Re: [hlds] (no subject)

[hash]

i dont get how you can go on a list of stuff you dont like on servers, that
mostly i agree with, but someone porn sprays is okay, while ppl under 20
isnt.

i find normally the gimps with pr0n sprays ARE kids under 20

nice rant otherwise

- Original Message -
From: "K. Mike Bradley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 6:48 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds] (no subject)


> WARCRAFT IS NOT CS DAMN IT !
> SERVER ADMINS REMOVE WARCRAFT MOD FROM YOUR SERVERS!!
>
> No really I HATE it.
>
>
> If ya wana play Warcraft play warcraft...
> I'm gona play CS the way it was intended.
>
>
> I WISH I could filter server's with mods in my server list.
>
>
>
> My Filter =
>
> No abusive admins (usually a 12 year old PUNK who I just WASITED)
> No hackers
> No children under 20
> No Newbs
> No servers with slots reserved so I can't join because they are full
...even
> though I filtered for NO FULL SERVERS
>   (I hate that one)
> Yes Good quality porn spray
> No Camping Whiners
> No BOT's
> No AFK's
> No Stacked Teams
> NO WARCRAFT or DEATHMATCH or SUPERHERO MOD
>  I WANA PLAY CS DAMN IT!
> No Ugly women
> No Fat chicks
> No Guys who pretend to be women (EUUH !!)
> No curse word filters
>  EAT MY HOT LEAD BITCH  THAT'S RIGHT I SAID BIATCH ... Are you
> lookin at me? Cause I don't see no one else here ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wojciech H
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [hlds] (no subject)
>
> Check through all the Warcraft mods listed here:
>
> http://www.game-monitor.com/modsearch.php
>
> Michael Jordan wrote:
>
> >This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> >--
> >[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Looking for a
> >warcraft3 version 1.2 mod for cs. I have been to:
> >
> >
> >
> >http://djeyl.net/forum/
> >
> >http://www.gamingforums.com 
> >
> >http://warcraft3.filefront.com 
> >
> >
> >
> >and have also Googled all over the place but have not found this
> >particular version. People say the newer versions can be set up almost
> >like 1.2 but I don't want almost. Can someone help me find this mod or
> >will I just get flamed for posting? There is a server owner named P-K
> >in Tempe Arizona who runs this mod but he is hardly ever on and doesn't
> >list any way to get in touch with him.
> >
> >
> >
> >Please help me!
> >
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Michael Jordan
> >
> >(no, not him!)
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >
> >
> >___
> >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] [OT] The "community"

[hash]

I can't speak for anyone else, but I didn't really take offense at the
12-year-old phrase. It was the overall attitude of "your puny cable servers
shouldnt be on the same list with my mighty one".


From: "Whisper ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Well taking everything extremely literally is what happens when you
> deal with twelve year olds because they do not have the capacity for
> abstract thought (in most cases) and that is why defines them we we
> short handedly label a person or group of people as 12 year olds, and
> the fact I have to explain that to some of you means I'm probably
> dealing with a bunch of people who although in age may not be 12 years
> old, certainly like to act the part when they decide they want to take
> offense at being labeled "12 year olds" or the use of that term, even
> when it doesn't apply to them.
>
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:35:05 +0100, Mick Carter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well said Dennis!!
> >
> > Mick
> >
> >


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] [OT] The "community"

[hash]

I thank Dennis for voicing himself far better than I ever could. I too run a
couple of servers off a cable connection, and while its far from what I'd
like to have, it's making due with what I have and what I have to spend. The
40 or so regulars seem to enjoy it, so I guess you really can run a server
from cable, within reason.

What, exactly, is the problem with 12 year old running servers anyways? If I
came home to find my 12 year old had figured out how to set up a server for
him and his friends to play on, I'd be thrilled that he'd be following my
footsteps into geekdom. So with the new server listings you have to scroll a
bit and be a bit more choosey to avoid servers like this. While this can be
slightly annoying, I don't see how this is as big of a deal as everyones
making it out to be.

I'm sure everyone knows this link, but Whisper made a point of a guide so
http://server.counter-strike.net/ . Yes it's cs specific, but the info there
can be used for any hl server. It has a very detailed guide, and even
answers "how many people can I run on my 512/256 ADSL connection??".

I'm not going to rip on valve, but the last two years has been nothing but
pushed back release dates, ignoring VAC for other projects, and bug fixes
that fix two things and brings three. Again, I'm not ripping on valve for
this, I'm just saying that it's not exactly new, or anything different. So
now that source beta is out and HL2 is finally coming out (we think), work
on VAC has seems to be completely halted - again tho, who didn't see this
coming? Frustrating as hell I agree, but not exactly a surprise.

-hash

From: "Whisper ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Well maybe you are not a 12 year old Dennis, but from the questions
> that repeatedly asked, and the complete lack of maths skills
> demonstrated by far too many people who wish to be "server admins" I
> don't think it is that elitist or harsh to make the call! (BTW, if you
> think the comments apply to you then obviously they do, if they don't
> then, you ought to ignore them like any sensible person would if they
> did not have some inferiority complex or something)
>
> Especially considering how much of a retarded waste of time this issue
> is in the scheme of things in regards to the problems people who know
> what they are talking about would rather see addressed first!!
>
> Like how about a friggin VAC update?
> How about the de_nuke flashbang bug?
> How about fixing silent planting?
> How about an Official Valve approved clear and concise guide to
> setting servers up so we can direct these 12 year olds to it whenever
> they ask stupid questions like "how many people can I run on my
> 512/256 ADSL connection??" 
>
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:10:02 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well said Dennis.
> >
> > Another point I'd like to make - a lot of you may see the complaining
made
> > about the MSL sorting method unwarranted, and from all of the whining
and
> > unconstructive discussion taking place about it here, I can see why.
> >
> > However - the current sorting method went from one that admins could at
least
> > do something about, to a method that doesnt really favor too many admins
at
> > all, especially those that pay for a dedicated server on a high-end
network.
> >
> > Did the old method have flaws? Yes, but managible. The new method is
worse.
> > Good thing tho is that YES, Valve IS listening, just that the current
> > implementation was poorly thought out and implemented. It is fixable,
just
> > hope that they are still listening and will do something about it.
> >
> > And out of all the discussion, whining and complaining spent on this
thread, I
> > am sorry to say that I am the *only one* to offer up any kind of
solution (see
> > my last post). If you're going to file a complaint about something,
fine, but
> > at least have the foresight to offer a solution as well, otherwise
you're just
> > wasting everyones time, esp your own.
> >
> > - K2
> > http://www.hardfought.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > All of a sudden I'm reading messages from pissed-off elitists saying
that
> > > servers run from a home connection are somehow meaningless, run by
> > > 12-year-olds, poorly run, or otherwise insignificant. While this is
> > > certainly true in many cases, there ARE some that are well run by
people who
> > > have just as much pride in running a clean, fun, and yes, well-liked
server
> > > as you do.
> > >
> > > Point one: Like it or not

Re: [hlds] This game is currently unavailable?

[hash]

wierd lil trick ive run accrossed, and it works for me and all of my
friends.

close steam down, and go into ur mod folder and find a file named custom.hpk
and blow that sucker away. restart steam and ur good to go.

the game will remake that custom.hpk

- Original Message -
From: "Mark Whittington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 12:14 AM
Subject: [hlds] This game is currently unavailable?


> Having a weird problem.  I'm trying to connect to my cstrike server
> and I'm getting a message, "This game is currently unavailable.
> Please try again at another time."  I see this when trying to connect
> to any cstrike game.  But I see people online on other servers, and
> the status page shows that there are 30,000 people playing cstrike
> right now.  Also, I can launch DOD or NS or Opfor with no problem.
>
> Anybody have any ideas?
>
> -Mark
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?

[hash]

> > as for whoever said xp for win servers, i would like u to send me some
of
> > that fine jamacian weed you're smoking, cuz im out at the moment.
> You have no clue what you are talking about, get your knowledge to a
reasonable level, and point out
> the facts on which you build your above statement. If not, quit insulting
people by being
> "better-knowing" when in fact you are immensely wrong!

tad high strung i think, since it was a joke. ill make sure to keep my
comments to ppl who
are "better-humored".



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?

[hash]

yanno u can goto microsoft and sign up for a "eval" version of 2k3 32 bit
edition and 64. completely free and run fine for 6 months before you have to
buy it.

just fyi. this way u can give 2k3 a spin free.

odd thing is, microsoft doesnt actually keep the 6 month time-out on their
end, so a reinstall gives you another 6 months.

- Original Message -
From: "Roc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?


> Thank you Sir
>
> Regards
> - Original Message -
> From: "Napier, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:41 PM
> Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
>
>
> > 2000 vs 2003 if cost is a non issue use 2003.
> > As for hlds it really makes very little difference.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 3:30 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> >
> >
> > If cost is NOT an issue would 2003 then be the way to go?
> >
> > I'm asking because I was going to try 2003 and now want to be sure to
I'm
> > making the right decision.
> >
> > Regards
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Napier, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 2:05 PM
> > Subject: RE: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> >
> >
> > > I think you mean 'making it expensive..' not useless.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Steven Hartland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:07 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?
> > >
> > >
> > > Not true as far as I know it isn't hyperthread "aware" but that
doesn't
> > > stop u using it. The difference is that the scheduler it will treat
the
> > > logical
> > > CPU's as real CPU's and as we all know this isn't the case.
> > > The result is that it "may" not extract as good as performance as
> > > a hyperthread aware OS like Windows XP or 2003 server.
> > >
> > > The fact remains though that 2003 is still a "server" OS and as such
> > > is priced accordingly making it useless for running legal game
servers.
> > >
> > > Steve / K
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "K. Mike Bradley"
> > >
> > > > Nope, 2000 does not support Hyperthreading. This feature must
> > > > be turned of in the bios to load and run 2000.
> >
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>
>



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?

[hash]

nope, 2k does not support hyperthreading

and as mentioned earlier, both 2k and 2k3 are basically the same os, just
with slight differences. theres more setup that has to be done on 2k3 since
its server software, and has nothing set up on install.

as for whoever said xp for win servers, i would like u to send me some of
that fine jamacian weed you're smoking, cuz im out at the moment.


- Original Message -
From: "Donald Holl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?


> > Wait. Does Win2k Pro support HT?
>
> I doubt it. HT wasn't around when Windows 2000 came out so it would seem
to make sense that Windows 2003 can take advantage of HT and therefore
perform better.
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>
>



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?

[hash]

ive used both and honestly, i saw 0 difference.

2k3 supports hyperthreading tho, so if ur cpu supports it, id go with 2k3.
otherwise ones about as good of a choice as the other.



- Original Message -
From: "Z Teknology HLDS Email" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 11:53 PM
Subject: [hlds] Windows 2000 or Windows 2003?


> Anybody have experience hosting with win2k or win2k3 and see any big
> differences?  Going to run 3-4 CS servers on it and a 7 person personal
> ventrilo...CPU isn't an issue, just which OS is better, any thoughts?
>
> Zack Sloane
> http://zteknology.com
> We Put Personal Back in Personal Computer!
> You Dream it, We Build It!
>
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
>
>
>



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Re: [hlds] VAC Update

[hash]

lol i love this idea

- Original Message -
From: "Donald Holl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 2:44 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds] VAC Update


I wish they would update it at least every 2 weeks and not tell anyone they
did. Just let the cheaters find out when they're banned.

- Original Message -
From: "Floop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 01:32 AM
Subject: [hlds] VAC Update

When was the last VAC update? Wasn't it like a month ago? Sure was nice when
it was being updated several times a week. Any chance on getting a comment
from a Valve employee as to if/when the updates will pick up again?

Thanks,
Floop
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds





___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds