Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Eric(deacon)

2002-06-07 Thread DeNiro

Eric (Deacon) wrote:
| And once again, even if you were 100% correct, is completely irrelevant.
| Thanks for playing the "Here, let me populate hlds_linx list with more
| spam" game.  You win.

Funny game, what do I win?





___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Eric(deacon)

2002-06-07 Thread DeNiro

DeNiro wrote:
| | By the way...  Up to, but not including this email, it comes out to a
| | total of 46 messages over the course of a week.  That's an average of
| | approximately 7 messages a day, most of which are very short, to the
| | point messages.  Out of a total of 539 messages for the month of june,
| | that's approximately 8 to 8.5 percent of all messages total.  Now,
| | what's the complaint again?  Out of approximately 90 messages a day, 7
| | are from me.  Now, even if we assume incorrectly that half those are
| | unnecessary posts...what the hell is your problem?  What makes me your
| | target?
|
| Uum just to point this out. Your first post was on the 2th and your last
| post was on the 7th which gives you 5 days, which makes it a average of
| 9.2 posts. Also 8.5% is a large share.

I just realized that I've also made an error cause those 46 msgs wer
eposted up untill yesterday and today isn't over yet so it doesn't
count. This brings you upto a average of 11.5. But the 2 to 6 average of
the rest should also go up cause those were calculated in the same manner.


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] Eric(deacon)

2002-06-07 Thread DeNiro

| By the way...  Up to, but not including this email, it comes out to a
| total of 46 messages over the course of a week.  That's an average of
| approximately 7 messages a day, most of which are very short, to the
| point messages.  Out of a total of 539 messages for the month of june,
| that's approximately 8 to 8.5 percent of all messages total.  Now,
| what's the complaint again?  Out of approximately 90 messages a day, 7
| are from me.  Now, even if we assume incorrectly that half those are
| unnecessary posts...what the hell is your problem?  What makes me your
| target?

Uum just to point this out. Your first post was on the 2th and your last
post was on the 7th which gives you 5 days, which makes it a average of
9.2 posts. Also 8.5% is a large share.

While random selection of a few ppl on the same list have a daily averge
between 2 to 6.

If you look at the list by thread you'll see you replied in almost all
the threads that were posted yesterday (I counted 4 smaller threads you
didn't post in).

Now complaining about 100 messages in you inbox is not a valid argument,
you subsribed youself.

If you look at most of the flames you'll see that most of the times you
trigger those flames yourself (or probably won't see as you don't seem
to be contious about it).

I for one signed up to this list because I wanted to talk about hlds_l
and not hear jokes. If I want to hear something funny i'll listen to
George Carlin mp3's.


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



RE: [hlds_linux] [OT]Learn how to quote

2002-06-06 Thread DeNiro

Although I feel so so on the original subject, I really don't see a reason
for you to react in such fashion. Just a simple push on the delete button
would do just fine.

>And while we're on the topic of just about useless rants, let me go on
>about how I can't stand it when people come to a stop at a Yield sign,
>THEN look, and then decide if maybe it's clear enough to go without
>having to negotiate with other vehicles (driven by people with possibly
>even more than the half a brain they can claim).  And if I feel like
>wasting some more time, I can go into something else equally as
>ineffective, like maybe a rant about how people make political
>decisions based on spoonfed propoganda instead of bothering to search
>out the facts...


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



Re:RE: [hlds_linux] [OT]Learn how to quote

2002-06-06 Thread DeNiro

> A discussion about legalitly issues for cheats by ppl who are no
> lawyers always does the trick for me :) Especially when they begin
> comparing US law to other countries
>
> BlackEdder

And what does this have todo with out little quote problem? :)


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



Re: [hlds_linux] Cheaters having legality issues?

2002-06-05 Thread DeNiro

Also consider that in both US and EU it is illegale to toy aroun dwith
secured information.

By hacking into the security module they are not only breaking the EULA but
also breaking a much more serious law.


> Of course, one good successfull legal case against a cheater or
> cheat-maker would leave a very interesting situation afterwards.
>
> -Cruiser
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jonathan Hodges" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:17 PM
> Subject: [hlds_linux] Cheaters having legality issues?
>
>
>> >Anyway, I don't think cheaters really care
>> >if they breach the EULA or not.
>> >Quite likely they didn't pay for the game to
>> >begin with, so breaking one
>> >rule more or less won't bother them.
>>
>> This brings me back to my point in the first place, which was why
>> would some cheater care about following the GPL guidelines when
>> releasing new versions of cheats when they don't care about legal
>> issues anyway?
>>
>> >Actually what OGC is doing is 100%
>> >circumventing detection.
>>
>> Definitely.
>>
>> And about any legal action against cheaters, I do not know of any
>> gaming company taking action against them, nor do I think any will in
>> the future.  Not only are there way too many of them, but with so many
>> international users in the internet multiplayer community, it is
>> virtually impossible to track them all down and attempt to do anything
>> about them in their home country.  The gaming compaines and the admin
>> community will have to continue to develop ways to block these cheats
>> and patch any vulnerabilities, just as is happening now.  And plus,
>> even though updating the code is no easy task, it is still much faster
>> than any judiciary system in the world.
>>
>> It'ls been good to have some discussion on the issue.  Keep up the
>> good work Valve, admins, and organizations that promote fair gaming.
>>
>> Jonathan Hodges
>> Northwestern University
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>
>> ___
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
> ___
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux