Re: [hlds_linux] sys_ticrate 1000 and pingboost 3 - BUG
Richard Fennell wrote: We have always found running Source along side High Performance CS servers will effect the performance of the CS server adversely. When running CS 1.6 fun and CS 1.6 War alone, the Warserver is stable at 950 FPS. When starting one CS:S server, the problems will begin. I think, we can only rent another root and seperate the CS 1.6 server from CS:S. Thx for all replys cya mr. jack ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] sys_ticrate 1000 and pingboost 3
Hi, I'm running on my rootserver (D820 + 2 GB Ram): 12 Slot WC3 1.6 12 Slot 1.6 War-Server pingboost 3 systicrate 1000 1x14 Slot CS:S Tick100 1x 12 Slot CS:S Tick 100 But the Warserver is not running good, the shooting is not clean. What can I do to optimize the Warserver? Serverconfig: http://phpfi.com/165091 Kernelconfig (2.6.18 + gentoo and ck patchset): http://phpfi.com/165089 Systeminformations: http://phpfi.com/165090 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] what do these kernel messages indicate?
Jon McDermott wrote: Martin Zwickel wrote: On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:12:40 -0500 Jon McDermott [EMAIL PROTECTED] bubbled: I'm seeing from 2 to 10 of these messages a day in my dmesg log file: srcds_amd[18045] trap bounds rip:f68ea7cd rsp:b510 error:0 srcds_amd[22773] trap bounds rip:f68ea7cd rsp:b510 error:0 srcds_amd[27452] trap bounds rip:f68ea7cd rsp:b510 error:0 srcds_amd[19888] trap bounds rip:f68ea7cd rsp:b510 error:0 srcds_amd[5029] trap bounds rip:f68ea7cd rsp:b510 error:0 srcds_amd[21741] trap bounds rip:f68ea7cd rsp:b510 error:0 srcds_amd[8683] trap bounds rip:f68ea7cd rsp:b510 error:0 srcds_amd[11154] :f68ea7cd rsp:b510 error:0 My kernel: 2.6.9-34.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Jun 30 10:32:04 EDT 2006 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Try a newer kernel! It's rather old! It's stable though. Any reason to believe that the problem goes away with a newer kernel? I'm not a real fan of software updates on a production system without good reasons. Jon There is a very good reason to upgrade to 2.6.17.5. You should read http://isc.incidents.org/diary.php?storyid=1485isc=1f2db69aeecb35f0fa2b24183244dfc4 and http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-July/047907.html ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] what do these kernel messages indicate?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2.6.9-34.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Jun 30 10:32:04 EDT 2006 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Try a newer kernel! It's rather old! Actually that looks like a RedHat kernel (ES3?), which is back-ported with security fixes (notice the date on it). He may not have the option to update to a newer revision, unless he wants to compile it himself (sometimes a bad idea in RH land). Jeff Love Burgh Gaming the kernel is an outdated RedHat Kernel :P ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] monitoring tools
Hi I'm using Wine and HLSW v1.0.0.45. Regards mr. jack David Williams wrote: hey guys. just migrated my comp to linux. Well actually I'm dual booting but only because i love PC gaming too much :). I have a srcds server and when i'm in windows i use hlsw to make sure everything is cool. Is there a linux equivalent? I ask this because i am slowing spending more and more time in SuSE 10.1. which is quite a testiment to linux especially as i have had only minimal hardware problems (damn windows hardware contracts :( ). anyway i hope you guys are as helpful as the people in the windows list. and maybe one day i'll migrate my server to linux too. Meph ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Kernel preemption or not?
I'm interessted in an expert http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=endep=/gQPU.search=expert opinion http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=endep=/gQPU.search=opinion to ;) we've an amd 64 3700 and all cs server (1.6 and Source, some with plugins, warserver without) are lagging Mathias Sandahl wrote: -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hello! I've read on some forums that hlds could benefit from kernel preemption on. Anyone who tried this and have some comments about it? /Mathias! -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
