[hlds_linux] WOOHOO. Valve and AMD Opteron

2003-03-07 Thread Kevin J. Anderson
http://collective.valve-erc.com/index.php?news=1047073952-21295300


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


RE: [hlds_linux] Re: [OT} Be ready--SCO to sue everything Linux???

2003-03-07 Thread Stan Hoeppner

> In any case, I guess this dashes my dream of running 500 instances of
> HLDS on the 390 I have at the office ;->


That, and the fact that the S390 processing complex wouldn't have enough
horsepower to run 500 HLDS servers (unless they were like 4 player servers).
And, assuming at least 64MB per HLDS instance, I'm guessing that your S390
wouldn't have enough physical memory either.  Last spec I read showed the
S390 maxing out at 32GB physical memory.

Oh, and btw, there is the *small* matter of getting an i386 binary running
on an S390. ;)

StanTheMan

rcon admin at:
Beer for Breakfast servers
   66.111.111.66:27015 (CS multi-map)
   66.111.111.66:27016 (CS militia/dust2)Dallas, TX

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


RE: [hlds_linux] Re: Be ready--SCO to sue everything Linux???

2003-03-07 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Here it comes, the ubiquitous:

I told you so.  ;)

$1 Billion?  You've got to be fucking kidding me

StanTheMan

rcon admin at:
Beer for Breakfast servers
   66.111.111.66:27015 (CS multi-map)
   66.111.111.66:27016 (CS militia/dust2)Dallas, TX


> -Original Message-
> From: Will Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [hlds_linux] Re: Be ready--SCO to sue everything Linux???
>
>
> A short time ago, at a computer terminal far, far away, Stan
> Bubrouski wrote:
> >scratch and therefore is not subjet to any of their patents.
>  The article
> >mentions lawyers names and what not, but they are consultants as they
> >ahve delt with intellectual property cases before, SCO has hired them
> >to consult o nteh licensing terms it would seem.  Not for the express
> >purpose of suing anyone.
>
> fyi:
>
>SCO sues Big Blue over Unix, Linux
>http://news.com.com/2100-1016-991464.html
>
> --
> Will Day  Those who would give up essential
> Liberty, to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]   purchase a little temporary Safety,
> deserve neither
> UNIX System ProgrammerLiberty nor Safety.
> Atlanta, GA - Benjamin Franklin, Penn.
> Assembly, Nov. 11, 1755
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives, please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


RE: [hlds_linux] New Security Modules -March 4

2003-03-07 Thread Kevin J. Anderson


->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of m0gely
->Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 10:23 AM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] New Security Modules -March 4
->
->
->Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
->> 34? holy shit, wow.  your servers were a cheaters haven
->
->Oh were they?  I have over 100,000 player connections each month. ;)
->
->http://quake2.telestream.com/funstats/srvstats.php
->http://quake2.telestream.com/icestats/srvstats.php
->

Well, I look at it this way, if that is how many VAC *did* catch, just
imagine how many it hasn't...

; (
kev

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] New Security Modules -March 4

2003-03-07 Thread m0gely
Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
34? holy shit, wow.  your servers were a cheaters haven
Oh were they?  I have over 100,000 player connections each month. ;)

http://quake2.telestream.com/funstats/srvstats.php
http://quake2.telestream.com/icestats/srvstats.php
--
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] RE:P4 vs Dual PIII

2003-03-07 Thread Oscar N aka 'Dreadful'
Running FreeBSD without any pingbooster, but with the kernel option
HZ=1000, the effect is somehow the same as using pingbooster...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu

Gambler wrote:

some questions do u use any pingbooster on the servers ? valves or
udpsoft ? what values if u use valves
do u use sys_ticrate 1 or default ?

best regards Gustav "Gambler" Hejdenberg

Serveradmin @ www.gamers.nu 



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] hum..

2003-03-07 Thread J. Wintermantel

- Original Message -
From: "kama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 12:05 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] hum..


>
> have not recieved any new messages...
>
> this is just a test...
>
> /Bjorn

It works!
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


[hlds_linux] hum..

2003-03-07 Thread kama

have not recieved any new messages...

this is just a test...

/Bjorn

Fish 1: Do you think we'll ever get out of this bowl?
Fish 2: Oh my God! A talking fish!

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] New Security Modules -March 4

2003-03-07 Thread Jules (aka Buddha-Pest)
"m0gely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Kingsley Foreman wrote:
| > well me thinks they are vac is catching people again
| > ive got 7 today
|
| w00t!  I got 34 since the 4th!

yeah, but how many were REALLY cheating?   >:)

didn't i read recently that VAC was generating false positives again?


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] [No C-D] Stripping from stats

2003-03-07 Thread Jules (aka Buddha-Pest)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > > > And of course it drops your clients' frame rates in half :\
| > >
| > > Which is BS
| > > It can affect the FPS for a few people, but both with lower AND
| > > higher fps as a end resoult, most likely dependent on if you
| > > are CPU limited or Vidcard limited in your current FPS.
| >
| > Can you explain how exactly C-D could actually *improve* a client's FPS?
|
| By removing player models from the field of vision that you cannot see you
| decrease the amount of overdraw of playermodels happening on your screen
(the
| effect you get by a tilerendering card like Kryo-2, just to a lesser
degree).
| The vidcard not having to draw players you cannot see will increase the
fps in
| certain situations.

except that drawing models is handled by your 3D hardware where as C-D
"clipping" is using your primary CPU...  Vidcards are very good at drawing
lots of objects even if they shouldn't be visible.

| > Also, can you explain why, on my AthlonXP 1900+ w/Ti4200 I end up with
| > 40 to 50 FPS in some maps where I normally may see it drop to, oh, 90
| > from 100 solid?
|
| I have no idea, crappy settings or viddrivers? A bug in the C-D software?
| Personally I get 40-50fps 800 res on my Celeron 450/Savage 2k system, with
&
| without C-D.
| Obviously something is wrong with your setup & C-D combination.
| Report it as a bug to UA so it can be fixed instead of
| whining...

i saw a definite drop in fps and so have many many people.  it's a worthy
sacrifice however :)

~j


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] [No C-D] Stripping from stats

2003-03-07 Thread Jules (aka Buddha-Pest)
"hondaman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| About the only perl I know is "man perl"  :/

actually, it's perldoc perl :)


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


[OT] Re: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D

2003-03-07 Thread Jules (aka Buddha-Pest)
james, don't bottom post  jeez, not this shit again



"James Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:10:06AM -0800, Jules (aka Buddha-Pest) wrote:
| > ummm, no...
| >
| > i'm glad you're on the team, but that's not the way i remember it.
unless
| > you guys changed a bunch of stuff.
| >
| > what CD does on the client side is inject itself into hl the same way
most
| > cheats do thus preventing cheats from loading.
| >
| > if you are really detecting cheats, why NOT send the info to the server?
| >
| > me thinks you're fibbing a bit here.
|
| >> "Mike Hodgkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
| >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| >> | LOL
| >> | It does detect cheats, it just doesnt tell the server. Thats why you
get
| >> | code errors if you try loading it up with OGC.
| >> | Im on the UA anticheat team, I know what Im talking about.
|
| Jules, don't top post.


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux