[hugin-ptx] Re: translation

2009-03-15 Thread RizThon
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 22:22, Bruno Postle  wrote:

>
> Ok, I've added a 'translation' Category to the 'patches' tracker,
> translators can set the Group to 'hugin':

Perfect, wiki updated.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: translation

2009-03-15 Thread Bruno Postle

On Sun 15-Mar-2009 at 21:48 +0100, RizThon wrote:
>
>ok but then what category and group should I choose? None? As for the
>summary we could specify "translation" or something. I'm only asking this
>question so that I can update the wiki. That way people won't have to wonder
>which category or group they should use.

Ok, I've added a 'translation' Category to the 'patches' tracker, 
translators can set the Group to 'hugin':

https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?group_id=77506&atid=550443

-- 
Bruno

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: translation

2009-03-15 Thread RizThon
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 19:38, Bruno Postle  wrote:

>
> >Could we add to the tracker a "translation" category?
>
> We can, though subimitting them as a patch works ok, they don't get
> lost.


ok but then what category and group should I choose? None? As for the
summary we could specify "translation" or something. I'm only asking this
question so that I can update the wiki. That way people won't have to wonder
which category or group they should use.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: half the images are upside down!

2009-03-15 Thread slaterson

i will post the .pto file here to the group.

i was able to get everything straightened out, but i haven't done
enough test to isolate everything.  i changed a few things in my
second attempt, where it worked correctly.  i checked out the latest
hugin (3732) and re-built the entire panorama and set an anchor on one
of the images.  to build the pano, i loaded the eight tif files and
set the third image as the anchor.  in the previous attempt i left the
anchor on the first image.  then went to the images tab and found all
the control points automatically, optimized and the preview was
correct.

i will try again with the anchor on the first image, analyze the
contol points more carefully and see what sort of results i get.

thanks


On Mar 15, 3:40 am, Bruno Postle  wrote:
> On Fri 13-Mar-2009 at 14:36 -0700, slaterson wrote:
>
>
>
> >i have a set of photos i have been trying to stitch but half of them
> >are displayed upside down (rotated 180 degrees) in the preview window.
>
> This is most likely to be a bad result from control point
> generation.  These automatic tools often get it wrong and you need to
> add or delete pairs of points manually in the Control Points tab.
>
> >the images are rather large, i am happy to downsize them and post if
> >there is a place to put them.
>
> You can just send the .pto file, this will show any problems.
>
> --
> Bruno
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: translation

2009-03-15 Thread Bruno Postle

On Sun 15-Mar-2009 at 12:13 +0100, RizThon wrote:
>
>I attached both my fr.po & mo files.

Thanks, I've commited it.

>I'll update the wiki to explain how easy it is to contribute to the
>translation.

Thanks, the instructions look a lot better.

>Could we add to the tracker a "translation" category?

We can, though subimitting them as a patch works ok, they don't get 
lost.

-- 
Bruno

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.8.0_beta2 released

2009-03-15 Thread Guido Kohlmeyer

Yuval Levy schrieb:
> I've been fiddling with it for months and have not come to a conclusion. 
> Guido has been more pragmatic and hence was able to publish an SDK. His 
> definition of SDK is what it takes to build the Hugin binary.
> 
> On the other hand, the installer is meant to install all what it takes 
> to run Hugin. This is different from what it takes to build Hugin.
> 
> Strictly speaking, Enblend-Enfuse is needed to run Hugin but not to 
> build it. The same applies to the different control point generators, 
> including Match-n-Shift.
> 
> The SDK is not geared toward the installer. Maybe it should?

Yes, the SDK should contain control point generators as well, but I 
mainly focused on a system to build Hugin. Meanwhile Enblend is nearly 
mandatory for Hugin and Autopano-SIFT-C is a common component as well, 
altough it is patended, which currently doesn't matter for private use.
The control point generators may be provided as an additional package 
well, because there are like "plugins".

Actually I didn't deal with the control point generators and have know 
knowledge which generators are available on windows platform, whether 
there are patended and of which quality there are. I expect there is an 
overview given anywhere, but I didn't searched so far.

If there is a good documentation to build the generators let me know and 
I will integrate them in the SDK too. in case I will

Guido

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: SVN 3736 build error

2009-03-15 Thread Ippei UKAI


On 2009-03-15, at 20:04, Bruno Postle wrote:

>
> On Sun 15-Mar-2009 at 11:52 +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
>>
>> [ 89%] Building CXX object src/hugin1/ptbatcher/CMakeFiles/
>> PTBatcherGUI.dir/BatchFrame.o
>> /usr/local/src/hugin/hugin-0.7.0/src/hugin1/ptbatcher/BatchFrame.cpp:
>> In member function ‘virtual void* BatchFrame::Entry()’:
>> /usr/local/src/hugin/hugin-0.7.0/src/hugin1/ptbatcher/
>> BatchFrame.cpp:231: error: ‘class Batch’ has no member named
>> ‘GetLastFile’
>
> This can be fixed if you rename src/hugin1/ptbatcher to
> src/hugin1/PTBatcher and edit src/hugin1/CMakeLists.txt to suit.
>
> I haven't commited this because it could also be fixed by changing
> some #include's - Ippei, which would you rather have?


I've fixed the #include's. The fix was needed anyways. Thanks for  
pointing out.

Ippei
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: translation

2009-03-15 Thread RizThon
> attach it to the tracker (or email it to me or Pablo).
Could we add to the tracker a "translation" category? I'm updating the wiki,
but I don't really want to email addresses or else you'll probably receive
quite a lot of spam. The tracker looks pretty straight forward to use, the
only question is which category and group to use.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: SVN 3736 build error

2009-03-15 Thread Bruno Postle

On Sun 15-Mar-2009 at 11:52 +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
>
>[ 89%] Building CXX object src/hugin1/ptbatcher/CMakeFiles/
>PTBatcherGUI.dir/BatchFrame.o
>/usr/local/src/hugin/hugin-0.7.0/src/hugin1/ptbatcher/BatchFrame.cpp: 
>In member function ‘virtual void* BatchFrame::Entry()’:
>/usr/local/src/hugin/hugin-0.7.0/src/hugin1/ptbatcher/
>BatchFrame.cpp:231: error: ‘class Batch’ has no member named 
>‘GetLastFile’

This can be fixed if you rename src/hugin1/ptbatcher to 
src/hugin1/PTBatcher and edit src/hugin1/CMakeLists.txt to suit.

I haven't commited this because it could also be fixed by changing 
some #include's - Ippei, which would you rather have?

-- 
Bruno

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] SVN 3736 build error

2009-03-15 Thread Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)

Hi,

I get:



[ 89%] Building CXX object src/hugin1/ptbatcher/CMakeFiles/
PTBatcherGUI.dir/BatchFrame.o
/usr/local/src/hugin/hugin-0.7.0/src/hugin1/ptbatcher/BatchFrame.cpp: 
In member function ‘virtual void* BatchFrame::Entry()’:
/usr/local/src/hugin/hugin-0.7.0/src/hugin1/ptbatcher/
BatchFrame.cpp:231: error: ‘class Batch’ has no member named 
‘GetLastFile’
make[3]: *** [src/hugin1/ptbatcher/CMakeFiles/PTBatcherGUI.dir/
BatchFrame.o] Error 1


(SVN 3735 was fine)

Regards

Jean-Luc


pgpis9gBaayXi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin crashes my computer (cpu panic)

2009-03-15 Thread Bruno Postle

On Sat 14-Mar-2009 at 16:33 -0700, ls129 wrote:
>
>Hugin managed twice to crash the computer. In a way that took windows
>by surprize. the computer just switched itself off. the power switch
>had to be reset, cable extracted and put back in order for the system
>to boot again.

Though it would be very cool if hugin could crash an operating 
system, this is much more likely to be a hardware fault.

hugin really works your machine, it will use a lot of memory, CPU 
and disk IO.  It may also be using a different disk for temporary 
files than you expect, so you may just be running out of disk space.

-- 
Bruno

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: half the images are upside down!

2009-03-15 Thread Bruno Postle

On Fri 13-Mar-2009 at 14:36 -0700, slaterson wrote:
>
>i have a set of photos i have been trying to stitch but half of them
>are displayed upside down (rotated 180 degrees) in the preview window.

This is most likely to be a bad result from control point 
generation.  These automatic tools often get it wrong and you need to 
add or delete pairs of points manually in the Control Points tab.

>the images are rather large, i am happy to downsize them and post if
>there is a place to put them.

You can just send the .pto file, this will show any problems.

-- 
Bruno

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: PTBatcher and PTBatcherGUI in SVN

2009-03-15 Thread T. Modes


> Since I do not have Cmake going on my machine at the moment, I  
> probably have broken Cmake build.
> I did my best without testing, but could someone take a look and fix  
> the Cmake build please?
>

Works on windows without further modifications.

Thanks

Thomas
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: PTBatcher and PTBatcherGUI in SVN

2009-03-15 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sonntag 15 März 2009 schrieb Ippei UKAI:
> Hi all,
>
> I have moved PTBatcher and PTBatcherGUI to inside hugin1.

No problems with PTBatcher,
but  in PTBatcherGUI 
error: ../PTBatcher/RunStitchFrame.h: No such file or directory
error: ../PTBatcher/Batch.h: No such file or directory

According to the tree, it looks like it should be " ../ptbatcher/Batch.h" 
(lowercase)

Either you rename ptbacher to PTBatcher, or change the include files to load 
ptbatcher.

> Since I do not have Cmake going on my machine at the moment, I  
> probably have broken Cmake build.
> I did my best without testing, but could someone take a look and fix  
> the Cmake build please?

Kornel

P.S.
I made a symbolic link "ln -s ptbatcher PTBatcher" and changed the line
add_subdirectory(ptbatcher)
in
add_subdirectory(PTBatcher)
in src/hugin1/CMakeLists.txt

Compilation went ok afterwards

-- 
Kornel Benko
kornel.be...@berlin.de


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[hugin-ptx] hugin crashes my computer (cpu panic)

2009-03-15 Thread ls129

I haven't seen this happening since the days when i was writing device
drivers.

Hugin managed twice to crash the computer. In a way that took windows
by surprize. the computer just switched itself off. the power switch
had to be reset, cable extracted and put back in order for the system
to boot again.
All this twice at the 13th picture when Hugin was aligning a 19-
picture-file project.

My CPU is AMD 2Ghz Athlon


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.8.0_beta2 released

2009-03-15 Thread TeoLinux

How can I help with Italian translation?

On Mar 9, 11:43 pm, Bruno Postle  wrote:
> On Mon 09-Mar-2009 at 22:19 +, Bruno Postle wrote:
>
>
>
> > * Updated German, Swedish, Slovak, Dutch translations
>
> This is the state of the hugin translations:
>
> sk.po     (Slovak)                 1 untranslated message.
> sv.po     (Swedish)                1 untranslated message.
> nl.po     (Dutch)                  3 untranslated messages.
> de.po     (German)                13 untranslated messages.
> fr.po     (French)                64 untranslated messages.
> ja.po     (Japanese)              86 untranslated messages.
> ru.po     (Russian)               87 untranslated messages.
> zh_CN.po  (Simplified Chinese)    87 untranslated messages.
> es.po     (Spanish)               89 untranslated messages.
> bg.po     (Bulgarian)             96 untranslated messages.
> cs_CZ.po  (Czech)                 98 untranslated messages.
> hu.po     (Hungarian)             98 untranslated messages.
> ko.po     (Korean)                99 untranslated messages.
> pl.po     (Polish)                99 untranslated messages.
> it.po     (Italian)              100 untranslated messages.
> uk.po     (Ukranian)             180 untranslated messages.
> pt_BR.po  (Brazilian Portuguese) 229 untranslated messages.
> ca_ES.po  (Catalan)              263 untranslated messages.
>
> --
> Bruno

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: half the images are upside down!

2009-03-15 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský

2009/3/14 slaterson :
>
> if i can figure out how to download a specific snapshot i will give it
> a try
>
>
> On Mar 14, 1:06 am, Lukáš Jirkovský  wrote:
>> 2009/3/13 allard :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > I've seen this too on a set of photos that I did before with my own
>> > 3652 build, where it went fine. With the new 3716 build I had this
>> > problem.
>>
>> > On Mar 13, 10:36 pm, slaterson  wrote:
>> >> i have a set of photos i have been trying to stitch but half of them
>> >> are displayed upside down (rotated 180 degrees) in the preview window.
>>
>> >> there are eight photos total, all of them taken in a single 'line',
>> >> i.e. only rotating the camera in one direction.  control point
>> >> detection works great, however as soon as the optimizer runs and the
>> >> results applied, the last four images are upside down in the preview
>> >> window (both gl and old previewers).  i have  noticed the pitch and
>> >> roll values on the 'correct' images are ~ 0 - -1.5 for pitch and 0 - 3
>> >> for roll; for the upside down images they are set to ~+5 for pitch and
>> >> -176 for roll.  changing the roll to +4 (manually) rotates the images,
>> >> of course, but they are not lined up in the preview window according
>> >> to the control points.  its not even close, actually.
>>
>> >> the images are rather large, i am happy to downsize them and post if
>> >> there is a place to put them.
>>
>> Can you try r3668 and r3669? These are probably only ones which have
>> messed a bit with stitching options.
> >
>

If you know how to build hugin, you can simply download sources from
subversion using svn co
https://hugin.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/hugin/hugin/trunk -r 3668
hugin.

Anyway, I don't know how did you tried to create panorama. If it was
using Align button it could be caused by change in revision 3668. You
can simply check it by creating panorama manually (eg go to the images
tab, create control points, then optimize…) if it works correctly it
is most likely caused by this change. If not, you will have to use
bisecting (see hereinafter) in order to find which commit causes it
(of cause if you want to).

The problematic change could be tracked more exactly by so-called
bisecting – you are beginning with knowledge which version works and
which doesn't. Then you checkout version in a half between them and
try it. If it works correctly, it must be problem in newer revisions,
so you will try revision from the between of you current revision and
the revision where it doesn't work and so on and on until you find
which commit causes the problem.

Lukáš "stativ" Jirkovský

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: PTBatcher and PTBatcherGUI in SVN

2009-03-15 Thread Ippei UKAI

On 2009-03-04, at 12:12, Yuval Levy wrote:
> Ippei UKAI wrote:
>> Lately, I'm wondering why PTBatcher and PTBatcherGUI are not in the /
>> hugin/src/hugin1 directory. All other sub-projects with wxWidgets
>> dependencies are in hugin1 directory.
>>
>> Should they be moved before the release?
>
> I support your motion. Yes.

On 2009-03-02, at 03:13, Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Sun 01-Mar-2009 at 13:46 +0100, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>>
>> There are lots of code which uses it for eg. writing files, wxString
>> is used there a lot (this one should be fairly easy to convert it to
>> std::string). I'll try to remove this dependency later if it would be
>> possible (I'm not sure difficult would be for example getting user
>> config directory without use of wxWidgets).
>
> This isn't a priority, the Batch Processor was only ever planned to
> be for GUI users.

Hi all,

I have moved PTBatcher and PTBatcherGUI to inside hugin1.

Since I do not have Cmake going on my machine at the moment, I  
probably have broken Cmake build.
I did my best without testing, but could someone take a look and fix  
the Cmake build please?

Thanks,
Ippei
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: Generalised stereographic projections

2009-03-15 Thread Peter Gawthrop

Hi Tom,

  sorry to be unclear; I meant panini the projection not panini the
  software. I will certainly keep going with panini (in both senses);
  mathmap is just a simpler way for me personally to try out ideas
  quickly.

  Thanks for the helpful explanation of the internals of panini. I
  plan to have a look at the code over the next few weeks.

  Peter.
  

From: Tom Sharpless 
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Generalised stereographic projections
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 11:41:26 -0700 (PDT)

