Re: [hlds_linux] Does a hard drive effect HLDS Linux performance?

2003-12-21 Thread Muldy
In relation with this topic... Does the floppy effect HLDS linux
performance ?
Not really just kidding ;)
Have a Nice christmas!
Britt Priddy (PZGN) wrote:

wow - people are diggin now.

- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 3:52 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Does a hard drive effect HLDS Linux performance?



m0gely wrote:



Rock wrote:



--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Don't forget IDE drives affect cpu alot harder than scsi drives when
accessed. Not sure to what extent but 2 map changes at the same time
could spike it.

This hasn't been the case for some time. While IDE still uses some CPU,
it's mostly insignificant.

Well, that depends on how pegged out your single cpu is from the hlds
processes.   If you are taking up most if not all of your cpu with 2 or
more hlds processes, when one changes maps, it *will* lag the servers.
I have seen it happen recently on damn respectable hardware with an IDE
drive in it.  Its just too bad hlds uses so much cpu now, compared to
when it used to.
kev



The lag is due especially at the speed of the disk which are in générals
in IDE into 5400trs/min and in SCSI in 1trs/min.
For the CPU, if the DMA are actived, the CPU usage for the hard disk is
very low (look this =))
bye

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] Does a hard drive effect HLDS Linux performance?

2003-12-21 Thread Britt Priddy \(PZGN\)
wow - people are diggin now.


- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 3:52 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Does a hard drive effect HLDS Linux performance?


> m0gely wrote:
>
>> Rock wrote:
>>
>>> --
>>> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>>> Don't forget IDE drives affect cpu alot harder than scsi drives when
>>> accessed. Not sure to what extent but 2 map changes at the same time
>>> could spike it.
>>
>>
>> This hasn't been the case for some time. While IDE still uses some CPU,
>> it's mostly insignificant.
>
> Well, that depends on how pegged out your single cpu is from the hlds
> processes.   If you are taking up most if not all of your cpu with 2 or
> more hlds processes, when one changes maps, it *will* lag the servers.
> I have seen it happen recently on damn respectable hardware with an IDE
> drive in it.  Its just too bad hlds uses so much cpu now, compared to
> when it used to.
>
> kev
>

The lag is due especially at the speed of the disk which are in générals
in IDE into 5400trs/min and in SCSI in 1trs/min.

For the CPU, if the DMA are actived, the CPU usage for the hard disk is
very low (look this =))

bye

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] Does a hard drive effect HLDS Linux performance?

2003-12-21 Thread le-stratege
> m0gely wrote:
>
>> Rock wrote:
>>
>>> --
>>> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>>> Don't forget IDE drives affect cpu alot harder than scsi drives when
>>> accessed. Not sure to what extent but 2 map changes at the same time
>>> could spike it.
>>
>>
>> This hasn't been the case for some time. While IDE still uses some CPU,
>> it's mostly insignificant.
>
> Well, that depends on how pegged out your single cpu is from the hlds
> processes.   If you are taking up most if not all of your cpu with 2 or
> more hlds processes, when one changes maps, it *will* lag the servers.
> I have seen it happen recently on damn respectable hardware with an IDE
> drive in it.  Its just too bad hlds uses so much cpu now, compared to
> when it used to.
>
> kev
>

The lag is due especially at the speed of the disk which are in générals
in IDE into 5400trs/min and in SCSI in 1trs/min.

For the CPU, if the DMA are actived, the CPU usage for the hard disk is
very low (look this =))

bye

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


RE: [hlds_linux] Does a hard drive effect HLDS Linux performance ?

2003-12-20 Thread siberia
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin J.
Anderson
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 7:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Does a hard drive effect HLDS Linux performance ?

m0gely wrote:

Well, that depends on how pegged out your single cpu is from the hlds
processes.   If you are taking up most if not all of your cpu with 2 or
more hlds processes, when one changes maps, it *will* lag the servers.
I have seen it happen recently on damn respectable hardware with an IDE
drive in it.  Its just too bad hlds uses so much cpu now, compared to
when it used to.

kev
___

What's even sadder is that people have to take such minor things into
consideration because hlds_l is such an incredibly huge resource hog. It's
been months and Valve is still unable to come up with a solution, doesn't
look good.

--
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.209 / Virus Database: 261.5.1 - Release Date: 12/18/2003



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] Does a hard drive effect HLDS Linux performance ?

2003-12-20 Thread Kevin J. Anderson
m0gely wrote:

Rock wrote:

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Don't forget IDE drives affect cpu alot harder than scsi drives when
accessed. Not sure to what extent but 2 map changes at the same time
could spike it.


This hasn't been the case for some time. While IDE still uses some CPU,
it's mostly insignificant.
Well, that depends on how pegged out your single cpu is from the hlds
processes.   If you are taking up most if not all of your cpu with 2 or
more hlds processes, when one changes maps, it *will* lag the servers.
I have seen it happen recently on damn respectable hardware with an IDE
drive in it.  Its just too bad hlds uses so much cpu now, compared to
when it used to.
kev

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] Does a hard drive effect HLDS Linux performance ?

2003-12-20 Thread m0gely
Rock wrote:
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Don't forget IDE drives affect cpu alot harder than scsi drives when accessed. Not 
sure to what extent but 2 map changes at the same time could spike it.
This hasn't been the case for some time. While IDE still uses some CPU,
it's mostly insignificant.
--
- m0gely
http://quake2.telestream.com/
Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] Does a hard drive effect HLDS Linux performance ?

2003-12-20 Thread Rock
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Don't forget IDE drives affect cpu alot harder than scsi drives when accessed. Not 
sure to what extent but 2 map changes at the same time could spike it.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> I am planning on colacation of a server which will give me a 
pipe of 2.66
> ghz. The price of colocation is charged by the server so I am trying to
> get
> the best bang for the buck without a huge dent in my pocket. My question
> is
> should I get a Western Digital 10,000 RPM raptor or should I stick with a
> 7200 rpm drive. The current specs of my system
> Asus A7V600
> Samsung pc3200 1 gig ddr ram
> Amd Barton 3000+ NOT 64 bit
> That leaves the hard drive, I plan on running 2 32 player servers on this
> machine, should I stick with a 7200 rpm drive with 8mb cache or move on up
> with a 10,000 rpm drive ? Thanks
>

The speed of the HardDrive is used only for a change map and restart of
server.



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



Rock of Rock's Hideout

For help or support please visit the suport forums:
http://www.rocks-hideout.com
also support can be found on AOL instant messanger at:
FHMDeathSquad
RocksHideout











-
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
--

___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux