[hlds_linux] Assertion Failed :-
Hello, Not quite sure what is going on my CS:GO servers but everytime I update or restart the game server im flooded with these errors during the steamdCM update. /home/buildbot/buildslave_steam/steam_rel_client_linux/build/src/clientdll/../common/asyncfileiohandler.cpp (983) : Assertion Failed: pItem->nSize == cubBytesRead App state (0x300506) downloading, progress: 75.51 (4442175321 / 5882712795) Also at times the update module seems to go in a loop before the server starts. Could someone please advise ? :) This is a CENTOS 64BIT distro Thanks :) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] The 1000fps problem
Contact me if your interested in viewing a ROCK SOLID 1000 FPS server
It's very possible.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Kveri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no chance of running 1000fps stable server on any hardware, YOU
> CAN'T GET 1000FPS STILL server. I'm running 998-1000fps server on
> celeron 1,8GHz.
>
> Kveri
>
> tuorpeZ wrote / napísal(a):
> > Hello,
> >
> > Has someone succeed to get a stable 1000fps hlds on a core2duo ?
> > I tryed a lot of different kernel configurations but I never achieve to
> > get FPS close to 1000 for a long time.
> >
> > Here what I've already tested (64bits) :
> > Kernel 2.6.24.5 default
> > Kernel 2.6.24.5 1000HZ
> > Kernel 2.6.27.4 1000HZ No preempt
> > Kernel 2.6.27.4 1000HZ preempt
> > Kernel 2.6.27.4 1500HZ preempt (With USER_HZ=1500)
> > Kernel 2.6.26.6 1000HZ preempt + RT patch
> >
> > Neither of those kernels achieve to get a stable +/- 900 fps except for
> > the RT kernel :
> >
> > CPU InOut Uptime Users FPSPlayers
> > 71.00 0.00 0.00 15 2 930.23 0
> > stats
> > CPU InOut Uptime Users FPSPlayers
> > 70.00 0.00 0.00 15 2 855.43 0
> >
> > BUT 70% CPU without players !
> >
> > Other kernels cause some drops to 300FPS.
> >
> > I think that my box (c2duo 2x2Ghz) simply can't compute 1000fps for
> > HLDS... I think that it is only possible on a Xeon/Opteron CPU.
> > Am I wrong ? Did someone succeed to get 1000fps on other than a "server
> > class" CPU (ie Xeon/Opteron) ?
> >
> >
> > --- tuorpeZ
> >
> >
> > en3my a écrit :
> >
> >> None.
> >>
> >> Default 2.6.26.6 kernel with config i've included in prev. mail.
> >>
> >> One more thing i forgot to suggest - try to disable almost every feature
> in
> >> MB's BIOS - COM, LPT, USB, Sound, etc. I don't have proof that they
> really
> >> mess your FPS, but belive they do :)
> >>
> >> -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
> >> en3my
> >> www.2Po.eu
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: "Philipp Reddigau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: "Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list"
> >>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 11:13 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The 1000fps problem
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> @Enemy
> >>> Wich Kernel patches are you using?
> >>>
> >>> best regards,
> >>> Philipp
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> en3my schrieb:
> >>>
> >>>
> Speaking on the subject... I was trying to archive 1000FPS performance
> on
> my
> dual quad box for few months under Debian Linux. Best result i've got
> is
> by
> using latest kernel (im using 2.6.26.5) with kernel config you can
> get at
>
> http://2po.eu/downloads/custom/www.2po.eu_linux_kernel_2.6.26.6.config
>
> But i suggest anyone to experiment with "IO Schedulers", all the
> settings
> in
> "Processor type and features", try to disable all the "Power
> Managment",
> try
> kernel param "acpi=off" (append="acpi=off" for lilo.conf).
>
> When dealing with lot of servers on one physical box (i have 8
> physical
> cores and allow to run about 20 HLDS's and few HLDSS's at same time)
> you
> must experiment with affinities ("man taskset" in Linux) and
> priorities
> ("man renice").
>
> And as it was suggested before in this maillist - if you're using 4+
> GB
> of
> ram, use 64bit distro.
>
> -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
> en3my
> www.2Po.eu
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Faustas Buskevicius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list"
>
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 10:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The 1000fps problem
>
>
>
>
>
> > Take it easy :) I didn't say they "hacked" it.
> > Since CPU values have been known to be reported incorrectly, there's
> > no reason why fps values would *always* be reliable and accurate.
> >
> > In response to OP, try running 1000hz, not tickless kernel. Kveri has
> > suggested doing so in the past. I think it's worth a shot. Please let
> > us know of your findings.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 7:15 PM, en3my <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> 2 Faustas:
> >> I think if they've hacked the output of "stats - fps" value, they
> would
> >> not
> >> change the "stats - cpu use" field. Don't they? :) Any way, not me
> nor
> >> my
> >> friends have a single complain about GH.com servers. That's why i
> >> belive
> >> the
> >> text i see in "stats" command and i belive stable 1000 fps is
> possible
> >> to
> >> archive (under Linux, don't know about others OS's).
> >>
> >> 2 J T:
> >> I'm not advertising any companies hosting. I've just told that
> >> "perfect"
> >> server is a real thing :)
> >>
> >> -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
> >> en3my
> >> www.2Po.eu
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: "Faustas Bu
Re: [hlds_linux] New ban system -> new bug...
yah I can confirm my amxbans system still is working On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Pawel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So use amxbans ;) > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Martin Christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > The ban with : > > > > - amx_ban : not working > > - rcon banid : working but the bannedcfgfile isn't updated. So, all > > peoples you try to ban comes back after a mapchange if you reload the > > bannedcfgfile or after a reboot if you load the bannedcfgfile at sartup > > only. > > > > > > Valve, thank you again. > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] IP RANGE ERROR - Incorrect Setup - Please advise.
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] gary.. please advise . On Jan 13, 2008 8:52 AM, Al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Original Message ----- > From: "Brandon Cherup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 12:12 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] IP RANGE ERROR - Incorrect Setup - Please > advise. > > > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > ping -I 216.246.153.14 google.com - DOES NOT WORK (Range 2) > > > sorry this should read ping -I 205.234.153.14 google.com > > > > BUT GARY EITHER WAY IT DOSNT WORK > > > > you define two different default gateways (GATEWAY=216.246.108.129 and > GATEWAY=205.234.153.1)! This is not possible! > > What do u mean this is not possible ? The datacenter gave me this second > subnet of ips... > > A datacenter will give you as many ranges of IPs as you like. However in > most cases when a server has 2 different subnets these are usually on > different network cards on something acting as a router or one IP range to > be for a private IP network (non routable) and a public (routable) > network. > Looking at your config you are using just 1 network card. Is your server > connected to your host's switch via a vlan or trunk? If you are assigned > just the 1 vlan on your network connection that is one reason it is not > working another as others have pointed out there can only be 1 "default" > gateway to use mutiple gateways you must use either a router or assign > different gateways to different destination networks: > e.g > "route add -net 217.64.127.0/24 gw 205.234.153.1" > will route traffic destined to 217.64.127.0/24 (the network my server is > on) > out through gateway 205.234.153.1 as long as there is an active interface > on > your server on the same subnet as 205.234.153.1 note that specifying a > gateway using this method is alternative to specifying a default gateway > in > your network-scripts. > > Another thing to test, can you ping both gateways from the server? > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] IP RANGE ERROR - Incorrect Setup - Please advise.
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ip a 1: lo: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:30:48:91:72:2e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 216.246.108.130/29 brd 216.246.108.135 scope global eth0 inet 205.234.153.2/28 brd 205.234.153.15 scope global eth0:5 inet 216.246.108.131/29 brd 216.246.108.135 scope global secondary eth0:1 inet 216.246.108.132/29 brd 216.246.108.135 scope global secondary eth0:2 inet 216.246.108.133/29 brd 216.246.108.135 scope global secondary eth0:3 inet 216.246.108.134/29 brd 216.246.108.135 scope global secondary eth0:4 inet 205.234.153.3/28 brd 205.234.153.15 scope global secondary eth0:6 inet 205.234.153.4/28 brd 205.234.153.15 scope global secondary eth0:7 inet 205.234.153.5/28 brd 205.234.153.15 scope global secondary eth0:8 inet 205.234.153.6/28 brd 205.234.153.15 scope global secondary eth0:9 inet 205.234.153.7/28 brd 205.234.153.15 scope global secondary eth0:10 inet 205.234.153.8/28 brd 205.234.153.15 scope global secondary eth0:11 inet 205.234.153.9/28 brd 205.234.153.15 scope global secondary eth0:12 inet 205.234.153.10/28 brd 205.234.153.15 scope global secondary eth0:13 inet 205.234.153.11/28 brd 205.234.153.15 scope global secondary eth0:14 inet 205.234.153.12/28 brd 205.234.153.15 scope global secondary eth0:15 inet 205.234.153.13/28 brd 205.234.153.15 scope global secondary eth0:16 inet 205.234.153.14/28 brd 205.234.153.15 scope global secondary eth0:17 inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe91:722e/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 1000 link/ether 00:30:48:91:72:2f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 4: sit0: mtu 1480 qdisc noop link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0 On Jan 13, 2008 7:12 AM, Brandon Cherup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ping -I 216.246.153.14 google.com - DOES NOT WORK (Range 2) > > > sorry this should read ping -I 205.234.153.14 google.com > > > > BUT GARY EITHER WAY IT DOSNT WORK > > > > you define two different default gateways (GATEWAY=216.246.108.129 and > GATEWAY=205.234.153.1)! This is not possible! > > What do u mean this is not possible ? The datacenter gave me this second > subnet of ips... > > > > > > > > On Jan 13, 2008 5:02 AM, Peter Hansen / gamed.de <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Hello, > > > > you define two different default gateways (GATEWAY=216.246.108.129 and > > GATEWAY= 205.234.153.1)! This is not possible! > > > > Look at "route -n" with route is active network 0.0.0.0 means default. > > > > Please look at "ifconfig" or "ip a" too and see wheter the ips are up. > > The fact that you can ping the addresses sounds like there are up. > > > > Use nmap from a node in the same subnet(s) to see to witch mac-addresses > > the ips resolve. > > > > What about ssh or some other services with a binding to every address? > > Are they online in nmap? > > > > Whats the error when you try to bind to the ips of the second range? > > > > Greets from Germany, > > Peter > > > > Gary Stanley schrieb: > > > At 03:55 PM 1/12/2008, Brandon Cherup wrote: > > > > > >> ping -I 216.246.153.14 google.com - DOES NOT WORK (Range 2) > > > > > > Of course that won't work, that's not an IP that is binded to the > > > routing table. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Gary Stanley ([EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) > > > > > > Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > > > A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) > > > frowned upon? > > > Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting" > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > - -- > > Entwicklung > > > > > > fast IT GmbH > > Am Gatherhof 44 > > D-40472 Düsseldorf > > > > http://www.fastit.net > > > > Telefon +49 / (0)180 - 5 327 848 (0,14 EUR/Min) > > Telefax +49 / (0)180 - 5 327 849 (0,14 EUR/Min) > &g
Re: [hlds_linux] IP RANGE ERROR - Incorrect Setup - Please advise.
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] ping -I 216.246.153.14 google.com - DOES NOT WORK (Range 2) sorry this should read ping -I 205.234.153.14 google.com BUT GARY EITHER WAY IT DOSNT WORK you define two different default gateways (GATEWAY=216.246.108.129 and GATEWAY=205.234.153.1)! This is not possible! What do u mean this is not possible ? The datacenter gave me this second subnet of ips... On Jan 13, 2008 5:02 AM, Peter Hansen / gamed.de <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hello, > > you define two different default gateways (GATEWAY=216.246.108.129 and > GATEWAY=205.234.153.1)! This is not possible! > > Look at "route -n" with route is active network 0.0.0.0 means default. > > Please look at "ifconfig" or "ip a" too and see wheter the ips are up. > The fact that you can ping the addresses sounds like there are up. > > Use nmap from a node in the same subnet(s) to see to witch mac-addresses > the ips resolve. > > What about ssh or some other services with a binding to every address? > Are they online in nmap? > > Whats the error when you try to bind to the ips of the second range? > > Greets from Germany, > Peter > > Gary Stanley schrieb: > > At 03:55 PM 1/12/2008, Brandon Cherup wrote: > > > >> ping -I 216.246.153.14 google.com - DOES NOT WORK (Range 2) > > > > Of course that won't work, that's not an IP that is binded to the > > routing table. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Gary Stanley ([EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > > Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > > A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) > > frowned upon? > > Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting" > > > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > - -- > Entwicklung > > > fast IT GmbH > Am Gatherhof 44 > D-40472 Düsseldorf > > http://www.fastit.net > > Telefon +49 / (0)180 - 5 327 848 (0,14 EUR/Min) > Telefax +49 / (0)180 - 5 327 849 (0,14 EUR/Min) > > > Eingetragen beim Amtsgericht Düsseldorf unter HRB 47957 > Geschäftsführer: Christoph Herrnkind > UStIDNr.: DE 226 958 586 > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHieHNj07BMfCgreMRArxsAJ4+VfBLEXgwB6ME0U/fOAwcNmsQGQCfSdWj > L6wf94OVQB+/uiH1qGzlU4Y= > =oM2z > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] IP RANGE ERROR
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Guys I'm having issues setting up a second range of virtual ips to my dedicated server...One of the experts here could point out my errors I have 2 ranges set up on my box, each one is 2 different subnets. The first one shares the same subnet as my main ip and seem to have no problems with it, however with range 2 I can not get any services or applications to bind to any of those ips. But for some strange reason i can PING the ips (range 2) from a remote computer and get a response! ping -I 216.246.108.134 google.com WORKS (Range 1) ping -I 216.246.153.14 google.com - DOES NOT WORK (Range 2) I have placed the configs inside /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts *First file - First Range (ifcfg-eth0-range1)* DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static HWADDR=00:30:48:91:72:2E IPADDR_START=216.246.108.131 IPADDR_END=216.246.108.134 CLONENUM_START=1 NETMASK=255.255.255.248 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet *Second File - Second Range (ifcfg-eth0-range2)* DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static HWADDR=00:30:48:91:72:2E IPADDR_START=205.234.153.2 IPADDR_END=205.234.153.14 CLONENUM_START=5 GATEWAY=205.234.153.1 NETMASK=255.255.255.240 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet *and my ifcfg-eth0 looks like this* DEVICE=eth0 BROADCAST=216.246.108.135 HWADDR=00:30:48:91:72:2E IPADDR= 216.246.108.130 NETMASK=255.255.255.248 GATEWAY=216.246.108.129 NETWORK=216.246.108.128 ONBOOT=yes Any ideas Please... -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] IP RANGE ERROR - Incorrect Setup - Please advise.
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Guys I'm having issues setting up a second range of virtual ips to my dedicated server...One of the experts here could point out my errors I have 2 ranges set up on my box, each one is 2 different subnets. The first one shares the same subnet as my main ip and seem to have no problems with it, however with range 2 I can not get any services or applications to bind to any of those ips. But for some strange reason i can PING the ips (range 2) from a remote computer and get a response! ping -I 216.246.108.134 google.com WORKS (Range 1) ping -I 216.246.153.14 google.com - DOES NOT WORK (Range 2) I have placed the configs inside /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts *First file - First Range (ifcfg-eth0-range1)* DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static HWADDR=00:30:48:91:72:2E IPADDR_START=216.246.108.131 IPADDR_END=216.246.108.134 CLONENUM_START=1 NETMASK=255.255.255.248 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet *Second File - Second Range (ifcfg-eth0-range2)* DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static HWADDR=00:30:48:91:72:2E IPADDR_START=205.234.153.2 IPADDR_END=205.234.153.14 CLONENUM_START=5 GATEWAY=205.234.153.1 NETMASK=255.255.255.240 ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet *and my ifcfg-eth0 looks like this* DEVICE=eth0 BROADCAST=216.246.108.135 HWADDR=00:30:48:91:72:2E IPADDR=216.246.108.130 NETMASK=255.255.255.248 GATEWAY=216.246.108.129 NETWORK=216.246.108.128 ONBOOT=yes Any ideas Please... -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Re: ERROR ON 64bit CENTOS
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Thank you esa On Jan 7, 2008 2:30 AM, Esa Häkkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Ubuntu 64-bit, it is mandatory to install ia32-libs, check is there > similar package on CentOS. > > ubuntu64bit: apt-get install ia32-libs > > (my 50 cents) > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] ERROR ON 64bit CENTOS -
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] ./hlds_run -binary hlds_amd64 -game cstrike +map de_dust2 +maxplayers 12 -debug Enabling debug mode Auto-restarting the server on crash ./hlds_run: line 360: hlds_amd64: command not found cat: hlds.2869.pid: No such file or directory email debug.log to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 7 03:01:44 EST 2008: Server restart in 10 seconds Mon Jan 7 03:01:47 EST 2008: Server Quit thats for amd64 and this is for amd ./hlds_run -binary hlds_amd -game cstrike +map de_dust2 +maxplayers 12 -debug Enabling debug mode Auto-restarting the server on crash ./hlds_run: line 360: hlds_amd: command not found cat: hlds.2881.pid: No such file or directory email debug.log to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 7 03:02:19 EST 2008: Server restart in 10 seconds My current setup is a Core2Quad model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPUQ6600 @ 2.40GHz stepping: 11 cpu MHz : 2393.998 cache size : 4096 KB Is this the preferred choice for running good / stable halflife servers ? Also the kernel is 2.6.22 - NO HRT / NO DYMANIC TICKS - 1000 HZ - preempt kernel , antici i/o scheduler On Jan 6, 2008 3:22 PM, Gary Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 01:21 PM 1/6/2008, Brandon Cherup wrote: > >-- > >[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > >Im not running no SCRIPT :x > > > > > >/hlds_run -game cstrike +map de_dust2 +maxplayers 12 > > > > > > > > > >heh guys > > > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] lms]# ls /bin/sh > >/bin/sh > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] lms]# > > > > ls -la /bin/sh > > > -- Gary Stanley ([EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned > upon? > Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting" > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] ERROR ON 64bit CENTOS -
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
no breaking
and yes bin/sh is on it
no it dosnt break when i type it, goes straight to sh prompt
On Jan 6, 2008 1:35 PM, tsuehpsyde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> Is /bin/sh on your system? If so, does it break if you run it or does it
> bring up a new shell?
>
> On Jan 6, 2008 12:21 PM, Brandon Cherup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --
> > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > Im not running no SCRIPT :x
> >
> >
> > /hlds_run -game cstrike +map de_dust2 +maxplayers 12
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > heh guys
> >
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] lms]# ls /bin/sh
> > /bin/sh
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] lms]#
> >
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] cstrikep]# ls -l
> > total 51372
> > -r--r--r-- 1 lms lms 70 Oct 4 21:33 appdir.txt
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 381987 Oct 24 10:16 core_i386.so
> > drwxr-x--- 14 lms lms4096 Jan 6 11:20 cstrike
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 2057878 Oct 24 10:16 engine_amd64.so
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 2676249 Oct 24 10:16 engine_amd.so
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 2684547 Oct 24 10:16 engine_i486.so
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 2666563 Oct 24 10:16 engine_i686.so
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 171762 Oct 24 10:16 filesystem_stdio_amd64.so
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 242182 Oct 24 10:16 filesystem_stdio_i386.so
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 lms lms 5 Jan 6 14:32 hlds.2502.pid
> > -rwxr-xr-- 1 lms lms 232742 Oct 24 10:16 hlds_amd
> > -rwxr-xr-- 1 lms lms 68581 Oct 24 10:16 hlds_amd64
> > -rwxr-xr-- 1 lms lms 234918 Oct 24 10:16 hlds_i486
> > -rwxr-xr-- 1 lms lms 233958 Oct 24 10:16 hlds_i686
> > -rwxr-xr-- 1 lms lms 10527 Jan 6 15:51 hlds_run
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 lms lms 3513408 Sep 1 2005 hldsupdatetool.bin
> > -rwxr-xr-- 1 lms lms 255912 Oct 24 10:16 hltv
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 863 Jan 6 20:25 InstallRecord.blob
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 2789611 Oct 24 10:16
> > libSteamValidateUserIDTickets_amd64.so
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 3572199 Oct 24 10:16
> > libSteamValidateUserIDTickets_i386.so
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 23337 Oct 24 10:16 linuxreadme.txt
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 2384353 Oct 24 10:16 proxy_i386.so
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms3413 Apr 7 2005 readme.txt
> > drwxr-x--- 2 lms lms4096 Oct 24 10:16 reslists
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 lms lms 8584961 Nov 9 21:51 steam
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 390717 Oct 24 10:16 steam_api_i486.so
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 9163332 Oct 24 10:16 steamclient_i486.so
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 lms lms 358301 Nov 16 2005 test1.so
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 lms lms 453372 Nov 16 2005 test2.so
> > -r-xr-xr-x 1 lms lms 8306090 Nov 16 2005 test3.so
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 358870 Oct 24 10:16 tier0_s_i486.so
> > drwxr-x--- 11 lms lms4096 Oct 24 10:16 valve
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 457443 Oct 24 10:16 vstdlib_s_i486.so
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] cstrikep]#
> >
> >
> > On Jan 6, 2008 1:06 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Doesn't have anything to do with your OS, this is just poor scripting.
> > > Post the script and we might be able to help correct it.
> > >
> > > > --
> > > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > > > I dont understand why Im getting this error, can any one point me in
> > the
> > > > right direction for this ? I cant start any cs servers without
> getting
> > > > this
> > > > error...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > bash: ./hlds_run: /bin/sh : bad interpreter: No such file or
> directory
> > > > bash: ./hlds_run: /bin/sh : bad interpreter: No such file or
> directory
> > > > ./hlds_run: line 13: `init() {
> > > > '
> > > > ./hlds_run: line 13: syntax error near unexpected token `{
> > > > '
> > > > ./hlds_run: line 12:
> > > > : command not found
> > > > ./hlds_run: line 9:
> > > > : command not found
> > > > /hlds_run: line 1: /bin/sh
> > > > : No such file or directory
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > ___
> > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> archives,
> > > > please visit:
> > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ___
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > > please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> > --
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
> --
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
--
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] ERROR ON 64bit CENTOS -
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Im not running no SCRIPT :x
/hlds_run -game cstrike +map de_dust2 +maxplayers 12
heh guys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lms]# ls /bin/sh
/bin/sh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lms]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cstrikep]# ls -l
total 51372
-r--r--r-- 1 lms lms 70 Oct 4 21:33 appdir.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 381987 Oct 24 10:16 core_i386.so
drwxr-x--- 14 lms lms4096 Jan 6 11:20 cstrike
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 2057878 Oct 24 10:16 engine_amd64.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 2676249 Oct 24 10:16 engine_amd.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 2684547 Oct 24 10:16 engine_i486.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 2666563 Oct 24 10:16 engine_i686.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 171762 Oct 24 10:16 filesystem_stdio_amd64.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 242182 Oct 24 10:16 filesystem_stdio_i386.so
-rw-rw-r-- 1 lms lms 5 Jan 6 14:32 hlds.2502.pid
-rwxr-xr-- 1 lms lms 232742 Oct 24 10:16 hlds_amd
-rwxr-xr-- 1 lms lms 68581 Oct 24 10:16 hlds_amd64
-rwxr-xr-- 1 lms lms 234918 Oct 24 10:16 hlds_i486
-rwxr-xr-- 1 lms lms 233958 Oct 24 10:16 hlds_i686
-rwxr-xr-- 1 lms lms 10527 Jan 6 15:51 hlds_run
-rwxr-xr-x 1 lms lms 3513408 Sep 1 2005 hldsupdatetool.bin
-rwxr-xr-- 1 lms lms 255912 Oct 24 10:16 hltv
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 863 Jan 6 20:25 InstallRecord.blob
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 2789611 Oct 24 10:16
libSteamValidateUserIDTickets_amd64.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 3572199 Oct 24 10:16
libSteamValidateUserIDTickets_i386.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 23337 Oct 24 10:16 linuxreadme.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 2384353 Oct 24 10:16 proxy_i386.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms3413 Apr 7 2005 readme.txt
drwxr-x--- 2 lms lms4096 Oct 24 10:16 reslists
-rwxr-xr-x 1 lms lms 8584961 Nov 9 21:51 steam
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 390717 Oct 24 10:16 steam_api_i486.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 9163332 Oct 24 10:16 steamclient_i486.so
-r-xr-xr-x 1 lms lms 358301 Nov 16 2005 test1.so
-r-xr-xr-x 1 lms lms 453372 Nov 16 2005 test2.so
-r-xr-xr-x 1 lms lms 8306090 Nov 16 2005 test3.so
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 358870 Oct 24 10:16 tier0_s_i486.so
drwxr-x--- 11 lms lms4096 Oct 24 10:16 valve
-rw-r--r-- 1 lms lms 457443 Oct 24 10:16 vstdlib_s_i486.so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cstrikep]#
On Jan 6, 2008 1:06 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't have anything to do with your OS, this is just poor scripting.
> Post the script and we might be able to help correct it.
>
> > --
> > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > I dont understand why Im getting this error, can any one point me in the
> > right direction for this ? I cant start any cs servers without getting
> > this
> > error...
> >
> >
> >
> > bash: ./hlds_run: /bin/sh : bad interpreter: No such file or directory
> > bash: ./hlds_run: /bin/sh : bad interpreter: No such file or directory
> > ./hlds_run: line 13: `init() {
> > '
> > ./hlds_run: line 13: syntax error near unexpected token `{
> > '
> > ./hlds_run: line 12:
> > : command not found
> > ./hlds_run: line 9:
> > : command not found
> > /hlds_run: line 1: /bin/sh
> > : No such file or directory
> > --
> >
> > ___
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
>
>
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
--
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] ERROR ON 64bit CENTOS -
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I dont understand why Im getting this error, can any one point me in the
right direction for this ? I cant start any cs servers without getting this
error...
bash: ./hlds_run: /bin/sh : bad interpreter: No such file or directory
bash: ./hlds_run: /bin/sh : bad interpreter: No such file or directory
./hlds_run: line 13: `init() {
'
./hlds_run: line 13: syntax error near unexpected token `{
'
./hlds_run: line 12:
: command not found
./hlds_run: line 9:
: command not found
/hlds_run: line 1: /bin/sh
: No such file or directory
--
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] The stable 1000fps server, is it for real?
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] if you want your server to runn 1000 fps you could pay someone to set up your kernel and everything for you, thats what i did for mine! On 9/26/07, Thomas h <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Im using Both Intel and AMD desktop CPUs, I have server CPUS as well, so I > can test on that too, but I dont believe in a change because of a > "server"CPU... The mainboard might have something to say, but i doubt that > too, since to tickrate is more stable than any other in my country. > > I know that the fps_max needs to be higher than the value you want, i use > +100 for each "step". about the server(s) it doesnt make any difference > how > many or few I have on it... im testing with just 16slots CS or CSS and my > clients as the only player, if i even have an active slot. > > The OS is a bootstrapped debian etch with a bit of perl libs and sshd > running... doing nothing. > > Regards, Thomas > > >Thomas, what processors are you using? Are you using desktop > >processors or server processors? Also to get 500 FPS in Source use > >fps_max 600. Source is odd in how it works that, you don't actually > >get what you set fps_max to. Also how big of server are you talking > >about? How many players? > > > >On 9/26/07, Thomas h <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Like you I have tested just about everything you mentioned and i have > > > stripped the kernel to almost nothing. Still I have never seen 1000FPS > >with > > > stats in console. > > > > > > Using -pingboost 3 only gives me 500FPS, even though its higher > without. > >I > > > wonder what that is about. > > > > > > For some reason the FPS seems to be about 10% lower than the level im > > > targeting. 1000FPS and the FPS is peaking at about 910, 500FPS and the > > > server is peaking at about 450. Though it changes with kernel and > >hardware > > > arch... I did see nice round numbers with a particular kernel on AMDs > X2 > > > CPUs, but using same kernel and settings on Intel and the numbers were > >odd > > > and lacking about 10%. > > > > > > I mostly tweaked toward perfect source servers, and succeeded quite > will > > > making somewhat stable tickrate 100 servers, but when i check the FPS > >(they > > > are peaking a 500FPS) it can be quite low (100-200) very demanding > > > people/players still play on a flawless server when i ask how the > server > > > run. > > > > > > max_fps is a serverside cvar in hlds too, you can even set it using a > >rcon > > > fps_max X which means its actually in the users control. :-( > > > > > > Regards, Thomas > > > > > > >Thanks for your replys, but im running linux on the server and will > not > > > >change to > > > >windows. So please leave windows out of this (hlds_linux) maiinglist. > > > > > > > >Is fps_max a serverside cvar? I know it is in SRCDS, but we are > >discussing > > > >HLDS, > > > >not SRCDS. > > > > > > > >With 995 i meant that the servers top fpspeak is 995 and its not > >stable. If > > > >it > > > >would have been stable at 995fps i wouldn't complain :D > > > > > > > >Regards > > > > > > > >On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:54 , <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: > > > > > > > > >Hello everyone. > > > > >I have spent the last 4 weeks searching, asking, reading, testing > >alot of > > > >things > > > > >to achieve a hlds running at a stable 1000fps. > > > > >I don't mean running 920-995fps i really mean 1000fps. > > > > > > > > > >I have read guides on Swedish, English, German and even French. > > > > >I have tried several distros (both 32-bit and 64-bit), kernels and > > > >patches. > > > > >I have tries with and without HPET, Dynamick tick (tickless), > 1000hz, > > > >2000hz, > > > > >4000hz and even 1hz. > > > > >I have tried dedicating the process to a specific core and renice > has > > > >been set to > > > > >the process aswell. > > > > > > > > > >No kernelconfig has giving me a stable 1000fps server (unless > >pingboost 3 > > > >was > > > > >issued, but that fucks up the serverspeed). > > > > > > > > > >So, im asking you guys, what options do i have left? Is there any > one > >out > > > >there > > > > >who could enlighten me on how to proceed? > > > > > > > > > >Heres the sevrer i have been doing my tests on: > > > > > > > > > >Dell 1950 > > > > >Dual Quadcore Xeon running at 2.3Ghz 1333FSB > > > > >4x1024MB FBDRAM > > > > >73GB 10.000rpm HDD > > > > > > > > > >Please, help me figure out a way to make a stable 1000fps server. > > > > > > > > > >Regards > > > > > > > > > >___ > > > > >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > >archives, > > > >please visit: > > > > >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >___ > > > >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, > > > >please visit: > > > >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > >
Re: [hlds_linux] The stable 1000fps server, is it for real?
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] how about do you go with doing that ? On 9/25/07, Andy Giesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since you change your ACPI profile from whatever is installed to > Standard PC and it changes the timer resolution allowing it. > > On 9/25/07, Brandon Cherup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > umm since WHEN did windows push 995 fps ? > > > > On 9/25/07, Andy Giesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > fps_max 0? I even did this on Windows. Empty it would sit at 995 > > > constant and when I changed fps_max to 0 it is unlimited and would sit > > > at 1000. Give that a try. *shrug* > > > > > > On 9/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > Hello everyone. > > > > I have spent the last 4 weeks searching, asking, reading, testing > alot > > > of things > > > > to achieve a hlds running at a stable 1000fps. > > > > I don't mean running 920-995fps i really mean 1000fps. > > > > > > > > I have read guides on Swedish, English, German and even French. > > > > I have tried several distros (both 32-bit and 64-bit), kernels and > > > patches. > > > > I have tries with and without HPET, Dynamick tick (tickless), > 1000hz, > > > 2000hz, > > > > 4000hz and even 1hz. > > > > I have tried dedicating the process to a specific core and renice > has > > > been set to > > > > the process aswell. > > > > > > > > No kernelconfig has giving me a stable 1000fps server (unless > pingboost > > > 3 was > > > > issued, but that fucks up the serverspeed). > > > > > > > > So, im asking you guys, what options do i have left? Is there any > one > > > out there > > > > who could enlighten me on how to proceed? > > > > > > > > Heres the sevrer i have been doing my tests on: > > > > > > > > Dell 1950 > > > > Dual Quadcore Xeon running at 2.3Ghz 1333FSB > > > > 4x1024MB FBDRAM > > > > 73GB 10.000rpm HDD > > > > > > > > Please, help me figure out a way to make a stable 1000fps server. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, > > > please visit: > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > -- > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] The stable 1000fps server, is it for real?
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] umm since WHEN did windows push 995 fps ? On 9/25/07, Andy Giesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > fps_max 0? I even did this on Windows. Empty it would sit at 995 > constant and when I changed fps_max to 0 it is unlimited and would sit > at 1000. Give that a try. *shrug* > > On 9/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hello everyone. > > I have spent the last 4 weeks searching, asking, reading, testing alot > of things > > to achieve a hlds running at a stable 1000fps. > > I don't mean running 920-995fps i really mean 1000fps. > > > > I have read guides on Swedish, English, German and even French. > > I have tried several distros (both 32-bit and 64-bit), kernels and > patches. > > I have tries with and without HPET, Dynamick tick (tickless), 1000hz, > 2000hz, > > 4000hz and even 1hz. > > I have tried dedicating the process to a specific core and renice has > been set to > > the process aswell. > > > > No kernelconfig has giving me a stable 1000fps server (unless pingboost > 3 was > > issued, but that fucks up the serverspeed). > > > > So, im asking you guys, what options do i have left? Is there any one > out there > > who could enlighten me on how to proceed? > > > > Heres the sevrer i have been doing my tests on: > > > > Dell 1950 > > Dual Quadcore Xeon running at 2.3Ghz 1333FSB > > 4x1024MB FBDRAM > > 73GB 10.000rpm HDD > > > > Please, help me figure out a way to make a stable 1000fps server. > > > > Regards > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Team Fortress 2 Content Available
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] /test# ./steam -command update -game tf -dir /tf2/ Checking bootstrapper version ... Updating Installation Cannot open output file '/tf2//InstallRecord.blob' I can't be the only one getting this error ? anyone ... please ? On 9/14/07, Jason Ruymen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > -- > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > Hi guys, > > First off, in preparation for the upcoming dedicated server for Team > Fortress 2, we've updated the hldsupdatetool. Along with that, we've > made the content for Team Fortress 2 that you'll need for a dedicated > server available. To get that, run hldsupdatetool with the command > "-command update -game tf". > > The dedicated server itself is not yet ready. We're working very hard > to make it available as soon as possible. The Linux build might be a > little later than the Win32 build, but hopefully not by much. So for > now, sync up the TF 2 content that's available to get your server ready > :) > > Thanks, > Jason > > -- > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Server FPS will not go over 250 frames per second
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] what causes this to jump around like that ? On 9/8/07, Brandon Cherup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > well, ive got it producing about 940 FPS a second, it drops down to 400 > sometimes even 80... The problem im having now is that the server seems to > be on CRACK. the users RELOAD like crazy, everything is supery speedy... > what would cause this ? > > On 9/7/07, Crazy Canucks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I am no Linux guru, but it may be a kernel timing issue as well. I > > think you need to compile a 1000hz kernel do you not? I understand > > pre-emptible and tickless also help. > > > > Drek > > > > Svensk Ljud & Ljus Produktion wrote: > > > If you are running 1 gameserver on 2 cores then it will loose some > > > because > > > of switching between core 0 and 1. > > > Its better to assign one gameserver to each core ! > > > > > > start with- > > > taskset -c 0 ./srcds_run > > > > > > - for core 0 > > > > > > Peter > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "extendhost.de" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: > > > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 8:12 PM > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Server FPS will not go over 250 frames > > per > > > second > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Server FPS will not go over 250 frames per second
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] well, ive got it producing about 940 FPS a second, it drops down to 400 sometimes even 80... The problem im having now is that the server seems to be on CRACK. the users RELOAD like crazy, everything is supery speedy... what would cause this ? On 9/7/07, Crazy Canucks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am no Linux guru, but it may be a kernel timing issue as well. I > think you need to compile a 1000hz kernel do you not? I understand > pre-emptible and tickless also help. > > Drek > > Svensk Ljud & Ljus Produktion wrote: > > If you are running 1 gameserver on 2 cores then it will loose some > > because > > of switching between core 0 and 1. > > Its better to assign one gameserver to each core ! > > > > start with- > > taskset -c 0 ./srcds_run > > > > - for core 0 > > > > Peter > > - Original Message - > > From: "extendhost.de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 8:12 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Server FPS will not go over 250 frames > per > > second > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] HLDS Server FPS will not go over 250 frames per second
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Im having problems compiling my kernel to change the freq, ive have spent over 600 dollars in the past 2 days with remotes hands trying to get this to properly compile. On 9/6/07, Guy Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > grep CONFIG_HZ > > My config file is: /boot/config-2.6.22.2-42.fc6 > > Your fps can't exceed the above value. I got this info from this group. > > Guy > > } -Original Message- > } From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hlds_linux- > } [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Cherup > } Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 2:14 PM > } To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com > } Subject: [hlds_linux] HLDS Server FPS will not go over 250 frames per > } second > } > } -- > } [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > } I'm trying to run a 1000 fps server, yet i cant reach those specs. I > have > } a > } core 2 duo 2.4 ghz and running debian 4.0 ( kernel 2.8.16 ). > } > } My server will only top out at 250, What am I doing wrong ? > } > } > } My current cmd line is as follows > } > } > } ./hlds_run -game cstrike -tickrate 1 +fps_max 1000 -pingboost 3 > } +maxplayers 32 +map de_dust > } -- > } > } ___ > } To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > } please visit: > } http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] HLDS Server FPS will not go over 250 frames per second
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I'm trying to run a 1000 fps server, yet i cant reach those specs. I have a core 2 duo 2.4 ghz and running debian 4.0 ( kernel 2.8.16 ). My server will only top out at 250, What am I doing wrong ? My current cmd line is as follows ./hlds_run -game cstrike -tickrate 1 +fps_max 1000 -pingboost 3 +maxplayers 32 +map de_dust -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Re: HLDS Server FPS will not go over 250 frames per second
-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] this is the hardware its currently running on ! core 2 duo and debian 4 kernel 2.6, Intel Core 2 Duo 2. - 250 GB Hard Drive* 2 GB RAM* Linux version 2.6.18-4-686 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)) #1 SMP Wed May 9 23:03:12 UTC 2007 On 9/5/07, Brandon Cherup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm trying to run a 1000 fps server, yet i cant reach those specs. I have > a core 2 duo 2.4 ghz and running debian 4.0 ( kernel 2.8.16 ). > > My server will only top out at 250, What am I doing wrong ? > > > My current cmd line is as follows > > > ./hlds_run -game cstrike -tickrate 1 +fps_max 1000 -pingboost 3 > +maxplayers 32 +map de_dust > > -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