> 
> Hi Peter
> 
> You seem to suggest that Panini is limited to making "realistic" or
> "sensible" images.  It is not.  In fact it is a fine toy for making
> weird and ridiculous images, too.
> 
> Indeed, what you are doing sounds to me like just what Panini does:
> project a source image on a sphere or cylinder, then project that
> surface, as seen from a movable point of view, onto the destination
> image.
> 
> The first projection can be chosen pretty arbitrarily.  Panini
> provides the inverses of several popular lens and pano projections, so
> that you can recreate the ideal "world view" spherical panorama on the
> panosurface -- but you don't have to do that.  In fact you can change
> the assumed source format freely, which often does weird things to the
> image.   And it would be no trick at all to add other source
> projections.  Moreover, unless the source is cubic, Panini also lets
> you scale and rotate the source projection with respect to the
> panosurface.
> 
> The second projection is the simple linear viewing projection provided
> by OpenGL, which renders a "true perspective" view of the panosurface
> on the screen.  Panini restricts the view point of the the second
> projection to be "back of center" and inside a square of side equal to
> the panosphere radius, but there is nothing essential about that.
> 
> This scheme gives the Pannini projection, as described above by Bruno,
> when all of the following are true: the source projection correctly
> restores the "world pano"; the panosurface is a cylinder; and the eye
> point is on the projection axis 1 radius back of center.
> 
> But a huge variety of other cases is possible, so I urge you to keep
> experimenting with Panini, too.
> 
> Best regards, Tom
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 6, 10:45 am, Peter Gawthrop  wrote:
> > Hi Yuv,
> >
> > The mathmap code & brief explanation is now at:
> >
> > http://www.lightspacewater.net/Software/
> >
> > I plan to document the mathematics over the next week.
> >
> > Enjoy,
> >         Peter.
> >
> > From: Yuval Levy 
> > Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Generalised stereographic projections
> > Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:12:42 -0500
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi Peter,
> >
> > > sorry I am getting in late on this thread - got plenty of backlog to
> > > process in my in-box.
> >
> > > Peter Gawthrop wrote:
> > > >   I have been playing with generalisations of the stereographic
> > > >   projection. Given a "view sphere" of a 360 panorama, the basic idea
> > > >   is the float around inside that sphere and then project on to either
> > > >   a plane or a cylinder.
> >
> > > and how about a sphere again?
> >
> > > > Conventional perspective comes from
> > > >   projecting from the centre of the sphere, and stereographic from the
> > > >   back, onto a plane. This projection allows projection from anywhere
> > > >   in the sphere in any (meaningful) direction.
> >
> > > >   First tries at using this at
> >
> > > >  http://www.flickr.com/photos/gawthrop/sets/72157614419442162/
> >
> > > >   At the moment, it's a mathmap implementation. But I would like to
> > > >   think about putting it in hugin and/or panini. Note that, unlike the
> > > >   Panini projection, the aim is to distort - albeit in a meaningful way.
> >
> > > >   Comments&suggestions appreciated.
> >
> > > beautiful, and I think *very* useful too. Is the mathmap implementation
> > > available for playing somewhere?
> >
> > > Yuv
> >
> > > __        
> > > This email has been scanned by Netintelligence        
> > >http://www.netintelligence.com/email
> > 
> 
> __
> This email has been scanned by Netintelligence
> http://www.netintelligence.com/email

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin SDK for Mac (Experimental)

2009-03-15 Thread Ippei UKAI

Most importantly, as far as I remember, Cmake-generated Xcode project  
does not use any of the Xcode's useful features.

In order to satisfy the faults Harry has pointed out, Hugin's Cmake  
build needs be thorough with those. But if we succeeded in that, there  
would be no point generating Xcode project from Cmake just to do what  
make files generated by Cmake does better.

So, the real question is what our Cmake project doesn't have that  
separately maintained Xcode project does. According to Harry, the  
answer looks like "a lot" unfortunately.

Ippei

On 2009-03-15, at 16:51, Harry van der Wolf wrote:

> Yes, it could. But it would only build an XCode project which would  
> compile Hugin for the architecture/platform the code was generated on.
> It would not:
> - generate a universal project
> - generate a bundle that would run on lower versions of the OS, e.g.  
> when generated on Leopard it would not run on Tiger.
> - generate a "self contained" bundle, e.g. a bundle containing all  
> libraries in it.
> - generate a bundle containing the tools like enblend, enfuse, pt*  
> binaries and so on,
> - generate a bundle containing the localisation: both help and  
> translations
>
> Maybe I forget one or two options, but these are the reasons why we  
> continue on the current (quite big and quite complex) project.
>
> Harry
>
>
> 2009/3/14 Yuval Levy 
>
> Harry van der Wolf wrote:
> > These two files are not yet known to the
> > XCode project so they must be added first.
>
> excuse my ignorance, couldn't the Xcode project be generated with  
> "cmake
> -G Xcode" ?
>
> Yuv
>
>
>
>
> >


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin SDK for Mac (Experimental)

2009-03-15 Thread Harry van der Wolf
Yes, it could. But it would only build an XCode project which would compile
Hugin for the architecture/platform the code was generated on.
It would not:
- generate a universal project
- generate a bundle that would run on lower versions of the OS, e.g. when
generated on Leopard it would not run on Tiger.
- generate a "self contained" bundle, e.g. a bundle containing all libraries
in it.
- generate a bundle containing the tools like enblend, enfuse, pt* binaries
and so on,
- generate a bundle containing the localisation: both help and translations

Maybe I forget one or two options, but these are the reasons why we continue
on the current (quite big and quite complex) project.

Harry


2009/3/14 Yuval Levy 

>
> Harry van der Wolf wrote:
> > These two files are not yet known to the
> > XCode project so they must be added first.
>
> excuse my ignorance, couldn't the Xcode project be generated with "cmake
> -G Xcode" ?
>
> Yuv
>
> >
>

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---