Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: GSOC - Patent free control point generator project - Vetting Exercise
Thanks again for your help ;-) I attached my patch to this e-mail. It only concerns the panomatic-lib directory. Note that I wrote it on the Pablo's variation of the lib that I got by bzr branch lp:~pablo.dangelo/hugin/panomatic-lib. Therefore the patch also include the correction of a bug in CMakeLists.txt. Waiting for your feedbacks! On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:39 PM, T. Modes wrote: > > then your friend is "hg diff" instead of "svn diff". or more generally, > if you > > made changes against any folder structure that is not under version > control, > > "diff". > > > > panomaticlib is in a bazaar repository. Also "bzr diff" (to make the > confusion complete ;-) > > Thomas > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx > -- Chapo __(===)__ Antoine Deleforge BEST LBG Grenoble member -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Photometric optimization aborted
Hi Ryan... It shouldn't fail because it wasn't necessary. There is more to the issue. Yeh, I just guessed, too many people make work for nothing. Best regards, John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
[hugin-ptx] Re: Photometric optimization aborted
On Apr 7, 10:49 pm, "John McAllister" wrote: > Why are you trying to exposure optimise a scene series that probably doesn't > need it? Well, in the preview window it looked like it *did* need it, but the stitched result actually does look fine as you predict. This leaves some questions, though: 1. Does something (enblend?) tweak exposure settings even without exposure optimization? 2. Is that error message an über-cryptic way of saying "this step is unnecessary for this scene" or did you just guess from my description of the input? 3. Even if the photometrics did start out perfect, shouldn't optimization just suggest minuscule adjustments instead of blowing up? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
[hugin-ptx] Re: Compiling Hugin on Windows problems / Improving the Panowiki article
Hi Dezen, Hugin compiles fine on windows. (VS2008, CMake 2.8.0) If you are not so experienced with compiling (as I assume from your questions), it's the best to start with the SDK. You cited an older version of the SDK. Follow the link on http://wiki.panotools.org/Build_Hugin_for_Windows_with_SDK and take this version (last version from 09.05.2009). The SDK is built with Visual Studio 2008. So for building with the SDK you will need VS2008 (building all lib by hand as described at http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_SDK_%28MSVC_2008%29 is much work and requires some experience with compiling. The result is the same as using the SDK, so both ways are the same) For compiling new versions there are 2 things to change: 1.) You will need the additional glut lib. You can find a precompiled list here on the list http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/msg/53c124802b27c84e 2.) You need to update libpano13 to current version (subversion version or latest beta version) and to compile it (Don't try to compile enblend-enfuse at this stage. Use the official version from sf site. Enblend-enfuse requires more libs to compile.) Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Mosaic drag mode + keeping Tr parameters consistency on roll patch (vetting exercise)
On Thu 08-Apr-2010 at 00:19 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote: On Thu 08-Apr-2010 at 00:15 +0200, Darko Makreshanski wrote: Here is the patch that I have proposed earlier. Thanks, it builds here (centos4 Linux) but I get a segfault when I open the fast preview window. It may be a local problem, I'll try again with a clean tree tomorrow. With a clean build it is now fine. Using a project with lots of XYZ shifts that would normally get scrambled in Drag mode: If I select 'mosaic' in Drag mode then left-mouse moves the photos around, and right-mouse rotates around the centre as expected. Well done, this is a very useful patch. -- Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
[hugin-ptx] Compiling Hugin on Windows problems / Improving the Panowiki article
Hello everybody, I could not manage to compile Hugin on Windows XP Pro SP2 32 bit. Using: MS Visual Studio 2005 CMake 2.8 gettext package boost 1.4.2 ilmbase 1.0.1 libpano 13-2.9.14 openexr-1.6.1 wxWidgets 2.8.10 Followed all the instructions from: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_Windows Building wxWidgets and boost were succesful. Still following problems ocurred: 1. cmakesetup configuration error: "wxWidgets not found" the same error as described here: http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/da632715d320324c/52c95cdd585ef6e9?lnk=gst&q=compiling+win# the solution was to use cmake 2.6.3, I am using cmake 2.8, any suggestions? Working with the HuginSDK resulted in the same error. http://hugin.panotools.org/sdk/MSVC/hugin_enblend_sdk_msvc2008_v2.7z Question: is the HuginSDK suitable for buidling newer Hugin releases at all? 2. Building OpenEXR ended in lots of errors. I have opened the .sln file in Visual Studio and tried to compile. Compiling IlmBase results: (excuse the german expresssions, please) Fehler 18 error PRJ0019: Ein Tool hat einen Fehlercode aus folgender Quelle zurückgegeben: "Running Iex unit tests..." IexTest Fehler 92 error PRJ0019: Ein Tool hat einen Fehlercode aus folgender Quelle zurückgegeben: "Running HalfTest unit tests..." HalfTest Fehler 218 error PRJ0019: Ein Tool hat einen Fehlercode aus folgender Quelle zurückgegeben: "Running Imath unit tests..." ImathTest Compiling openexr results, these are some of the 49 errors: (excuse the german expresssions, please) Fehler 1 fatal error C1083: Datei (Include) kann nicht geöffnet werden: "zlib.h": No such file or directory c:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator\Desktop\pano\hugin_builds\hugin_sdk \openexr-1.6.1\IlmImf\ImfZipCompressor.cpp 45 Fehler 58 fatal error C1083: Datei (Include) kann nicht geöffnet werden: "zlib.h": No such file or directory c:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator\Desktop\pano\hugin_builds\hugin_sdk \openexr-1.6.1\IlmImf\ImfPxr24Compressor.cpp73 Fehler 138 fatal error C1083: Datei (Include) kann nicht geöffnet werden: "ImfInputFile.h": No such file or directory c:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator\Desktop\pano\hugin_builds\hugin_sdk \openexr-1.6.1\exrheader\main.cpp 43 Fehler 139 fatal error C1083: Datei (Include) kann nicht geöffnet werden: "ImfInputFile.h": No such file or directory c:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\Administrator\Desktop\pano\hugin_builds\hugin_sdk \openexr-1.6.1\exrmakepreview\makePreview.cpp 45 . My main problem is I have no idea what is meant in the description: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_Windows#Building_OpenEXR For all projects do: * set each project to static lib * remove OPENEXR_DLL, _USEDLL and *_EXPORTS defines * set runtime to MT * disable SSE2, to generate binaries that run on all platforms * remove the createDLL part of the post-build command, but keep the call to install*.cmd, such as ..\..\..\installIlmImf.cmd $ (IntDir) --- How do I set everything in Visual Studio? Besides that the instructions are quite contradictory, http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Compiling_Windows http://wiki.panotools.org/Build_Hugin_for_Windows_with_SDK I see a lot of place for improvements in both articles, I would like to contribute to them, if I ever manage to build Hugin on my own :-) Thanks for any suggestions in advance -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
[hugin-ptx] Re: Funky test result
I figured out what I did wrong when I took up the process again: my lens focal length input was wrong. I noticed the the FOV for each section of the image had a different value, even though I put in the same focal length - that's what caused the misalignment and warping of the edges. It's actually surprising to me that Hugin did such a good job on the major part of the image itself, the important part, and only had trouble with the edges. Frank On Apr 7, 4:42 pm, ORFrankOR wrote: > I'd been having trouble with v 2009, so I downloaded and installed v > 2010 and ran it on an existing image that I divided into two parts. > The result, while OK in the image area, shows misalignment of the > border frame and distortion of the edges and edge and corner toning > that resembles vignetting. > > I can make images available for anyone to examine. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
[hugin-ptx] Re: Panorama Makefile (GSOC project)
Thanks for your infos, Yuv. So if you guys like it, I'll leave the proposal as it is. Deadline is coming soon. To allow replacement of make in the future, I'll take it as guideline to limit dependencies on make in the parts that don't need it (stitching logic ..). Flo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
[hugin-ptx] Zooming for fast preview proposal
Hi, I wrote the additional proposal for the zooming for the fast preview idea on the wiki. Its available at: pdf:http://wiki.panotools.org/File:Proposal-zooming.pdf wiki: http://wiki.panotools.org/User:Dmakreshanski/GSOC-zooming-proposal google: http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/student_proposal/show/google/gsoc2010/dmakreshanski/t127074117189 I have also added all the links at the student proposal page Best, Darko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
RE: [hugin-ptx] Stitching blurred images
Consider another pano stitcher. I too have had issues with blurred images sometimes one in the center of the whole batch. I found that Autostitch or Autopano Pro are able to handle these. Dale Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 21:28:48 -0400 Subject: [hugin-ptx] Stitching blurred images From: nicolas.pellet...@gmail.com To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com Hi, I've run into a situation that I cannot stitch automatically with hugin and would like any input you guys have. Basically, I have a pano made of multiple images with a macro lens, shot a wide aperture (100mm macro at 2.8 with a focusing distance inside the macro range). I have multiple images in the range that are sharp, therefore stitch perfectly. I have many others that are out of focus and are only blurred transitions. These don't have anything sharp, but do have different "spots" i.e. not a single blurred flat color. Those images don't get control points properly. I have tried panomatic and autopanosiftc with different sized images, but nothing yet. What I'd like to achieve: get all the sharp images perfectly aligned, get all the blurred images somewhat aligned. Since they are that blurred, bad alignment would not be a problem, enblend would make a nice result. No alignment at all would mean manual work which I would like to avoid; keep the whole process automated. Any input welcomed! Thanks nick PS, for panomatic, there are some sieve parameters... I thought they might help, but can't figure out how they work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx _ The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
[hugin-ptx] Re: GSOC - Patent free control point generator project - Vetting Exercise
> then your friend is "hg diff" instead of "svn diff". or more generally, if you > made changes against any folder structure that is not under version control, > "diff". > panomaticlib is in a bazaar repository. Also "bzr diff" (to make the confusion complete ;-) Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Stitching blurred images
another thing that may help along the same line of exchanging image sets prior to stitching: run all the images through some really extreme sharpening / unsharp mask filter, or whatever other filter that produces predictable results with distinguishable features out of the blur. run the CP generator against the filtered images. substitute before stitching. Yuv On April 8, 2010 05:01:31 am Carl von Einem wrote: > How about shooting the same set twice? Let's assume your light meter > shows 1/500sec @ f2.8, so for each frame a second exposure could be shot > with 1/15sec @ f16. Maybe this is doable with a bracketing setting, > otherwise I'd try tethered shooting. My macro lens even allows to be > stopped down to f32. The stopped down set should align a lot better, > just exchange the image sets prior to stitching. > > Carl > > Nicolas Pelletier schrieb am 08.04.10 03:28: > > Basically, I have a pano made of multiple images with a macro lens, shot > > a wide aperture (100mm macro at 2.8 with a focusing distance inside the > > macro range). > > > > I have multiple images in the range that are sharp, therefore stitch > > perfectly. > > I have many others that are out of focus and are only blurred > > transitions. These don't have anything sharp, but do have different > > "spots" i.e. not a single blurred flat color. > > Those images don't get control points properly. > > > > I have tried panomatic and autopanosiftc with different sized images, > > but nothing yet. > > > > What I'd like to achieve: get all the sharp images perfectly aligned, > > get all the blurred images somewhat aligned. Since they are that > > blurred, bad alignment would not be a problem, enblend would make a nice > > result. No alignment at all would mean manual work which I would like to > > avoid; keep the whole process automated. > > > > PS, for panomatic, there are some sieve parameters... I thought they > > might help, but can't figure out how they work. > > Sorry, no idea about this. Panomatic is not too well documented as it > seems. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: GSOC - Patent free control point generator project - Vetting Exercise
On April 8, 2010 02:33:53 am Antoine Deleforge wrote: > Concerning the patch: the problem is that I only modified files in > /panomtic-lib/panomatic/. I'm not sure that it is linked to any subversion > directory, is it? then your friend is "hg diff" instead of "svn diff". or more generally, if you made changes against any folder structure that is not under version control, "diff". the following three commands should give you the details for the three particular situations: svn help diff hg help diff man diff Yuv -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
Re: [hugin-ptx] Funky test result
On 7 April 2010 23:42, ORFrankOR wrote: > I'd been having trouble with v 2009, so I downloaded and installed v > 2010 and ran it on an existing image that I divided into two parts. > The result, while OK in the image area, shows misalignment of the > border frame and distortion of the edges and edge and corner toning > that resembles vignetting. Cropping a rectangle from a photo gives you a 'shifted' image, i.e. this isn't a 'normal' photo, Hugin can stitch it but it isn't a good way to test anything. -- Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
Re: [hugin-ptx] Stitching blurred images
How about shooting the same set twice? Let's assume your light meter shows 1/500sec @ f2.8, so for each frame a second exposure could be shot with 1/15sec @ f16. Maybe this is doable with a bracketing setting, otherwise I'd try tethered shooting. My macro lens even allows to be stopped down to f32. The stopped down set should align a lot better, just exchange the image sets prior to stitching. Carl Nicolas Pelletier schrieb am 08.04.10 03:28: Basically, I have a pano made of multiple images with a macro lens, shot a wide aperture (100mm macro at 2.8 with a focusing distance inside the macro range). I have multiple images in the range that are sharp, therefore stitch perfectly. I have many others that are out of focus and are only blurred transitions. These don't have anything sharp, but do have different "spots" i.e. not a single blurred flat color. Those images don't get control points properly. I have tried panomatic and autopanosiftc with different sized images, but nothing yet. What I'd like to achieve: get all the sharp images perfectly aligned, get all the blurred images somewhat aligned. Since they are that blurred, bad alignment would not be a problem, enblend would make a nice result. No alignment at all would mean manual work which I would like to avoid; keep the whole process automated. PS, for panomatic, there are some sieve parameters... I thought they might help, but can't figure out how they work. Sorry, no idea about this. Panomatic is not too well documented as it seems. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
[hugin-ptx] Funky test result
I'd been having trouble with v 2009, so I downloaded and installed v 2010 and ran it on an existing image that I divided into two parts. The result, while OK in the image area, shows misalignment of the border frame and distortion of the edges and edge and corner toning that resembles vignetting. I can make images available for anyone to examine. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
