Re: [hlds_linux] Multiple Servers
Brian A. Stumm wrote: I am running two instances of TFC from the same install directory using halfd, not sure if halfd makes a difference but I suspect not. So yes, I think it should work. I exec a autoexec27016.cfg file in my command line args and have some stuff in that file to seperate out the settings for the second server ie: I asked this a few days ago but no one replied. I am wondering if weird things happen to one server if the other autoupdates. -- - m0gely http://quake2.telestream.com/ Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
AW: [hlds_linux] hlds update
i already tried this... same error.. :(( -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Adam Hobbs Gesendet: Saturday, September 20, 2003 19:30 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RE: [hlds_linux] hlds update try a ./steam -update first, then run the server. I did it tonight while buiilding a server and found that the actual steam binary had been updated ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Broken Mods?
There is a version of wc3 that has been writen for 0.9.6 that should run with cs 1.6. Check the released plugins forum on amxmod.net Latest metamod works fine HLGuard - don't know yet but check the united admins site Adminmod is steam compatible from what I've read, but why runit when AMX does everything it does...only better (IMHO of course) Stats me: see hlguard. Its a UA project. HLstats has been updated to work with steam so you may be lucky with the other UA projects > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of SBlaze > Sent: Sunday, 21 September 2003 2:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [hlds_linux] Broken Mods? > > > I'm new to the mailing list so please don't flame me. I'm > currious as to what > seems to be broken in the way of mods for CS 1.6 right now. > > On my old CS 1.5 server I ran Metamod 1.16.2, AMX Mod 0.9x(Warcraft 3 and > FirstBlood) HL Guard 1.5x, StatsMe and AdminMod. > > Since I run the newer 1.6 now I'm sure there are some > compatability issues. Can > anyone bring me up to date on the status on one, some, or all of > these. As I > said I'm fairly new to the list so I'm sure I'm asking for old > news. I really > would like to run StatsMe and the AMX mods. I would like to use > Adminmod as > well...but how does that work now? Before I just used a shortcut > on my desktop > to load my cfg to give me admin access. With steam is that even remotely > possible > > I appreciate anything anyone can tell me. > > Thanks > SBlaze > > > = > In the absence of order there will be chaos. > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] To James and Eric
>I'm not your friend? Now I think *I* am going to cry :( http://Brian.youaremyfriend.com/ LOL Jeremy ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] hlds update
try a ./steam -update first, then run the server. I did it tonight while buiilding a server and found that the actual steam binary had been updated > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, 21 September 2003 2:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [hlds_linux] hlds update > > > > > myserver:/srv/game/hlds_l # ./hlds_run -game valve -autoupdate > Auto detecting CPU > Using Pentium II Optimised binary. > Auto-restarting the server on crash > Updating server using Steam. > Checking bootstrapper version ... > Updating Installation > Checking/Installing 'Linux Server Engine' version 0 > > Checking/Installing 'HL base content' version 0 > ContentServer rejected client's protocol version > Sat Sep 20 19:15:10 CEST 2003: Steam Update failed, ignoring. > > > > what did i do wrong > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Broken Mods?
I'm new to the mailing list so please don't flame me. I'm currious as to what seems to be broken in the way of mods for CS 1.6 right now. On my old CS 1.5 server I ran Metamod 1.16.2, AMX Mod 0.9x(Warcraft 3 and FirstBlood) HL Guard 1.5x, StatsMe and AdminMod. Since I run the newer 1.6 now I'm sure there are some compatability issues. Can anyone bring me up to date on the status on one, some, or all of these. As I said I'm fairly new to the list so I'm sure I'm asking for old news. I really would like to run StatsMe and the AMX mods. I would like to use Adminmod as well...but how does that work now? Before I just used a shortcut on my desktop to load my cfg to give me admin access. With steam is that even remotely possible I appreciate anything anyone can tell me. Thanks SBlaze = In the absence of order there will be chaos. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Multiple Servers
Does running multiple servers from the same directory still work the same w/ 1.6? IE, /usr/bin/screen -A -m -d -S cs1 /usr/local/games/hlds_l/hlds_run -game cstrike +ip 64.191.10.205 +maxplayers 14 +servercfgfile server1.cfg +mapcyclefile mapcyc le1.txt +motdfile motd1.txt +logsdir logs1 +map de_dust Will servercfgfile, mapcyclefile, etc still work. Just thinking ahead once I get 1.6 dl'd. --- Mark Moran ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] hlds update
myserver:/srv/game/hlds_l # ./hlds_run -game valve -autoupdate Auto detecting CPU Using Pentium II Optimised binary. Auto-restarting the server on crash Updating server using Steam. Checking bootstrapper version ... Updating Installation Checking/Installing 'Linux Server Engine' version 0 Checking/Installing 'HL base content' version 0 ContentServer rejected client's protocol version Sat Sep 20 19:15:10 CEST 2003: Steam Update failed, ignoring. what did i do wrong ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] [OT] To James and Eric
I know we fight allot, but hey so do my friends and I. Hell I even have fights with my girlfriend. But in the end my friends and I make up over a beer or two and my girlfriend and I have makeup sex. I can't buy you a beer and I sure as hell am not coming to your house to have sex with you s. Here's the next thing better. We'll agree to disagree and just be friends I think I'm going to cry. :D http://James.youaremyfriend.com/ http://Eric.youaremyfriend.com/ Jeremy ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Reserved Slots.
Valve changed the way the API works, this problem has been dealt with in AMX. Perhaps you should look at how AMX does this. (Or even use AMX?) -EvilGrin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alastair Grant Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 2:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [hlds_linux] Reserved Slots. Many server admins have a reserved slot system going on to allow only admins connect into the final spot on the server. Valve nicely added sv_visiblemaxplayers to allow us to hide that reserved slot, but with the current system it can't be done. When people connect to a server they have a pending Steam ID, and their real ID is not assigned until a few seconds later. This means the only way of having reserved slots working is by allowing people to join the server then waiting to check. The major problem with this 99% of people joining on the last slot won't be admins and get kicked, which is rather rude IMO. Wouldn't a system where the ID is assigned before people join the server be better for situations, or even Valve supporting reserved slots directly. I only have a mod on for reserved slots, so perhaps this is a feature that should be supported directly. -- Wireplay Official http://www.wireplay.co.uk/ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.520 / Virus Database: 318 - Release Date: 18/09/2003 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Steam master list IPs?
Geoff King said: > Info was posted on the HLApps list. > > Here's the original message. Note that you have to query *each* region > to get a 'full' list. Alfred later warned that if tools did this > excessively he may have to impose rate limits. > > -EvilGrin > Thanks! Has anyone created a qstat rc file to handle this yet? ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] centralised sql banlist/admin list
http://tisserand.ncuk.net/john/sbs1.01.tar.gz I've added a new field into the sql tables called banid which is used as the primary key (it used to use the wonid). The only other change really was modifying all instances of won to steam. I added a Changelog file also. Works fine here, so give it a bash. I don't claim to be fluent in php or sql at all so any problems I'll try and see wots happening... Original Author was a one Simon Garner of this list I believe. All credit for original code should go to him. john On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, James Sykes wrote: > Don't spose anyone fancys hacking it for SteamIDS? :) > IS there a home page for that? Maby the developer is already doing it ? > > James > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott > Pettit > Sent: 20 September 2003 06:18 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] centralised sql banlist/admin list > > You could use SBS but you need to change it to support SteamID's. > > ftp://ftp.cstrike.co.nz/pub/sbs/sbs1.0.tar.gz > > Cheers, > > Scott > ___ > Scott Pettit > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Hobbs > Sent: Saturday, 20 September 2003 5:03 p.m. > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [hlds_linux] centralised sql banlist/admin list > > Can anyone recommend a package that can manage a centralised banlist > and/or > a centralised admin access datalist running via sql? > > Im completely reinstalling my farm of ~ 10 servers and would like to > centralize things as much as possible. > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ
heh, are you on crack? tulip on 2.4.9 doesn't even work properly without a patch, and in 2.6, the tulip-driver has been split up in like 4 different modules. while 3com just works-every-time, even isa-3coms work flawless as long as you manually set them to use rj45 instead of bnc/coax. 3com 4evah ;-) - Sindre >= Original Message From "Brian A. Stumm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = >On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Daniel Stroven wrote: > >> brian wrote: >> Gee so your saying that ANCIENT 2.4.9 kernel supported all your NEW >> hardware? >> >> No, had to patch source for eth cards. I think a couple other things >> possibly. > >If your patching your ETHnet cards then you don't do your homework >upfront. Purchase cards that use tulip based drivers and you can use ANY >kernel you want. Netgear FA310s work with tulip drivers, so do many >realteks and intel chips. btw, netgear FA311's do NOT use tulip drivers, >but 310s do. 10/100 NIC's have been around far too long to worry about >drivers, just use cards that support the tulip driver... I stear clear of >3coms on linux btw... > > >___ >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] centralised sql banlist/admin list
Don't spose anyone fancys hacking it for SteamIDS? :) IS there a home page for that? Maby the developer is already doing it ? James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Pettit Sent: 20 September 2003 06:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] centralised sql banlist/admin list You could use SBS but you need to change it to support SteamID's. ftp://ftp.cstrike.co.nz/pub/sbs/sbs1.0.tar.gz Cheers, Scott ___ Scott Pettit [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Hobbs Sent: Saturday, 20 September 2003 5:03 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [hlds_linux] centralised sql banlist/admin list Can anyone recommend a package that can manage a centralised banlist and/or a centralised admin access datalist running via sql? Im completely reinstalling my farm of ~ 10 servers and would like to centralize things as much as possible. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Reserved Slots.
Many server admins have a reserved slot system going on to allow only admins connect into the final spot on the server. Valve nicely added sv_visiblemaxplayers to allow us to hide that reserved slot, but with the current system it can't be done. When people connect to a server they have a pending Steam ID, and their real ID is not assigned until a few seconds later. This means the only way of having reserved slots working is by allowing people to join the server then waiting to check. The major problem with this 99% of people joining on the last slot won't be admins and get kicked, which is rather rude IMO. Wouldn't a system where the ID is assigned before people join the server be better for situations, or even Valve supporting reserved slots directly. I only have a mod on for reserved slots, so perhaps this is a feature that should be supported directly. -- Wireplay Official http://www.wireplay.co.uk/ ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] centralised sql banlist/admin list
That looks quite nice, but a little overkill perhaps for people who just want the banning distribution system + web front end like myself. I've settled for sbs which I've added steam support into and also some user management via sql and session control although I don't know how good a solution it is currently (im thinking my code is dodgy :) Also using an nfs export to share the ban list which gets copied to each server every 10mins. I suppose I should add some kkrcon controls in it so when bans are placed they actually get banid'd on the server too. john On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, James Couzens wrote: > The project that I am working on "My Half-Life Admin" was written > specifically for people like your self. One of its features is a > centralized banning database, but its a lot more than just that. Roll on > over to http://myHLAdmin.com and review the documentation and see if it > strikes you. I'm only accepting people into the beta who are running at > least 3 servers, and you clearly meet that criteria. > > Cheers, > > James > > - Original Message - > From: "Adam Hobbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:03 PM > Subject: [hlds_linux] centralised sql banlist/admin list > > > > Can anyone recommend a package that can manage a centralised banlist > and/or > > a centralised admin access datalist running via sql? > > > > Im completely reinstalling my farm of ~ 10 servers and would like to > > centralize things as much as possible. > > > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ
"Brian A. Stumm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Just a friendly netiquette reminder :) > >and whatever you do don't put huge ascii art in your .sig Yer espscially ones that dont work as ascii art :P Steve / K ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ
"Brian A. Stumm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >80 lines of quote > >Ok I can't argue with that, I'm no sys admin... :) Please trim your posts Brian!! Steve / K ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Crazy Usage
Stan Bubrouski wrote: Again what the hell are you talking about? All the quote above says is that windows CPU usage reporting can be innacurate. I never said it could never reach 100% and I never made a single claim about Windows reporting more or less CPU usage than is true. Jesus. Wait...you say that it's "inaccurate", but then "I never made a single claim about Windows reporting more or less CPU usage than is true." Please explain these two diametrically opposed statements. No CPU usage reporting system is perfect, I don't see your argument here. It seems like you want to just keep touting your own horn. Yes, I'm "touting" my own horn. *sigh* Except that what you said was NOT that "No CPU usage reporting system is perfect." You said "It's an established fact that windows can be very inaccurate when reporting CPU usage." The point was that when he presented to you the fact that running with the kind of low CPU usage that he was seeing with 2.4.9 was not only *possible* in Win32, but that it did, in fact, directly correlated with the numbers he was seeing, showing that it *IS* indeed possible. However, you fire back that Win32 CPU reporting "can be very inaccurate", which means that you don't trust *IT*, either. The problem is, nobody else has seen whatever it is that you've seen to create your inherent distrust of 2.4.9 and Win32. Instead you put words in my mouth that I never said and start up an argument that you want me to now prove that Windows CPU usage isn't perfect. Hahaha...backpeddle much? > How so? You've never seen a process reach 99% CPU? ...as the entirety of your response. Thanks for the enlightenment. I'm not going to waste my time on every flame put forth by you. That's, unfortunately, the kind of response I was expecting. You're not a politician by trade, by any chance, are you? -- Eric (the Deacon remix) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ
Oscar N wrote: I would be very happy if you could do the same test on the same machine(s) but with freebsd :) /Oscar me too! best regards, raoul bhatia ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] fy_iceworld & cpu usage
hi, do you know any map like iceworld based on de_dust2? i have 1 server(hl 3.1.1.0c+boffix, 2.4.20-20.7) on amd 1500XP+ 1GB ram with 16 people playing in spike there is 70% CPU utilization on the same server cs1.6 de_dust2 with 16 people max 30% i'm lame in map creating but i think that, really small map as iceworld cannot do so much load maybe this is due to the original map -> de_vegas what are you thinking? do you have a source .map file for fy_iceworld somebody? -- - Marek Cervenka = ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ
I would be very happy if you could do the same test on the same machine(s) but with freebsd :) /Oscar On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:48:24 -0700 "James Couzens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Everyone, > > I spent several hours gathering this information, and I hope that some > of you can find it useful. Let me preface these results with the fact > that I was unable to run 2.4.9 on the SMP machine because it would > kernel panic(likely SMP I don't know but I didn't have the time to > figure it out, so I used another test machine). > > HLDS 3.1.1.1d - Day of Defeat 1.0 (latest server .so) > MetaMod 1.16.2 > CpuStat 1.01 > > AMD MP 2000 2GB PC2100 DDR266 > Slackware 8.1 > > 2.4.20 HZ 100 (default) > [11:50:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 25% FPS: 40 Players: > 14/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 5 m > [11:52:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 50% FPS: 33 Players: > 18/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 7 m > [11:54:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 89% FPS: 16 Players: > 23/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 9 m > [11:57:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 91% FPS: 16 Players: > 28/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 11 m > [11:58:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 92% FPS: 11 Players: > 28/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 13 m > [11:59:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 98% FPS: 5 Players: > 30/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 13 m > > 2.6.0-test4 HZ 100 > [9:24:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 66% FPS: 16 Players: > 22/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 16 m > [9:30:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 73% FPS: 12 Players: > 27/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 23 m > [9:35:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 80% FPS: 10 Players: > 31/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 27 m > > 2.6.0-test4 HZ 250 > [11:24:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 61% FPS: 36 Players: > 20/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 3 m > [11:26:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 56% FPS: 47 Players: > 20/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 5 m > [11:27:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 62% FPS: 34 Players: > 19/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 6 m > [11:30:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 74% FPS: 25 Players: > 24/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 9 m > [11:31:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 86% FPS: 12 Players: > 29/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 10 m > [11:32:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 89% FPS: 13 Players: > 29/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 11 m > [11:35:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 96% FPS: 12 Players: > 30/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 13 m > > 2.6.0-test4 HZ 500 > [8:56:am] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 84% FPS: 34 Players: > 21/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 33 m > > AMD XP2600 1GB PC2700 DDR333 > Slackware 8.1 > > 2.6.0-test4 HZ 512 > [12:15:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 70% FPS: 55 Players: > 26/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 2 m > [12:16:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 64% FPS: 65 Players: > 25/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 2 m > [12:16:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 73% FPS: 57 Players: > 27/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 3 m > [12:17:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 64% FPS: 64 Players: > 28/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 3 m > [12:17:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 86% FPS: 34 Players: > 31/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 4 m > [12:19:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 83% FPS: 29 Players: > 30/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 6 m > > 2.4.9-ac9+ext3 HZ 100 !!! DING DING DING WINNER DING DING DING !!! > [12:32:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 40% FPS: 29 Players: > 24/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 4 m > [12:34:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 38% FPS: 33 Players: > 23/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 6 m > [12:38:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 45% FPS: 27 Players: > 27/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 9 m > [12:39:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 56% FPS: 21 Players: > 30/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 10 m > [12:40:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 52% FPS: 23 Players: > 30/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 12 m > [12:44:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 58% FPS: 22 Players: > 30/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 16 m > > as I start to compile the kernel: (renice -19 pid_of_hlds) > [12:44:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 85% FPS: 21 Players: > 28/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 16 m > [12:45:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 95% FPS: 28 Players: > 28/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 16 m > [12:46:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 93% FPS: 28 Players: > 29/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 17 m > [12:47:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 92% FPS: 26 Players: > 28/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 18 m > [12:49:pm] -r5-dod1- [DOD1] Statistics: CPU: 91% FPS: 25 Players: > 28/32 Map: dod_avalanche Uptime: 20 m > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uname -a > Linux nsradio 2.4.9-ac9 #1 Sun Sep 14 20:18:39 PDT 2003 i686 unknown > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# uptime > 12:48:03 up 21 min, 3 users, load average: 2.11, 1.42, 0.72 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# top -V > procps version 2.0.16 > > top snapshot: > 217 nobody12 -19 114M 114M 5116 S < 52.7 22.8 9:56
