Re: [hlds_linux] New client update. WTF? You guys really are insane.

2004-05-01 Thread knowhow
 KnowHow The NetCrawler wrote:
 1) You never hear from the people who like the updates, so forums and
 community only gets you thus far.

 On the contrary, look at the replies Nick gets when he posts about VAC
 updates, and consider the many thank yous Alfred got when he announced
 sv_downloadurl.


downloadurl and VAC are not a gameplay changes, which I thought was what
we were talking about?

 2) I like when the game changes a little, keeps it interesting. We all
 survived 1.4, didn't we?

 This isn't a little. What Valve are doing nowadays is fundamentally
 changing the gameplay without giving us the option of leaving it as-was.


You mean like taking away bunny jumping?

 4) As always people will complain, and eventually grow to live with it.

 A lot of the better players I know have now given up complaining and are
 reinstalling 1.5. Last night I joined them and had a blast playing CS as
 a game of skill instead of luck.

Well, good for you then.

 With the Steam hlds using excessive CPU on the most powerful of boxes,
 and the continual breaking of CD/AMX/etc, I'm seriously starting to
 re-evaluate the merits of running it compared to 1.5.

1.5 was updated once.. to 1.5.. that's why steam breaks addons, because it
updates. Personally I haven't had that big a problem with updating my
server, it's a lot worse with the client.



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


RE: [hlds_linux] New client update. WTF? You guys really are insane.

2004-04-29 Thread | RapidGame Support |

here here.. I completely agree. Since this update was only released today I
haven't had the chance to play CS yet (At work) but from what ive seen on
this list I don't think imp going to like what I see when I play later. I
have one question though.. Why does the AWP always get scrutinised against??
Why not just make it fire roses out the barrel instead or make it shoot
water or better still make a flag pop out the end saying Bang..

Valve need to started reading this list in my opinion.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Lee
Sent: 29 April 2004 16:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hlds_linux] New client update. WTF? You guys really are
insane.


I just played the new update to test a server and i have a few questions.

1) Why are the new crosshairs so large? They are like playskool big at
1024. You cant just up and change something as important as crosshairs
in a fps and expect people to be ok with it. I havent heard any
complaints about the cstike crosshairs. Maybe they could have stood to
be a little darker, but damn you make something as stupid as the radar
an option and the crosshairs are mandatory? What kind of sense does that
make?

2) Why did you guys put the delay on the scope of the awp? The delay
should be on the bullet load time like its supposed to be. You should
have just done it like the reload. Where as if someone switches to their
pistol and the awp goes back to not having a bullet. Switch back to the
awp and it starts to load the new round again. This zoom delay works,
but is confusing and there is no way to really know if you can fire again.

3) Whats the model updates? I havent notice anny changes, although some
say their fps dropped, but they always say that since fps can easliy be
lied about and gives them a reason for being gh3yed l1k3 a nub or
whatever it is they say now.

4) I did notice the interface tweaks, looks like crap if you ask me. The
old stuff was fine.

Anyways guys, you stand once again to piss off a bunch of people here.
Im glad you changed the awp, although instead of fixing it you just make
it seemed to be broke. The crosshairs? wtf? Why dont you guys fix things
that really need to be fixed? Are you even listening to the community? I
can give you some links to some community sites if you want some
feedback. I dont know where you guys are getting your instructions from
but they definitly do not have their finger on the pulse of the gaming
community. I'm starting to think this is part of some kind of marketing
scheme to change small crap until you eventually make everyone want to
stop playing cs. I'm really starting to think cs was better before valve
  bought it.

Finally, here is a list of things that need to be fixed on the client.
Other can add to this if they want. I normally wouldnt do this, but you
guys sold CZ already and I was hoping it would fix alot of these
problems. Since you dropped the ball on that one I dont think its too
much to ask.

1) steam is SLOW. It takes longer for me to join a cstrike game if steam
isnt running than it does for me to join a ut2004 game and the interface
is really unresponsive. Also steam eats up a ton of memory when running.
All in all, you guys need to optimized steam a little better. All it is,
is a download manager and an im client. How hard can it be?

2) The riot shield SUX!!! Make a server opion to disable it. Make it so
the people take damage when using it. Make them run alot slower. Make
them bright pink. I dont care, just do something. You guys do realize
this thing is banned in almost every league right? Ohh wait, i forgot
you guys just spent time updating the crosshairs for cs, so you dont.
Ok, well this thing is banned in almost every league.

3) FPS is getting lower and lower with each update, how about you guys
try optimizing the engine some more? Don't tell me it can't be done, you
are making HL2 and ive seen movies of it.

4) Add some more realism to the game. *ahem* cts running around with
silencers on all the guns regardless of weather or not they are really
on? That kind of stuff was acceptable back when hl came out, but now?

5) MAKE VAC WORK!! Dont ban the hackers from cstrike, just ban them from
vac servers. Cheating is fine, IF the server allows it.

See others comments.

--
Thanks,

David Lee

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


RE: [hlds_linux] New client update. WTF? You guys really are insane.

2004-04-29 Thread Kenny @ Emsco
I agree with you guys the changes make the awp seem broken now.
I do like the map updates to nuke brightness / box bug fix on the back ramp.
The cross hairs have to go or at least the ability to change back to the
old. With pistols you have a huge c/h at 800x600.

So what else was changed with the update besides cross hair? Is this apart
of the other optimizations, can we get a list?

Kenny

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hlds_linux-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of | RapidGame Support |
 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 10:52 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] New client update. WTF? You guys really are
 insane.


 here here.. I completely agree. Since this update was only released today
 I
 haven't had the chance to play CS yet (At work) but from what ive seen on
 this list I don't think imp going to like what I see when I play later. I
 have one question though.. Why does the AWP always get scrutinised
 against??
 Why not just make it fire roses out the barrel instead or make it shoot
 water or better still make a flag pop out the end saying Bang..

 Valve need to started reading this list in my opinion.



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] New client update. WTF? You guys really are insane.

2004-04-29 Thread Matt Judge
I am not going to edit the post as I think it is all worth keeping, and
I am top posting so's people don't have to scroll down :)
Why not ask on this list before making changes?  Better still, why not
get feedback from your webpage and forum?  It wouldn't take 10 minutes
to knock up a simple php script to ask any visitors their opinion on
whether a game aspect should be changed and how it should be changed.
This place is beginning to feel more like planetside each day; lots of
changes that nobody wants, the changes people do want get ignored, more
and more lag with every release, software releases that are useless and
nobody wants (Sony's Core Combat / Valve's Condition Zero),
Matt.

David Lee wrote:

I just played the new update to test a server and i have a few questions.

1) Why are the new crosshairs so large? They are like playskool big at
1024. You cant just up and change something as important as crosshairs
in a fps and expect people to be ok with it. I havent heard any
complaints about the cstike crosshairs. Maybe they could have stood to
be a little darker, but damn you make something as stupid as the radar
an option and the crosshairs are mandatory? What kind of sense does that
make?
2) Why did you guys put the delay on the scope of the awp? The delay
should be on the bullet load time like its supposed to be. You should
have just done it like the reload. Where as if someone switches to their
pistol and the awp goes back to not having a bullet. Switch back to the
awp and it starts to load the new round again. This zoom delay works,
but is confusing and there is no way to really know if you can fire
again.
3) Whats the model updates? I havent notice anny changes, although some
say their fps dropped, but they always say that since fps can easliy be
lied about and gives them a reason for being gh3yed l1k3 a nub or
whatever it is they say now.
4) I did notice the interface tweaks, looks like crap if you ask me. The
old stuff was fine.
Anyways guys, you stand once again to piss off a bunch of people here.
Im glad you changed the awp, although instead of fixing it you just make
it seemed to be broke. The crosshairs? wtf? Why dont you guys fix things
that really need to be fixed? Are you even listening to the community? I
can give you some links to some community sites if you want some
feedback. I dont know where you guys are getting your instructions from
but they definitly do not have their finger on the pulse of the gaming
community. I'm starting to think this is part of some kind of marketing
scheme to change small crap until you eventually make everyone want to
stop playing cs. I'm really starting to think cs was better before valve
 bought it.
Finally, here is a list of things that need to be fixed on the client.
Other can add to this if they want. I normally wouldnt do this, but you
guys sold CZ already and I was hoping it would fix alot of these
problems. Since you dropped the ball on that one I dont think its too
much to ask.
1) steam is SLOW. It takes longer for me to join a cstrike game if steam
isnt running than it does for me to join a ut2004 game and the interface
is really unresponsive. Also steam eats up a ton of memory when running.
All in all, you guys need to optimized steam a little better. All it is,
is a download manager and an im client. How hard can it be?
2) The riot shield SUX!!! Make a server opion to disable it. Make it so
the people take damage when using it. Make them run alot slower. Make
them bright pink. I dont care, just do something. You guys do realize
this thing is banned in almost every league right? Ohh wait, i forgot
you guys just spent time updating the crosshairs for cs, so you dont.
Ok, well this thing is banned in almost every league.
3) FPS is getting lower and lower with each update, how about you guys
try optimizing the engine some more? Don't tell me it can't be done, you
are making HL2 and ive seen movies of it.
4) Add some more realism to the game. *ahem* cts running around with
silencers on all the guns regardless of weather or not they are really
on? That kind of stuff was acceptable back when hl came out, but now?
5) MAKE VAC WORK!! Dont ban the hackers from cstrike, just ban them from
vac servers. Cheating is fine, IF the server allows it.


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux