Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)
Having a version that works with libc6 2.2.5 would be great. For some people upgrading to 2.3 (debian sarge) isnt an option yet. Corporate policies etc. Madman wrote: Ohh fine... I think there is a quite easy solution for that... The only thing Valve should do, that they make a static linked binary... I dont think it's so difficult, and could solve everyone's problem with debian stable. Bye - Madman out - Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." *** Transmition End *** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael McKoy Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Currently, CSS will only run with glibc 2.3 Hi! I've heard things about cs:source vs libc6 2.2. I would like a final confirmation about the fact(?) that cs:source would run only with 2.3. Because in some forums, people say different things (some say It's the problem, others think differently) So? Bye - Madman out - Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." *** Transmition End *** ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- Christophe Dyzers - NTA Specialist - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Belgacom ANS/NTA/NST/IST/UNIX - Rue Carli 2, B-1140 Brussels (Belgium) Head office: Boulevard du Roi Albert II 27, B-1030 Brussels (Belgium) Phone: +32-2-7061366 - Fax: +32-2-7061150 - http://www.belgacom.be/ ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)
Thanks. It's your opinion. Let me have my own, and leave this choice to me. I'm still asking for that staticly linked binary, if it's possible... (it is, only a matter of compiling) It would be nice if Valve could provide that... Bye - Madman out - Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." *** Transmition End *** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ranger Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 5:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Hi, i think Sarge is "Stable" enough for an Gameserver. I also have use it for FTP, WEB and 5 mysql Databases. All without problems. The servers didnt Crash, no swap using und no memory leaks :-) - Original Message - From: "Madman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:04 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) > Yeah, the upgrade would help me, but if I had upgraded my system, I > would have done it some time ago.. That's exactly the point. I do NOT > want to replace my _stable_ system with an _unstable_ one, just > because of cs:source. A static linked binary would solve every > problem. That would be a rational solution. And It's easy to provide, > isn't it, Valve? > > Bye > > - Madman out - > >Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) > > "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." > > *** Transmition End *** > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ranger > Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 9:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) > > > hi, > > i can you only tell how to make an upgrade to Debian 3.1 sarge. Its > your own risk, a have made 2 upgrades without problems. > > Your /etc/apt/sources.list must be edit and look like this. You can > choose also other Update-Servers. They have all the same data. > --- > deb http://ftp.debian.de/debian sarge main > deb-src http://ftp.debian.de/debian sarge main > deb http://ftp.debian.de/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main > deb-src http://ftp.debian.de/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main > #deb http://ftp.debian.de/debian/ woody-proposed-updates main > #deb-src http://ftp.debian.de/debian/ woody-proposed-updates main > deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main > deb-src http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main > > deb http://debian.tu-bs.de/debian/ sarge main > deb-src http://debian.tu-bs.de/debian/ sarge main > deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main deb-src > http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main > -- > then type in cour console > > apt-get update > // This reads the new sarge-packages > apt-get dist-upgrade > //This make an upgrade to the most packages > > you can use your actually Kernel. After this you can compile a new, > better an 2.6.x Kernel with an patch from Con Kolivas :-) > > www.aargh.at > > - Original Message - > From: "Rodolphe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:48 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) > > >> Hi, >> >> Can u help me to upgrade glibc on my debian ? >> >> Thx ;) >> >> >> ranger wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> at the start of cs:source i also could not start the server, because >>> i have Debian 3.0/Stable/glibc 2.2.x ! After an upgrade to Debian >>> 3.1/Sarge/glibc 2.3.x the server runs > great >>> and >>> the cpu usage is low. >>> An 18 Slot Server uses max 30% with an XP2800+ and a 2.6.8.1 >>> Kernel/1000Hz >>> >>> There is no negative ti update to glibc 2.3.x for my system >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "Michael McKoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:05 PM >>> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) >>> >>> >>>> Currently, CSS will only run with glibc 2.3 >>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> I've heard things about cs:source vs libc6 2.2. I would like a >>>>> final confirmation about the fact(?) that cs:source would run only >>>>> with 2.3. Because in some forums, people say different things >>>>> (some > >>>>&g
RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 12:36, ScratchMonkey wrote: > --On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:04 PM +0200 Madman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > A static linked binary would solve every problem. > > Would it? Didn't the libc/kernel interface change not long ago? My old > statically-linked Tribes2 binary no longer works with Fedora Core 2, but > the dynamic one does. You can't use statically linked binaries because it violates the GPL. So unless HLDS/SRCDS decides to go opensource... they can't statically link any of their programs against GPL'ed code. Unreal 2004 dedicated servers were forced to make this switch in their early releases as well. -- Daniel Yakiwchuk Webfire Hosting www.webfire.ca ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)
--On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:04 PM +0200 Madman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A static linked binary would solve every problem. Would it? Didn't the libc/kernel interface change not long ago? My old statically-linked Tribes2 binary no longer works with Fedora Core 2, but the dynamic one does. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)
Hi, i think Sarge is "Stable" enough for an Gameserver. I also have use it for FTP, WEB and 5 mysql Databases. All without problems. The servers didnt Crash, no swap using und no memory leaks :-) - Original Message - From: "Madman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:04 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Yeah, the upgrade would help me, but if I had upgraded my system, I would have done it some time ago.. That's exactly the point. I do NOT want to replace my _stable_ system with an _unstable_ one, just because of cs:source. A static linked binary would solve every problem. That would be a rational solution. And It's easy to provide, isn't it, Valve? Bye - Madman out - Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." *** Transmition End *** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ranger Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 9:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) hi, i can you only tell how to make an upgrade to Debian 3.1 sarge. Its your own risk, a have made 2 upgrades without problems. Your /etc/apt/sources.list must be edit and look like this. You can choose also other Update-Servers. They have all the same data. --- deb http://ftp.debian.de/debian sarge main deb-src http://ftp.debian.de/debian sarge main deb http://ftp.debian.de/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main deb-src http://ftp.debian.de/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main #deb http://ftp.debian.de/debian/ woody-proposed-updates main #deb-src http://ftp.debian.de/debian/ woody-proposed-updates main deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main deb-src http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main deb http://debian.tu-bs.de/debian/ sarge main deb-src http://debian.tu-bs.de/debian/ sarge main deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main -- then type in cour console apt-get update // This reads the new sarge-packages apt-get dist-upgrade //This make an upgrade to the most packages you can use your actually Kernel. After this you can compile a new, better an 2.6.x Kernel with an patch from Con Kolivas :-) www.aargh.at - Original Message - From: "Rodolphe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:48 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Hi, Can u help me to upgrade glibc on my debian ? Thx ;) ranger wrote: Hi, at the start of cs:source i also could not start the server, because i have Debian 3.0/Stable/glibc 2.2.x ! After an upgrade to Debian 3.1/Sarge/glibc 2.3.x the server runs great and the cpu usage is low. An 18 Slot Server uses max 30% with an XP2800+ and a 2.6.8.1 Kernel/1000Hz There is no negative ti update to glibc 2.3.x for my system - Original Message - From: "Michael McKoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Currently, CSS will only run with glibc 2.3 Hi! I've heard things about cs:source vs libc6 2.2. I would like a final confirmation about the fact(?) that cs:source would run only with 2.3. Because in some forums, people say different things (some say It's the problem, others think differently) So? Bye - Madman out - Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." *** Transmition End *** ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)
Yeah, the upgrade would help me, but if I had upgraded my system, I would have done it some time ago.. That's exactly the point. I do NOT want to replace my _stable_ system with an _unstable_ one, just because of cs:source. A static linked binary would solve every problem. That would be a rational solution. And It's easy to provide, isn't it, Valve? Bye - Madman out - Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." *** Transmition End *** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ranger Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 9:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) hi, i can you only tell how to make an upgrade to Debian 3.1 sarge. Its your own risk, a have made 2 upgrades without problems. Your /etc/apt/sources.list must be edit and look like this. You can choose also other Update-Servers. They have all the same data. --- deb http://ftp.debian.de/debian sarge main deb-src http://ftp.debian.de/debian sarge main deb http://ftp.debian.de/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main deb-src http://ftp.debian.de/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main #deb http://ftp.debian.de/debian/ woody-proposed-updates main #deb-src http://ftp.debian.de/debian/ woody-proposed-updates main deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main deb-src http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main deb http://debian.tu-bs.de/debian/ sarge main deb-src http://debian.tu-bs.de/debian/ sarge main deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main -- then type in cour console apt-get update // This reads the new sarge-packages apt-get dist-upgrade //This make an upgrade to the most packages you can use your actually Kernel. After this you can compile a new, better an 2.6.x Kernel with an patch from Con Kolivas :-) www.aargh.at - Original Message - From: "Rodolphe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:48 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) > Hi, > > Can u help me to upgrade glibc on my debian ? > > Thx ;) > > > ranger wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> at the start of cs:source i also could not start the server, because >> i have Debian 3.0/Stable/glibc 2.2.x ! >> After an upgrade to Debian 3.1/Sarge/glibc 2.3.x the server runs great >> and >> the cpu usage is low. >> An 18 Slot Server uses max 30% with an XP2800+ and a 2.6.8.1 >> Kernel/1000Hz >> >> There is no negative ti update to glibc 2.3.x for my system >> >> - Original Message ----- >> From: "Michael McKoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:05 PM >> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) >> >> >>> Currently, CSS will only run with glibc 2.3 >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I've heard things about cs:source vs libc6 2.2. I would like a >>>> final confirmation about the fact(?) that cs:source would run only >>>> with 2.3. Because in some forums, people say different things (some >>>> say It's the problem, others think differently) >>>> >>>> So? >>>> >>>> Bye >>>> >>>> - Madman out - >>>> >>>> Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) >>>> >>>> "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." >>>> >>>> *** Transmition End *** >>>> >>>> >>>> ___ >>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >>>> archives, please visit: >>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >>> archives, please visit: >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> >> >> ___ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >> archives, please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux >> >> > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)
I think Alfred said he was attempting this but was having problems so for now make do with 2.3 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Madman Sent: 13 October 2004 20:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Ohh fine... I think there is a quite easy solution for that... The only thing Valve should do, that they make a static linked binary... I dont think it's so difficult, and could solve everyone's problem with debian stable. Bye - Madman out - Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." *** Transmition End *** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael McKoy Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Currently, CSS will only run with glibc 2.3 > Hi! > > I've heard things about cs:source vs libc6 2.2. I would like a final > confirmation about the fact(?) that cs:source would run only with 2.3. > Because in some forums, people say different things (some say It's the > problem, others think differently) > > So? > > Bye > > - Madman out - > > Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) > > "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." > > *** Transmition End *** > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux *** This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and are intended for the above named recipient only. If this has come to you in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail from your system. You must take no action based on this, nor must you copy or disclose it or any part of its contents to any person or organisation. Statements and opinions contained in this email may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods. Please note that e-mail communications may be monitored. The registered office of Littlewoods Limited and its subsidiaries is 100 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L70 1AB. Registered number of Littlewoods Limited is 262152. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)
Ohh fine... I think there is a quite easy solution for that... The only thing Valve should do, that they make a static linked binary... I dont think it's so difficult, and could solve everyone's problem with debian stable. Bye - Madman out - Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." *** Transmition End *** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael McKoy Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Currently, CSS will only run with glibc 2.3 > Hi! > > I've heard things about cs:source vs libc6 2.2. I would like a final > confirmation about the fact(?) that cs:source would run only with 2.3. > Because in some forums, people say different things (some say It's the > problem, others think differently) > > So? > > Bye > > - Madman out - > > Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) > > "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." > > *** Transmition End *** > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)
hi, i can you only tell how to make an upgrade to Debian 3.1 sarge. Its your own risk, a have made 2 upgrades without problems. Your /etc/apt/sources.list must be edit and look like this. You can choose also other Update-Servers. They have all the same data. --- deb http://ftp.debian.de/debian sarge main deb-src http://ftp.debian.de/debian sarge main deb http://ftp.debian.de/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main deb-src http://ftp.debian.de/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main #deb http://ftp.debian.de/debian/ woody-proposed-updates main #deb-src http://ftp.debian.de/debian/ woody-proposed-updates main deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main deb-src http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main deb http://debian.tu-bs.de/debian/ sarge main deb-src http://debian.tu-bs.de/debian/ sarge main deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main -- then type in cour console apt-get update // This reads the new sarge-packages apt-get dist-upgrade //This make an upgrade to the most packages you can use your actually Kernel. After this you can compile a new, better an 2.6.x Kernel with an patch from Con Kolivas :-) www.aargh.at - Original Message - From: "Rodolphe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:48 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Hi, Can u help me to upgrade glibc on my debian ? Thx ;) ranger wrote: Hi, at the start of cs:source i also could not start the server, because i have Debian 3.0/Stable/glibc 2.2.x ! After an upgrade to Debian 3.1/Sarge/glibc 2.3.x the server runs great and the cpu usage is low. An 18 Slot Server uses max 30% with an XP2800+ and a 2.6.8.1 Kernel/1000Hz There is no negative ti update to glibc 2.3.x for my system - Original Message - From: "Michael McKoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Currently, CSS will only run with glibc 2.3 Hi! I've heard things about cs:source vs libc6 2.2. I would like a final confirmation about the fact(?) that cs:source would run only with 2.3. Because in some forums, people say different things (some say It's the problem, others think differently) So? Bye - Madman out - Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." *** Transmition End *** ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)
Hi, Can u help me to upgrade glibc on my debian ? Thx ;) ranger wrote: Hi, at the start of cs:source i also could not start the server, because i have Debian 3.0/Stable/glibc 2.2.x ! After an upgrade to Debian 3.1/Sarge/glibc 2.3.x the server runs great and the cpu usage is low. An 18 Slot Server uses max 30% with an XP2800+ and a 2.6.8.1 Kernel/1000Hz There is no negative ti update to glibc 2.3.x for my system - Original Message - From: "Michael McKoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Currently, CSS will only run with glibc 2.3 Hi! I've heard things about cs:source vs libc6 2.2. I would like a final confirmation about the fact(?) that cs:source would run only with 2.3. Because in some forums, people say different things (some say It's the problem, others think differently) So? Bye - Madman out - Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." *** Transmition End *** ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)
Hi, at the start of cs:source i also could not start the server, because i have Debian 3.0/Stable/glibc 2.2.x ! After an upgrade to Debian 3.1/Sarge/glibc 2.3.x the server runs great and the cpu usage is low. An 18 Slot Server uses max 30% with an XP2800+ and a 2.6.8.1 Kernel/1000Hz There is no negative ti update to glibc 2.3.x for my system - Original Message - From: "Michael McKoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Currently, CSS will only run with glibc 2.3 Hi! I've heard things about cs:source vs libc6 2.2. I would like a final confirmation about the fact(?) that cs:source would run only with 2.3. Because in some forums, people say different things (some say It's the problem, others think differently) So? Bye - Madman out - Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." *** Transmition End *** ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)
Currently, CSS will only run with glibc 2.3 > Hi! > > I've heard things about cs:source vs libc6 2.2. I would like a final > confirmation about the fact(?) that cs:source would run only with 2.3. > Because in some forums, people say different things (some say It's the > problem, others think differently) > > So? > > Bye > > - Madman out - > > Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) > > "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." > > *** Transmition End *** > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)
Hi! I've heard things about cs:source vs libc6 2.2. I would like a final confirmation about the fact(?) that cs:source would run only with 2.3. Because in some forums, people say different things (some say It's the problem, others think differently) So? Bye - Madman out - Madman ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) "To boldly go where no one has gone before ..." *** Transmition End *** ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
