Re: [hlds_linux] VAC false positive
On Thursday 28 November 2002 23:09, Jeremy Brooking wrote: > On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 10:50, Rene Luckow wrote: > > yes, but if you take something out a context, you have to place it > > somehting comparable... the principle of the situation in an analogy has > > to be the same... > > According to the dictionary, no. But this is way to off topic for > discussion. > hehe, you're right, this could be one of those mega long threads if we continue :) -- Insert clever remark here ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] VAC detections
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 10:49, Rene Luckow wrote: > I haven't tried about VAC, but I have written eric a couple of times, and git > answers within a day... dunno with VAC though > > I'll agree to the extend that the normal cs(l)user has no idea what VAC is, > and how it works, ppl still mail me to ask if I run the latest vac... on the > other hand, I don't know how the could have done it, if they had announced a > mail addy for ppl to write, they would have to hire a gazilion ppl to > answer... however, if you really haven't cheated you are determined enough to > write the company on your own... And thats exactly it, I know too little about VAC what it does and doesnt do, to answer user questions myself. I also know how much I dislike it like when helpdesk staff give out my email address or email addresses of others in the NOC to users, who end up emailing me with problems that are not my department to answer. I do not want to go giving people erics email address to mail, unless he states to us, this is what he wishes to happen. Hence why I have been, and still am, asking VALVe on this list, for the official contact address/name/website/whatever they want to hand out, for contacting them regarding any false positive issues people are and may continue to have. Also I am suggesting that the place this info on the cstrike website, and their own (In an easily findable place). If you are going to provide a service which has the ability to affect so many people, you have to support it, its that simple. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] VAC false positive
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 10:50, Rene Luckow wrote: > yes, but if you take something out a context, you have to place it somehting > comparable... the principle of the situation in an analogy has to be the > same... According to the dictionary, no. But this is way to off topic for discussion. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] VAC false positive
On Thursday 28 November 2002 21:57, Jeremy Brooking wrote: > On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 08:46, Rene Luckow wrote: > > On Thursday 28 November 2002 04:01, Jeremy Brooking wrote: > > > Youre the one who has loved your car analogys since day one, hence why > > > i put it in a form you could perhaps take a grasp on. > > > > that was not a analogy, but a bad comparison... you might wanna catch up > > on what an analogy is > > Seems like 1 to me. > > 1. Similarity in some respects between things that are > otherwise dissimilar. > > > yes, but if you take something out a context, you have to place it somehting comparable... the principle of the situation in an analogy has to be the same... -- Insert clever remark here ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
