[hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS
-- Hi there! I have 2 servers running on one box. one SRCDS v57 and one HLDS v35. Yesterday I wrote a script to build a graph of the hlds/srcds stats output, and now I wonder why SRCDS's fps is much more accurate than HLDS's? Here a diff: SRCDS: http://server.clanngc.de/rrdtool/stats_thunder-day.png HLDS: http://server.clanngc.de/rrdtool/stats_flash-day.png fps values: hlds: fps: 250 fps_max = 166 tickrate = 300 srcds: fps: 166 fps_max = 300 tickrate = 100 Kernel runs with HZ: 1000 The HLDS fps values go from 232 to 274. But in 90% it's ~250 fps. WTF? ps.: HLDS fps_max is now also 300. Makes no difference. Regards, Martin -- MyExcuse: piezo-electric interference Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Research Development TechnoTrend AG http://www.technotrend.de -- [ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS
HLDS tickrate? fps_max? There is no thing like that on HLDS - Original Message - From: Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:45 AM Subject: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS -- Hi there! I have 2 servers running on one box. one SRCDS v57 and one HLDS v35. Yesterday I wrote a script to build a graph of the hlds/srcds stats output, and now I wonder why SRCDS's fps is much more accurate than HLDS's? Here a diff: SRCDS: http://server.clanngc.de/rrdtool/stats_thunder-day.png HLDS: http://server.clanngc.de/rrdtool/stats_flash-day.png fps values: hlds: fps: 250 fps_max = 166 tickrate = 300 srcds: fps: 166 fps_max = 300 tickrate = 100 Kernel runs with HZ: 1000 The HLDS fps values go from 232 to 274. But in 90% it's ~250 fps. WTF? ps.: HLDS fps_max is now also 300. Makes no difference. Regards, Martin -- MyExcuse: piezo-electric interference Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Research Development TechnoTrend AG http://www.technotrend.de -- [ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS
Sure, try sys_ticrate ;) And at least HLDS can use the pingboost options. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Gesendet: 16.03.06 10:00:57 An: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Betreff: Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS HLDS tickrate? fps_max? There is no thing like that on HLDS - Original Message - From: Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:45 AM Subject: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS -- Hi there! I have 2 servers running on one box. one SRCDS v57 and one HLDS v35. Yesterday I wrote a script to build a graph of the hlds/srcds stats output, and now I wonder why SRCDS's fps is much more accurate than HLDS's? Here a diff: SRCDS: http://server.clanngc.de/rrdtool/stats_thunder-day.png HLDS: http://server.clanngc.de/rrdtool/stats_flash-day.png fps values: hlds: fps: 250 fps_max = 166 tickrate = 300 srcds: fps: 166 fps_max = 300 tickrate = 100 Kernel runs with HZ: 1000 The HLDS fps values go from 232 to 274. But in 90% it's ~250 fps. WTF? ps.: HLDS fps_max is now also 300. Makes no difference. Regards, Martin -- MyExcuse: piezo-electric interference Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Research Development TechnoTrend AG http://www.technotrend.de -- [ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS
HLDS have its own tickrate setting in the sys_tickrate cvar (def. 100), and have fps_max cvar (def. 72) :) -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Evaldas Žilinskas Enviado el: jueves, 16 de marzo de 2006 9:59 Para: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Asunto: Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS HLDS tickrate? fps_max? There is no thing like that on HLDS - Original Message - From: Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:45 AM Subject: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS -- Hi there! I have 2 servers running on one box. one SRCDS v57 and one HLDS v35. Yesterday I wrote a script to build a graph of the hlds/srcds stats output, and now I wonder why SRCDS's fps is much more accurate than HLDS's? Here a diff: SRCDS: http://server.clanngc.de/rrdtool/stats_thunder-day.png HLDS: http://server.clanngc.de/rrdtool/stats_flash-day.png fps values: hlds: fps: 250 fps_max = 166 tickrate = 300 srcds: fps: 166 fps_max = 300 tickrate = 100 Kernel runs with HZ: 1000 The HLDS fps values go from 232 to 274. But in 90% it's ~250 fps. WTF? ps.: HLDS fps_max is now also 300. Makes no difference. Regards, Martin -- MyExcuse: piezo-electric interference Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Research Development TechnoTrend AG http://www.technotrend.de -- [ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS
-- On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:03:27 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] bubbled: Sure, try sys_ticrate ;) And at least HLDS can use the pingboost options. ??? Ofcourse, I use sys_ticrate for HLDS! Just named it tickrate ... Yes, I had Pingboost 3, changed back to 2 because I had some problems with my CPU usage. If there is a fps_max in hlds, no clue! I jsut set it in case of ;) FYI: hlds param: -pingbooster 2 +sys_ticrate 300 +alias sys_ticrate wait srcds param: -tickrate 100 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Gesendet: 16.03.06 10:00:57 An: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Betreff: Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS HLDS tickrate? fps_max? There is no thing like that on HLDS - Original Message - From: Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:45 AM Subject: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS -- Hi there! I have 2 servers running on one box. one SRCDS v57 and one HLDS v35. Yesterday I wrote a script to build a graph of the hlds/srcds stats output, and now I wonder why SRCDS's fps is much more accurate than HLDS's? Here a diff: SRCDS: http://server.clanngc.de/rrdtool/stats_thunder-day.png HLDS: http://server.clanngc.de/rrdtool/stats_flash-day.png fps values: hlds: fps: 250 fps_max = 166 tickrate = 300 srcds: fps: 166 fps_max = 300 tickrate = 100 Kernel runs with HZ: 1000 The HLDS fps values go from 232 to 274. But in 90% it's ~250 fps. WTF? ps.: HLDS fps_max is now also 300. Makes no difference. Regards, Martin -- MyExcuse: piezo-electric interference Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Research Development TechnoTrend AG http://www.technotrend.de -- [ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- MyExcuse: The keyboard isn't plugged in Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Research Development TechnoTrend AG http://www.technotrend.de -- [ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS
But fps_max do not affect HLDS fps. - Original Message - From: Ludoservers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 11:08 AM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS HLDS have its own tickrate setting in the sys_tickrate cvar (def. 100), and have fps_max cvar (def. 72) :) -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Evaldas Žilinskas Enviado el: jueves, 16 de marzo de 2006 9:59 Para: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Asunto: Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS HLDS tickrate? fps_max? There is no thing like that on HLDS - Original Message - From: Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:45 AM Subject: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS -- Hi there! I have 2 servers running on one box. one SRCDS v57 and one HLDS v35. Yesterday I wrote a script to build a graph of the hlds/srcds stats output, and now I wonder why SRCDS's fps is much more accurate than HLDS's? Here a diff: SRCDS: http://server.clanngc.de/rrdtool/stats_thunder-day.png HLDS: http://server.clanngc.de/rrdtool/stats_flash-day.png fps values: hlds: fps: 250 fps_max = 166 tickrate = 300 srcds: fps: 166 fps_max = 300 tickrate = 100 Kernel runs with HZ: 1000 The HLDS fps values go from 232 to 274. But in 90% it's ~250 fps. WTF? ps.: HLDS fps_max is now also 300. Makes no difference. Regards, Martin -- MyExcuse: piezo-electric interference Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Research Development TechnoTrend AG http://www.technotrend.de -- [ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS
-- On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:51:02 +0200 Evaldas Žilinskas [EMAIL PROTECTED] bubbled: But fps_max do not affect HLDS fps. It doesn't matter if fps_max do affect HLDS fps, the question is: Why is it unstable like hell?! -- MyExcuse: You must've hit the wrong any key. Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Research Development TechnoTrend AG http://www.technotrend.de -- [ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS
It's hard to answer this. Maybe it has something to do with Linux versions and server mods. On my server after the AMXX 1.70 release I got better FPS results. Now when I run sys_ticrate 1000 and pingboost 1 server FPS jump from 500 to 1000 (depends on map that I'm runing then). de_aztec was always a plague on my Pentium. I heard that people get much stable FPS when they run BSD. Of course I don't believe in that and I still stick close to my SuSE 9.x ;). - Original Message - From: Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 3:26 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS -- On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:51:02 +0200 Evaldas Žilinskas [EMAIL PROTECTED] bubbled: But fps_max do not affect HLDS fps. It doesn't matter if fps_max do affect HLDS fps, the question is: Why is it unstable like hell?! -- MyExcuse: You must've hit the wrong any key. Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Research Development TechnoTrend AG http://www.technotrend.de -- [ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] SRCDS fps much more accurate than HLDS
-- On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:50:54 +0200 Evaldas Žilinskas [EMAIL PROTECTED] bubbled: It's hard to answer this. Maybe it has something to do with Linux versions and server mods. On my server after the AMXX 1.70 release I got better FPS results. Now when I run sys_ticrate 1000 and pingboost 1 server FPS jump from 500 to 1000 (depends on map that I'm runing then). de_aztec was always a plague on my Pentium. I heard that people get much stable FPS when they run BSD. Of course I don't believe in that and I still stick close to my SuSE 9.x ;). Well, I also use AMXX 1.70. And HLGuard 1.80 + latest metamod-p. I don't want to run on a high tickrate since it shouldn't make any difference for the players. It only burns my server CPU ... Oh, SuSE ... I pity you ;) I run on Gentoo. But that is another topic... Hmm, I think it would be very interesting if the fps was also unstable before they updated to the event handling. How is SRCDS driven? Events or polling? -- MyExcuse: We are Microsoft. What you are experiencing is not a problem; it is an undocumented feature. Martin Zwickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Research Development TechnoTrend AG http://www.technotrend.de -- [ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
