RE: [hlds_linux] securing OS (was: Log-File Naming)

2002-09-13 Thread Eric (Deacon) 

> > Most likely it's because you are a smart user.
> > The biggest problem is that most users are not and the preconfig
that
> > comes with M$ software is even worse then a Redhat installation :D
>
> Just for reference and since it might be of interest to admins on
> this list running RedHat (omg, I'm getting ontopic again), you
> *can* secure a RedHat installation if you put some effort into it

You can, of course, secure Win2k if you put some effort into it as well
:)

--
Eric (the Deacon remix)

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

[hlds_linux] securing OS (was: Log-File Naming)

2002-09-13 Thread Florian Zschocke 

Stefan Huszics wrote:
>
> Most likely it's because you are a smart user.
> The biggest problem is that most users are not and the preconfig that
> comes with M$ software is even worse then a Redhat installation :D

Just for reference and since it might be of interest to admins on
this list running RedHat (omg, I'm getting ontopic again), you
*can* secure a RedHat installation if you put some effort into it:

http://www.tldp.org/LDP/solrhe/Securing-Optimizing-Linux-RH-Edition-v1.3/index.html

Florian.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux