy today of JJ Goldberg's book Jewish Power. Rather than repeat all the information offered, I thought I would provide an overview and some links, and allow readers to confirm all this for themselves. For those who don't believe that the various Zionist and religious-Jewish organizations come together to generate policy, you have obviously not heard (as I hadn't) of the National Jewish Community Relations Advisory Council. Let me allow Mr Goldberg, who is a journalist in Israel and America, and who is editor of the Jewish community magazine Forward, to describe this group to you:"The council, known by the Jaw Breaking title of the National Jewish Community Relations Advisory Council, or NCRAC (pronounced "nacrac"), is nothing less than the central policy making council of the organized American Jewish community. Its membership includes a dozen of the most powerful and broadly representative groups on the national Jewish scene: the three main synagogue unions, Reform, Conservative, and Orothodox; the three main "defense agencies," Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Committee, and American Jewish Congress; and the three largest Jewish women's groups, Hadassah, the National Council on Jewish Women, and Women's American ORT. Also included, along with a handful of other national bodies, are 117 local community councils, representing the world of Jewish federated charities and their donors." Ah. And what do these groups do? Mr Goldberg tells us:"MCRAC's policy positions are hammed out in intense, year-long negotiations among the agencies, then boted on at the council's annual assembly and published each fall in a booklet, the Joint Program Plan. ... The eighty-four page plan for 1992 included, along with ten pages on Israel and eight pages onanti-Semitism in Russia and the Arab world, no less than six pages on public- school education, six pages on abortion rights and the status of women, four pages on poverty, three pages each on immigration policy, federal courts, and universal health care, and four pages on the environment."So what is being said is that ALL THE JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS IN AMERICA REALLY DO MEET ONCE A YEAR AND DECIDE ON A JOINT POLITICAL PLATFORM. Wow. :-OI am still trying to absorb that. In my recent article for Pravda on the Jewish lobby, someone told me that the Jewish lobby in America didn't have an official position on gun control. Mr Goldberg disagrees, stating, "The 1994 plan added teo pages entitled 'Gun Control and Violence,' plus a four page section titled 'Constitutional Protections in a Pluralistic Democracy.' These protections addressed issuesranging from the death penalty and homosecxual right to term limits, campaign- finance reform, and congressionaln redistricting."So American Jewry, meaning all the synagogues and all the formal Jewish power structure, actually does have a written program which it issues each year and which all organizations adhere to. So if you are wondering why, say Orthodox Jewish congregations are not active on issues like abortion and homosexuality with conservative Christian churches, it is because they have coordinated with all the other Jewish community groups in America not to be active on those issues. And if you are wondering why you see all the Jewish organizations working together on issues like undermining the Second Amendment and banning guns, it is because ALL JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS IN THE COUNTRY MEET ANNUALLY TO DECIDE WHAT TO THINK ON THESE ISSUES.Wow. I keep putting that in capitals because it blows me away. Those who would like to read Mr Goldberg's book, in which he goes into detail on how Jewish organizations did a lot of things, from blocking pro-Christian educational legislation to forcing George Bush Sr out of office, you can buy this book here:http://shop.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=0ECNF1A6SImscssidHUB0V7SLNB9K8PW2P4H5244KFWB5DEACisbn=0201327988Now Mr Goldberg does point out that not all Jews follow this line. "The NCRAC agenda provokes widespread resentment among Jewish activists at the grassroots." In particular, he points to a growing racist movement among Jews that want NCRAC to denounce blacks as the course of crime in America, and wants NCRAC to recognize that "Islam [is] the enemy of Judaism".Sounds like a pleasant group of folks. Let's hear what one rabbi has to say about abortion in the Jewish religion in Mr Goldberg's book:"In rabbinic canon law, .. human life does not simply begin at conception. It develops gradually, acquiring greater legal protection as the fetus gains viability. Development continues even after birth, he added paranthetically; an infant that dies before the eighth day does receive a Jewish funeral."In any case, ... Judaism rules that the morth's needsautomatically take precedent until the moment of birth. 'There is
Re: H-Net* langkah bendul
*~*
{ Sila lawat Laman Hizbi-Net - http://www.hizbi.net }
{Hantarkan mesej anda ke: [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
{Iklan barangan? Hantarkan ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
*~*
PAS : KE ARAH PEMERINTAHAN ISLAM YANG ADIL
~~~
Assalamualaikum
Emm... saya masih kurang jelas dalam perkara ini...
Adat langkah bendul ni disudut mana karutnya dan bahagian mana pulak yang
terkeluar dari landasan Islam?
Apa yang saya lihat dan pahami langkah bendul ini hanyalah satu adat bukan
ibadat.
Mengikut hukum sesuatu adat itu selagi ia tidak bercanggah dengan syarak
boleh diamalkan
dan boleh juga ditinggalkan. Jika mampu maka perbuatlah ia. Jika tidak
tinggalkan lah ia.
Pada saya ia elok lah diamalkan. Hati kakak kena jaga la jugak. Bila adik
kawin dulu tentu la kakak sedih.
Walaupun pemberian tak seberapa. Tapi sekurang-kurangnya dia tak la
diketepikan.
- Original Message -
From: zulkefli hashim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adat tak boleh langkah bendul mengarut dan terkeluar dari landasan Islam.
Percaya kepada pantang larang adat tersebut menjadikan kita percaya kepada
benda karut dan dilarang dalam islam.
Juga adat yang tidak membenarkan 2 orang anak berkahwin pada tahun yang
sama, juga karut.
Sedangkan Nabi menikahkan 2 anak perempuan pada hari yang sama.
( Melanggan ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] pada body : SUBSCRIBE HIZB)
( Berhenti ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] pada body: UNSUBSCRIBE HIZB)
( Segala pendapat yang dikemukakan tidak menggambarkan )
( pandangan rasmi bukan tanggungjawab HIZBI-Net )
( Bermasalah? Sila hubungi [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Pengirim: oon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
