*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
{ Sila lawat Laman Hizbi-Net - http://www.hizbi.net }
{ Hantarkan mesej anda ke: [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
{ Iklan barangan? Hantarkan ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
PAS : KE ARAH PEMERINTAHAN ISLAM YANG ADIL
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The So-Called Evidence Is A Farce
WorldNews.com, Sun 21 Oct 2001
Letters to the Editor.
I'm a retired Special Forces Master Sergeant. That
doesn't cut much for those who will only accept the
opinions of former officers on military matters, since
we enlisted swine are assumed to be incapable of
grasping the nuances of doctrine.
But I wasn't just in the army. I studied and taught
military science and doctrine. I was a tactics
instructor at the Jungle Operations Training Center in
Panama, and I taught Military Science at West Point.
And contrary to the popular image of what Special
Forces does, SF's mission is to teach. We offer advice
and assistance to foreign forces. That's everything
from teaching marksmanship to a private to instructing
a Battalion staff on how to coordinate effective air
operations with a sister service.
Based on that experience, and operations in eight
designated conflict areas from Vietnam to Haiti, I
have to say that the story we hear on the news and
read in the newspapers is simply not believable. The
most cursory glance at the verifiable facts, before,
during, and after September 11th, does not support the
official line or conform to the current actions of the
United States government.
But the official line only works if they can get
everyone to accept its underlying premises. I'm not at
all surprised about the Republican and Democratic
Parties repeating these premises. They are simply two
factions within a single dominant political class, and
both are financed by the same economic powerhouses. My
biggest disappointment, as someone who identifies
himself with the left, has been the tacit acceptance
of those premises by others on the left, sometimes
naively, and sometimes to score some morality points.
Those premises are twofold. One, there is the premise
that what this de facto administration is doing now is
a "response" to September 11th. Two, there is the
premise that this attack on the World Trade Center and
the Pentagon was done by people based in Afghanistan.
In my opinion, neither of these is sound.
To put this in perspective we have to go back not to
September 11th, but to last year or further.
A man of limited intelligence, George W. Bush, with
nothing more than his name and the behind-the-scenes
pressure of his powerful father-a former President,
ex-director of Central Intelligence, and an oil man-is
systematically constructed as a candidate, at
tremendous cost. Across the country, subtle and
not-so-subtle mechanisms are put into place to
disfranchise a significant fraction of the Democrat's
African-American voter base. This doesn't come out
until Florida becomes a battleground for Electoral
College votes, and the magnitude of the story has been
suppressed by the corporate media to this day. In a
decision so lacking in legitimacy, the Supreme Court
will neither by-line the author of the decision nor
allow the decision to ever be used as a precedent,
Bush v. Gore awards the presidency of the United
States to a man who loses the popular vote in Florida
and loses the national popular vote by over 600,000.
This de facto regime then organizes a very interesting
cabinet. The Vice President is an oil executive and
the former Secretary of Defense. The National Security
Advisor is a director on the board of a transnational
oil corporation and a Russia scholar. The Secretary of
State is a man with no diplomatic experience
whatsoever, and the former Chair of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff. The other interesting appointment is Donald
Rumsfeld as Secretary of Defense. Rumsfeld is the
former CEO of Searle Pharmaceuticals. He and Cheney
were featured as speakers at the May, 2000,
Russian-American Business Leaders Forum. So the
consistent currents in this cabinet are petroleum, the
former Soviet Union, and the military.
Based on the record of Daddy Bush, in all his guises,
and the general trajectory of US foreign policy as far
back as the Carter Administration, I feel I can
reasonably conclude that Middle Eastern and South
Asian fossil fuels are one of their major
preoccupations. Not just because this klavern has some
very direct financial interests in fossil fuel, but
because they surely know that worldwide oil production
is peaking as we speak, and will soon begin a
permanent and precipitous decline that will completely
change the character of civilization as we know it
within 20 years. Even the left seems to be in deep
denial about this, but the math is available. And, no,
alternative energies and energy technologies will not
save us. All the alternatives in the world can not
begin to provide more than a tiny fraction of the
energy base now provided by oil. This makes it more
than a resource, and the drive to control what's left
more than an economic competition.
I further conclude that the economic colonization of
the former Soviet Union is probably high on that
agenda, and in fact has a powerful synergy with the
issue of petroleum. Russia not only holds vast
untapped resources that beckon to imperialism in
crisis, it remains a credible military and nuclear
challenger in the region.
We have not one, but three members of the Bush de
facto cabinet with military credentials, which makes
the cabinet look quite a lot like a military General
Staff. All this way before September 11th.
Then there's the subject of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization. NATO might have expected consignment to
the dustbin of the Cold War after the Eastern Bloc
shattered in 1991. Peace dividend and all that. But it
didn't. It expanded directly into the former states of
the Eastern Bloc toward the former Soviet Union, and
contributed significant forces to the devastation of
Iraq-a key country in the world oil market, over which
control translates into the ability to manipulate oil
prices.
NATO is a military formation, and the United States
exerts the controlling interest in it. It seemed like
a form without a function, but it remedied that pretty
quickly.
Then when Yugoslavia refused to play ball with the
International Monetary Fund, the US and Germany began
a systematic campaign of destabilization there, even
using some of the veterans of Afghanistan in that
campaign.
NATO became the military arm of that agenda-the
break-up of Yugoslavia into compliant statelets, the
further containment of the former Soviet Union, and
the future pipeline easement for Caspain Sea oil to
Western European markets through Kosovo.
You see, this is important to understand, and
people-even those against the war talk-are tending to
overlook the significance of it. NATO is not a
guarantor of international law, and it is not a
humanitarian organization.
It is a military alliance with one very dominant
partner. And it can no longer claim to be a defensive
alliance against European socialists. It is an
instrument of military aggression.
NATO is the organization that is now going to thrust
further along the 40th parallel from the Balkans
through the Southern Asian Republics of the former
Soviet Union. The US military has already taken
control of a base in Uzbekistan. No one is talking
about how what we are doing seems to be a very logical
extension of a strategy that was already in motion,
and has been in motion for two decades. Once we
recognize the pattern of activity designed to
simultaneously consolidate control over Middle Eastern
and South Asian oil, and contain and colonize the
former Soviet Union, Afghanistan is exactly where they
need to go to pursue that agenda.
Afghanistan borders Iran, Pakistan, and even China
but, more importantly, the Central Asian Republics of
the former Soviet Union, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and
Tajikistan. These border Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan
borders Russia. Turkmenistan sits on the Southeastern
quadrant of the Caspian Sea, whose oil the Bush
Administration dearly covets.
Afghanistan is necessary for two things: as a base of
operations to begin the process of destabilizing,
breaking off, and establishing control over the South
Asian Republics, which will begin within the next
18-24 months in my opinion, and constructing a
pipeline through Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and
Pakistan to deliver petroleum to the Asian market.
The BBC was recently told by Niaz Naik, a Pakistani
Foreign Secretary, that senior American officials were
warning them as early as mid-July that military action
for mid-October was being planned for Afghanistan. In
1996, the Department of Energy was issuing reports on
the desirability of a pipeline through Afghanistan,
and in 1998, Unocal testified before the House
Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific that this
pipeline was crucial to transport Caspian Basin oil to
the Indian Ocean.
Given this evidence that a military operation to
secure at least a portion of Afghanistan has been on
the table, possibly as early as five years ago, I
can't help but conclude that the actions we are seeing
put into motion now are part of a pre-September 11th
agenda. I'm absolutely sure of that, in fact. The
planning alone for operations, of this scale, that are
now taking shape, would take many months. And we are
seeing them take shape in mere weeks.
It defies common sense. This administration is lying
about this whole thing being a "reaction" to September
11th. That leads me, in short order, to be very
suspicious of their yet-to-be-provided evidence that
someone in Afghanistan is responsible. It's just too
damn convenient. Which also leads me to wonder-just
for the sake of knowing-what actually did happen on
September 11th, and who actually is responsible.
The so-called evidence is a farce. The US presented
Tony Blair's puppet government with the evidence, and
of the 70 so-called points of evidence, only nine even
referred to the attacks on the World Trade Center, and
those points were conjectural. This is a bullshit
story from beginning to end. Presented with the
available facts, any 16-year old with a liking for
courtroom dramas could tear this story apart like a
two-dollar shirt. But our corporate press regurgitates
it uncritically. But then, as we should know by now,
their role is to legitimize.
This cartoon heavy they've turned bin Laden into makes
no sense, when you begin to appreciate the complexity
and synchronicity of the attacks. As a former military
person who's been involved in the development of
countless operations orders over the years, I can tell
you that this was a very sophisticated and costly
enterprise that would have left what we call a huge
"signature".
In other words, it would be very hard to effectively
conceal.
So there's a real question about why there was no
warning of this. That can be a question about the
efficacy of the government's intelligence apparatus.
That can be a question about various policies in the
various agencies that had to be duped to orchestrate
this action. And it can also be a question about
whether or not there was foreknowledge of the event,
andthat foreknowledge is being covered up. To dismiss
this concern out of hand as the rantings of conspiracy
nuts is premature. And there is a history of this kind
of thing being done by national political bosses,
including the darling of liberals, Franklin Roosevelt.
The evidence is very compelling that the Roosevelt
Administration deliberately failed to act to stop
Pearl Harbor in order to mobilize enough national
anger to enter the World War II. I have no idea why
people aren't asking some very specific questions
about the actions of Bush and company on the day of
the attacks. Follow along: Four planes get hijacked
and deviate from their flight plans, all the while on
FAA radar. The planes are all hijacked between 7:45
and 8:10 AM Eastern Daylight Time. Who is notified?
This is an event already that is unprecedented. But
the President is not notified and going to a Florida
elementary school to hear children read. By around
8:15 AM, it should be very apparent that something is
terribly wrong. The President is glad-handing
teachers. By 8:45, when American Airlines Flight 11
crashes into the World Trade Center, Bush is settling
in with children for his photo ops at Booker
Elementary. Four planes have obviously been hijacked
simultaneously, an event never before seen in history,
and one has just dived into the worlds best know twin
towers, and still no one notifies the nominal
Commander in Chief. No one has apparently scrambled
any Air Force interceptors either. At 9:03, United
Flight 175 crashes into the remaining World Trade
Center building. At 9:05, Andrew Card, the
Presidential Chief of Staff whispers to George W.
Bush. Bush "briefly turns somber" according to
reporters. Does he cancel the school visit and convene
an emergency meeting? No. He resumes listening to
second graders read about a little girl's pet fucking
goat, and continues this banality even as American
Airlines Flight 77 conducts an unscheduled point turn
over Ohio and heads in the direction of Washington DC.
Has he instructed Chief of Staff Card to scramble the
Air Force? No. An excruciating 25 minutes later, he
finally deigns to give a public statement telling the
United States what they already have figured out; that
there's been an attack by hijacked planes on the World
Trade Center. There's a hijacked plane bee-lining to
Washington, but has the Air Force been scrambled to
defend anything yet? No. At 9:30, when he makes his
announcement, American Flight 77 is still ten minutes
from its target, the Pentagon. The Administration will
later claim they had no way of knowing that the
Pentagon might be a target, and that they thought
Flight 77 was headed to the White House, but the fact
is that the plane has already flown South and past the
White House no-fly zone, and is in fact tearing
through the sky at over 400 nauts. At 9:35, this plane
conducts another turn, 360 degrees over the Pentagon,
all the while being tracked by radar, and the Pentagon
is not evacuated, and there are still no fast-movers
from the Air Force in the sky over Alexandria and DC.
Now, the real kicker: A pilot they want us to believe
was trained at a Florida puddle-jumper school for
Piper Cubs and Cessnas, conducts a well-controlled
downward spiral, descending the last 7,000 feet in
two-and-a-half minutes, brings the plane in so low and
flat that it clips the electrical wires across the
street from the Pentagon, and flies it with pinpoint
accuracy into the side of this building at 460 nauts.
When the theory about learning to fly this well at the
puddle-jumper school began to lose ground, it was
added that they received further training on a flight
simulator. This is like saying you prepared your
teenager for her first drive on I-40 at rush hour by
buying her a video driving game. It's horse shit!
There is a story being constructed about these events.
My crystal ball is not working today, so I can't say
why. But at the least, this so-called
Commander-in-Chief and his staff that we are all
supposed to follow blindly into some ill-defined war
on terrorism is criminally negligent or unspeakably
stupid. And at the worst, if more is known or was
known, and there is an effort to conceal the facts,
there is a criminal conspiracy going on. Certainly,
the Bush de facto administration was facing a
confluence of crises from which they were temporarily
rescued by this event. Whether they played a sinister
role or not, there is little doubt that they have at
the very least opportunistically pounced on this
attack to overcome their lack of legitimacy, to shift
the blame for the encroaching recession from
capitalism to the September 11th terror attack, to
legitimize their pre-existing foreign policy agenda,
and to establish and consolidate repressive measures
domestically and silence dissent. In many ways,
September 11th pulled the Bush cookies out of the
fire. And given them the green light to begin
constructing a long-term scenario within which to
establish fascistic control measures at home and
abroad as a citadel for the ruling class in the
catastrophic conjuncture that we are entering based on
the end of oil. This elephant in the living room is
being studiously ignored. In fact, the domestic
repression has already begun, officially and
unofficially. It's kind of a latter day McCarthyism. I
participated in a teach-in at Chapel Hill, North
Carolina, on the 17th of September, and though not a
single person on the panel excused or justified the
attacks, and every person there offered either
condolences and prayers for the victims, we were
excoriated within two days as "enemies of America."
Yesterday an op-ed called for my deportation (to
where, one can only guess). Now Herr Ashcroft is fast
tracking the biggest abrogation of US civil liberties
since the so-called anti-terrorism legislation after
the Oklahoma City bombing - which by the way hasn't
resulted in anti-terrorism but in the acceleration of
the application of the racist death penalty. The FBI
has defined terrorist groups not by whether any given
group has ever acted as terrorists, but by their
beliefs. Some socialists and anti-globalization groups
have already been identified by name as terrorist
groups, even though there is not a single shred of
evidence that they have ever participated in any
criminal activity. It reminds me of the Smith Act that
was finally declared unconstitutional, but only after
a hell of a lot of people served a hell of a long time
in jail for the crime of thinking. I think this also
points to yet another huge problems that the Bush
regime was facing. Worldwide resistance to the whole
so-called neoliberal agenda, which is a prettied up
term for debt-leverage imperialism. While debt and the
threat of sanctions has been used to coerce nations in
the periphery, we have to understand that the final
guarantor of compliance remains military action. For a
global economic agenda, there is always a
corresponding political and military agenda. The focal
point of these actions in the short term is Southern
Asia, but they have already scripted this as a
worldwide and protracted fight against terrorism. It's
far better than drug wars as a rationalization, and
the drug war thing was being discredited in any case.
Leftists are regaining power and popularity in
Venezuela, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Ecuador, Colombia,
the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Brazil, and Argentina.
Cuba has gained immense prestige over the last few
years. The empire is beginning to unravel. We can
hardly justify intervention in these places by saying
they are not towing the economic line by allowing the
absolute domination of their societies by
transnational corporations. That exposes the agenda.
So we simply claim they are supporting terrorism. It's
for all these reasons I say the left has missed the
boat on this one, by allowing them to get away with
rushing past the question of who did what on September
11th. If the official story is a lie, and I think the
circumstantial case is strong enough to stay with this
question, then we really do need to know what
happened. And we need to understand concretely what
the motives of this administration are. And we need to
understand more than just their immediate motives, but
where the larger social forces that underwrite our
situation right now are headed. I do not think this
administration is engaged in the deliberative process
of a political grouping that is on top of their game.
They are puttingtogether some very deliberative
technical solutions in response to a larger situation
that it slipping rapidly out of their control. Like
clear cutting. There's a very smart technology being
employed to do a very dumb thing. What they are
responding to is not September 11th, but the beginning
of a permanent and precipitous decline in worldwide
oil production, the beginning of a deep and protracted
worldwide recession, and the unraveling of the empire.
