subject:"\[HOT\] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM"

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

2015-10-27 Thread Rafael Avila Coya

I forgot to say that, to elaborate a tagging proposal, we would need to
know all the original tags plus the different values for each one, and
their meaning.

Cheers,

Rafael.

On 27/10/15 14:23, mi...@groundtruth.in wrote:
> Map Kibera has extensively mapped watsan features, and developed tags to
> cover many related properties
> 
> The Map Kibera wiki page on this isn't functional right now, so here are
> OverPass Turbo links. Click on a few of the features to see the extent
> of what's covered
> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/cix
> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ciz
> 
> Will work to add the specifics into the discussion. Some of the tags are
> good, some need work. Will be very good to align these with a global
> consensus tagging scheme for watsan.
> 
> -Mikel
>  
> * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 6:17 AM, Dale Kunce 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Totally agree Joseph. We just need agree on what is what and then
> push it into the existing scheme.
> 
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Joseph Reeves
> mailto:iknowjos...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Sure, but can those existing keys / values be extended to cover
> the wash data or is it too far from the mainstream OSM data?
> Looking at the examples given by Jose I'd say that much could be
> brought into the existing osm schema without too much trouble.
> 
> Cheers, Joseph
> 
> 
> 
> On 27 October 2015 at 11:50, Dale Kunce  > wrote:
> 
> Joseph,
> Right now we use a combination of pump=* and
> amenity=drinking_water both of which don't really cover the
> full needs of wash data.
> 
> Dale
> 
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Joseph Reeves
> mailto:iknowjos...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> hi Jose, Dale,
> 
> On the topic of a standard tagging schema, there's the
> start of something on the wiki: 
> 
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:pump
> 
> The pump key has already got some use:
> 
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=pump#overview
> 
> It would be great if this could be extended to suit your
> needs. Some things would be easily done
> (PUMP_TYPE, FLOW_RATE), but others such as the time it's
> been failed for would presumably take some extra
> thinking. I'm sure we could get it worked out though!
> 
> Cheers, Joseph
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 27 October 2015 at 11:42, Dale Kunce
> mailto:dale.ku...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Jose,
> I think it would be really smart if MSF, Red Cross
> and other NGOs could come up with a standard tagging
> scheme for wash activities. There isn't anything
> thus far and I can see a huge benefit to support
> both our Missing Maps field work but also field work
> in other areas such as refugee camps.
> 
> Dale
> 
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Jose Cisneros
> Gallegos  > wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone!
> 
> The MSF team in Chad is carrying splendid work
> and so far has sent previously non-existing data
> about water points in the region of Bokoro. At
> the GIS unit in MSF London we are trying to
> incorporate this newly acquired data into OSM,
> however we are not exactly sure how to proceed.
> Some of the variables include:
> 
>  - PUMP_EXISTS
>  - PUMP_TYPE
>  - OTHER_PUMP_TYPE
>  - HAND_PUMP_WORKING
>  - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_TIME_UNIT
>  - NOT_WORKING:HOW_LONG_NOT_WORKING
>  - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_LABEL
>  - WHY_NOT_WORKING
>  - FLOW_RATE
>  - BOREHOLE_PROTECTED
>  - REPAIR_NEEDED
>  - TYPE_OF_REPAIR_NEEDED
> 
> Should all of the variables be included as tags?
> Is there a protocol on how to incorporate WASH
> and water infrastructure data?
> 
> Thanks for your help!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Jose
> GIS volunteer @ MSK UK / BRC
> 
> ___
>

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

2015-10-27 Thread Rafael Avila Coya

Hi, José and all:

To incorporate that data into OSM would be an import.

If not mistaken, Séverin Menard organized the first import back in 2012
of UNICEF data of Central African Republic, that included three sets of
data: health facilities, schools and water facilities. The latest was
the biggest, with 1,937 nodes.

With some small modifications, we still use that import workflow [1] as
a reference for most (if not all) the manual imports we organize through
the HOT Tasking Manager. You can see two examples here: [2] and [3].

From the CAR UNICEF WASH import wiki [4] we can get further tags for the
tagging translation of your original tags. This is one starting
suggestion using all sources you have pointed to:

PUMP_EXISTS and
PUMP_TYPE -> pump=powered/manual/yes/no/unknown

OTHER_PUMP_TYPE -> ?

HAND_PUMP_WORKING -> operational_status=open/closed/unknown

NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_TIME_UNIT -> opening_hours=* ?

NOT_WORKING:HOW_LONG_NOT_WORKING -> opening_hours=* ?

NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_LABEL -> ?

WHY_NOT_WORKING -> ?

FLOW_RATE -> This would need a new tag

BOREHOLE_PROTECTED -> This would need a new tag

REPAIR_NEEDED -> pump:status maybe...

TYPE_OF_REPAIR_NEEDED -> This would need a new tag

Those with "?" are the ones I don't know the exact meaning.

To answer your questions:

Should all of the variables be included as tags?

That should be decided during the import process, that it's normally as
follows:

1) A group of people (could be you alone, or with HOT community, or
whoever you think is best) discuss a proposal and write a wiki. In fact,
it's what we are doing right now.

2) Then, it has to be discussed with the local OSM community. If Chad
OSM community is small, it's advisable to submit it to HOT for opinions,
but my understanding is that there is actually a Chad community already
(I may ask around to find out).

3) Once that step is cleared, we go to the imports list, to eventually
improve the workflow, tagging, etc.

4) We create the Tasking Manager project for the import.

Steps 1, 2 and 3 shouldn't take more than 2-3 weeks altogether. Actual
import (step 4) duration depends on how many water facilities we have,
number of volunteers who join, etc.

Apart from the import itself, it's very advisable to include, at least,
tracing the roads that give access to all those water points. If those
water points have also the place they are located in the original
tagging, it would be very interesting to add a place node to the places
that aren't named yet. These two features (access roads and place nodes)
were part of the UNICEF import workflow, as you can read, and of many
other subsequent imports.

Is there a protocol on how to incorporate WASH and water infrastructure
data?

I have already answered to this question: Follow import guidelines
(steps 1, 2 and 3) and do the manual import through the HOT Tasking
Manager (step 4). I can help you throughout all the process.

Cheers,

Rafael.

[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_CAR_UNICEF_workflow
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_Liberia_UNMIL_Places_Workflow
[3]
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_Nigeria_eHealth_Borno_Health_Facilities
[4] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_CAR_UNICEF_WASH#Tagging_Plans

On 27/10/15 14:23, mi...@groundtruth.in wrote:
> Map Kibera has extensively mapped watsan features, and developed tags to
> cover many related properties
> 
> The Map Kibera wiki page on this isn't functional right now, so here are
> OverPass Turbo links. Click on a few of the features to see the extent
> of what's covered
> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/cix
> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ciz
> 
> Will work to add the specifics into the discussion. Some of the tags are
> good, some need work. Will be very good to align these with a global
> consensus tagging scheme for watsan.
> 
> -Mikel
>  
> * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 6:17 AM, Dale Kunce 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Totally agree Joseph. We just need agree on what is what and then
> push it into the existing scheme.
> 
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Joseph Reeves
> mailto:iknowjos...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Sure, but can those existing keys / values be extended to cover
> the wash data or is it too far from the mainstream OSM data?
> Looking at the examples given by Jose I'd say that much could be
> brought into the existing osm schema without too much trouble.
> 
> Cheers, Joseph
> 
> 
> 
> On 27 October 2015 at 11:50, Dale Kunce  > wrote:
> 
> Joseph,
> Right now we use a combination of pump=* and
> amenity=drinking_water both of which don't really cover the
> full needs of wash data.
> 
> Dale
> 
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Joseph Reeves
> mailto:iknowjos...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> hi Jose, Dale,

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

2015-10-27 Thread mikel

Map Kibera has extensively mapped watsan features, and developed tags to cover 
many related properties
The Map Kibera wiki page on this isn't functional right now, so here are 
OverPass Turbo links. Click on a few of the features to see the extent of 
what's coveredhttp://overpass-turbo.eu/s/cixhttp://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ciz

Will work to add the specifics into the discussion. Some of the tags are good, 
some need work. Will be very good to align these with a global consensus 
tagging scheme for watsan.
-Mikel * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron 


 On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 6:17 AM, Dale Kunce  
wrote:
   
 

 Totally agree Joseph. We just need agree on what is what and then push it into 
the existing scheme.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Joseph Reeves  wrote:

Sure, but can those existing keys / values be extended to cover the wash data 
or is it too far from the mainstream OSM data? Looking at the examples given by 
Jose I'd say that much could be brought into the existing osm schema without 
too much trouble.
Cheers, Joseph


On 27 October 2015 at 11:50, Dale Kunce  wrote:

Joseph,Right now we use a combination of pump=* and amenity=drinking_water both 
of which don't really cover the full needs of wash data.
Dale
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Joseph Reeves  wrote:

hi Jose, Dale,
On the topic of a standard tagging schema, there's the start of something on 
the wiki: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:pump

The pump key has already got some use:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=pump#overview

It would be great if this could be extended to suit your needs. Some things 
would be easily done (PUMP_TYPE, FLOW_RATE), but others such as the time it's 
been failed for would presumably take some extra thinking. I'm sure we could 
get it worked out though!
Cheers, Joseph



On 27 October 2015 at 11:42, Dale Kunce  wrote:

Jose,I think it would be really smart if MSF, Red Cross and other NGOs could 
come up with a standard tagging scheme for wash activities. There isn't 
anything thus far and I can see a huge benefit to support both our Missing Maps 
field work but also field work in other areas such as refugee camps.
Dale
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Jose Cisneros Gallegos 
 wrote:

Hi everyone!
The MSF team in Chad is carrying splendid work and so far has sent previously 
non-existing data about water points in the region of Bokoro. At the GIS unit 
in MSF London we are trying to incorporate this newly acquired data into OSM, 
however we are not exactly sure how to proceed. Some of the variables include:
 - PUMP_EXISTS - PUMP_TYPE - OTHER_PUMP_TYPE - HAND_PUMP_WORKING - 
NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_TIME_UNIT - NOT_WORKING:HOW_LONG_NOT_WORKING - 
NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_LABEL - WHY_NOT_WORKING - FLOW_RATE - 
BOREHOLE_PROTECTED - REPAIR_NEEDED - TYPE_OF_REPAIR_NEEDED
Should all of the variables be included as tags? Is there a protocol on how to 
incorporate WASH and water infrastructure data?
Thanks for your help!
Cheers,

JoseGIS volunteer @ MSK UK / BRC
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot





-- 
sent from my mobile device
Dale Kuncehttp://normalhabit.com

___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot







-- 
sent from my mobile device
Dale Kuncehttp://normalhabit.com






-- 
sent from my mobile device
Dale Kuncehttp://normalhabit.com

___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


 
  ___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

2015-10-27 Thread Dale Kunce

Totally agree Joseph. We just need agree on what is what and then push it
into the existing scheme.

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Joseph Reeves 
wrote:

> Sure, but can those existing keys / values be extended to cover the wash
> data or is it too far from the mainstream OSM data? Looking at the examples
> given by Jose I'd say that much could be brought into the existing osm
> schema without too much trouble.
>
> Cheers, Joseph
>
>
>
> On 27 October 2015 at 11:50, Dale Kunce  wrote:
>
>> Joseph,
>> Right now we use a combination of pump=* and amenity=drinking_water both
>> of which don't really cover the full needs of wash data.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Joseph Reeves 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> hi Jose, Dale,
>>>
>>> On the topic of a standard tagging schema, there's the start of
>>> something on the wiki:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:pump
>>>
>>> The pump key has already got some use:
>>>
>>> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=pump#overview
>>>
>>> It would be great if this could be extended to suit your needs. Some
>>> things would be easily done (PUMP_TYPE, FLOW_RATE), but others such as
>>> the time it's been failed for would presumably take some extra thinking.
>>> I'm sure we could get it worked out though!
>>>
>>> Cheers, Joseph
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27 October 2015 at 11:42, Dale Kunce  wrote:
>>>
 Jose,
 I think it would be really smart if MSF, Red Cross and other NGOs could
 come up with a standard tagging scheme for wash activities. There isn't
 anything thus far and I can see a huge benefit to support both our Missing
 Maps field work but also field work in other areas such as refugee camps.

 Dale

 On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Jose Cisneros Gallegos <
 jm.cisnero...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone!
>
> The MSF team in Chad is carrying splendid work and so far has sent
> previously non-existing data about water points in the region of Bokoro. 
> At
> the GIS unit in MSF London we are trying to incorporate this newly 
> acquired
> data into OSM, however we are not exactly sure how to proceed. Some of the
> variables include:
>
>  - PUMP_EXISTS
>  - PUMP_TYPE
>  - OTHER_PUMP_TYPE
>  - HAND_PUMP_WORKING
>  - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_TIME_UNIT
>  - NOT_WORKING:HOW_LONG_NOT_WORKING
>  - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_LABEL
>  - WHY_NOT_WORKING
>  - FLOW_RATE
>  - BOREHOLE_PROTECTED
>  - REPAIR_NEEDED
>  - TYPE_OF_REPAIR_NEEDED
>
> Should all of the variables be included as tags? Is there a protocol
> on how to incorporate WASH and water infrastructure data?
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Jose
> GIS volunteer @ MSK UK / BRC
>
> ___
> HOT mailing list
> HOT@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>


 --
 sent from my mobile device

 Dale Kunce
 http://normalhabit.com


 ___
 HOT mailing list
 HOT@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> sent from my mobile device
>>
>> Dale Kunce
>> http://normalhabit.com
>>
>>
>


-- 
sent from my mobile device

Dale Kunce
http://normalhabit.com
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

2015-10-27 Thread Joseph Reeves

Sure, but can those existing keys / values be extended to cover the wash
data or is it too far from the mainstream OSM data? Looking at the examples
given by Jose I'd say that much could be brought into the existing osm
schema without too much trouble.

Cheers, Joseph



On 27 October 2015 at 11:50, Dale Kunce  wrote:

> Joseph,
> Right now we use a combination of pump=* and amenity=drinking_water both
> of which don't really cover the full needs of wash data.
>
> Dale
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Joseph Reeves 
> wrote:
>
>> hi Jose, Dale,
>>
>> On the topic of a standard tagging schema, there's the start of something
>> on the wiki:
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:pump
>>
>> The pump key has already got some use:
>>
>> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=pump#overview
>>
>> It would be great if this could be extended to suit your needs. Some
>> things would be easily done (PUMP_TYPE, FLOW_RATE), but others such as
>> the time it's been failed for would presumably take some extra thinking.
>> I'm sure we could get it worked out though!
>>
>> Cheers, Joseph
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27 October 2015 at 11:42, Dale Kunce  wrote:
>>
>>> Jose,
>>> I think it would be really smart if MSF, Red Cross and other NGOs could
>>> come up with a standard tagging scheme for wash activities. There isn't
>>> anything thus far and I can see a huge benefit to support both our Missing
>>> Maps field work but also field work in other areas such as refugee camps.
>>>
>>> Dale
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Jose Cisneros Gallegos <
>>> jm.cisnero...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 Hi everyone!

 The MSF team in Chad is carrying splendid work and so far has sent
 previously non-existing data about water points in the region of Bokoro. At
 the GIS unit in MSF London we are trying to incorporate this newly acquired
 data into OSM, however we are not exactly sure how to proceed. Some of the
 variables include:

  - PUMP_EXISTS
  - PUMP_TYPE
  - OTHER_PUMP_TYPE
  - HAND_PUMP_WORKING
  - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_TIME_UNIT
  - NOT_WORKING:HOW_LONG_NOT_WORKING
  - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_LABEL
  - WHY_NOT_WORKING
  - FLOW_RATE
  - BOREHOLE_PROTECTED
  - REPAIR_NEEDED
  - TYPE_OF_REPAIR_NEEDED

 Should all of the variables be included as tags? Is there a protocol on
 how to incorporate WASH and water infrastructure data?

 Thanks for your help!

 Cheers,


 Jose
 GIS volunteer @ MSK UK / BRC

 ___
 HOT mailing list
 HOT@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> sent from my mobile device
>>>
>>> Dale Kunce
>>> http://normalhabit.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> HOT mailing list
>>> HOT@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> sent from my mobile device
>
> Dale Kunce
> http://normalhabit.com
>
>
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

2015-10-27 Thread Dale Kunce

Joseph,
Right now we use a combination of pump=* and amenity=drinking_water both of
which don't really cover the full needs of wash data.

Dale

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Joseph Reeves 
wrote:

> hi Jose, Dale,
>
> On the topic of a standard tagging schema, there's the start of something
> on the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:pump
>
> The pump key has already got some use:
>
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=pump#overview
>
> It would be great if this could be extended to suit your needs. Some
> things would be easily done (PUMP_TYPE, FLOW_RATE), but others such as
> the time it's been failed for would presumably take some extra thinking.
> I'm sure we could get it worked out though!
>
> Cheers, Joseph
>
>
>
>
> On 27 October 2015 at 11:42, Dale Kunce  wrote:
>
>> Jose,
>> I think it would be really smart if MSF, Red Cross and other NGOs could
>> come up with a standard tagging scheme for wash activities. There isn't
>> anything thus far and I can see a huge benefit to support both our Missing
>> Maps field work but also field work in other areas such as refugee camps.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Jose Cisneros Gallegos <
>> jm.cisnero...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone!
>>>
>>> The MSF team in Chad is carrying splendid work and so far has sent
>>> previously non-existing data about water points in the region of Bokoro. At
>>> the GIS unit in MSF London we are trying to incorporate this newly acquired
>>> data into OSM, however we are not exactly sure how to proceed. Some of the
>>> variables include:
>>>
>>>  - PUMP_EXISTS
>>>  - PUMP_TYPE
>>>  - OTHER_PUMP_TYPE
>>>  - HAND_PUMP_WORKING
>>>  - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_TIME_UNIT
>>>  - NOT_WORKING:HOW_LONG_NOT_WORKING
>>>  - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_LABEL
>>>  - WHY_NOT_WORKING
>>>  - FLOW_RATE
>>>  - BOREHOLE_PROTECTED
>>>  - REPAIR_NEEDED
>>>  - TYPE_OF_REPAIR_NEEDED
>>>
>>> Should all of the variables be included as tags? Is there a protocol on
>>> how to incorporate WASH and water infrastructure data?
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>
>>> Jose
>>> GIS volunteer @ MSK UK / BRC
>>>
>>> ___
>>> HOT mailing list
>>> HOT@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> sent from my mobile device
>>
>> Dale Kunce
>> http://normalhabit.com
>>
>>
>> ___
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>>
>


-- 
sent from my mobile device

Dale Kunce
http://normalhabit.com
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

2015-10-27 Thread Joseph Reeves

hi Jose, Dale,

On the topic of a standard tagging schema, there's the start of something
on the wiki:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:pump

The pump key has already got some use:

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=pump#overview

It would be great if this could be extended to suit your needs. Some things
would be easily done (PUMP_TYPE, FLOW_RATE), but others such as the time
it's been failed for would presumably take some extra thinking. I'm sure we
could get it worked out though!

Cheers, Joseph




On 27 October 2015 at 11:42, Dale Kunce  wrote:

> Jose,
> I think it would be really smart if MSF, Red Cross and other NGOs could
> come up with a standard tagging scheme for wash activities. There isn't
> anything thus far and I can see a huge benefit to support both our Missing
> Maps field work but also field work in other areas such as refugee camps.
>
> Dale
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Jose Cisneros Gallegos <
> jm.cisnero...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone!
>>
>> The MSF team in Chad is carrying splendid work and so far has sent
>> previously non-existing data about water points in the region of Bokoro. At
>> the GIS unit in MSF London we are trying to incorporate this newly acquired
>> data into OSM, however we are not exactly sure how to proceed. Some of the
>> variables include:
>>
>>  - PUMP_EXISTS
>>  - PUMP_TYPE
>>  - OTHER_PUMP_TYPE
>>  - HAND_PUMP_WORKING
>>  - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_TIME_UNIT
>>  - NOT_WORKING:HOW_LONG_NOT_WORKING
>>  - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_LABEL
>>  - WHY_NOT_WORKING
>>  - FLOW_RATE
>>  - BOREHOLE_PROTECTED
>>  - REPAIR_NEEDED
>>  - TYPE_OF_REPAIR_NEEDED
>>
>> Should all of the variables be included as tags? Is there a protocol on
>> how to incorporate WASH and water infrastructure data?
>>
>> Thanks for your help!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>> Jose
>> GIS volunteer @ MSK UK / BRC
>>
>> ___
>> HOT mailing list
>> HOT@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> sent from my mobile device
>
> Dale Kunce
> http://normalhabit.com
>
>
> ___
> HOT mailing list
> HOT@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

2015-10-27 Thread Dale Kunce

Jose,
I think it would be really smart if MSF, Red Cross and other NGOs could
come up with a standard tagging scheme for wash activities. There isn't
anything thus far and I can see a huge benefit to support both our Missing
Maps field work but also field work in other areas such as refugee camps.

Dale

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Jose Cisneros Gallegos <
jm.cisnero...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone!
>
> The MSF team in Chad is carrying splendid work and so far has sent
> previously non-existing data about water points in the region of Bokoro. At
> the GIS unit in MSF London we are trying to incorporate this newly acquired
> data into OSM, however we are not exactly sure how to proceed. Some of the
> variables include:
>
>  - PUMP_EXISTS
>  - PUMP_TYPE
>  - OTHER_PUMP_TYPE
>  - HAND_PUMP_WORKING
>  - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_TIME_UNIT
>  - NOT_WORKING:HOW_LONG_NOT_WORKING
>  - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_LABEL
>  - WHY_NOT_WORKING
>  - FLOW_RATE
>  - BOREHOLE_PROTECTED
>  - REPAIR_NEEDED
>  - TYPE_OF_REPAIR_NEEDED
>
> Should all of the variables be included as tags? Is there a protocol on
> how to incorporate WASH and water infrastructure data?
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Jose
> GIS volunteer @ MSK UK / BRC
>
> ___
> HOT mailing list
> HOT@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
>
>


-- 
sent from my mobile device

Dale Kunce
http://normalhabit.com
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

[HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

2015-10-27 Thread Jose Cisneros Gallegos

Hi everyone!

The MSF team in Chad is carrying splendid work and so far has sent
previously non-existing data about water points in the region of Bokoro. At
the GIS unit in MSF London we are trying to incorporate this newly acquired
data into OSM, however we are not exactly sure how to proceed. Some of the
variables include:

 - PUMP_EXISTS
 - PUMP_TYPE
 - OTHER_PUMP_TYPE
 - HAND_PUMP_WORKING
 - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_TIME_UNIT
 - NOT_WORKING:HOW_LONG_NOT_WORKING
 - NOT_WORKING:NOT_WORKING_LABEL
 - WHY_NOT_WORKING
 - FLOW_RATE
 - BOREHOLE_PROTECTED
 - REPAIR_NEEDED
 - TYPE_OF_REPAIR_NEEDED

Should all of the variables be included as tags? Is there a protocol on how
to incorporate WASH and water infrastructure data?

Thanks for your help!

Cheers,


Jose
GIS volunteer @ MSK UK / BRC
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

Re: [HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

[HOT] How to incorporate WASH data into OSM

9 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information