[hugin-ptx] Hugin development contribution
Hello, I want to help hugin development through code contribution. I already did a code audit and understand most of its structure and logic. But there is still some gray areas. First of all, can you explain me how the code submission process works please ? I've watched the TODO list. And there are two features, I can correctly implement : - Implement the better handling of image groups - Add informative status messages I didn't spot where images are handled by groups and I'd like to know what 'better handling' mean in this case. Concerning the informative status messages, I want to know at which level should they be displayed. In the UI or in the command line ? These messages, are they directed to developers or to users ? Thank you in advance for you answers. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/01a13a9b-66d9-49f0-99b9-920dafd87a7b%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: hugin_executor.exe ignores the compression parameter
On 03.11.2016 19:11, Gnome Nomad wrote: > Hmm, TIFF uses lossless compression. So why are you wanting to use no > compression? Depending on the computer and workload, compression and less-IO can be faster or slower than no compression and more IO. (on modern computers, the consensus seems to be that the CPU is so much faster than IO that decompression with less IO is faster. However if you have hardware doing the DMA to get things off disk and the CPU is already pegged at 100%, the uncompressed scenario will win. Similarly, compression may be slower than decompression, and for stuff that needs to be stored once and read back only once or twice (like for example temporary files in a "worflow"), the compression may slow things down to be not useful overall.) Roger. -- +-- Rogier Wolff -- www.harddisk-recovery.nl -- 0800 220 20 20 -- - Datarecovery Services Nederland B.V. Delft. KVK: 30160549 - | Files foetsie, bestanden kwijt, alle data weg?! | Blijf kalm en neem contact op met Harddisk-recovery.nl! -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/20161104102659.GT13432%40BitWizard.nl. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: hugin_executor.exe ignores the compression parameter
The issue has broken my toolchain. That's the only reason I noticed it. I am a software developer, so I know that user feedback is important. Thanks a lot, especially to Thomas, for the quick reaction. I'm excited! -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/17bddfef-9439-4ce7-b963-617c4bd075ed%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