This brings me to a point about what all this means
for Americans' security, which they are perfectly
justified to worry about. The actions being prepared
by this administration will not only not enhance our
security, it will significantly degrade it. Military
action against many groups across the globe, which is
what the administration is telling us quite openly
they are planning to do, will put a lot of backs
against the wall. That can't be very secure. The
concept of war being touted here is a violation of the
principles of war on several counts, and will
inevitably lead to military catastrophes, if you're
inclined to view this from a position of moral and
political neutrality. And the people who are now in
possession of half the world's remaining oil reserves
are subject to destabilization for which we can't even
pretend to predict the consequences-but loss of access
to critical energy supplies is certainly within the
realm of possibility. Worst of all, we will be
destabilizing Pakistan, a nuclear power in an active
conflict with its neighbor, and we will be provoking
Russia, another nuclear power. The security stakes
don't get any higher, and Americans can ill afford to
ignore nukes. And I think that this domestic agenda is
a tremendous threat to the security of anyone who is
critical of the government or their corporate
financiers, and we already know that the real threats
are against populations that can easily be scapegoated
as the domestic crisis deepens. There is a very real
threat right now of creeping fascism in this country,
and that phenomenon requires its domestic enemies.
Historically those enemies have included leftists,
trade unionists, and racially and nationally oppressed
sectors. This whole "state of emergency" mentality is
already being used to quiet the public discourses of
anti-racism, of feminism, of environmentalism, and of
both socialism and anarchism. And while there is token
resistance by officials to anti-Muslim xenophobia, the
stereotypical images have saturated the media, and the
government is already beginning to openly re-instate
racial profiling. It is only a short step from there
to go after other groups. We have long been prepared
by the ideologies of overt and covert racism, and
racism as both institution and corresponding
psychology in the United States is nearly intractable.
It's for all these reasons that I say emphatically
that we can not accept anything from this
administration; not their policies nor their bullshit
stories. What they are doing is very, very dangerous,
and the time to fight back against them, openly, is
right now, before they can consolidate their power and
their agenda. Once they have done that, our job
becomes much more difficult. The left, if it has the
capacity to self-organize out of its oblivion, needs
to understand its critical roles here. We have to play
the role of credible, hard-working, and non-sectarian
partners in a broader peace-movement. We have to
study, synthesize, and describe our current historical
conjuncture. And we have to prepare leadership for the
decisive conflict that will emerge to first defeat
fascism then take political power. Rosa Luxemburg's
words are truer than ever right now. We are not faced
with a choice between socialism and capitalism, but
socialism or barbarism. And what we can least afford
are denial and timidity. (Stan Goff Joined the U.S.
Armed Forces in 1970 and Left in 1996)
--- Zul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Edisi KL: SUMPAH TALIBAN
>
> Fri, 26 Oct 2001
>
>
>
> » Siapa Kami?
> » myArchive
> » myAffiliate
> » myClassifieds
> » myF1
> » myMobile
>
> » New Straits Times
> » New Sunday Times
> » Business Times
> » Malay Mail
> » Sunday Mail
>
> » Berita Harian
> » Berita Minggu
> » Harian Metro
> » Metro Ahad
> » Sudut Pelajar: Didik
> » Koleksi Rencana
>
> » Computimes
> » Business Computing
>
> » Keterangan Umum
> » Arkib Berita sejak 1991
> » Pendaftaran Arkib
> » Khidmat Pelanggan
> » Syarat Penggunaan
> » Yuran
> » Soalan Lazim
>
> » Speaker's Corner
> » Forum Perdana
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Arena | Bintang | Mahkamah | Mukadepan |
> Rencana | Setempat | Arkib Seminggu | HM Home
> Mukadepan: Edisi KL: SUMPAH TALIBAN
> 25 October 2001
> Hantar kepada kenalan! | Format untuk
> pencetak
>
> ISLAMABAD: Pemimpin Taliban bersumpah
> tidak akan menyerahkan Osama bin Laden walaupun
> Amerika Syarikat membunuh seluruh penduduk
> Afghanistan.
>
> “Kami tidak akan menyerahkan Osama
> kepada mereka. Jika mereka membunuh semua penduduk
> dan menghancurkan Afghanistan sekali pun, kami tidak
> akan menyerahkan Osama.
>
> “Kami mempunyai undang-undang, kami
> menghormati maruah Afghanistan, kami mempunyai
> budaya Afghanistan dan menyerahkan Osama
> bertentangan dengan budaya kami,” kata Duta
> Afghanistan ke Pakistan, Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef,
> dalam temuramah dengan Reuters, semalam.
>
> Abdul Salam tidak menolak kemungkinan
> mengadakan rundingan bagi menyelesaikan krisis itu
> tetapi menegaskan Afghanistan bersedia berperang
> hingga titisan darah terakhir bagi mempertahankan
> maruahnya.
>
> Maruah ialah tradisi yang tidak pernah
> dibuang oleh etnik Pastun iaitu majoriti penduduk
> Afghanistan. Maruah itu yang digelar Pakhtunwali
> yang membolehkan sesebuah keluarga atau satu suku
> puak boleh dikutuk selama beberapa generasi jika
> melakukan sesuatu yang tidak bermaruah.
>
> Abdul Salam berkata: “Kami berpegang
> teguh kepada maruah kami, mereka perlu
> menghormatinya dan kami sedang berjuang untuk
> mengekal dan mempertahankannya.
>
> Semalam ialah hari ke-18 Amerika
> menyerang Afghanistan dalam usahanya supaya Taliban
> menyerahkan Osama yang dituduh merancang serangan di
> New York dan Washington, 11 September lalu, walaupun
> ia masih gagal mengemukakan bukti kukuh pemababitan
> Osama.
>
> Duta berusia 34 tahun itu yang kini
> terkenal di seluruh dunia kerana beliau ialah
> satu-satunya suara Afghanistan dengan dunia luar,
> mengadakan sidang akhbar setiap hari di Islamabad.
> Seperti biasa, beliau memakai jubah putih dan
> berserban hitam.
>
> Abdul Salam sentiasa yakin Taliban yang
> memerintah negara paling miskin di dunia mampu
> menentang serangan Amerika, kuasa besar dunia yang
> mempunyai angkatan tentera paling moden.
>
> Menurutnya, jika negaranya mempunyai
> peralatan yang diperlukan, Taliban bersedia
> menyerang Amerika dan berikrar membunuh rakyat
> Amerika sebagai balasan tindakan kuasa barat itu
> “Kami mesti membunuh mereka, kami mesti
>
> ATTACHMENT part 2 image/jpeg name=emedia.jpg
> ATTACHMENT part 3 application/octet-stream
name=5898479@Top
> ATTACHMENT part 4 application/octet-stream
name=spacer
> ATTACHMENT part 5 image/gif name=keyword.gif
> ATTACHMENT part 6 image/gif name=ehome.gif
> ATTACHMENT part 7 image/gif name=eng_news.gif
> ATTACHMENT part 8 image/gif name=bm_news.gif
> ATTACHMENT part 9 image/gif name=pullout.gif
> ATTACHMENT part 10 image/gif name=paid_info.gif
> ATTACHMENT part 11 image/gif name=interact.gif
> ATTACHMENT part 12 image/gif name=prosakti.gif
> ATTACHMENT part 13 application/octet-stream
name=3839511@BottomLeft
> ATTACHMENT part 14 application/octet-stream
name=8717366@x01
=====
Allahu a'lam.
Wassalam.
IMMI
" RIGHT THINKING NOW...FOR THE NEXT ERA "
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
( Melanggan ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] pada body : SUBSCRIBE HIZB)
( Berhenti ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] pada body: UNSUBSCRIBE HIZB)
( Segala pendapat yang dikemukakan tidak menggambarkan )
( pandangan rasmi & bukan tanggungjawab HIZBI-Net )
( Bermasalah? Sila hubungi [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pengirim: hadi ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
