*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
{ Sila lawat Laman Hizbi-Net - http://www.hizbi.net }
{ Hantarkan mesej anda ke: [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
{ Iklan barangan? Hantarkan ke [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
Undilah PAS : MENENTANG KEZALIMAN & MENEGAKKAN KEADILAN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Is Mahathir Lying?
In an interview with Charlie Rose on PBS, Dr Mahathir asserted that Anwar was an
agitator and that he was good
at arranging demonstrations.
Dr Mahathir claimed:
"In 1974 he (Anwar) urged students to demonstrate because it seemed
one child died of starvation ¼ "
"¼ But he made these allegations, and the students came out and rioted
but eventually there was no
starvation at all ¼ "
He is in fact saying that Anwar was an agitator, a liar and a trouble-maker. If
that was the case, why did he
arduously woo him and entice him into joining the Barisan Nasional? Why did he
parade Anwar as a prized trophy
with a lot of pomp in 1982!
When did it dawn upon Mahathir that Anwar had lied that a child had died of
starvation and had used this lie to
agitate the students into rioting? Was it in 1974 or 1999?
If it was in 1974, how could he now state in New York that "He was my very good
friend, my heir apparent. I had
placed a lot of expectations on him ¼ "?
If it was in 1999, is he admitting that it took him 25 years to get to the truth
of this matter and find out about
Anwar?s role in the Baling demonstrations?
Has Mahathir inadvertently revealed the obvious that you can be anything and it
doesn?t matter as long as you are
with the Barisan Nasional? Is he confirming that you can be an agitator, a liar,
a trouble-maker or whatever and
these traits and characteristics can be tolerated without any problem as long as
you are a Barisan man?
Secondly, it is a pathological lie for Mahathir to insist that Anwar had
withheld his urine test results relating to
arsenic poisoning for 14 days. It doesn?t do any credit to his credibility to
state this especially when Dr Wan Azizah
had clarified that the court was informed the following day on receipt of the
urine test results.
It is easy to claim anything and it doesn?t take much courage for doing so when
your adversary is rendered
incapable of a rebuttal.
But would Mahathir dare face Anwar and accuse him to his face on a live
television debate? If he has any sense of
honour, then he should accept this challenge and face Anwar man to man. Let the
debate begin and let the people
judge.
Executive Committee
1 October 1999
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
( Melanggan ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] pada body : SUBSCRIBE HIZB)
( Berhenti ? To : [EMAIL PROTECTED] pada body: UNSUBSCRIBE HIZB)
( Segala pendapat yang dikemukakan tidak menggambarkan )
( pandangan rasmi & bukan tanggungjawab HIZBI-Net )
( Bermasalah? Sila hubungi [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pengirim: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
