Re: [hlds_linux] IPv6 on SRCDS
On 17/01/2015 22:28, Erik-jan Riemers wrote: If we all think like that, we wont have ipv6 in 10 years and it will be too late. I rather have it *now* and support both so the change can be done in steps or something like that. It's probably a non issue anyway. It's more likely that the average buffoon will get, effectively, one /48 block from his isp. Or maybe a /56 block. Unlike IPv4, that will give him bazillions of addresses to assign to his toaster, phone et al. IIRC it gives your buffoon significantly more address space than ipv4 has in total. i.e he won't need NAT any more, but you'd be able to ban his entire range trivially. Just with a single /48 or /56 entry in your firewall. I doubt that will stop everyone of course. proxies, changing ISP, changing hardware etc etc etc could all get around an ip ban, but it's not like the extra address space of ipv6 is making the problem any worse than now, and, I think it would make it more difficult for some because a lot of people get dynamic ip addresses, which would be completely unnecessary. -- Dan ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] IPv6 on SRCDS
If we all think like that, we wont have ipv6 in 10 years and it will be too late. I rather have it *now* and support both so the change can be done in steps or something like that. 2015-01-17 22:59 GMT+01:00 Robert Paulson : > I for one hope they don't add IPV6 any time soon. > > It is already enough of a hassle to ban all these F2P hackers and it will > be 10 times worse when everyone has hundreds of ips. > > And plugins and databases would need to be upgraded as well. > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:14 AM, ics wrote: > > > This has been suggested on this list time to time for the past 4-5 years. > > No answer has been ever given to one way or the other. > > > > -ics > > > > Giovanni Harting kirjoitti: > > > > I would guess the new source 2 supports IPv6, everything else would be > >> terrifying. > >> > >> 2015-01-17 16:32 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kelker : > >> > >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >>> Hash: SHA1 > >>> > >>> Hey there, > >>> > >>> I've searched around the web > >>> but didn't find any current news about this: > >>> > >>> How about IPv6 on Source dedicated Servers? > >>> There were some posts back in 2013 that it isn't possible - yet. > >>> > >>> But meanwhile IPv6 deployment has made huge steps and here in Germany > >>> we already have ISPs that only serve native v6 adresses to their > >>> customers and are doing carrier grade NAT for the remaining IPv4-only > >>> services (which has, depending on the load of their core routers, a > >>> horrible performance at some times). > >>> > >>> So is there any way now to bind srcds servers to a native v6 or at > >>> least some word about the progress of making it compatible (maybe even > >>> a word from a developer here :-) )? > >>> > >>> Thanks in advance an best regards! > >>> Kevin > >>> > >>> PS: please don't slap me if I've missed something about that topic. > >>> Haven't been around quite a long time but tried my best to search the > >>> forums first. > >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > >>> Version: GnuPG v2 > >>> > >>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUuoCgAAoJEKd25JuJ3jlZNKsP/2D5BRMYeQYJJhGM1UG1zqze > >>> IgQnwQYI75nt67BUf5TSv3IMjhyGJd7kNt3E+V0qDY/bjhSLnbEuMMAAiW8P3tdD > >>> HJFwFmJaOR0/IP6Pn/G6md0kKsJ0u5I0K/5CGrWS+YM4M/cvKMeBAvydfO19Fa7O > >>> CUo3uORvAIotGEaWD36U1T/wedR8kRHkTBlXHn3YV3G9k1qUuMtjegojGm2EtcB5 > >>> Hl/v90jna8amncBhSdyIvNnA98XQvxAGPIW6RLVKImdVfosuit1Z00E0D1IJHPDf > >>> xpVfM/e1g7FVPBFPQryKwfMhR7imUCQemcBOavLFseFs5SNmxoVFqWVMCWYXlODC > >>> udSxHrnKSFrB+bJ0OEpkxOhm0QkxxKvrGntXc3cdEhMOio5R0sejSgsSPcP3ebTT > >>> GMsFsuH1VUUzIMfq5Lh2WSRdnYAe2ao7k6CVMHT7jtFsRw9BZVZHH6ZfeFsCjT0V > >>> vJWXPq0Xa5NCAVcAyv9dtAKkKyKLcIGdsRSmGr7a+ml7p5SkbiATn5QVmcuUZyL/ > >>> xzqzC27e4eUK4Gs+PgSV7rCaao0hGRfdMynjAf5Gzv0/iQEyk33coi1ECPRrjZrY > >>> hANbzjlE0pAQsyH9E8nr+yYVqX/MA6XDmiMSDDctdRA1NhUB8+ORBDxPlio/l/0Y > >>> CBjIqKytuN4ZJ5xhztEb > >>> =H/tm > >>> -END PGP SIGNATURE- > >>> > >>> ___ > >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >>> please visit: > >>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >>> > >> ___ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > >> please visit: > >> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > >> > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] IPv6 on SRCDS
I for one hope they don't add IPV6 any time soon. It is already enough of a hassle to ban all these F2P hackers and it will be 10 times worse when everyone has hundreds of ips. And plugins and databases would need to be upgraded as well. On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:14 AM, ics wrote: > This has been suggested on this list time to time for the past 4-5 years. > No answer has been ever given to one way or the other. > > -ics > > Giovanni Harting kirjoitti: > > I would guess the new source 2 supports IPv6, everything else would be >> terrifying. >> >> 2015-01-17 16:32 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kelker : >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hey there, >>> >>> I've searched around the web >>> but didn't find any current news about this: >>> >>> How about IPv6 on Source dedicated Servers? >>> There were some posts back in 2013 that it isn't possible - yet. >>> >>> But meanwhile IPv6 deployment has made huge steps and here in Germany >>> we already have ISPs that only serve native v6 adresses to their >>> customers and are doing carrier grade NAT for the remaining IPv4-only >>> services (which has, depending on the load of their core routers, a >>> horrible performance at some times). >>> >>> So is there any way now to bind srcds servers to a native v6 or at >>> least some word about the progress of making it compatible (maybe even >>> a word from a developer here :-) )? >>> >>> Thanks in advance an best regards! >>> Kevin >>> >>> PS: please don't slap me if I've missed something about that topic. >>> Haven't been around quite a long time but tried my best to search the >>> forums first. >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >>> Version: GnuPG v2 >>> >>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUuoCgAAoJEKd25JuJ3jlZNKsP/2D5BRMYeQYJJhGM1UG1zqze >>> IgQnwQYI75nt67BUf5TSv3IMjhyGJd7kNt3E+V0qDY/bjhSLnbEuMMAAiW8P3tdD >>> HJFwFmJaOR0/IP6Pn/G6md0kKsJ0u5I0K/5CGrWS+YM4M/cvKMeBAvydfO19Fa7O >>> CUo3uORvAIotGEaWD36U1T/wedR8kRHkTBlXHn3YV3G9k1qUuMtjegojGm2EtcB5 >>> Hl/v90jna8amncBhSdyIvNnA98XQvxAGPIW6RLVKImdVfosuit1Z00E0D1IJHPDf >>> xpVfM/e1g7FVPBFPQryKwfMhR7imUCQemcBOavLFseFs5SNmxoVFqWVMCWYXlODC >>> udSxHrnKSFrB+bJ0OEpkxOhm0QkxxKvrGntXc3cdEhMOio5R0sejSgsSPcP3ebTT >>> GMsFsuH1VUUzIMfq5Lh2WSRdnYAe2ao7k6CVMHT7jtFsRw9BZVZHH6ZfeFsCjT0V >>> vJWXPq0Xa5NCAVcAyv9dtAKkKyKLcIGdsRSmGr7a+ml7p5SkbiATn5QVmcuUZyL/ >>> xzqzC27e4eUK4Gs+PgSV7rCaao0hGRfdMynjAf5Gzv0/iQEyk33coi1ECPRrjZrY >>> hANbzjlE0pAQsyH9E8nr+yYVqX/MA6XDmiMSDDctdRA1NhUB8+ORBDxPlio/l/0Y >>> CBjIqKytuN4ZJ5xhztEb >>> =H/tm >>> -END PGP SIGNATURE- >>> >>> ___ >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>> please visit: >>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >>> >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] IPv6 on SRCDS
This has been suggested on this list time to time for the past 4-5 years. No answer has been ever given to one way or the other. -ics Giovanni Harting kirjoitti: I would guess the new source 2 supports IPv6, everything else would be terrifying. 2015-01-17 16:32 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kelker : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey there, I've searched around the web but didn't find any current news about this: How about IPv6 on Source dedicated Servers? There were some posts back in 2013 that it isn't possible - yet. But meanwhile IPv6 deployment has made huge steps and here in Germany we already have ISPs that only serve native v6 adresses to their customers and are doing carrier grade NAT for the remaining IPv4-only services (which has, depending on the load of their core routers, a horrible performance at some times). So is there any way now to bind srcds servers to a native v6 or at least some word about the progress of making it compatible (maybe even a word from a developer here :-) )? Thanks in advance an best regards! Kevin PS: please don't slap me if I've missed something about that topic. Haven't been around quite a long time but tried my best to search the forums first. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUuoCgAAoJEKd25JuJ3jlZNKsP/2D5BRMYeQYJJhGM1UG1zqze IgQnwQYI75nt67BUf5TSv3IMjhyGJd7kNt3E+V0qDY/bjhSLnbEuMMAAiW8P3tdD HJFwFmJaOR0/IP6Pn/G6md0kKsJ0u5I0K/5CGrWS+YM4M/cvKMeBAvydfO19Fa7O CUo3uORvAIotGEaWD36U1T/wedR8kRHkTBlXHn3YV3G9k1qUuMtjegojGm2EtcB5 Hl/v90jna8amncBhSdyIvNnA98XQvxAGPIW6RLVKImdVfosuit1Z00E0D1IJHPDf xpVfM/e1g7FVPBFPQryKwfMhR7imUCQemcBOavLFseFs5SNmxoVFqWVMCWYXlODC udSxHrnKSFrB+bJ0OEpkxOhm0QkxxKvrGntXc3cdEhMOio5R0sejSgsSPcP3ebTT GMsFsuH1VUUzIMfq5Lh2WSRdnYAe2ao7k6CVMHT7jtFsRw9BZVZHH6ZfeFsCjT0V vJWXPq0Xa5NCAVcAyv9dtAKkKyKLcIGdsRSmGr7a+ml7p5SkbiATn5QVmcuUZyL/ xzqzC27e4eUK4Gs+PgSV7rCaao0hGRfdMynjAf5Gzv0/iQEyk33coi1ECPRrjZrY hANbzjlE0pAQsyH9E8nr+yYVqX/MA6XDmiMSDDctdRA1NhUB8+ORBDxPlio/l/0Y CBjIqKytuN4ZJ5xhztEb =H/tm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] IPv6 on SRCDS
I would guess the new source 2 supports IPv6, everything else would be terrifying. 2015-01-17 16:32 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kelker : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hey there, > > I've searched around the web > but didn't find any current news about this: > > How about IPv6 on Source dedicated Servers? > There were some posts back in 2013 that it isn't possible - yet. > > But meanwhile IPv6 deployment has made huge steps and here in Germany > we already have ISPs that only serve native v6 adresses to their > customers and are doing carrier grade NAT for the remaining IPv4-only > services (which has, depending on the load of their core routers, a > horrible performance at some times). > > So is there any way now to bind srcds servers to a native v6 or at > least some word about the progress of making it compatible (maybe even > a word from a developer here :-) )? > > Thanks in advance an best regards! > Kevin > > PS: please don't slap me if I've missed something about that topic. > Haven't been around quite a long time but tried my best to search the > forums first. > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUuoCgAAoJEKd25JuJ3jlZNKsP/2D5BRMYeQYJJhGM1UG1zqze > IgQnwQYI75nt67BUf5TSv3IMjhyGJd7kNt3E+V0qDY/bjhSLnbEuMMAAiW8P3tdD > HJFwFmJaOR0/IP6Pn/G6md0kKsJ0u5I0K/5CGrWS+YM4M/cvKMeBAvydfO19Fa7O > CUo3uORvAIotGEaWD36U1T/wedR8kRHkTBlXHn3YV3G9k1qUuMtjegojGm2EtcB5 > Hl/v90jna8amncBhSdyIvNnA98XQvxAGPIW6RLVKImdVfosuit1Z00E0D1IJHPDf > xpVfM/e1g7FVPBFPQryKwfMhR7imUCQemcBOavLFseFs5SNmxoVFqWVMCWYXlODC > udSxHrnKSFrB+bJ0OEpkxOhm0QkxxKvrGntXc3cdEhMOio5R0sejSgsSPcP3ebTT > GMsFsuH1VUUzIMfq5Lh2WSRdnYAe2ao7k6CVMHT7jtFsRw9BZVZHH6ZfeFsCjT0V > vJWXPq0Xa5NCAVcAyv9dtAKkKyKLcIGdsRSmGr7a+ml7p5SkbiATn5QVmcuUZyL/ > xzqzC27e4eUK4Gs+PgSV7rCaao0hGRfdMynjAf5Gzv0/iQEyk33coi1ECPRrjZrY > hANbzjlE0pAQsyH9E8nr+yYVqX/MA6XDmiMSDDctdRA1NhUB8+ORBDxPlio/l/0Y > CBjIqKytuN4ZJ5xhztEb > =H/tm > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] IPv6 on SRCDS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey there, I've searched around the web but didn't find any current news about this: How about IPv6 on Source dedicated Servers? There were some posts back in 2013 that it isn't possible - yet. But meanwhile IPv6 deployment has made huge steps and here in Germany we already have ISPs that only serve native v6 adresses to their customers and are doing carrier grade NAT for the remaining IPv4-only services (which has, depending on the load of their core routers, a horrible performance at some times). So is there any way now to bind srcds servers to a native v6 or at least some word about the progress of making it compatible (maybe even a word from a developer here :-) )? Thanks in advance an best regards! Kevin PS: please don't slap me if I've missed something about that topic. Haven't been around quite a long time but tried my best to search the forums first. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUuoCgAAoJEKd25JuJ3jlZNKsP/2D5BRMYeQYJJhGM1UG1zqze IgQnwQYI75nt67BUf5TSv3IMjhyGJd7kNt3E+V0qDY/bjhSLnbEuMMAAiW8P3tdD HJFwFmJaOR0/IP6Pn/G6md0kKsJ0u5I0K/5CGrWS+YM4M/cvKMeBAvydfO19Fa7O CUo3uORvAIotGEaWD36U1T/wedR8kRHkTBlXHn3YV3G9k1qUuMtjegojGm2EtcB5 Hl/v90jna8amncBhSdyIvNnA98XQvxAGPIW6RLVKImdVfosuit1Z00E0D1IJHPDf xpVfM/e1g7FVPBFPQryKwfMhR7imUCQemcBOavLFseFs5SNmxoVFqWVMCWYXlODC udSxHrnKSFrB+bJ0OEpkxOhm0QkxxKvrGntXc3cdEhMOio5R0sejSgsSPcP3ebTT GMsFsuH1VUUzIMfq5Lh2WSRdnYAe2ao7k6CVMHT7jtFsRw9BZVZHH6ZfeFsCjT0V vJWXPq0Xa5NCAVcAyv9dtAKkKyKLcIGdsRSmGr7a+ml7p5SkbiATn5QVmcuUZyL/ xzqzC27e4eUK4Gs+PgSV7rCaao0hGRfdMynjAf5Gzv0/iQEyk33coi1ECPRrjZrY hANbzjlE0pAQsyH9E8nr+yYVqX/MA6XDmiMSDDctdRA1NhUB8+ORBDxPlio/l/0Y CBjIqKytuN4ZJ5xhztEb =H/tm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
