I've done small benchmark. I've used only one file. Testing machine was Pentium 4...@2ghz Northwood, 1519MB RAM (in fact it should be 1536, but free reports 1519), OS Archlinux current, own kernel build 2.6.28.5 The command was: time nona -z COMPRESSION -r hdr -m EXR_m -o foo_hdr_ -i 0 bar.pto
Speed (average of time spent in user in seconds): ---------- NONE 17.538s RLE 18.012s B44A 18.176s B44 18.203s PIZ 18.922s ZIP 19.992s PXR24 21.846s Compressed size (in kB): ------------------------- B44A 6675 PIZ 6903 ZIP 7187 PXR24 8016 B44 8532 RLE 9337 NONE 19523 It seems that the best compressions for this particular file are PIZ (default) and B44A, but B44A is lossy compression with half format. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
benchmark
Description: Binary data
