Blake has mostly covered it. But worth saying explicitly, if we assume that
the best you're going to get on a GPS is 5m, but your concern is that
you're mapping things that are much closer together - then the solution is
to combine the GPS and paper based approach. The important thing from a
navigation point of view is getting the relevant features correctly placed
reactive to each other.
What you will find is that the combination of airial/gps and survey data
will bring the accuracy down. But ultimately, relative postition is the key.
Cheers
Chris
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 at 17:43 Gertrude Hope wrote:
> Hi Blake,
> Thank you so much for The information.
> On Feb 29, 2016 7:31 PM, "Blake Girardot" wrote:
> ___
> HOT mailing list
> HOT@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot