Re: [hlds_linux] Kernel Fun

2003-07-27 Thread antstrength
These are LAN servers.  I thought they were pub.

Dave


On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 02:57, Daniel Stroven wrote:
 216.32.201.69:27015 (FF=OFF)
 216.32.201.96:27015 (FF=ON)
 216.32.201.107:27015 (24/7 Awp_Map)

 Welcome to come play.

 dan
 - Original Message -
 From: antstrength [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 12:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Kernel Fun


  What's the ip/port of your servers?  I'm in jersey and would love to
  play with a 15-20 ping.
 
  Dave
 
 
  On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 17:19, Daniel Stroven wrote:
   This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
   --
   [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
   I have been experimenting with kernels lately in hopes of improving
 performance even more.  This is based on RH 7.2 or higher.
  
   The stable kernel I have been using for last the few months is the
 2.4.21-rc1-jam1 kernel/patch set.  This runs solid, but one can never be
 completely satisfied.
  
   Just for backround, I ICMP ping my servers in Jersey at 50-55ms.  In
 game ping on p3 boxes with 14+ players is 70-100.  In game ping on xeon
 boxes with 14+ is around 70-75..more stable on the newer hardware.  This was
 without pingboost enabled, and on the 2.4.21 kernel.
  
   So the first 2.5.X kernel we got up was 2.5.74-mm3.  In game latency was
 reduced solidly by 10ms.  55-65 is now my average ping on the Xeon
 boxes...with 14+ players present.  The players living in the area are no
 longer 20-30ms but 15-20ms in game.
  
   On another box, we put up 2.5.75-mm1 kernel.  With the same results,
 though the .74 kernel, ftp seems to go defunct, but not on the .75 kernel.
  
   I have just rebooted to 2.6.0-test1-mm2 kernel and will see how well
 this performs.  This kernel replaces the 2.5.74 kernel, leaving 2.5.75-mm1
 still in place.  If anyone else is playing with kernels on redhat, I would
 be interested in hearing your results.  I will reply my results with this
 kernel after a week of testing.
  
   dan
   --
  
  
   ___
   To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
   http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 
 
  ___
  To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
  http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] Kernel Fun

2003-07-27 Thread Daniel Stroven
These are not LAN servers.  They are public.  Im in florida and I play on my
servers all the time.  According to stats 15,300 players thru the server in
the last 30 days.  So definitely not LAN :)))


- Original Message -
From: antstrength [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Kernel Fun


 These are LAN servers.  I thought they were pub.

 Dave


 On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 02:57, Daniel Stroven wrote:
  216.32.201.69:27015 (FF=OFF)
  216.32.201.96:27015 (FF=ON)
  216.32.201.107:27015 (24/7 Awp_Map)
 
  Welcome to come play.
 
  dan
  - Original Message -
  From: antstrength [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 12:34 AM
  Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Kernel Fun
 
 
   What's the ip/port of your servers?  I'm in jersey and would love to
   play with a 15-20 ping.
  
   Dave
  
  
   On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 17:19, Daniel Stroven wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
I have been experimenting with kernels lately in hopes of improving
  performance even more.  This is based on RH 7.2 or higher.
   
The stable kernel I have been using for last the few months is the
  2.4.21-rc1-jam1 kernel/patch set.  This runs solid, but one can never be
  completely satisfied.
   
Just for backround, I ICMP ping my servers in Jersey at 50-55ms.  In
  game ping on p3 boxes with 14+ players is 70-100.  In game ping on xeon
  boxes with 14+ is around 70-75..more stable on the newer hardware.  This
was
  without pingboost enabled, and on the 2.4.21 kernel.
   
So the first 2.5.X kernel we got up was 2.5.74-mm3.  In game latency
was
  reduced solidly by 10ms.  55-65 is now my average ping on the Xeon
  boxes...with 14+ players present.  The players living in the area are no
  longer 20-30ms but 15-20ms in game.
   
On another box, we put up 2.5.75-mm1 kernel.  With the same results,
  though the .74 kernel, ftp seems to go defunct, but not on the .75
kernel.
   
I have just rebooted to 2.6.0-test1-mm2 kernel and will see how well
  this performs.  This kernel replaces the 2.5.74 kernel, leaving
2.5.75-mm1
  still in place.  If anyone else is playing with kernels on redhat, I
would
  be interested in hearing your results.  I will reply my results with
this
  kernel after a week of testing.
   
dan
--
   
   
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives,
  please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
  
  
   ___
   To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
  please visit:
   http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
  
 
 
  ___
  To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
  http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] Kernel Fun

2003-07-27 Thread antstrength
Oh.  When i tried to connect it gave me an error.  I've never seen this
before: LAN servers are resticted to local clients (class C).

Dave


  On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 14:20, Daniel Stroven wrote:
 These are not LAN servers.  They are public.  Im in florida and I play on my
 servers all the time.  According to stats 15,300 players thru the server in
 the last 30 days.  So definitely not LAN :)))


 - Original Message -
 From: antstrength [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 11:55 AM
 Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Kernel Fun


  These are LAN servers.  I thought they were pub.
 
  Dave
 
 
  On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 02:57, Daniel Stroven wrote:
   216.32.201.69:27015 (FF=OFF)
   216.32.201.96:27015 (FF=ON)
   216.32.201.107:27015 (24/7 Awp_Map)
  
   Welcome to come play.
  
   dan
   - Original Message -
   From: antstrength [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 12:34 AM
   Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Kernel Fun
  
  
What's the ip/port of your servers?  I'm in jersey and would love to
play with a 15-20 ping.
   
Dave
   
   
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 17:19, Daniel Stroven wrote:
 This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
 --
 [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
 I have been experimenting with kernels lately in hopes of improving
   performance even more.  This is based on RH 7.2 or higher.

 The stable kernel I have been using for last the few months is the
   2.4.21-rc1-jam1 kernel/patch set.  This runs solid, but one can never be
   completely satisfied.

 Just for backround, I ICMP ping my servers in Jersey at 50-55ms.  In
   game ping on p3 boxes with 14+ players is 70-100.  In game ping on xeon
   boxes with 14+ is around 70-75..more stable on the newer hardware.  This
 was
   without pingboost enabled, and on the 2.4.21 kernel.

 So the first 2.5.X kernel we got up was 2.5.74-mm3.  In game latency
 was
   reduced solidly by 10ms.  55-65 is now my average ping on the Xeon
   boxes...with 14+ players present.  The players living in the area are no
   longer 20-30ms but 15-20ms in game.

 On another box, we put up 2.5.75-mm1 kernel.  With the same results,
   though the .74 kernel, ftp seems to go defunct, but not on the .75
 kernel.

 I have just rebooted to 2.6.0-test1-mm2 kernel and will see how well
   this performs.  This kernel replaces the 2.5.74 kernel, leaving
 2.5.75-mm1
   still in place.  If anyone else is playing with kernels on redhat, I
 would
   be interested in hearing your results.  I will reply my results with
 this
   kernel after a week of testing.

 dan
 --


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
 archives,
   please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
   
   
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
   please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
   
  
  
   ___
   To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
   http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 
 
  ___
  To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
 please visit:
  http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


Re: [hlds_linux] Kernel Fun

2003-07-27 Thread Daniel Stroven
I have heard of this error happening sometimes, but never seen it actually
myself.  Try again and see what you get.

dan
- Original Message -
From: antstrength [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Kernel Fun


 Oh.  When i tried to connect it gave me an error.  I've never seen this
 before: LAN servers are resticted to local clients (class C).

 Dave


   On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 14:20, Daniel Stroven wrote:
  These are not LAN servers.  They are public.  Im in florida and I play
on my
  servers all the time.  According to stats 15,300 players thru the server
in
  the last 30 days.  So definitely not LAN :)))
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: antstrength [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 11:55 AM
  Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Kernel Fun
 
 
   These are LAN servers.  I thought they were pub.
  
   Dave
  
  
   On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 02:57, Daniel Stroven wrote:
216.32.201.69:27015 (FF=OFF)
216.32.201.96:27015 (FF=ON)
216.32.201.107:27015 (24/7 Awp_Map)
   
Welcome to come play.
   
dan
- Original Message -
From: antstrength [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 12:34 AM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Kernel Fun
   
   
 What's the ip/port of your servers?  I'm in jersey and would love
to
 play with a 15-20 ping.

 Dave


 On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 17:19, Daniel Stroven wrote:
  This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
  --
  [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
  I have been experimenting with kernels lately in hopes of
improving
performance even more.  This is based on RH 7.2 or higher.
 
  The stable kernel I have been using for last the few months is
the
2.4.21-rc1-jam1 kernel/patch set.  This runs solid, but one can
never be
completely satisfied.
 
  Just for backround, I ICMP ping my servers in Jersey at 50-55ms.
In
game ping on p3 boxes with 14+ players is 70-100.  In game ping on
xeon
boxes with 14+ is around 70-75..more stable on the newer hardware.
This
  was
without pingboost enabled, and on the 2.4.21 kernel.
 
  So the first 2.5.X kernel we got up was 2.5.74-mm3.  In game
latency
  was
reduced solidly by 10ms.  55-65 is now my average ping on the Xeon
boxes...with 14+ players present.  The players living in the area
are no
longer 20-30ms but 15-20ms in game.
 
  On another box, we put up 2.5.75-mm1 kernel.  With the same
results,
though the .74 kernel, ftp seems to go defunct, but not on the .75
  kernel.
 
  I have just rebooted to 2.6.0-test1-mm2 kernel and will see how
well
this performs.  This kernel replaces the 2.5.74 kernel, leaving
  2.5.75-mm1
still in place.  If anyone else is playing with kernels on redhat, I
  would
be interested in hearing your results.  I will reply my results with
  this
kernel after a week of testing.
 
  dan
  --
 
 
  ___
  To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
  archives,
please visit:
  http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives,
please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

   
   
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
archives,
  please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
  
  
   ___
   To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
  please visit:
   http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
  
 
 
  ___
  To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
  http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux


 ___
 To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
 http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux



___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux