Re: [hlds_linux] Which server to buy?
This thread has bcome the dumbest thing i've seen in a long time =\ -- Zack Sloane http://zteknology.com AIM: Z teKno1ogy -- "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Prime Minister Jean Chrétien -- Only the ignorant man becomes angry, the wise man understands. -- - Original Message - From: "Jeremy Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 5:48 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Which server to buy? > Zachary H. Sloane wrote: > > >Brad, your website doesn't work...just thought i should let you know just in > >case you didn't already. :) > > > > > > > > > > Posting the above to the list instead of privately has to be the dumbest > thing ive seen in a long time. > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Which server to buy?
> > ...that has to be the dumbest thing I've seen in a long time. > you having to respond to my post may be the dumbest thing I've seen in a long time. -- Zack Sloane http://zteknology.com AIM: Z teKno1ogy -- "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Prime Minister Jean Chrétien -- Only the ignorant man becomes angry, the wise man understands. -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Which server to buy?
Brad, your website doesn't work...just thought i should let you know just in case you didn't already. :) -- Zack Sloane http://zteknology.com AIM: Z teKno1ogy -- "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Prime Minister Jean Chrétien -- Only the ignorant man becomes angry, the wise man understands. -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Link for a bot
Hi, i wanna run a bot on a server i run...just one, so when 2 peopel connect the bot leaves...just so that first person stays...what's a good bot to get and can i have the link to the site. thx -- Zack Sloane AIM: Z teKno1ogy -- "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Prime Minister Jean Chrétien -- Only the ignorant man becomes angry, the wise man understands. -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] client crashing problem.
> I can't figure it out what problem make the clients dropping and crashing. Are you running statsme with the knifekill.cfg??? That causes the exact same thing. slt||*HuLK[zAcK] #Solitude irc.gamesnet.net http://z.rocks-hideout.com ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] adminmod query
> Very bizarre..I have never seen that admin_weaponscheck setting anywhere > before. I can't even find it now! :D > Same here...never seen it before in my 2 years of HLDS admining. O well. $ynthetiK #claneS irc.gamesnet.net http://www.epicskill.com http://z.rocks-hideout.com ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] adminmod query
> make sure you also set: admin_weaponscheck 1 > > admin_weaponscheck?! Not heard of (or seen) that setting. Does that need to > go in the server.cfg or adminmod.cfg file? What does it do?! > > Jay. don't worry about it...you just need the admin_command admin_restrictweapon 4 6 in ur server.cfg. $ynthetiK #claneS irc.gamesnet.net http://www.epicskill.com http://z.rocks-hideout.com ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] VAC - Is it even working?
> Quick question for you ner.. er, guys, about VAC. I have had it running on > my servers for some time now, and I've NEVER seen it catch anyone. Am I > doing something wrong or what? I mean, it says "Server is Secure" when it > starts up, what else should I look for? That's it. I haven't seen it catch anyone else either, but i know its working Z Pr0jEcT -- W http://zack.xtreme-solutions.com Admin of epic Skill Burial Groundz - #claneS IP: 12.107.1.27:27015 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Overflow hack? or just me?
Has anyone else noticed any of this? About 5 times tonite, everyone (EVERYONE) in my server overflowed, i was in it TWICE when it happened. One time one guy was like, Ok, this is gay, bye bye server. Then i overflowed, as well as everyone else. So i'm assuming he's using something that did that? I'm using admin mod AM v25026a, SM v2.6.4, MM and HLG 1.20. Windows box (althought i don't think it matters). and the server is NOT crashing, just players overflowing...anyone have any clue? Z Pr0jEcT -- W Admin of RH6 Burial Groundz IP: 12.107.1.27:27015 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] New Beta Security Modules -September 27
you guys are linux right, not windoze? Anyone with a windows box having a problem with this? Z Pr0jEcT -- W Admin of RH6 Burial Groundz IP: 12.107.1.27:27015 - Original Message - From: "machone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 3:02 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] New Beta Security Modules -September 27 > Same results here and now it wont download the security module even. > > > - Original Message - > From: "James Gurney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:47 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] New Beta Security Modules -September 27 > > > > James Gurney wrote: > > > > > I've restarted the server.. and people still can't connect.. This is not > > > with the latest server version.. going to try that next.. > > > > Ok, just installed latest server update.. still no go: > > > > > > SV_ReadClientMessage: unknown command char (223) > > Dropped <(SOF)>Deset from server > > Reason: Bad command character in client command > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] weapon restriction
> >There are no players who can't > >be killed. Lol, normally i'd agree. Im "The Redeemer." I went 108-0. I consider that not being able to be killed, lol. Just wanted to throw that in. http://www.geocities.com/khaoskoolhost/108-0.jpg Z Pr0jEcT -- W Admin of RH6 Burial Groundz IP: 12.107.1.27:27015 - Original Message - From: "Eric (Deacon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:31 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] weapon restriction > > A lot of them are Cal-I players, and their skill is indeed, vast. I > > don't claim all players are capable of such amazing feats, but several > > are. > > Several are what? Unbelievably skilled? Great. Let's say you have a > full 2 dozen of the best players in the world that drop by your server > from time to time when they happen to feel like pubbing. You're going > to say that you're going to change the face of the game for everyone > else because a tiny handful of players can do to you what nobody else > can? If you want to provide a server that isn't a cushy haven for > people who've developed the amazing skill of sitting in one spot and > hoping an opponent crosses through their LOF, you can either a) not run > maps prone to this sort of thing (cs_militia, for instance), or b) > realize that to do so, you're going to have to start running a DMC > server. > > Valve has so bastardized the game, its weapons, and the aiming system, > that to have an advantage in CS anymore amongst the typical CS players, > you must be on the defensive team and take up a defensive position and > wait for the opponent to come to you to die. That's just how it is. > > > The fact that you have not seen this yourself would seem to suggest > > that it's your experience which is limited, not mine. > > Oh I've seen skilled AWP usage. You don't want to start a pissing match > in that regard, and honestly I think it's funny that you try to toss me > the hot potato of your argument, charging that I must not play > with--much less live with--some truly skilled players. But the fact > remains that it's *skilled* AWP usage. It's NOT firing an AWP > accurately while strafing and jumping and running, and it's NOT using an > old and short-lived weaponswitch bug to fire the AWP at a more rapid > rate than normal. Hell, quickshots doesn't even work anymore... > > > Ok, running I might have been exaggerating, but frequently you'll > watch > > people hiding behind a wall.. They sidestep out with their awp zoomed, > > and are able to fire and get an accurate shot without pausing to > steady > > the weapon, crouching, etc. > > It may not be slow enough for you to observe their actions easily, but > they're actually stopping, aiming, and firing very quickly. They most > certainly pause for at least split second, and often longer than that. > You just don't always see/notice them till the very last second (if > that). > > > My entire point was that the awp is lacking > > any sort of random movement such as you would expect in a realistic > > sniper rifle. > > What exactly in CS is as you would expect in a realistic anything? > Pretty much nothing. The game isn't about realism. It's about gameplay > with a more down-to-earth flavor than Quake and similar games. You want > to talk about frustration, go play RA3 one-on-one against any mediocre > player. You'll come crawling back to CS, realizing how truly slow paced > it is these days. The AWP will be nothing compared to the rail gun, for > instance. I'm sure there are probably servers out there that manage to > strip the game of the rail gun, but most admins and players don't cry > about not having the skill to effectively utilize the weapons in the > game. Instead they try to take lessons from those who are consistently > killing them with the weapon and try to get better. Some, like me, > resign themselves to the fact that they're simply not as talented as > some of the better players and content themselves with small gains and > support of the better players. > > Hmmm > > > This was remedied before, and apparently someone has figured a way > > around it again because it's something I see fairly often. > > Really? That's news to the best players in the world. Some of the > mediocre players in the world are continually trying to adapt the speed > hack to get around current VAC and other anti-cheat utilities, of > course, which may be what you're seeing. > > > Once again, you feel the need to criticize me > > instead of talking about the actual point. > > Sir, I don't feel a need to criticize you *instead* of "talking about > the actual point". I'm pointing out areas where you, as an individual, > are putting out flawed and amazingly bizarre statements to try to gain > public acceptance for your view from either people who don't know any > better or other people who share your disdain for losing. We all want > to win. It's just that most of us do
Re: [hlds_linux] WON being stupid again?
Me 2, but won is still kinda slow when i boot up the game. but whatever, as long as i get in doesn't matter. Z Pr0jEcT -- W Admin of RH6 Burial Groundz IP: 12.107.1.27:27015 - Original Message - From: "HalfLife" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 12:49 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] WON being stupid again? > Hi, > > Now my server is up running again, with no Timeout problems > > /Frank > > - Original Message - > From: "foad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 9:30 PM > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] WON being stupid again? > > > > I am with you on that one.. All this reading on a Sat is just killing me!!! > > > > Chris > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nick > > McLaren > > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 1:23 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] WON being stupid again? > > > > > > There is no point in speculating. Wait for the official word, which will not > > come from a friend or colleague. It will come from Valve or WON.NET most > > likely. So end the rumors please, for the sake of all of us. Thanks! > > > > - > > Nick McLaren, CCNA, SCSA > > Battle LAN Technical Admin > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > http://www.battlelan.com/ > > - > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Will > > Brendel > > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 3:17 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] WON being stupid again? > > > > > > It's true. Here's what happened. Hackers managed to break into WON's > > servers. They stole all the CD-Keys in the database. Because of this > > attack, the people at WON decided to switch to the more secure Windows > > family of operating systems. After that, the VALVe people decided to update > > CS 1.6 and expand the WON system to many other games. Because of the server > > upgrades required for this huge change, all of the WON auth servers are > > down. > > > > Or that is a load of crap and VALVe is just performing routine maintenance. > > Is there a point to speculation that I'm just missing? > > > > Regards, > > Disk2 > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Tricky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 3:16 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] WON being stupid again? > > > > > > > bought by scamsoft? i seriously doubt it. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Jules (aka Buddha-Pest)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Newsgroups: mirror.valve.hlds_linux > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 1:56 PM > > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] WON being stupid again? > > > > > > > > > > i hear Valve was bought by Microsoft yesterday and they just went 100% > > > > windows. Also WON.net now uses .NET... hence the downtime... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Will Brendel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > | Instead of passing around rumors and saying CS 1.6 will be out at > > 10:30 > > > PM > > > > | EST tonight (I have the inside info you know! I hear they are asking > > > for > > > > | mirrors right now!) how about we just wait for the WON auth servers to > > > go > > > > | back online? I think we can live without Half-Life for a couple > > hours. > > > > | Well, people that aren't desperate losers can live without it anyway. > > > It > > > > | will be back up, but it will take some time. Until then, there's no > > > point > > > > | in speculating. > > > > | > > > > | That's just my $0.02 on the matter. > > > > | > > > > | Regards, > > > > | Disk2 > > > > | > > > > | - Original Message - > > > > | From: "Elminst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > | To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > | Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 1:16 PM > > > > | Subject: [hlds_linux] WON being stupid again? > > > > | > > > > | > > > > | > Taking forever to try to connect, and getting WON auth errors... > > > > | > Anyone else having this problem yet again? > > > > | > > > > > | > ___ > > > > | > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, > > > > | please visit: > > > > | > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > | > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > ___ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > ___
Re: [hlds_linux] New Modules?
yes, i just changed it, and it said "updating security modules" Any news Eric? or Erik whatever it is :-D Z Pr0jEcT -- W Admin of RH6 Burial Groundz IP: 12.107.1.27:27015 - Original Message - From: "James Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 5:31 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] New Modules? > > I just had a regular (admin) inform me that there are new modules. > Apparently it was announced by the server. > > Anyone else see this? > > Servers needed a restart ( I am not running the beta servers at the > moment ). > > James. > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] Beta Security Modules
How much longer until the Beta Security Modules are ready for public release. Because I rent my servers and can't put the -testmodule line in my bootup. And I can't stand listening to how many people you guys have caught while i sit here and get BS'ed by cheaters :( Z Pr0jEcT _ W - Original Message - From: "Donald Maner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:37 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] New beta security modules - August 28 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- That's a good question, but it doesn't affect my servers. I'm checking my logs for any new catches and manually baning them. I have no tolerance, and with a reported over 70K+ CS players, I don't think I'll ever care about 100-200 cheaters being perm-banned from my boxen. Good riddance. I've yet to have one email saying it was a false positive, and I'm pretty sure my response would be "Too bad, go play somewhere else." Origional Message: Yes, I've read that post too... It sais that it's not instant but the guy will likely be banned by morning (which I would assume would be 8-12h max). But if you check the timestamps on those 2 entries I sent you will see that they are 18h+ apart, which IMO would be well above "instantness". And he is still trying to connect, eg L0830016.log:L 08/30/2002 - 19:41:16: Secure: "[APE]InVisiBLE<1229><652533><>" was detected cheating and dropped from the server. That is almost 24h later... apparently still not banned. How many days is it supposed to take before they get banned? If it works at all right now it seems to take longer to actually get banned then the penalty itself (24h). -- [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
