Re: [HOT] #2559 - Jigawa State Road Network

[Russell Deffner]

Hi Manuel, you can unsubscribe yourself here:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot - towards the bottom.

=Russ

 

From: Manuel Ramón Ternero Vega [mailto:manter...@hotmail.es] 
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 4:44 PM
To: john whelan; hot@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [HOT] #2559 - Jigawa State Road Network

 

 

Please I dont want otrecieve more emails from this group

  _  

From: john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com>
Sent: 18 February 2017 17:33
To: Daniel Specht
Cc: hot@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [HOT] #2559 - Jigawa State Road Network 

 

Additionally if you don't map the settlements then how do you know where the
highways are?  Does it really need tracks?

Cheerio John

 

On 18 February 2017 at 11:04, Daniel Specht <danspe...@gmail.com> wrote:

If all hamlets are to be connected to the road network and all residential
roads mapped, I'd recommend allowing tiles to be split into 64 parts rather
than 16. The current tiles are big enough to intimidate mappers to want to
map below tertiary roads.


 

-- 

Dan


___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

 

___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Re: [HOT] #2559 - Jigawa State Road Network

[Manuel Ramón Ternero Vega]

Please I dont want otrecieve more emails from this group


From: john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com>
Sent: 18 February 2017 17:33
To: Daniel Specht
Cc: hot@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [HOT] #2559 - Jigawa State Road Network

Additionally if you don't map the settlements then how do you know where the 
highways are?  Does it really need tracks?

Cheerio John

On 18 February 2017 at 11:04, Daniel Specht 
<danspe...@gmail.com<mailto:danspe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
If all hamlets are to be connected to the road network and all residential 
roads mapped, I'd recommend allowing tiles to be split into 64 parts rather 
than 16. The current tiles are big enough to intimidate mappers to want to map 
below tertiary roads.

--
Dan

___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org<mailto:HOT@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Re: [HOT] #2559 - Jigawa State Road Network

[john whelan]

Additionally if you don't map the settlements then how do you know where
the highways are?  Does it really need tracks?

Cheerio John

On 18 February 2017 at 11:04, Daniel Specht  wrote:

> If all hamlets are to be connected to the road network and all residential
> roads mapped, I'd recommend allowing tiles to be split into 64 parts rather
> than 16. The current tiles are big enough to intimidate mappers to want to
> map below tertiary roads.
>
> --
> Dan
>
> ___
> HOT mailing list
> HOT@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

[HOT] #2559 - Jigawa State Road Network

[Daniel Specht]

If all hamlets are to be connected to the road network and all residential
roads mapped, I'd recommend allowing tiles to be split into 64 parts rather
than 16. The current tiles are big enough to intimidate mappers to want to
map below tertiary roads.

-- 
Dan
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot